Chase
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
chase
Website:
Employees number:
34,537
Number of followers:
634,896
NAICS:
52
Industry Type:
Homepage:
chase.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
CHA_2732315
Scan Status:
In-progress
Chase Company CyberSecurity Posture
chase.com
At Chase, we’re dedicated to helping you succeed. Whether you’re in need of banking, credit cards, mortgages, auto financing, investment guidance, small business support, or payment solutions, we’re beside you every step of the way. For customer service, contact us via chase.com/customerservice. See full social media terms and conditions at chase.com/socialterms. JPMorgan Chase is an Equal Opportunity Employer, including Disability/Veterans.
Chase A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Chase Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
Chase
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Chase Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Chase
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Chase Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
12
Attack Types
3
Fried Frank
FortinetChase Affiliated Companies
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: On November 7, 2025, Chase Affiliated Companies disclosed a data breach to the Texas Attorney General’s office, impacting 979 Texas residents. The exposed information included names and Social Security numbers (SSNs), both classified as personally identifiable information (PII). The breach significantly elevates the risk of identity theft for affected individuals, given the sensitivity of SSNs, which are prime targets for fraudulent activities such as loan applications, tax fraud, or unauthorized account openings.The company responded by issuing notifications via U.S. Mail to impacted individuals, detailing the compromised data and offering guidance on protective measures. However, no public information was provided regarding additional support, such as credit monitoring or identity theft protection services. The incident underscores the critical need for robust data security measures, particularly when handling high-value PII, as the exposure of such data can lead to long-term financial and reputational harm for victims.The breach’s scale affecting nearly a thousand individuals highlights systemic vulnerabilities in data protection, reinforcing concerns over how financial institutions safeguard sensitive customer information against evolving cyber threats.
JPMorgan Chase, Fried, Frank, Harris and Shriver & Jacobson LLP: 659 JPMorgan clients affected by data breach at Fried Frank
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Fried Frank Data Breach Exposes PII of 659 JPMorgan Clients A data breach at law firm Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP has compromised the personal information of 659 JPMorgan Chase clients, including investors and associated individuals. The incident stemmed from a compromised user account that allowed an unauthorized third party to access and copy files from a shared network drive. The breach was discovered on October 27, 2025, with JPMorgan Chase notified on December 9, 2025. Exposed data included names, account numbers, Social Security numbers, passport numbers, government IDs, and contact details. Affected individuals spanned multiple states, with 37 in Massachusetts, two in New Hampshire, and one in Maine. Regulatory disclosures were filed with the Maine Attorney General, Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, and New Hampshire Attorney General on January 12, 2026. In response, JPMorgan Chase and Fried Frank conducted a joint review to assess the breach’s scope and bolster security measures. While JPMorgan’s systems remained uncompromised, the firm is offering affected clients two years of free credit monitoring through Experian IdentityWorks, including daily credit monitoring, identity theft resolution, and $1 million in insurance coverage. The incident highlights vulnerabilities in third-party legal service providers handling sensitive financial data.
Unnamed Financial Institution
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In May 2025, an unnamed financial institution in Asia was targeted by Fog ransomware hackers. The attackers utilized legitimate employee monitoring software Syteca (formerly Ekran) and several open-source pen-testing tools, including GC2, Adaptix, and Stowaway. This tactic, described as 'living off the land,' allowed the attackers to operate more stealthily, reducing the likelihood of detection. The use of legitimate software in the attack chain was deemed highly unusual and reflects a shift in the tactics employed by Fog hackers.
Fortinet, Cisco, Amazon Web Services and JPMorgan Chase: Cloud storage buckets leaking secret data despite security improvements
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: Tenable Report Highlights Persistent Cloud Security Risks Despite Improvements A recent report by Tenable reveals both progress and ongoing vulnerabilities in cloud security, particularly around "toxic cloud trilogies" publicly exposed, critically vulnerable, and highly privileged cloud instances. Between October 2024 and March 2025, the number of organizations with at least one such instance on AWS or Google Cloud Platform (GCP) dropped from 38% to 29%, while those with five or more declined from 27% to 13%. Despite these improvements, Tenable warns that such exposures remain a pressing concern. The report also uncovered widespread exposure of sensitive data in cloud configurations. Researchers found that 54% of AWS Elastic Container Service (ECS) task definitions and 52% of Google CloudRun environment variables contained confidential information. Additionally, over a quarter of AWS users stored sensitive data in user data fields, with 3.5% of AWS EC2 instances holding secrets posing a significant risk if exploited. AWS hosted the highest proportion of sensitive data (16.7% of its buckets), compared to 6.5% for GCP and 3.2% for Microsoft Azure. While nearly 80% of AWS users have enabled critical identity-checking services, the findings underscore persistent misconfigurations and overconfidence in cloud security measures. The report, released at AWS re:Invent 2024 in Las Vegas, highlights the need for continued vigilance in securing cloud environments.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. on April 29, 2024. The breach occurred due to a software issue that allowed unauthorized access to plan participant information between August 26, 2021, and February 23, 2024, potentially affecting personal and financial information such as names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and bank account details.
