What is the official website of Chase Media Solutions ?

The official website of Chase Media Solutions is http://www.chase.com/mediasolutions.

What is Chase Media Solutions's cybersecurity risk score?

Chase Media Solutions has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 751 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Chase Media Solutions experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Chase Media Solutions currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Chase Media Solutions been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Chase Media Solutions has been affected by multiple supply chain cyber incidents. The affected supply chain sources and their corresponding incident IDs are: Fried Frank (Incident ID: JPMFRI1768878048) Fortinet (Incident ID: FORCISAMAJPM1767748297)

Does Chase Media Solutions have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Chase Media Solutions is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Chase Media Solutions have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Chase Media Solutions does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Chase Media Solutions comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Chase Media Solutions is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Chase Media Solutions have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Chase Media Solutions does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Chase Media Solutions comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Chase Media Solutions is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Chase Media Solutions have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Chase Media Solutions is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Chase Media Solutions operate in ?

Chase Media Solutions operates primarily in the Marketing Services industry.

How many employees does Chase Media Solutions have ?

Chase Media Solutions employs approximately 96 people worldwide.

Does Chase Media Solutions own any subsidiaries ?

Chase Media Solutions presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Chase Media Solutions have ?

Chase Media Solutions's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 8,346 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Chase Media Solutions ?

Chase Media Solutions is classified under the NAICS code 5418, which corresponds to Advertising, Public Relations, and Related Services.

Does Chase Media Solutions have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Chase Media Solutions does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Chase Media Solutions have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Chase Media Solutions maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/chasemediasolutions.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Chase Media Solutions experienced ?

As of August 2, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Chase Media Solutions has experienced 15 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Chase Media Solutions have ?

Chase Media Solutions has an estimated 3,378 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Chase Media Solutions faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Vulnerability, Breach, Ransomware and Cyber Attack.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

CMS

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

751

/1000

Fair

776

/1000

Fair

Chase Media Solutions Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

chase.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

Chase Media Solutions powers data-driven digital campaigns that connect brands to target audiences through everyday purchases. We don't pester people with ads, we inspire them and deliver value through cash back offers. Customers are rewarded for shopping, while businesses drive incremental sales, so everyone wins. See full social media terms and conditions at chase.com/socialterms.

CMS A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

CMS

Chase Media Solutions CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

J.P. Morgan

Cyber Attack

3/2026

NYLJPMOUTOUT177...

Chase Media Solutio...

Breach

11/2025

JPM440374411082...

JPMorganChase

Breach

10/2025

Fried Frank

JPMFRI176887804...

Chase Media Solutio...

Ransomware

100

5/2025

JPM602061325

JPMorganChase

Breach

1/2025

CITJPM177683210...

JPMorganChase

Vulnerability

100

12/2024

Fortinet

FORCISAMAJPM176...

JPMorganChase

Cyber Attack

10/2024

JPMPAY177740071...

Chase Media Solutio...

Breach

100

8/2021

JPM404072625

Chase Media Solutio...

Breach

100

8/2021

JPM004091825

Chase Media Solutio...

Breach

5/2021

JPM351072625

Chase Media Solutio...

Breach

6/2018

JPM357072525

Chase Media Solutio...

Breach

02/2018

CHA10418622

Chase Media Solutio...

Breach

7/2013

JPM108072925

Chase Media Solutio...

Breach

8/2012

FIR145072625

Chase Media Solutio...

Breach

1/2012

FIR234080425

Loading…

A.I.

CMS Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for CMS

Incidents vs Marketing Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chase Media Solutions in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chase Media Solutions in 2026.

Incident Types CMS vs Marketing Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chase Media Solutions in 2026.

