Fried Frank
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
friedfrank
Website:
Employees number:
1,649
Number of followers:
36,750
NAICS:
54111
Industry Type:
Homepage:
friedfrank.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
FRI_2651989
Scan Status:
In-progress
Fried Frank Company CyberSecurity Posture
friedfrank.com
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP advises the world's leading corporations, investment funds and financial institutions on their most critical legal needs and business opportunities. The firm's 800 lawyers are based in North America, the UK and Europe.
Fried Frank A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Fried Frank Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 600 and 649
Fried Frank
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Fried Frank Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Fried Frank
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Fried Frank Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
1
Fried, Frank, Harris and Shriver & Jacobson LLP: Fried Frank Hit With Goldman Investment Data Breach Suit (1)
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Fried Frank Law Firm Faces Class Action Over Data Breach Exposing Goldman Sachs Investors’ Sensitive Information A class action lawsuit filed on December 24, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York alleges that international law firm Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP failed to protect the personal data of investors in a Goldman Sachs private equity fund. The complaint, brought by plaintiff Andrew Sacks, claims the firm’s security lapse exposed sensitive information, including Social Security numbers, addresses, and banking details, without notifying affected individuals or offering credit monitoring. Goldman Sachs Asset Management LP confirmed the breach on December 19, notifying account holders of the incident at Fried Frank. However, Sacks an investor in the Petershill Private Equity Seeding II Offshore Fund stated he was never directly informed by the law firm, only learning of the breach through Goldman. He argues that had he known of Fried Frank’s inadequate security, he would not have entrusted his data to the firm. Fried Frank acknowledged the incident in a statement, noting it took immediate action to contain the breach, engaged external cybersecurity experts, and reported the matter to law enforcement. The firm maintained that its client services remained uninterrupted. The lawsuit seeks damages and a court order requiring Fried Frank to cover at least 10 years of credit monitoring for affected individuals, citing the long-term risks of identity theft. Claims include negligence, breach of implied contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment. The case, *Sacks v. Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP* (No. 1:25-cv-10693), represents all individuals notified of the breach on or after December 19.
JPMorgan Chase, Fried, Frank, Harris and Shriver & Jacobson LLP: 659 JPMorgan clients affected by data breach at Fried Frank
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Fried Frank Data Breach Exposes PII of 659 JPMorgan Clients A data breach at law firm Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP has compromised the personal information of 659 JPMorgan Chase clients, including investors and associated individuals. The incident stemmed from a compromised user account that allowed an unauthorized third party to access and copy files from a shared network drive. The breach was discovered on October 27, 2025, with JPMorgan Chase notified on December 9, 2025. Exposed data included names, account numbers, Social Security numbers, passport numbers, government IDs, and contact details. Affected individuals spanned multiple states, with 37 in Massachusetts, two in New Hampshire, and one in Maine. Regulatory disclosures were filed with the Maine Attorney General, Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, and New Hampshire Attorney General on January 12, 2026. In response, JPMorgan Chase and Fried Frank conducted a joint review to assess the breach’s scope and bolster security measures. While JPMorgan’s systems remained uncompromised, the firm is offering affected clients two years of free credit monitoring through Experian IdentityWorks, including daily credit monitoring, identity theft resolution, and $1 million in insurance coverage. The incident highlights vulnerabilities in third-party legal service providers handling sensitive financial data.
Fried Frank Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Fried Frank
Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fried Frank in 2026.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fried Frank in 2026.
Incident Types Fried Frank vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fried Frank in 2026.
Incident History — Fried Frank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fried Frank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Fried Frank Company Subsidiaries
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP advises the world's leading corporations, investment funds and financial institutions on their most critical legal needs and business opportunities. The firm's 800 lawyers are based in North America, the UK and Europe.
Loading...
Fried Frank Similar Companies
DLA Piper
DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver exceptional outcomes on cross-border
.png)
Fried Frank CyberSecurity News
January 14, 2026 11:00 AM
Cybersecurity News: GoBruteforcer targets blockchain projects, Android accessibility issue just a bug, Verizon stops automatic phone unlocks
Senior cyber operator removed from Russia task force, CISA flags actively exploited Gogs vulnerability, JPMorgan discloses law firm breach.
January 14, 2026 09:51 AM
JPMorgan Discloses Supply Chain Breach at Law Firm That Impacts Over 650 Investors
JPMorgan Chase reports a data breach affecting 659 investors after a cybersecurity incident at the law firm Fried, Frank, Harris,...
January 13, 2026 05:09 PM
After Goldman, JPMorgan Discloses Law Firm Data Breach
The law firm Fried Frank seems to be informing high-profile clients about a recent data security incident.
