Fortinet
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
fortinet
Website:
Employees number:
15,505
Number of followers:
1,167,752
NAICS:
541514
Industry Type:
Homepage:
fortinet.com
IP Addresses:
53
Company ID:
FOR_1596759
Scan Status:
Completed
Fortinet Company CyberSecurity Posture
fortinet.com
Fortinet makes possible a digital world that we can always trust through its mission to protect people, devices, and data everywhere. This is why the world’s largest enterprises, service providers, and government organizations choose Fortinet to securely accelerate their digital journey.
Fortinet A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Fortinet Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 600 and 649
Fortinet
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Fortinet Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Fortinet
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Fortinet Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
20
Attack Types
3
Fortinet
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: Fortinet, a global cybersecurity leader, was referenced in a Sapio Research report highlighting systemic vulnerabilities across enterprises adopting AI-driven security tools. The study revealed that **86% of surveyed organizations (including Fortinet’s clients/partners) experienced one or more data breaches in 2024**, primarily due to **skill gaps in security awareness (56%)**, **lack of IT security training (54%)**, and **insufficient cybersecurity products (50%)**. While Fortinet itself wasn’t directly breached, the report underscored its ecosystem’s exposure to **AI-exploited attacks**, where cybercriminals leverage AI to bypass defenses, exacerbating risks like **misinformation, surveillance, and privacy violations (47% concern)**. The breaches—though not detailed—align with broader trends of **employee negligence, phishing, or unpatched vulnerabilities**, leading to **potential leaks of internal/customer data or financial reputational damage**. Fortinet’s response emphasizes upskilling (e.g., certifications for 62% of breach-affected firms) and AI integration, but the **lack of expert staff (48%)** remains a critical gap, amplifying attack surfaces for partners/clients using its platforms.
Fortinet
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: Fortinet, a global leader in broad, integrated, and automated cybersecurity solutions, experienced an incident that underscores the evolving challenges in cybersecurity. This incident involved unauthorized access to its networks, leading to concerns about the potential compromise of sensitive information. Fortinet's robust response to the incident included immediate investigation, implementation of additional security measures, and engagement with law enforcement and cybersecurity experts. Despite the severity of the threat, Fortinet's proactive approach and commitment to transparency helped mitigate the potential impact. This event highlights the persistent threats organizations face and the importance of advanced security protocols and swift response strategies to protect digital assets and maintain trust. Fortinet's experience serves as a reminder of the critical nature of cybersecurity vigilance in today’s interconnected digital landscape.
Fortinet
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: Fortinet experienced a targeted cyber attack wherein the SuperBlack ransomware operators exploited vulnerabilities in Fortinet firewalls. Leveraging the CVE-2024-55591 and CVE-2025-24472 vulnerabilities, attackers obtained super-admin access to Fortinet appliances, executing rapid deployment of the ransomware within 48 hours. Attackers established persistent access and prepared the ground for further intrusions by creating deceptive local VPN accounts and targeting high-value assets for data exfiltration before deploying the ransomware. The SuperBlack ransomware not only encrypts the data but includes a wiper component, WipeBlack, which eradicates traces of the ransomware activity post-encryption, complicating forensic and recovery efforts.
Fortinet (FortiClientEMS users)
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In July 2025, Fortinet’s FortiClientEMS (versions 7.2.0–7.2.2 and 7.0.1–7.0.10) was exploited by the Qilin ransomware group via **CVE-2023-48788**, a critical SQL injection vulnerability. The flaw allowed attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands through crafted HTTP requests, enabling unauthorized data access, encryption, and potential exfiltration. Qilin’s targeted exploitation of this vulnerability contributed to their dominance in the ransomware landscape, with 73 confirmed victims in July alone. Affected organizations—primarily in high-value sectors like **government, law enforcement, energy, and telecommunications**—faced operational disruptions, financial losses, and reputational damage. The attack vector’s persistence underscores systemic risks tied to unpatched enterprise systems, with Qilin leveraging the vulnerability to maximize both ransomware deployment and data leak extortion. Critical infrastructure entities were disproportionately impacted, amplifying the threat’s severity due to cascading effects on supply chains and public services.
Fortinet
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences
Description: Fortinet has patched a critical vulnerability (CVE-2025-32756) that has been exploited in the wild to compromise FortiVoice phone / conferencing systems. The vulnerability is a stack-based overflow that can lead to remote code and command execution by unauthenticated attackers. Attackers have used it to perform scans of the device network, erase system crashlogs, enable “fcgi debugging” setting to log credentials from the system or SSH login attempts, and drop malware. The vulnerability also affects FortiMail, FortiNDR, FortiRecorder, and FortiCamera, but the attackers have only used it to target FortiVoice installations. Users are advised to upgrade to fixed releases for the affected solutions.
Fortinet
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks: - Attack which causes data leak of employee of the company - Attack in which company lost current and former employees data through phishing scam
Description: A critical **OS command injection vulnerability (CVE-2025-58034, CVSS 6.7)** was discovered in **Fortinet’s FortiWeb security platform**, with confirmed active exploitation in real-world environments. The flaw (CWE-78) allows **authenticated attackers with elevated privileges** to execute **arbitrary code** via crafted HTTP requests or CLI commands, leading to **remote code execution (RCE)**. Successful exploitation enables full system compromise, **sensitive data exfiltration**, and **lateral movement** within enterprise networks. While the CVSS score is classified as *medium*, the **active exploitation and potential for complete system takeover** elevate its risk to a **high-priority remediation issue**.Fortinet released patches for affected versions (FortiWeb 8.0.2+, 7.6.6+, 7.4.11+, 7.2.12+, 7.0.12+), urging immediate upgrades. Organizations unable to patch are advised to enforce **strict access controls**, monitor logs for suspicious activity, and verify system integrity. The vulnerability, disclosed on **November 18, 2025**, poses a severe threat to enterprises relying on FortiWeb for web application security, risking **operational disruption, data breaches, and unauthorized network access** if left unaddressed.