J.P. Morgan
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: On April 18, 2024, the Vermont Office of the Attorney General disclosed a data breach at J.P. Morgan, stemming from a software vulnerability discovered on February 26, 2024. The incident exposed sensitive personal and financial information of an unspecified number of individuals, including names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and bank account details. The breach posed a severe risk of identity theft, financial fraud, and unauthorized access to customer accounts, given the highly confidential nature of the compromised data. While the exact scale of the breach remains undisclosed, the exposure of such critical information particularly Social Security numbers and banking details heightens the potential for long-term reputational damage, regulatory scrutiny, and legal repercussions for the financial institution. The incident underscores vulnerabilities in J.P. Morgan’s digital infrastructure, raising concerns about the adequacy of its cybersecurity measures in safeguarding customer data against exploitation by malicious actors.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported that JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. experienced a data breach on May 24, 2021, affecting customer account information. The report was made on August 13, 2021, and notification letters detailed that personal and financial information may have been accidentally seen by another customer, although no indication of misuse of information was reported.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: On August 10, 2018, the California Office of the Attorney General reported that JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. experienced a data breach on June 28, 2018. An employee improperly downloaded customer information, including names, addresses, mortgage loan numbers, and Social Security numbers, to a personal computer and online data storage sites, potentially exposing this data to third parties for about three weeks.
Chase
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Multiple Chase.com customers have reported logging in to their bank accounts, only to be presented with another customer’s bank account details. Chase has acknowledged the incident and stated that it was a glitch and not any hacking attempt. It was caused by an internal “glitch” Wednesday evening that did not involve any kind of hacking attempt or cyber attack.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. on December 5, 2013. The specific date of the breach is unknown, but the incident was detected between mid-July and mid-September 2013, potentially compromising personal information such as names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and bank account details.
First Republic Bank
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving First Republic Bank on August 14, 2012. The breach occurred on August 2, 2012, due to improper data disposal of client names, account types and numbers, and taxpayer identification/social security numbers. The number of affected individuals is unknown.
First Republic Bank
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving First Republic Bank on May 29, 2012. The breach occurred between January 21, 2012, and February 25, 2012, and compromised customer names, debit card numbers, and encrypted personal identification numbers (PINs).
Chase Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Chase
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Chase in 2026.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Chase in 2026.
Incident Types Chase vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Chase in 2026.
Incident History — Chase (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Chase cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Chase Company Subsidiaries
At Chase, we’re dedicated to helping you succeed. Whether you’re in need of banking, credit cards, mortgages, auto financing, investment guidance, small business support, or payment solutions, we’re beside you every step of the way. For customer service, contact us via chase.com/customerservice. See full social media terms and conditions at chase.com/socialterms. JPMorgan Chase is an Equal Opportunity Employer, including Disability/Veterans.
Loading...
Chase Similar Companies
Founded in the year 2000, the Indiabulls Group is one of the country’s leading business houses with interest across sectors like financial services, real estate, pharmaceutical and LED. Headquartered in Gurgaon, all the group companies are listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange, and the National Stock
Our heritage, since founding a civil law notary practice in the 1940s to establishing the Curacao International Trust Company in the 1960s, is built on challenging paradigms and delivering exceptional service within the financial and professional services industry. Today, we continue to pioneer awar
KPMG US
KPMG is one of the world’s leading professional services firms and the fastest growing Big Four accounting firm in the United States. With 90+ offices and more than 36,000 employees and partners throughout the US, we’re leading the industry in new and exciting ways. Our size and strength make us muc
Opening up a world of opportunity for our customers, investors, ourselves and the planet. We're a financial services organisation that serves more than 40 million customers, ranging from individual savers and investors to some of the world’s biggest companies and governments. Our network covers 58
Australia’s leading provider of financial services including retail, premium, business and institutional banking, funds management, superannuation, insurance, investment and sharebroking products and services. We are a business with more than 800,000 shareholders and over 52,000 employees. We offer
Deutsche Bank is the leading German bank with strong European roots and a global network. The bank focuses on its strengths in a Corporate Bank newly created in 2019, a leading Private Bank, a focused investment bank and in asset management. We provide financial services to companies, governments,
Wells Fargo
Wells Fargo & Company (NYSE: WFC) is a diversified, community-based financial services company with approximately $1.9 trillion in assets. Wells Fargo’s vision is to satisfy our customers’ financial needs and help them succeed financially. Founded in 1852 and headquartered in San Francisco, Wells Fa
TVS Credit Services Ltd.