Incident History - CMS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Chase Media Solutions Subsidiaries

CMS

Marketing Services

Website: http://www.chase.com/mediasolutions

Company Size: 96

ChaseFinancial Services

JPMorganChaseFinancial Services

J.P. MorganFinancial Services

J.P. Morgan Asset ManagementFinancial Services

JPMorgan Chase Commercial BankingFinancial Services

First RepublicFinancial Services

J.P. Morgan Wealth ManagementFinancial Services

J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A.Financial Services

InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan companyInformation Technology & Services

First Republic Private Wealth ManagementFinancial Services

Morgan HealthInsurance and Employee Benefit Funds

Chase for BusinessFinancial Services

Loading…

Chase Media Solutions Similar Companies

RR Donnelley

cb rrd.com

RRD provides a complete portfolio of marketing, packaging, print and business services to the world’s most respected brands, including 91% of the Fortune 100. Our proprietary technology, advanced data analytics and established expertise fuel organizational decision-making, from strategy through execution. With operations in 30 countries, global organizations and regulated industries trust RRD to reduce complexity and drive audience connections across the entire customer journey.

Loading…

NEWS

Chase Media Solutions CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

March 05, 2026 08:00 AM

The X's and O's of Advertising During the Big Game

Industry leaders talk about why the Super Bowl is still the ultimate advertising stage, even though strategies are changing.

Read Article

January 28, 2026 08:00 AM

FAQ on credit cards: Payment networks, generational shifts, and the rise of financial media in 2026

This FAQ addresses what financial services marketers, strategists, and insights professionals need to know about credit card trends,...

Read Article

November 18, 2025 08:00 AM

Full renewal of state and local cyber grants program passes in House

The PILLAR Act, which would renew federal cybersecurity grants to state and local governments for 10 years, passed by voice vote in the...

Read Article

October 29, 2025 07:00 AM

JPMorgan Chase’s Derek Waldron on building an AI-first bank culture

Derek Waldron, chief analytics officer at JPMorgan Chase, explains how AI is boosting innovation and empowering employees in the banking...

Read Article

October 28, 2025 07:00 AM

BofA Shuffles Technology, Media and Telecom Banking Leadership

Bank of America Corp. has announced new leaders of its technology, media and telecommunications investment banking business, following the...

Read Article

August 14, 2025 07:00 AM

How banks can supercharge intelligent automation with agentic AI

AI agents are an emerging frontier in banks' AI journey, but deploying agentic AI in banking may need fresh thinking and a fundamental...

Read Article

July 08, 2025 07:00 AM

JPMorgan expands tech team with Guggenheim veteran, memo says

JPMorgan Chase is hiring Guggenheim Securities executive Mike Amez, as the country's biggest bank continues to expand its technology...

Read Article

June 09, 2025 07:00 AM

Venture firm DataTribe raises $41 million to port government-led cybersecurity innovation to the private sector

DataTribe works with recent government alumni to adapt their cybersecurity expertise for the private sector. The approach has paid off, with DataTribe recently...

Read Article

May 29, 2025 07:00 AM

AI tools and your privacy: What you need to know

Easy-to-use artificial intelligence (AI) tools are changing our work and school lives. However, they come with a host of new privacy threats.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-18556

SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel vulnerability in N-able N-central allows Authentication Bypass. This issue affects N-central: through 2026.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://uptime.n-able.com/

CVE-2026-55735

SUMMARY

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in ueberauth guardian allows an unauthenticated attacker to revoke a victim's session with a forged token. Guardian.revoke/3 in lib/guardian.ex decodes the supplied token with peek/1, which performs no signature verification (it only base64-decodes the JWT header and payload). The resulting unverified claims are forwarded directly to the configured token module's revoke callback and the implementation's on_revoke callback, a state-mutating sink. The sibling operations refresh/2 and exchange/4 both call decode_and_verify first, so the signature is checked before anything acts on the claims; revoke/3 is the only state-mutating path that acts on claims without verifying the signature. An attacker who knows or guesses a victim's identifying claim values (jti, sub) can forge a JWT carrying those claims, sign it with an arbitrary key, and submit it to any endpoint that funnels a caller-supplied token into Guardian.revoke/3 (the standard logout / session-revocation pattern). When the token module mutates state keyed by the claims (whitelist deletion or blacklist insertion, for example a GuardianDb-style store), the victim's legitimate session is evicted. This is an unauthenticated session-revocation denial of service; the attacker never needs the signing secret. This issue affects guardian: from 1.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55734