Fortinet
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: Fortinet disclosed **CVE-2025-58034**, a **command injection zero-day vulnerability** in its **FortiWeb firewall products**, actively exploited in the wild. The flaw allows an **authenticated attacker** to execute arbitrary malicious code via crafted **CLI commands or HTTP requests**, despite its **CVSS score of 6.7 (medium severity)**. The vulnerability affects multiple versions, including **7.6.0–7.6.4, 7.4.0–7.4.8, 7.2.0–7.2.11, and 7.0.2–7.0.11**. The **U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)** added it to its **Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog**, warning of **significant risks to federal enterprises**. This marks the **second actively exploited FortiWeb vulnerability in a week**, following **CVE-2025-64446 (authentication bypass)**, indicating a **pattern of targeted attacks** on Fortinet’s web application firewall infrastructure. While no **direct data breach or ransomware deployment** has been confirmed, the **exploitation potential** poses severe risks, including **unauthorized system access, lateral movement, or follow-on attacks** like data exfiltration or service disruption. Fortinet credited **Trend Micro’s Trend Research** for responsible disclosure but has not provided details on **attacker attribution or impacted organizations**.
Fortinet
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: A threat actor exploited a Fortinet vulnerability and has exfiltrated and leaked a list of almost 500,000 Fortinet VPN login names and passwords that were allegedly scraped from exploitable devices. These VPN credentials could allow threat actors to access a network to perform data exfiltration, install malware, and perform ransomware attacks. The list of Fortinet credentials was leaked for free by a threat actor known as 'Orange,' who is the administrator of the newly launched RAMP hacking forum. The exploited Fortinet vulnerability was soon patched, but many VPN credentials were still valid.
Fortinet
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: Two proof-of-concept (PoC) exploits made public late last week for a critical SQL command injection vulnerability in Fortinet’s FortiWeb web application firewall (CVE-2025-25257). This vulnerability is expected to be leveraged by attackers soon.
Fortinet
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Fortinet disclosed a critical OS command injection vulnerability (CVE-2025-25256) in its **FortiSIEM** platform, a security information and event management (SIEM) system used for threat detection and incident response. The flaw, stemming from improper neutralization of special elements in CLI requests, allows **unauthenticated attackers** to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable systems **without user interaction**. Exploit code has already surfaced in the wild, though no confirmed attacks have been reported yet. The vulnerability affects multiple versions (6.1–7.3.1), with patches available in newer releases (e.g., 7.4, 7.3.2+). Mitigation includes restricting access to **TCP port 7900 (phMonitor service)** to trusted IPs. The lack of distinctive indicators of compromise (IoCs) complicates detection, increasing the risk of covert exploitation. Previous similar vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2023-34992) saw PoC exploits but no widespread abuse, though the critical nature of this flaw—enabling full system compromise—poses severe operational and security risks if left unpatched.
Fortinet
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has issued an urgent warning about **CVE-2025-58034**, a critical **OS command injection vulnerability** in **Fortinet FortiWeb**, which is actively exploited in real-world attacks. The flaw (CWE-78) allows **authenticated attackers** with access to the management interface or API to execute **arbitrary OS commands** via malicious HTTP requests or CLI inputs. Successful exploitation grants attackers **full control over the FortiWeb appliance**, enabling lateral movement into protected internal networks behind the firewall.Given FortiWeb’s widespread deployment across **thousands of enterprises globally**, the risk of large-scale compromise is severe. While no **direct data breach or ransomware** has been confirmed in the article, the vulnerability’s **active exploitation** poses an immediate threat to **organizational security posture**, potentially leading to **unauthorized system takeover, data exposure, or operational disruption** if left unpatched. CISA mandates **immediate patching** or mitigation (e.g., network segmentation, enhanced monitoring) to prevent escalation. Failure to remediate could result in **full infrastructure compromise**, particularly in environments where FortiWeb protects critical assets.
Fortinet
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: A critical security vulnerability, CVE-2025-25257, was discovered in FortiWeb web application firewalls, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute unauthorized SQL commands through crafted HTTP and HTTPS requests. This vulnerability, classified as CWE-89, poses a significant threat to organizations relying on FortiWeb for web application security. The flaw affects multiple FortiWeb versions and can lead to complete system compromise, data exfiltration, and service disruption. Organizations are urged to upgrade their FortiWeb installations to the patched versions immediately and consider disabling admin interfaces as a precaution.
Fortinet
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: In a significant cybersecurity incident, Fortinet faced a sophisticated cyber attack targeting its internal employee database. The attackers deployed a complex piece of malware that exploited an unknown vulnerability, leading to a massive data leak. Confidential information concerning both current and former employees was compromised, including but not limited to personal identification data, financial details, and security credentials. The breach has raised concerns about the potential for further unauthorized access and the ramifications on personal security for those affected. The company is currently cooperating with cybersecurity experts and law enforcement to mitigate the impact and prevent future occurrences. This event has put a spotlight on the ever-evolving nature of cyber threats and the importance of robust cybersecurity measures.
Fortinet
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Fortinet silently patched a **zero-day vulnerability** in its **FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF)**, versions 7.0.7 and 7.2.2, without issuing a public advisory or CVE designation. The flaw was actively exploited in the wild before disclosure, exposing organizations to **remote code execution (RCE) or WAF bypass risks**. Security researchers (WatchTowr) reverse-engineered the firmware updates, confirming malicious actors were probing unpatched FortiWeb instances. The lack of transparency delayed critical patching, leaving enterprises vulnerable to **post-compromise attacks**, including potential **data breaches, unauthorized access to web applications, or lateral movement within networks**. While Fortinet later acknowledged the fix under generic 'security hardening' notes, the delayed advisory increased operational risks, as defenders lacked context to prioritize mitigation. The incident highlights systemic risks when perimeter defenses like WAFs—often guarding sensitive data—are overlooked in patch management, amplifying exposure to **sophisticated threat actors leveraging zero-days for high-impact intrusions**.