From the largest cities to the smallest villages, India is filled with ambition and enterprise. As Indians from all walks of life set out to write their growth story, our timely and affordable credit empowers them to bring their dreams alive. As part of the TVS Group, we empower Indians from vario
Discover
Discover® is now part of Capital One. Together, we’ll continue to deliver exceptional financial products and experiences, drive innovation, and serve customers. Find the latest updates at https://capitalonediscover.com. Discover is one of the most recognized brands in the U.S. with the Discover® ca
.png)
Chase CyberSecurity News
December 02, 2025 08:00 AM
AI-powered scams: How you can help protect yourself
Fraudsters are now using AI to put a new, sophisticated spin on age-old scams, making personal and financial security more vital than ever.
December 01, 2025 08:00 AM
JPMorgan Chase, Citi, Morgan Stanley and Other Major US Banks Impacted by Data Breach at SitusAMC
A data breach at SitusAMC has affected several major US banks after attackers breached the finance technology company's network.
November 24, 2025 08:00 AM
Hackers steal sensitive data from major banking industry vendor
One of the banking industry's biggest vendors is responding to a cyberattack that has compromised some of its clients' sensitive data.
October 09, 2025 07:00 AM
CyberSmart: How to stay a step ahead of fraudsters
October is National Cybersecurity Awareness Month. With work-from-home for many of us, our reliance on digital tools has skyrocketed in...
September 18, 2025 07:00 AM
Global B2B events giant buys Chevy Chase cybersecurity conference organizer Billington
Global B2B events giant buys Chevy Chase cybersecurity conference organizer Billington ... Choose Washington Business Journal as a preferred news...
September 18, 2025 07:00 AM
Netskope Lands $908 Million US IPO At $7.26 Billion Valuation, Underscoring Soaring Demand For Cybersecurity Amid Trump Tariff Jitters - JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM), Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS)
Cybersecurity firm Netskope raised $908.2 million in a U.S. initial public offering, valuing the company at $7.26 billion,...
September 08, 2025 07:00 AM
Mind your business: How to keep your company cyber secure
Establish comprehensive cybersecurity policies that outline best practices for employees. These policies should cover password management, data protection and...
August 25, 2025 07:00 AM
CyberSmart: Clean and declutter to strengthen your cyber defenses
October is National Cybersecurity Awareness Month. With work-from-home still in place for many of us, our reliance on digital tools has...
July 30, 2025 07:00 AM
Venture capital Accel backs Indian cybersecurity startups to chase innovation over pricing power
Accel has backed six cybersecurity startups, including Akto and Seezo, which are finding interest globally for their AI-native, differentiated...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Chase CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Chase
The official website of Chase is http://www.chase.com.
Chase’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Chase’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 790, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does Chase’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Chase currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has Chase been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, Chase has been affected by multiple supply chain cyber incidents. The affected supply chain sources and their corresponding incident IDs are:
- Fried Frank (Incident ID: JPMFRI1768878048)
- Fortinet (Incident ID: FORCISAMAJPM1767748297)
Does Chase have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Chase is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Chase have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Chase does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Chase comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Chase is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Chase have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Chase does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Chase comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Chase is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Chase have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Chase is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Chase
Chase operates primarily in the Financial Services industry.
Number of Employees at Chase
Chase employs approximately 34,537 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Chase
Chase presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Chase’s LinkedIn Followers
Chase’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 634,896 followers.
NAICS Classification of Chase
Chase is classified under the NAICS code 52, which corresponds to Finance and Insurance.
Chase’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Chase does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Chase’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Chase maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/chase.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Chase
As of January 21, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Chase has experienced 12 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Chase has an estimated 30,814 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Chase ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware, Vulnerability and Breach.