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in ueberauth guardian (Guardian.Permissions module) allows a denial of service via BEAM atom-table exhaustion. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/guardian/permissions.ex and program routines 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':encode_permissions!/1, 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':encode_permissions_into_claims!/2, 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':do_encode_permissions!/2. The Guardian.Permissions mixin installs a public encode_permissions!/1 function on every module that does use Guardian.Permissions. For each key of the supplied map, encode_permissions!/1 calls String.to_atom(to_string(k)) before any validation runs. The integer-value clause of do_encode_permissions!/2 then short-circuits straight to encoding without validating the key against the configured permission set, so a key with an integer value is interned as a fresh atom with no exception raised. Atoms are never garbage collected and the BEAM atom table is a fixed-size resource (default roughly 1,048,576 entries), so each unique attacker-chosen key permanently consumes one slot. An attacker who can influence a permission map that reaches encode_permissions!/1 (for example a permissions map read from a request body and passed into token issuance via encode_permissions_into_claims!/2) can mint an unbounded number of atoms and exhaust the atom table, crashing the entire BEAM node and every service running on it. The sibling decode_permissions/1 is not affected because it skips keys absent from the configured permission set. This issue affects guardian: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55733

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in ueberauth guardian allows denial of service via unbounded atom creation from attacker-controlled binary input. Guardian.Permissions.AtomEncoding encodes permission scopes by passing arbitrary binaries to String.to_atom/1. When encode/3 in lib/guardian/permissions/atom_encoding.ex is called with a list, each binary entry is handled by the encode_value/3 binary clause, which calls String.to_atom(value) with no allow-list check. The perm_set argument (the application's small, finite set of legitimate permission names) is discarded, so any external string flows straight into atom creation. This encoder is selected with use Guardian.Permissions, encoding: Guardian.Permissions.AtomEncoding and reached through the imported encode/3 entry point. String.to_atom/1 creates a brand-new atom for every previously unseen binary, atoms are never garbage collected, and the BEAM atom table is fixed at roughly 1,048,576 entries by default. An application that funnels attacker-influenced permission scopes (from a request body, a JWT claim, or other external input) into encode/3 therefore mints one permanent atom per distinct value. A modest stream of varied, unauthenticated input permanently consumes the atom table and crashes the BEAM node with system_limit, taking down every application running on it. The default encoder is Guardian.Permissions.BitwiseEncoding, which is not affected. This issue affects guardian: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-54894

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in ueberauth guardian allows denial of service via unbounded atom creation from attacker-influenced binary input. Guardian.Plug.Keys derives connection and session namespace keys by passing arbitrary binaries to String.to_atom/1. base_key/1 in lib/guardian/plug/keys.ex converts any binary into the atom :"guardian_<input>", and the derived helpers claims_key/1, resource_key/1, and token_key/1 create a second atom on top of that. key_from_other/1 likewise converts a regex-captured binary through String.to_atom/1. The public specs advertise String.t() as a valid argument, so passing a string is documented usage, and higher-level entry points such as Guardian.Plug.current_token(conn, key: key) thread the caller-supplied key straight into these functions. String.to_atom/1 creates a brand-new atom for every previously unseen binary, atoms are never garbage collected, and the BEAM atom table is fixed at roughly 1,048,576 entries by default. An application that routes attacker-influenced data (a tenant identifier, header, or other request input) into a Guardian key therefore mints one permanent atom per distinct value. A modest stream of varied, unauthenticated input permanently consumes the atom table and crashes the BEAM node, taking down every application running on it. This issue affects guardian: from 0.1.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…