Fortinet
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: A critical **path traversal vulnerability (CVE pending)** in Fortinet’s **FortiWeb web application firewall (WAF)** is being actively exploited globally, allowing unauthenticated attackers to **create administrative accounts** on unpatched devices. The flaw, present in versions **8.0.1 and earlier**, enables threat actors to bypass authentication via a crafted HTTP POST request to the endpoint `/api/v2.0/cmdb/system/admin%3f/../../../../../cgi-bin/fwbcgi`. Attackers are automating mass scans and deploying preconfigured credentials (e.g., usernames like *Testpoint*, *trader1*; passwords like *3eMIXX43*, *AFT3$tH4ck*) to gain persistent admin access.Security researchers (**Defused, PwnDefend, watchTowr Labs**) confirm **widespread exploitation**, with IPs (e.g., *107.152.41.19*, *144.31.1.63*) linked to unauthorized account creation. While Fortinet released a patch (**8.0.2**) in late October, the lack of a public advisory or CVE assignment delays mitigation awareness. Organizations are urged to **immediately update**, audit admin accounts, block public access to management interfaces, and inspect logs for `fwbcgi` requests. The vulnerability serves as a **foothold for deeper network infiltration**, risking lateral movement into corporate environments if left unaddressed.
Fortinet
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) identified a critical **path-traversal vulnerability (CVE-2025-64446)** in Fortinet’s **FortiWeb web application firewall**, allowing unauthenticated attackers to gain **administrative access** via malicious HTTP/HTTPS requests. Exploitation grants deep network visibility, enabling attackers to **disable security controls, intercept sensitive data, or pivot laterally** across systems. While no confirmed ransomware link exists, the flaw’s severity—coupled with active exploitation—poses a **high risk of unauthorized access, data exposure, or system compromise**. CISA mandated a **7-day patching deadline** for federal agencies, urging all organizations to apply mitigations immediately. Failure to remediate could lead to **full administrative takeover of FortiWeb devices**, compromising protected applications and facilitating broader network infiltration. The vulnerability’s inclusion in CISA’s **Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog** underscores its criticality and ongoing abuse by threat actors.
Fortinet
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: The critical **CVE-2025-64446** vulnerability in **Fortinet FortiWeb WAF** allows unauthenticated attackers to gain **administrative access** via a **relative path-traversal flaw (CWE-23)**. Exploitation enables full system control, including **disabling security measures, intercepting sensitive data (e.g., credentials, financial transactions), and lateral movement into corporate networks**. While no confirmed ransomware link exists, the flaw’s severity—**CVSS Critical**—and active exploitation by threat actors pose **immediate operational risks**, including **data breaches, unauthorized command execution, and potential downstream infrastructure compromise**. CISA’s **7-day remediation deadline (Nov 21, 2025)** underscores the urgency, with federal agencies and private organizations at risk of **deep network infiltration, privilege escalation, and exposure of protected applications**. Failure to patch could lead to **sustained attacker presence, data exfiltration, or disruption of business-critical services**.
Fortinet
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued an urgent warning about **CVE-2025-64446**, a critical **relative path traversal vulnerability (CWE-23)** in Fortinet’s **FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF)**. This flaw allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication and execute **administrative commands remotely**, turning a defensive security appliance into an entry point for deeper network compromise. Exploitation is already active, targeting sectors like **finance, healthcare, and managed hosting**, where FortiWeb protects customer-facing applications.The vulnerability affects versions up to **7.4.7 and 7.6.5**, with patches (7.4.8, 7.6.6) available but adoption lagging. Attackers leveraging this flaw could **disable protections, exfiltrate sensitive data, deploy malware, or pivot into internal networks**. CISA mandated federal agencies to remediate by **November 21, 2025**, under **Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01**, warning that unpatched systems risk becoming **pivot points for ransomware or multi-stage attacks**. While Fortinet confirmed no customer data breaches yet, the **active exploitation in critical sectors** elevates the risk of **large-scale data leaks, operational disruption, or lateral movement into high-value systems** if left unaddressed.
Fortinet
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: A critical zero-day vulnerability affecting multiple Fortinet products has been actively exploited. The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-32756, enables unauthenticated remote code execution through a stack-based buffer overflow flaw. Attackers have been conducting network reconnaissance, erasing system logs, and capturing credentials. Several IP addresses have been identified as associated with the threat actors. Malicious files have been deployed on compromised systems to maintain long-term access. Organizations are urged to apply security patches immediately.
Fortinet
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: Fortinet faced criticism for silently patching **two zero-day vulnerabilities** in its **FortiWeb web application firewall (WAF)** without adequately informing customers. The first, **CVE-2025-64446 (FG-IR-25-910)**, disclosed on **November 14**, is a **critical** flaw (CVSS 9.4) combining **path traversal** and **authentication bypass** weaknesses in the GUI. The second, **CVE-2025-58034 (FG-IR-25-513)**, revealed **four days later**, is part of the same attack chain. Both vulnerabilities were exploited in the wild before public disclosure, exposing organizations to **unauthorized access, data breaches, or system compromise**.The lack of transparency erodes trust, as customers were left unaware of active exploitation risks. While no **direct data theft or financial loss** was confirmed in the article, the **critical severity of the flaws**—particularly the authentication bypass—poses a **high risk of system takeover, lateral movement, or follow-on attacks** (e.g., ransomware, data exfiltration). The silent patching approach undermines incident response preparedness, potentially allowing threat actors to maintain persistence in compromised environments. The reputational damage from **poor vulnerability disclosure practices** further compounds the impact, as security researchers and customers question Fortinet’s commitment to transparency and proactive risk communication.