How does Chase detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with symantec researchers, and incident response plan activated with likely (notifications sent to affected individuals), and communication strategy with notifications sent via u.s. mail to affected individuals with breach details and protective guidance, and enhanced monitoring with enabled identity-checking service (80%+ of aws users), and remediation measures with joint review to assess breach scope and bolster security measures, and recovery measures with offering two years of free credit monitoring through experian identityworks, and communication strategy with regulatory disclosures filed with maine, massachusetts, and new hampshire authorities..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Chase.com Account Information Mix-Up
Description: Multiple Chase.com customers reported logging in to their bank accounts and seeing another customer’s bank account details. Chase acknowledged the incident and stated that it was caused by an internal glitch and not any hacking attempt.
Type: Data Exposure
Vulnerability Exploited: Internal Glitch
Title: Fog Ransomware Attack on Financial Institution
Description: Fog ransomware hackers used legitimate employee monitoring software Syteca and several open-source pen-testing tools alongside usual encryption to attack an unnamed financial institution in Asia.
Date Detected: May 2025
Type: Ransomware
Attack Vector: Legitimate software and open-source pen-testing tools
Threat Actor: Fog Ransomware Hackers
Motivation: Financial Gain
Title: JPMorgan Chase Data Breach
Description: An employee improperly downloaded customer information, including names, addresses, mortgage loan numbers, and Social Security numbers, to a personal computer and online data storage sites, potentially exposing this data to third parties for about three weeks.
Date Detected: 2018-08-10
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2018-08-10
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Vulnerability Exploited: Human Error
Threat Actor: Employee
Title: First Republic Bank Data Breach
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving First Republic Bank on August 14, 2012. The breach occurred on August 2, 2012, due to improper data disposal of client names, account types and numbers, and taxpayer identification/social security numbers. The number of affected individuals is unknown.
Date Detected: 2012-08-02
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2012-08-14
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Improper Data Disposal
Vulnerability Exploited: Improper Data Disposal
Title: JPMorgan Chase Bank Data Breach
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported that JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. experienced a data breach on May 24, 2021, affecting customer account information. The report was made on August 13, 2021, and notification letters detailed that personal and financial information may have been accidentally seen by another customer, although no indication of misuse of information was reported.
Date Detected: 2021-05-24
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2021-08-13
Type: Data Breach
Title: Data Breach at J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Description: A data breach occurred due to a software issue that allowed unauthorized access to plan participant information, potentially affecting personal and financial information such as names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and bank account details.
Date Detected: 2024-04-29
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-04-29
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Software Issue
Vulnerability Exploited: Unauthorized Access
Title: JPMorgan Chase Bank Data Breach
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. on December 5, 2013. The specific date of the breach is unknown, but the incident was detected between mid-July and mid-September 2013, potentially compromising personal information such as names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and bank account details.
Date Detected: mid-July to mid-September 2013
Date Publicly Disclosed: December 5, 2013
Type: Data Breach
Title: First Republic Bank Data Breach
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving First Republic Bank on May 29, 2012. The breach occurred between January 21, 2012, and February 25, 2012, and compromised customer names, debit card numbers, and encrypted personal identification numbers (PINs).
Date Detected: 2012-05-29
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2012-05-29
Type: Data Breach
Title: J.P. Morgan Data Breach Due to Software Issue (2024)
Description: The Vermont Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving J.P. Morgan that occurred due to a software issue on February 26, 2024, potentially affecting personal and financial information, including names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and bank account details of an unknown number of individuals.
Date Detected: 2024-02-26
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-04-18
Type: Data Breach
Vulnerability Exploited: Software Issue
Title: Data Breach at Chase Affiliated Companies Affecting Texas Residents
Description: On Nov. 7, 2025, a data breach involving Chase Affiliated Companies was disclosed to the Texas Attorney General’s office. The breach impacted 979 residents of Texas, exposing names and Social Security numbers (PII). The exposure of such sensitive data increases the risk of identity theft for those affected. Chase Affiliated Companies notified impacted individuals via U.S. Mail, providing details about the breach and guidance on protective measures.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-11-07
Type: Data Breach
Title: Toxic Cloud Trilogies: Publicly Exposed, Critically Vulnerable, and Highly Privileged Cloud Buckets
Description: Tenable’s report highlights serious risks facing cloud storage users, including publicly exposed, critically vulnerable, and highly privileged cloud buckets (termed 'toxic cloud trilogies'). Researchers found sensitive data leaks in AWS and GCP cloud buckets, including Elastic Container Service task definitions, CloudRun environment variables, and user data. Despite improvements, 29% of organizations still had at least one toxic cloud trilogy, with 7% having 10 or more. AWS hosted more sensitive data (16.7%) than GCP (6.5%) or Azure (3.2%).