January 07, 2026 08:00 AM
Jurisdiction Questioned In NY Fried Frank Data Breach Suit
A New York federal judge is threatening to toss a proposed class action data security suit against Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP...
January 06, 2026 08:00 AM
Fried Frank Brings in Debevoise for Breach Lawsuit, Hires Data Security Experts
We promptly acted to contain the incident, and engaged industry-leading, external data security experts to assist in our response and in...
January 02, 2026 08:00 AM
Wisconsin's Bank First finalizes acquisition of in-state rival
Bank First in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, has completed its acquisition of Centre 1 Bancorp in Beloit; Citi plans to shed its remaining Russian...
December 28, 2025 01:58 PM
Goldman Sachs via Fried Frank Data Breach Investigation
If you were affected by the Goldman Sachs data breach, you may be entitled to compensation.
December 28, 2025 08:00 AM
Data Breach Affecting Goldman Sachs Investment Clients Allegedly Exposes Social Security Numbers
Data breach at Fried Frank affects Goldman Sachs clients, exposing sensitive personal info including SSNs and financial details.
December 27, 2025 08:00 AM
Goldman Sachs sends notice to clients on hacking incident: Read full letter
Tech News News: Goldman Sachs Group has sent a notice to its investors in some of its alternative investment funds, apprising them that...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Fried Frank CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Fried Frank
The official website of Fried Frank is http://www.friedfrank.com.
Fried Frank’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Fried Frank’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 631, reflecting their Poor security posture.
How many security badges does Fried Frank’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Fried Frank currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has Fried Frank been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, Fried Frank has been affected by a supply chain cyber incident involving Fried Frank, with the incident ID JPMFRI1768878048.
Does Fried Frank have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Fried Frank is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Fried Frank have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Fried Frank does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Fried Frank comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Fried Frank is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Fried Frank have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Fried Frank does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Fried Frank comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Fried Frank is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Fried Frank have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Fried Frank is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Fried Frank
Fried Frank operates primarily in the Law Practice industry.
Number of Employees at Fried Frank
Fried Frank employs approximately 1,649 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Fried Frank
Fried Frank presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Fried Frank’s LinkedIn Followers
Fried Frank’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 36,750 followers.
NAICS Classification of Fried Frank
Fried Frank is classified under the NAICS code 54111, which corresponds to Offices of Lawyers.
Fried Frank’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Fried Frank does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Fried Frank’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Fried Frank maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/friedfrank.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Fried Frank
As of January 21, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Fried Frank has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Fried Frank has an estimated 15,857 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Fried Frank ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
How does Fried Frank detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an incident response plan activated with yes, and third party assistance with industry-leading, external data security experts, and law enforcement notified with yes, and containment measures with prompt action to contain the incident, and communication strategy with no direct notification to affected individuals; notification via goldman sachs, and remediation measures with joint review to assess breach scope and bolster security measures, and recovery measures with offering two years of free credit monitoring through experian identityworks, and communication strategy with regulatory disclosures filed with maine, massachusetts, and new hampshire authorities..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Fried Frank Data Security Incident and Alleged Failure to Safeguard Sensitive Information
Description: International law firm Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP allegedly failed to adequately safeguard sensitive personal information of account investments associated with a Goldman Sachs private equity fund. A class action lawsuit claims the firm did not notify affected account holders or offer credit monitoring services after a security incident.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-12-19
Type: Data Breach
Title: Fried Frank Data Breach Exposes PII of 659 JPMorgan Clients
Description: A data breach at law firm Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP has compromised the personal information of 659 JPMorgan Chase clients, including investors and associated individuals. The incident stemmed from a compromised user account that allowed an unauthorized third party to access and copy files from a shared network drive.
Date Detected: 2025-10-27
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2026-01-12
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised User Account
Vulnerability Exploited: Unauthorized access to shared network drive
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Compromised user account.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach FRI1766606165
Data Compromised: Sensitive personal information including addresses, social security numbers, and banking information
Operational Impact: No disruption to client services reported
Customer Complaints: Yes (class action lawsuit filed)
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to alleged negligence
Legal Liabilities: Class action lawsuit filed (negligence, breach of implied contract, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment)
Identity Theft Risk: High (exposure of SSNs and banking information)
Payment Information Risk: High (banking information exposed)
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Data Compromised: Names, account numbers, Social Security numbers, passport numbers, government IDs, and contact details
Systems Affected: Shared network drive
Brand Reputation Impact: High
Identity Theft Risk: High
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Addresses, Social Security Numbers, Banking Information, and Personally Identifiable Information (PII).