Fortinet Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Fortinet
Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)
Fortinet has 2726.09% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
Fortinet has 1931.25% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types Fortinet vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)
Fortinet reported 13 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 13 vulnerabilities, 0 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — Fortinet (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fortinet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Fortinet Company Subsidiaries
Fortinet makes possible a digital world that we can always trust through its mission to protect people, devices, and data everywhere. This is why the world’s largest enterprises, service providers, and government organizations choose Fortinet to securely accelerate their digital journey.
Loading...
Fortinet Similar Companies
CrowdStrike
CrowdStrike (Nasdaq: CRWD), a global cybersecurity leader, has redefined modern security with the world’s most advanced cloud-native platform for protecting critical areas of enterprise risk — endpoints and cloud workloads, identity and data. Powered by the CrowdStrike Security Cloud and world-clas
Palo Alto Networks, the global cybersecurity leader, is shaping the cloud-centric future with technology that is transforming the way people and organizations operate. Our mission is to be the cybersecurity partner of choice, protecting our digital way of life. We help address the world's greatest s
.png)
Fortinet CyberSecurity News
November 17, 2025 05:01 PM
Critical vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb is under exploitation
The company faces criticism as multiple researchers claim a silent patch was issued weeks before official guidance was released.
November 17, 2025 01:51 PM
FortiWeb’s Fatal Flaw: Inside the CVE-2025-9242 Exploitation Wave
In the shadowy underbelly of cybersecurity, where firewalls are meant to stand as impregnable barriers, a critical vulnerability has exposed...
November 17, 2025 01:36 PM
CISA gives federal agencies one week to patch exploited Fortinet bug
U.S. government agencies have been given a shorter window than usual to patch a critical vulnerability affecting Fortinet's FortiWeb...
November 17, 2025 01:02 PM
CISA Warns of Fortinet FortiWeb WAF Vulnerability Exploited in the Wild to Gain Admin Access
CISA has issued an urgent alert about a critical vulnerability in Fortinet's FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF), actively exploited by...
November 17, 2025 12:34 PM
⚡ Weekly Recap: Fortinet Exploited, China's AI Hacks, PhaaS Empire Falls & More
Fortinet CVE exploited, China-linked AI attacks exposed, PhaaS platform dismantled, and fake crypto apps deploy RATs.
November 17, 2025 09:10 AM
Fortinet reports third quarter 2025 financial results
Revenue grew 14% year over year to $1.72 billion and product revenue grew 18% year over year to $559.3 million.
November 17, 2025 05:21 AM
Critical Vulnerability in FortiWeb Web Application Firewall
Fortinet has released security updates to address a critical severity vulnerability in FortiWeb Web Application Firewall.
November 17, 2025 02:30 AM
US cyber agency warns of active exploitation of Fortinet FortiWeb path traversal vulnerability
Security experts warned of exploitation last week, and now CISA and Fortinet have both released advisories regarding CVE-2025-64446.
November 16, 2025 09:00 AM
Week in review: Windows kernel flaw patched, suspected Fortinet FortiWeb zero-day exploited
Here's an overview of some of last week's most interesting news, articles, interviews and videos: Adopting a counterintelligence mindset in...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Fortinet CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Fortinet
The official website of Fortinet is https://www.fortinet.com.
Fortinet’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Fortinet’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 628, reflecting their Poor security posture.
How many security badges does Fortinet’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Fortinet currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Fortinet have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Fortinet is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Fortinet have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Fortinet does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Fortinet comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Fortinet is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Fortinet have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Fortinet does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Fortinet comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Fortinet is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Fortinet have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Fortinet is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Fortinet
Fortinet operates primarily in the Computer and Network Security industry.
Number of Employees at Fortinet
Fortinet employs approximately 15,505 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Fortinet
Fortinet presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Fortinet’s LinkedIn Followers
Fortinet’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 1,167,752 followers.
NAICS Classification of Fortinet
Fortinet is classified under the NAICS code 541514, which corresponds to Others.
Fortinet’s Presence on Crunchbase
Yes, Fortinet has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/fortinet.
Fortinet’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Fortinet maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/fortinet.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Fortinet
As of November 30, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Fortinet has experienced 20 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Fortinet has an estimated 2,802 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Fortinet ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach, Ransomware and Vulnerability.
How does Fortinet detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an remediation measures with patching the vulnerability, and third party assistance with cybersecurity experts, and and and and and remediation measures with users are advised to upgrade to fixed releases for the affected solutions., and containment measures with disable http/https administrative interfaces on affected devices, and remediation measures with apply security patches to the following minimum versions: fortivoice 7.2.1+, 7.0.7+, or 6.4.11+; fortimail 7.6.3+, 7.4.5+, 7.2.8+, or 7.0.9+; fortindr 7.6.1+, 7.4.8+, 7.2.5+, or 7.0.7+; fortirecorder 7.2.4+, 7.0.6+, or 6.4.6+; and forticamera 2.1.4+, and enhanced monitoring with block and monitor for connections from the following ip addresses: 198.105.127.124, 43.228.217.173, 43.228.217.82, 156.236.76.90, 218.187.69.244, and 218.187.69.59, and containment measures with disable the http/https administrative interface, and remediation measures with upgrade to patched versions, remediation measures with network segmentation, remediation measures with access controls, remediation measures with continuous monitoring, and and and containment measures with restrict access to phmonitor port (tcp/7900) to trusted internal hosts/ips, and remediation measures with upgrade to patched versions: fortisiem 7.4, 7.3.2+, 7.2.6+, 7.1.8+, 7.0.4+, or 6.7.10+, and communication strategy with public advisory with patch recommendations, communication strategy with subscription-based breaking news alerts, and remediation measures with proactive patch management (recommended), remediation measures with vulnerability remediation programs (recommended), remediation measures with securing internet-facing applications (recommended), remediation measures with robust network segmentation (recommended), and network segmentation with recommended to limit blast radius, and enhanced monitoring with recommended for early detection, and