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-03-05
Type: Data Exposure
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Cloud Storage
Vulnerability Exploited: Publicly exposed cloud buckets with critical vulnerabilities and highly privileged data
Title: Fried Frank Data Breach Exposes PII of 659 JPMorgan Clients
Description: A data breach at law firm Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP has compromised the personal information of 659 JPMorgan Chase clients, including investors and associated individuals. The incident stemmed from a compromised user account that allowed an unauthorized third party to access and copy files from a shared network drive.
Date Detected: 2025-10-27
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2026-01-12
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised User Account
Vulnerability Exploited: Unauthorized access to shared network drive
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Compromised user account.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Exposure CHA10418622
Data Compromised: Customer bank account details
Systems Affected: Chase.com
Incident : Data Breach JPM357072525
Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Mortgage loan numbers, Social security numbers
Incident : Data Breach FIR145072625
Data Compromised: Client names, Account types and numbers, Taxpayer identification/social security numbers
Incident : Data Breach JPM351072625
Data Compromised: Personal information, Financial information
Incident : Data Breach JPM404072625
Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Social security numbers, Bank account details
Incident : Data Breach JPM108072925
Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Social security numbers, Bank account details
Incident : Data Breach FIR234080425
Data Compromised: Customer names, Debit card numbers, Encrypted personal identification numbers (pins)
Incident : Data Breach JPM004091825
Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Social security numbers, Bank account details
Identity Theft Risk: Potential
Payment Information Risk: Potential
Incident : Data Breach JPM4403744110825
Data Compromised: Names, Social security numbers
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to exposure of sensitive PII
Identity Theft Risk: High (due to exposure of Social Security numbers)
Incident : Data Exposure FORCISAMAJPM1767748297
Data Compromised: Sensitive data, including confidential and restricted information
Systems Affected: AWS S3 BucketsGCP Cloud StorageAWS Elastic Container ServiceGoogle CloudRunAWS EC2 User Data
Operational Impact: Potential cascade of exploitative activity by attackers accessing exposed secrets
Brand Reputation Impact: High (due to sensitive data exposure)
Identity Theft Risk: High (due to exposure of personally identifiable information)
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Data Compromised: Names, account numbers, Social Security numbers, passport numbers, government IDs, and contact details
Systems Affected: Shared network drive
Brand Reputation Impact: High
Identity Theft Risk: High
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Customer Bank Account Details, Names, Addresses, Mortgage Loan Numbers, Social Security Numbers, , Client Names, Account Types And Numbers, Taxpayer Identification/Social Security Numbers, , Personal Information, Financial Information, , Personal Information, Financial Information, , Names, Addresses, Social Security Numbers, Bank Account Details, , Customer Names, Debit Card Numbers, Encrypted Personal Identification Numbers (Pins), , Personal Information, Financial Information, , Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), , Secrets, Confidential Data, Restricted Data, Personally Identifiable Information, and Personally Identifiable Information (PII).