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach FRI1766606165
Entity Name: Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
Entity Type: Law Firm
Industry: Legal Services
Location: International
Customers Affected: Account holders of Goldman Sachs Petershill Private Equity Seeding II Offshore Fund
Incident : Data Breach FRI1766606165
Entity Name: Goldman Sachs Asset Management LP
Entity Type: Asset Management
Industry: Financial Services
Location: International
Customers Affected: Investors in the Petershill Private Equity Seeding II Offshore Fund
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Entity Name: Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
Entity Type: Law Firm
Industry: Legal Services
Location: United States
Customers Affected: 659 JPMorgan Chase clients
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Entity Name: JPMorgan Chase
Entity Type: Financial Institution
Industry: Banking
Location: United States
Customers Affected: 659 clients
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach FRI1766606165
Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes
Third Party Assistance: Industry-leading, external data security experts
Law Enforcement Notified: Yes
Containment Measures: Prompt action to contain the incident
Communication Strategy: No direct notification to affected individuals; notification via Goldman Sachs
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Remediation Measures: Joint review to assess breach scope and bolster security measures
Recovery Measures: Offering two years of free credit monitoring through Experian IdentityWorks
Communication Strategy: Regulatory disclosures filed with Maine, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire authorities
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes.
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Industry-leading, external data security experts.
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach FRI1766606165
Type of Data Compromised: Addresses, Social security numbers, Banking information
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Type of Data Compromised: Personally Identifiable Information (PII)
Number of Records Exposed: 659
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Personally Identifiable Information: Names, account numbers, Social Security numbers, passport numbers, government IDs, contact details
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Joint review to assess breach scope and bolster security measures.
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by prompt action to contain the incident.
Ransomware Information
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through Offering two years of free credit monitoring through Experian IdentityWorks.
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach FRI1766606165
Legal Actions: Class action lawsuit filed (Sacks v. Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP)
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Regulatory Notifications: Maine Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business RegulationNew Hampshire Attorney General
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Class action lawsuit filed (Sacks v. Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP).
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Lessons Learned: Highlights vulnerabilities in third-party legal service providers handling sensitive financial data
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach FRI1766606165
Recommendations: Offer credit monitoring services to affected individuals, improve communication strategies for breach notifications, and enhance data security measures to prevent future incidents.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Highlights vulnerabilities in third-party legal service providers handling sensitive financial data.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Offer credit monitoring services to affected individuals, improve communication strategies for breach notifications and and enhance data security measures to prevent future incidents..
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach FRI1766606165
Source: Bloomberg Law
Incident : Data Breach FRI1766606165
Source: Complaint filed in US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Date Accessed: 2024-12-24
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Source: Regulatory filings
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Bloomberg Law, and Source: Complaint filed in US District Court for the Southern District of New YorkDate Accessed: 2024-12-24, and Source: Regulatory filings.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach FRI1766606165
Investigation Status: Ongoing
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through No direct notification to affected individuals; notification via Goldman Sachs, Regulatory disclosures filed with Maine, Massachusetts and and New Hampshire authorities.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach FRI1766606165
Customer Advisories: Notification sent by Goldman Sachs on December 19, 2024; no direct notification from Fried Frank.
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Customer Advisories: Offering two years of free credit monitoring through Experian IdentityWorks, including daily credit monitoring, identity theft resolution, and $1 million in insurance coverage
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Notification sent by Goldman Sachs on December 19, 2024; no direct notification from Fried Frank., Offering two years of free credit monitoring through Experian IdentityWorks, including daily credit monitoring, identity theft resolution and and $1 million in insurance coverage.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Entry Point: Compromised user account
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Root Causes: Compromised user account leading to unauthorized access to shared network drive
Corrective Actions: Joint review to bolster security measures
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Industry-leading, external data security experts.
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Joint review to bolster security measures.
Additional Questions
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2025-10-27.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2026-01-12.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Sensitive personal information including addresses, social security numbers, and banking information, Names, account numbers, Social Security numbers, passport numbers, government IDs and and contact details.
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was Industry-leading, external data security experts.
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Prompt action to contain the incident.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Names, account numbers, Social Security numbers, passport numbers, government IDs, and contact details, Sensitive personal information including addresses, social security numbers and and banking information.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 659.0.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Class action lawsuit filed (Sacks v. Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP).
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Highlights vulnerabilities in third-party legal service providers handling sensitive financial data.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Offer credit monitoring services to affected individuals, improve communication strategies for breach notifications and and enhance data security measures to prevent future incidents..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Regulatory filings, Bloomberg Law and Complaint filed in US District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Notification sent by Goldman Sachs on December 19, 2024; no direct notification from Fried Frank., Offering two years of free credit monitoring through Experian IdentityWorks, including daily credit monitoring, identity theft resolution and and $1 million in insurance coverage.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Compromised user account.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g., execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=friedfrank' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