containment measures with upskilling programs (61% report improved skills via certifications), containment measures with mandatory cybersecurity training (62% post-breach), and remediation measures with investment in ai security tools, remediation measures with cross-functional collaboration (ai specialists + security teams), remediation measures with prompt engineering training, and recovery measures with reskilling employees (48% retention tactic), recovery measures with partnerships with universities/certification bodies, and communication strategy with public report (oct. 8, 2024), communication strategy with media interviews (e.g., dice, fortinet experts), and enhanced monitoring with ai-driven threat detection, enhanced monitoring with real-time visibility tools, and and third party assistance with pwndefend, third party assistance with defused research team, third party assistance with watchtowr labs, third party assistance with rapid7, and containment measures with update to fortiweb 8.0.2, containment measures with review administrative user lists for unexpected accounts, containment measures with inspect logs for requests to `fwbcgi` path, containment measures with block public internet access to management interfaces, containment measures with restrict access to trusted networks or vpn-only channels, and remediation measures with apply firmware patch (8.0.2), remediation measures with remove unauthorized admin accounts, and communication strategy with security advisories from researchers (pwndefend, watchtowr labs), communication strategy with media reports urging immediate action, and network segmentation with restrict management interface access, and enhanced monitoring with log inspection for `fwbcgi` endpoint activity, and third party assistance with watchtowr (threat intelligence firm), and containment measures with immediate patching to versions 7.0.7 or 7.2.2 recommended, and remediation measures with traffic analysis for signs of post-compromise activity, remediation measures with strengthened monitoring of waf logs for anomalous requests, and communication strategy with generic patch notes referencing 'security hardening', communication strategy with no direct acknowledgment of in-the-wild exploitation initially, and enhanced monitoring with monitoring of waf logs for anomalous requests, and containment measures with apply security patches, containment measures with discontinue use of affected products (if mitigations unavailable), and remediation measures with patch fortiweb deployments per fortinet’s vendor instructions, remediation measures with follow bod 22-01 guidance for cloud services, remediation measures with review access logs for suspicious http/https requests, and communication strategy with cisa advisory (kev catalog addition), communication strategy with vendor notification (fortinet), and network segmentation with implement to limit lateral movement if fortiweb is compromised, and enhanced monitoring with monitor for exploitation attempts via http/https requests, and containment measures with network segmentation to limit lateral movement, and remediation measures with apply security patches per fortinet’s vendor instructions, remediation measures with implement bod 22-01 guidance for cloud services, remediation measures with discontinue use of affected products if mitigations unavailable, remediation measures with review access logs for suspicious http/https requests, and and enhanced monitoring with review access logs for exploitation attempts, and third party assistance with reported by jason mcfadyen (trend micro) under responsible disclosure, and remediation measures with cisa added to known exploited vulnerabilities catalog, remediation measures with fortinet likely working on patches (not explicitly stated), and communication strategy with public advisory by fortiguard labs, communication strategy with cisa advisory issued, and incident response plan activated with cisa binding operational directive (bod) 22-01 for federal agencies, and containment measures with isolate affected fortiweb appliances from broader network communication, containment measures with restrict administrative access via network segmentation and vpn-only pathways, containment measures with monitor for unfamiliar administrative activity or web traffic anomalies, and remediation measures with apply patches (7.4.8 or 7.6.6) immediately, remediation measures with remove or replace unpatchable appliances, and communication strategy with cisa advisory, communication strategy with fortinet security bulletin (fg-ir-25-910), and network segmentation with restrict administrative access to fortiweb appliances, and enhanced monitoring with sustained monitoring of access logs, unexpected requests, and outbound connections, and containment measures with network segmentation to restrict management access, containment measures with discontinuing use of affected product if patches/workarounds are insufficient, and remediation measures with apply security patches provided by fortinet, remediation measures with follow bod 22-01 guidance for cloud deployments, remediation measures with verify fortiweb version and cross-reference with fortinet’s advisory, and communication strategy with cisa alert issued, communication strategy with fortinet advisory published, communication strategy with public disclosure via media (e.g., google news, linkedin, x), and network segmentation with recommended to restrict management access, and enhanced monitoring with monitor fortiweb logs for suspicious authentication attempts, enhanced monitoring with track unusual cli commands, enhanced monitoring with detect command execution activities deviating from normal operations, and containment measures with upgrade to patched versions (8.0.2+, 7.6.6+, 7.4.11+, 7.2.12+, 7.0.12+), containment measures with restrict authenticated access to fortiweb systems, containment measures with monitor logs for suspicious command execution patterns, and remediation measures with patch management (priority testing in non-production environments before deployment), remediation measures with review historical logs for exploitation attempts, remediation measures with verify system integrity on affected deployments, and enhanced monitoring with recommended for unpatched systems, and remediation measures with silent patching of vulnerabilities (criticized for lack of transparency)..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Fortinet VPN Credential Leak
Description: A threat actor exploited a Fortinet vulnerability and has exfiltrated and leaked a list of almost 500,000 Fortinet VPN login names and passwords that were allegedly scraped from exploitable devices. These VPN credentials could allow threat actors to access a network to perform data exfiltration, install malware, and perform ransomware attacks. The list of Fortinet credentials was leaked for free by a threat actor known as 'Orange,' who is the administrator of the newly launched RAMP hacking forum. The exploited Fortinet vulnerability was soon patched, but many VPN credentials were still valid.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Vulnerability
Vulnerability Exploited: Fortinet VPN vulnerability
Threat Actor: Orange
Motivation: Unspecified
Title: Fortinet Employee Database Breach
Description: Fortinet faced a sophisticated cyber attack targeting its internal employee database. The attackers deployed a complex piece of malware that exploited an unknown vulnerability, leading to a massive data leak. Confidential information concerning both current and former employees was compromised, including but not limited to personal identification data, financial details, and security credentials.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Malware
Vulnerability Exploited: Unknown vulnerability
Title: Fortinet Cybersecurity Incident
Description: Fortinet, a global leader in broad, integrated, and automated cybersecurity solutions, experienced an incident that involved unauthorized access to its networks, leading to concerns about the potential compromise of sensitive information.