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Exposure CHA10418622
Entity Name: Chase
Entity Type: Financial Institution
Industry: Banking
Incident : Data Breach JPM357072525
Entity Name: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Entity Type: Financial Institution
Industry: Banking
Location: California
Incident : Data Breach FIR145072625
Entity Name: First Republic Bank
Entity Type: Bank
Industry: Financial Services
Location: California
Incident : Data Breach JPM351072625
Entity Name: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Entity Type: Financial Institution
Industry: Banking
Incident : Data Breach JPM404072625
Entity Name: J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Entity Type: Financial Institution
Industry: Banking
Incident : Data Breach JPM108072925
Entity Name: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Entity Type: Financial Institution
Industry: Banking
Location: California
Incident : Data Breach FIR234080425
Entity Name: First Republic Bank
Entity Type: Financial Institution
Industry: Banking
Location: California
Incident : Data Breach JPM004091825
Entity Name: J.P. Morgan
Entity Type: Financial Institution
Industry: Banking/Financial Services
Location: United States
Customers Affected: Unknown
Incident : Data Breach JPM4403744110825
Entity Name: Chase Affiliated Companies
Entity Type: Financial Services
Industry: Banking/Financial
Location: Texas, USA (impacted residents)
Customers Affected: 979
Incident : Data Exposure FORCISAMAJPM1767748297
Entity Name: AWS Users
Entity Type: Cloud Service Provider Customers
Industry: Various
Location: Global
Incident : Data Exposure FORCISAMAJPM1767748297
Entity Name: GCP Users
Entity Type: Cloud Service Provider Customers
Industry: Various
Location: Global
Incident : Data Exposure FORCISAMAJPM1767748297
Entity Name: Microsoft Azure Users
Entity Type: Cloud Service Provider Customers
Industry: Various
Location: Global
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Entity Name: Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
Entity Type: Law Firm
Industry: Legal Services
Location: United States
Customers Affected: 659 JPMorgan Chase clients
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Entity Name: JPMorgan Chase
Entity Type: Financial Institution
Industry: Banking
Location: United States
Customers Affected: 659 clients
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware JPM602061325
Third Party Assistance: Symantec researchers
Incident : Data Breach JPM4403744110825
Incident Response Plan Activated: Likely (notifications sent to affected individuals)
Communication Strategy: Notifications sent via U.S. Mail to affected individuals with breach details and protective guidance
Incident : Data Exposure FORCISAMAJPM1767748297
Enhanced Monitoring: Enabled identity-checking service (80%+ of AWS users)
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Remediation Measures: Joint review to assess breach scope and bolster security measures
Recovery Measures: Offering two years of free credit monitoring through Experian IdentityWorks
Communication Strategy: Regulatory disclosures filed with Maine, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire authorities
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Likely (notifications sent to affected individuals).
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Symantec researchers.
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Exposure CHA10418622
Type of Data Compromised: Customer Bank Account Details
Incident : Data Breach JPM357072525
Type of Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Mortgage loan numbers, Social security numbers
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Breach FIR145072625
Type of Data Compromised: Client names, Account types and numbers, Taxpayer identification/social security numbers
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Breach JPM351072625
Type of Data Compromised: Personal information, Financial information
Incident : Data Breach JPM404072625
Type of Data Compromised: Personal information, Financial information
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: namesaddressesSocial Security numbers
Incident : Data Breach JPM108072925
Type of Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Social security numbers, Bank account details
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Breach FIR234080425
Type of Data Compromised: Customer names, Debit card numbers, Encrypted personal identification numbers (pins)
Data Encryption: encrypted personal identification numbers (PINs)
Personally Identifiable Information: customer names
Incident : Data Breach JPM004091825
Type of Data Compromised: Personal information, Financial information
Number of Records Exposed: Unknown
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: namesaddressesSocial Security numbers
Incident : Data Breach JPM4403744110825
Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii)
Number of Records Exposed: 979
Sensitivity of Data: High (includes Social Security numbers)
Personally Identifiable Information: NamesSocial Security numbers
Incident : Data Exposure FORCISAMAJPM1767748297
Type of Data Compromised: Secrets, Confidential data, Restricted data, Personally identifiable information
Sensitivity of Data: High (confidential/restricted)
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Type of Data Compromised: Personally Identifiable Information (PII)
Number of Records Exposed: 659
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Personally Identifiable Information: Names, account numbers, Social Security numbers, passport numbers, government IDs, contact details
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Joint review to assess breach scope and bolster security measures.
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through Offering two years of free credit monitoring through Experian IdentityWorks.
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach JPM004091825
Regulatory Notifications: Vermont Office of the Attorney General
Incident : Data Breach JPM4403744110825
Regulatory Notifications: Disclosed to the Texas Attorney General’s office
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Regulatory Notifications: Maine Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business RegulationNew Hampshire Attorney General
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware JPM602061325
Lessons Learned: Expect the use of ordinary and legitimate corporate software as the norm in ransomware attacks.
Incident : Data Exposure FORCISAMAJPM1767748297
Lessons Learned: Organizations must prioritize secure cloud configurations, regularly audit cloud storage settings, and avoid storing sensitive data in publicly accessible or misconfigured buckets. AWS, GCP, and Azure users should enable identity-checking services and monitor for exposed secrets.