Type: Unauthorized Access
Title: Fortinet Cyber Attack by SuperBlack Ransomware
Description: Fortinet experienced a targeted cyber attack wherein the SuperBlack ransomware operators exploited vulnerabilities in Fortinet firewalls. Leveraging the CVE-2024-55591 and CVE-2025-24472 vulnerabilities, attackers obtained super-admin access to Fortinet appliances, executing rapid deployment of the ransomware within 48 hours. Attackers established persistent access and prepared the ground for further intrusions by creating deceptive local VPN accounts and targeting high-value assets for data exfiltration before deploying the ransomware. The SuperBlack ransomware not only encrypts the data but includes a wiper component, WipeBlack, which eradicates traces of the ransomware activity post-encryption, complicating forensic and recovery efforts.
Type: Ransomware
Attack Vector: Exploited vulnerabilities in Fortinet firewalls
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2024-55591CVE-2025-24472
Threat Actor: SuperBlack ransomware operators
Motivation: Data exfiltration and ransom
Title: Fortinet Critical Vulnerability Exploitation
Description: Fortinet has patched a critical vulnerability (CVE-2025-32756) that has been exploited in the wild to compromise FortiVoice phone / conferencing systems. The vulnerability is a stack-based overflow that can lead to remote code and command execution by unauthenticated attackers. Attackers have used it to perform scans of the device network, erase system crashlogs, enable “fcgi debugging” setting to log credentials from the system or SSH login attempts, and drop malware. The vulnerability also affects FortiMail, FortiNDR, FortiRecorder, and FortiCamera, but the attackers have only used it to target FortiVoice installations. Users are advised to upgrade to fixed releases for the affected solutions.
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-32756
Motivation: Scanning device networkErasing system crashlogsEnabling 'fcgi debugging' setting to log credentialsDropping malware
Title: Critical Zero-Day Vulnerability in Fortinet Products (CVE-2025-32756)
Description: A new proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit for a critical zero-day vulnerability affecting multiple Fortinet products raises urgent concerns about the security of enterprise network infrastructure.
Type: Zero-Day Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-32756
Motivation: Comprehensive compromise operations
Title: Critical SQL Injection Vulnerability in FortiWeb Web Application Firewalls
Description: A critical security vulnerability has been discovered in FortiWeb web application firewalls that enables unauthenticated attackers to execute unauthorized SQL commands through specially crafted HTTP and HTTPS requests. This vulnerability, classified as CWE-89 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command), represents a significant threat to organizations relying on FortiWeb for web application security.
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: SQL Injection
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-25257
Motivation: Unauthorized data access and manipulation
Title: Google Chrome Zero-Day Vulnerability (CVE-2025-6558) and FortiWeb RCE Vulnerability (CVE-2025-25257)
Description: Google has patched a Chrome zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-6558) exploited by attackers. Additionally, two proof-of-concept (PoC) exploits for a critical SQL command injection vulnerability in Fortinet’s FortiWeb web application firewall (CVE-2025-25257) have been made public.
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: Browser ExploitSQL Injection
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-6558CVE-2025-25257
Title: Critical OS Command Injection Vulnerability (CVE-2025-25256) in FortiSIEM
Description: Fortinet has released patches for a critical OS command injection vulnerability (CVE-2025-25256) in FortiSIEM, after practical exploit code surfaced in the wild. The vulnerability, caused by improper neutralization of special elements, allows unauthenticated attackers to execute unauthorized code or commands on vulnerable devices via specially crafted CLI requests. No user interaction is required. The vulnerability affects multiple versions of FortiSIEM, and admins are advised to upgrade to patched versions or restrict access to the phMonitor port (TCP port 7900) if immediate patching is not feasible.
Type: Vulnerability
Attack Vector: NetworkUnauthenticated CLI Requests
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-25256 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in FortiSIEM)
Title: Qilin Ransomware Group Dominates July 2025 with 73 Victims, Exploiting Critical Enterprise Vulnerabilities
Description: The Qilin ransomware group maintained its dominant position in July 2025, claiming 73 victims (17.3% of 423 total ransomware incidents). The group systematically exploited seven critical vulnerabilities, including CVE-2023-48788 (Fortinet FortiClientEMS SQL injection), CVE-2019-18935 (Telerik UI deserialization), and CVE-2025-5777 (Citrix NetScaler out-of-bounds read). Targets included U.S. critical infrastructure (government, energy, telecom) and supply chain entities via compromised software providers. The U.S. accounted for 223 victims, with Qilin outpacing competitors like INC Ransom (59 victims).
Date Detected: 2025-07-01
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-08-01
Type: Ransomware Attack
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities (CVE-2023-48788, CVE-2019-18935, CVE-2025-5777, etc.)SQL Injection (Fortinet FortiClientEMS)Deserialization Attack (Progress Telerik UI)Out-of-Bounds Read (Citrix NetScaler)Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) OperationsSupply Chain Attacks via Compromised Software Providers
Threat Actor: Name: Qilin Ransomware GroupType: Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) OperatorAttribution: {'confidence': 'High', 'source': 'Cyble Research'}Tactics: ['Persistent Targeting of High-Value Western Entities', 'Exploitation of Critical Infrastructure', 'Supply Chain Compromise via Software Providers', 'Systematic Vulnerability Weaponization']Historical Activity: Dominant for 3 of the last 4 months (as of July 2025)
Motivation: Financial GainOperational DisruptionData Exfiltration for Extortion
Title: AI Skills Shortage and Cybersecurity Challenges in Global Enterprises
Description: A report by Sapio Research and Fortinet highlights that 97% of global enterprises use or plan to deploy AI-driven security tools, but 48% cite a lack of AI expertise as the biggest challenge. The study, based on 1,850 IT/cybersecurity decision-makers across 29 countries, reveals that 86% of organizations experienced one or more data breaches in 2024, primarily due to workforce skill gaps (e.g., 56% lack security awareness, 54% lack IT security skills/training, 50% lack cybersecurity products). Executives emphasize the need for upskilling, certifications, and cross-functional collaboration to address AI-driven threats like prompt injection and misinformation. The cybersecurity job market remains robust, with over 500,000 open U.S. positions, 10% requiring AI knowledge.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-10-08
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Lack of Security Awareness (56%)Lack of IT Security Skills/Training (54%)Insufficient Cybersecurity Products (50%)AI Exploitation (e.g., Prompt Injection, Misinformation)
Vulnerability Exploited: Human ErrorSkill Gaps in WorkforceInadequate Training ProgramsAI Platform Misconfiguration
Threat Actor: Cybercriminals Leveraging AIInternal Threats Due to Lack of Awareness
Motivation: Financial GainData TheftDisruption of OperationsExploitation of AI Systems
Title: Global Exploitation of Path Traversal Vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb Web Application Firewall
Description: A recently uncovered path traversal vulnerability in Fortinet’s FortiWeb web application firewall (CVE not yet assigned) is being exploited globally. Attackers are creating new administrative accounts on unpatched devices without authentication. The flaw, fixed in FortiWeb 8.0.2, was first observed in early October 2024. Exploitation involves sending crafted HTTP POST requests to the endpoint `/api/v2.0/cmdb/system/admin%3f/../../../../../cgi-bin/fwbcgi`, bypassing authentication to generate admin-level accounts. Observed malicious usernames include 'Testpoint', 'trader1', and 'trader', with passwords like '3eMIXX43' and 'AFT3$tH4ckmet0d4yaga!n'. Attacks are automated, originating from IPs such as 107.152.41.19, 144.31.1.63, and blocks within 185.192.70.0/24. Security firms (PwnDefend, Defused, watchTowr Labs, Rapid7) confirmed the exploit and urged immediate patching (to 8.0.2) and system reviews for unauthorized accounts.
Date Detected: 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z
Type: Unauthorized Access
Attack Vector: NetworkExploit Public-Facing Application
Vulnerability Exploited: Name: FortiWeb Path Traversal Vulnerability (Unassigned CVE), Description: Path traversal flaw in `/api/v2.0/cmdb/system/admin%3f/../../../../../cgi-bin/fwbcgi` allowing unauthenticated admin account creation via crafted HTTP POST requests., FortiWeb 8.0.1 and earlierPatched Version: 8.0.2, Severity: Critical.
Threat Actor: Unknown (Automated Mass Scanning)Multiple Attackers
Motivation: Unauthorized AccessLateral MovementPotential Foothold for Further Attacks
Title: Fortinet Silently Patches Zero-Day Vulnerability in FortiWeb WAF
Description: Security researchers confirmed that Fortinet silently patched a zero-day vulnerability in its FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF), which was exploited in the wild before the fix was disclosed. The lack of public advisory or CVE designation at the time of patch release has raised concerns about transparency and timely mitigation guidance. The vulnerability was identified through reverse-engineering by WatchTowr researchers, who observed in-the-wild exploitation attempts likely targeting remote code execution or WAF protection bypasses. Fortinet later updated its advisory database with generic patch notes referencing 'security hardening,' but without directly acknowledging the active exploitation. The incident highlights operational risks due to delayed disclosure and underscores the importance of defense-in-depth strategies for perimeter-facing security devices like WAFs.
Type: Zero-day vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote code executionWAF protection bypass
Vulnerability Exploited: Unnamed critical vulnerability in FortiWeb WAF (no CVE assigned)
Title: Critical Fortinet FortiWeb Path Traversal Vulnerability (CVE-2025-64446) Actively Exploited
Description: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has added a critical Fortinet FortiWeb vulnerability (CVE-2025-64446) to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. The flaw, a relative path traversal vulnerability (CWE-23), allows unauthenticated attackers to gain administrative access to affected systems via specially crafted HTTP/HTTPS requests. CISA warns of active exploitation in the wild and mandates remediation by November 21, 2025, for federal agencies under BOD 22-01. The vulnerability poses severe risks, including potential ransomware initial access, deep network visibility, and security control bypass.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-11-14
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: NetworkHTTP/HTTPS Requests
Vulnerability Exploited: Cve Id: CVE-2025-64446, Cwe Id: CWE-23, Description: Relative path traversal vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb web application firewall, allowing unauthenticated administrative command execution via crafted requests., Cvss Score: None, Affected Versions: None.
Motivation: Unauthorized AccessPotential Ransomware Initial AccessData TheftLateral Movement
Title: Critical Fortinet FortiWeb Path Traversal Vulnerability (CVE-2025-64446) Actively Exploited
Description: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has added a critical Fortinet FortiWeb vulnerability (CVE-2025-64446) to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. This relative path-traversal flaw enables unauthenticated attackers to gain administrative access to affected FortiWeb WAF systems by sending crafted HTTP/HTTPS requests. Exploitation grants full privileges, allowing attackers to execute commands, disable security controls, intercept sensitive data, and pivot laterally within corporate networks. CISA mandates remediation by November 21, 2025, for federal agencies under BOD 22-01 and strongly recommends all organizations prioritize patching.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-11-14
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: NetworkHTTP/HTTPS Requests
Vulnerability Exploited: Cve Id: CVE-2025-64446, Vendor: Fortinet, Product: FortiWeb WAF, Vulnerability Type: Relative Path Traversal, Cwe Id: CWE-23, Cvss Score: Critical, Authentication Required: False, Active Exploitation: True.