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Lessons Learned: Highlights vulnerabilities in third-party legal service providers handling sensitive financial data
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach JPM4403744110825
Recommendations: Affected individuals should monitor their credit reports and financial accounts for suspicious activity., Consider placing a fraud alert or credit freeze on credit files., Be cautious of phishing attempts or scams targeting exposed PII.Affected individuals should monitor their credit reports and financial accounts for suspicious activity., Consider placing a fraud alert or credit freeze on credit files., Be cautious of phishing attempts or scams targeting exposed PII.Affected individuals should monitor their credit reports and financial accounts for suspicious activity., Consider placing a fraud alert or credit freeze on credit files., Be cautious of phishing attempts or scams targeting exposed PII.
Incident : Data Exposure FORCISAMAJPM1767748297
Recommendations: Conduct regular audits of cloud storage configurations, Enable identity-checking services (e.g., AWS IAM), Avoid storing sensitive data in user data or environment variables, Implement network segmentation and enhanced monitoring, Adopt secure development practices to prevent misconfigurationsConduct regular audits of cloud storage configurations, Enable identity-checking services (e.g., AWS IAM), Avoid storing sensitive data in user data or environment variables, Implement network segmentation and enhanced monitoring, Adopt secure development practices to prevent misconfigurationsConduct regular audits of cloud storage configurations, Enable identity-checking services (e.g., AWS IAM), Avoid storing sensitive data in user data or environment variables, Implement network segmentation and enhanced monitoring, Adopt secure development practices to prevent misconfigurationsConduct regular audits of cloud storage configurations, Enable identity-checking services (e.g., AWS IAM), Avoid storing sensitive data in user data or environment variables, Implement network segmentation and enhanced monitoring, Adopt secure development practices to prevent misconfigurationsConduct regular audits of cloud storage configurations, Enable identity-checking services (e.g., AWS IAM), Avoid storing sensitive data in user data or environment variables, Implement network segmentation and enhanced monitoring, Adopt secure development practices to prevent misconfigurations
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Expect the use of ordinary and legitimate corporate software as the norm in ransomware attacks.Organizations must prioritize secure cloud configurations, regularly audit cloud storage settings, and avoid storing sensitive data in publicly accessible or misconfigured buckets. AWS, GCP, and Azure users should enable identity-checking services and monitor for exposed secrets.Highlights vulnerabilities in third-party legal service providers handling sensitive financial data.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Implement network segmentation and enhanced monitoring, Enable identity-checking services (e.g., AWS IAM), Adopt secure development practices to prevent misconfigurations, Avoid storing sensitive data in user data or environment variables and Conduct regular audits of cloud storage configurations.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware JPM602061325
Source: Symantec researchers
Incident : Data Breach JPM357072525
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2018-08-10
Incident : Data Breach FIR145072625
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2012-08-14
Incident : Data Breach JPM351072625
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2021-08-13
Incident : Data Breach JPM404072625
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2024-04-29
Incident : Data Breach JPM108072925
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: December 5, 2013
Incident : Data Breach FIR234080425
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2012-05-29
Incident : Data Breach JPM004091825
Source: Vermont Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2024-04-18
Incident : Data Breach JPM4403744110825
Source: Texas Attorney General’s data breach portal
Incident : Data Exposure FORCISAMAJPM1767748297
Source: Tenable Report on Toxic Cloud Trilogies
Date Accessed: 2025-03-05
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Source: Regulatory filings
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Symantec researchers, and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2018-08-10, and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2012-08-14, and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2021-08-13, and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2024-04-29, and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: December 5, 2013, and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2012-05-29, and Source: Vermont Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2024-04-18, and Source: Texas Attorney General’s data breach portal, and Source: Tenable Report on Toxic Cloud TrilogiesDate Accessed: 2025-03-05, and Source: Cybersecurity DiveDate Accessed: 2025-03-05, and Source: Regulatory filings.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware JPM602061325
Investigation Status: Investigation ongoing
Incident : Data Exposure FORCISAMAJPM1767748297
Investigation Status: Ongoing (based on scans conducted between October 2024 and March 2025)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Notifications sent via U.S. Mail to affected individuals with breach details and protective guidance, Regulatory disclosures filed with Maine, Massachusetts and and New Hampshire authorities.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach JPM4403744110825
Customer Advisories: Notifications sent via U.S. Mail with breach details and protective guidance
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Customer Advisories: Offering two years of free credit monitoring through Experian IdentityWorks, including daily credit monitoring, identity theft resolution, and $1 million in insurance coverage
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Notifications sent via U.S. Mail with breach details and protective guidance, Offering two years of free credit monitoring through Experian IdentityWorks, including daily credit monitoring, identity theft resolution and and $1 million in insurance coverage.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Entry Point: Compromised user account
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Exposure CHA10418622
Root Causes: Internal Glitch
Incident : Data Breach JPM357072525
Root Causes: Human Error
Incident : Data Breach FIR145072625
Root Causes: Improper Data Disposal
Incident : Data Breach JPM004091825
Root Causes: Software Issue
Incident : Data Exposure FORCISAMAJPM1767748297
Root Causes: Misconfigured Cloud Storage Buckets, Public Exposure Of Sensitive Data, Lack Of Identity-Checking Services In Some Cases, Overconfidence In Cloud Provider Security Measures,
Corrective Actions: Enable Identity-Checking Services, Regularly Audit Cloud Configurations, Remove Sensitive Data From User Data/Environment Variables, Implement Enhanced Monitoring,
Incident : Data Breach JPMFRI1768878048
Root Causes: Compromised user account leading to unauthorized access to shared network drive
Corrective Actions: Joint review to bolster security measures
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Symantec researchers, Enabled identity-checking service (80%+ of AWS users).
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Enable Identity-Checking Services, Regularly Audit Cloud Configurations, Remove Sensitive Data From User Data/Environment Variables, Implement Enhanced Monitoring, , Joint review to bolster security measures.
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Fog Ransomware Hackers and Employee.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on May 2025.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2026-01-12.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Customer Bank Account Details, , Names, Addresses, Mortgage Loan Numbers, Social Security Numbers, , Client names, Account types and numbers, Taxpayer identification/social security numbers, , personal information, financial information, , names, addresses, Social Security numbers, bank account details, , names, addresses, Social Security numbers, bank account details, , customer names, debit card numbers, encrypted personal identification numbers (PINs), , names, addresses, Social Security numbers, bank account details, , Names, Social Security numbers, , Sensitive data, including confidential and restricted information, Names, account numbers, Social Security numbers, passport numbers, government IDs and and contact details.
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Chase.com and AWS S3 BucketsGCP Cloud StorageAWS Elastic Container ServiceGoogle CloudRunAWS EC2 User Data and .
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was Symantec researchers.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were names, personal information, Names, Addresses, debit card numbers, Account types and numbers, encrypted personal identification numbers (PINs), financial information, Social Security numbers, addresses, Names, account numbers, Social Security numbers, passport numbers, government IDs, and contact details, customer names, Social Security Numbers, Client names, bank account details, Sensitive data, including confidential and restricted information, Taxpayer identification/social security numbers, Mortgage Loan Numbers and Customer Bank Account Details.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 1.6K.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Expect the use of ordinary and legitimate corporate software as the norm in ransomware attacks., Organizations must prioritize secure cloud configurations, regularly audit cloud storage settings, and avoid storing sensitive data in publicly accessible or misconfigured buckets. AWS, GCP, and Azure users should enable identity-checking services and monitor for exposed secrets., Highlights vulnerabilities in third-party legal service providers handling sensitive financial data.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Implement network segmentation and enhanced monitoring, Enable identity-checking services (e.g., AWS IAM), Consider placing a fraud alert or credit freeze on credit files., Be cautious of phishing attempts or scams targeting exposed PII., Adopt secure development practices to prevent misconfigurations, Affected individuals should monitor their credit reports and financial accounts for suspicious activity., Avoid storing sensitive data in user data or environment variables and Conduct regular audits of cloud storage configurations.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Tenable Report on Toxic Cloud Trilogies, Texas Attorney General’s data breach portal, Symantec researchers, Cybersecurity Dive, Regulatory filings, Vermont Office of the Attorney General and California Office of the Attorney General.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Investigation ongoing.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Notifications sent via U.S. Mail with breach details and protective guidance, Offering two years of free credit monitoring through Experian IdentityWorks, including daily credit monitoring, identity theft resolution and and $1 million in insurance coverage.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Compromised user account.
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Internal Glitch, Human Error, Improper Data Disposal, Software Issue, Misconfigured cloud storage bucketsPublic exposure of sensitive dataLack of identity-checking services in some casesOverconfidence in cloud provider security measures, Compromised user account leading to unauthorized access to shared network drive.
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Enable identity-checking servicesRegularly audit cloud configurationsRemove sensitive data from user data/environment variablesImplement enhanced monitoring, Joint review to bolster security measures.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g., execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=chase' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