Title: Exploited Command Injection Zero-Day in Fortinet FortiWeb Firewall Products (CVE-2025-58034)
Description: A command injection zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-58034) in Fortinet’s FortiWeb firewall products is being actively exploited in the wild. The vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker to execute malicious code via crafted CLI commands or HTTP requests. It has a CVSS score of 6.7 (medium severity) but poses significant risks due to ongoing exploitation. The issue impacts versions 7.6.0–7.6.4, 7.4.0–7.4.8, 7.2.0–7.2.11, and 7.0.2–7.0.11. CISA has added it to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-11-18
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: Authenticated AttackCrafted CLI CommandsMalicious HTTP Requests
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-58034 (Command Injection in FortiWeb)
Title: Critical Path Traversal Vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb WAF (CVE-2025-64446)
Description: The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has issued an urgent warning concerning a critical flaw in Fortinet’s FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF), tracked as CVE-2025-64446. The vulnerability involves a relative path traversal weakness (CWE-23) that allows attackers to bypass authentication and execute administrative commands directly on the device. It has been added to CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, with a mandatory remediation deadline of November 21, 2025, for federal agencies. Active exploitation has been observed in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and managed hosting, with threat actors leveraging the flaw to gain administrative access, disable protections, exfiltrate data, or pivot deeper into networks.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-11-14
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: NetworkRemote Code Execution (RCE)Authentication Bypass
Vulnerability Exploited: Cve Id: CVE-2025-64446, Cwe Id: CWE-23, Description: Relative path traversal weakness allowing unauthenticated administrative command execution via crafted HTTP/HTTPS requests., FortiWeb builds up to 7.4.7FortiWeb builds up to 7.6.57.4.87.6.6
Motivation: Opportunistic ExploitationPotential Data ExfiltrationLateral MovementPersistence
Title: Critical OS Command Injection Vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb (CVE-2025-58034) Actively Exploited
Description: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has issued an urgent alert regarding a critical OS command injection vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb (CVE-2025-58034). The flaw allows authenticated attackers to execute unauthorized code on affected systems via crafted HTTP requests or CLI commands, bypassing security controls and potentially compromising the entire appliance and protected infrastructure behind the firewall. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-78 and is actively exploited in real-world attacks. CISA recommends immediate patching, mitigation strategies, or discontinuing use if remediation is not possible.
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: NetworkAuthenticated Access via Management Interface/APICrafted HTTP RequestsCLI Commands
Vulnerability Exploited: Cve Id: CVE-2025-58034, Cwe Id: CWE-78, Description: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection'), Cvss Score: None, Affected Versions: None, Patch Status: Patches released by Fortinet; immediate deployment recommended.
Title: Critical OS Command Injection Vulnerability in Fortinet’s FortiWeb (CVE-2025-58034)
Description: A critical OS command injection vulnerability (CVE-2025-58034) has been discovered in Fortinet’s FortiWeb security platform, allowing authenticated attackers with elevated privileges to execute arbitrary code via crafted HTTP requests or CLI commands. Active exploitation has been confirmed in real-world environments. The flaw stems from improper neutralization of special elements in OS commands (CWE-78), enabling remote code execution (RCE), system compromise, data exfiltration, or lateral movement within networks. Fortinet disclosed the vulnerability on November 18, 2025, with advisory reference FG-IR-25-513. Immediate patching to versions 8.0.2+, 7.6.6+, 7.4.11+, 7.2.12+, or 7.0.12+ is required. Organizations unable to patch should enforce stricter access controls and monitor logs for suspicious activity.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-11-18
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: Network (Authenticated, Elevated Privileges Required)
Vulnerability Exploited: Cve Id: CVE-2025-58034, Cwe Id: CWE-78, Cvss Score: 6.7, Cvss Severity: Medium (High Priority Due to Active Exploitation), Advisory Reference: FG-IR-25-513, Discoverer: Jason McFadyen (Trend Micro).
Title: Fortinet FortiWeb Zero-Day Vulnerabilities Exploited in Attack Chain
Description: Fortinet was criticized for silently patching two zero-day vulnerabilities in its FortiWeb web application firewall without informing customers. The vulnerabilities, CVE-2025-64446 (critical, CVSS 9.4) and CVE-2025-58034, were disclosed on November 14 and November 18, respectively. CVE-2025-64446 includes a path traversal flaw and an authentication bypass weakness, both part of the same attack chain.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-11-142025-11-18
Type: Zero-day exploitation
Attack Vector: Path traversal (CVE-2025-64446)Authentication bypass (CVE-2025-64446)
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-64446 (FG-IR-25-910)CVE-2025-58034 (FG-IR-25-513)
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Vulnerability.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Fortinet VPN vulnerability, Vulnerabilities in Fortinet firewalls, Unauthenticated attackers exploiting the vulnerability, AuthHash cookie parameter within the /remote/hostcheck_validate endpoint, HTTP/HTTPS administrative interface, phMonitor service (TCP/7900) via crafted CLI requests, Exploited Vulnerabilities (e.g., Fortinet, Telerik, Citrix, SharePoint)Compromised Software Providers (Supply Chain), Phishing (Likely)Exploited AI ToolsUnpatched Systems Due to Skill Gaps, Path traversal vulnerability in `/api/v2.0/cmdb/system/admin%3f/../../../../../cgi-bin/fwbcgi`, FortiWeb Path Traversal (CVE-2025-64446), Exposed FortiWeb WAF (HTTP/HTTPS), FortiWeb CLIHTTP Requests, FortiWeb WAF path traversal vulnerability (CVE-2025-64446) and FortiWeb management interfaceAPI access.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach FOR223227123
Data Compromised: Vpn login names, Vpn passwords
Systems Affected: Fortinet VPN devices
Incident : Data Breach FOR912050824
Data Compromised: Personal identification data, Financial details, Security credentials
Incident : Ransomware FOR001032225
Systems Affected: Fortinet appliances
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR548051425
Systems Affected: FortiVoiceFortiMailFortiNDRFortiRecorderFortiCamera
Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability FOR300060925
Systems Affected: FortiVoiceFortiMailFortiNDRFortiRecorderFortiCamera
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR553070925
Data Compromised: Sensitive data stored in the backend database
Systems Affected: FortiWeb web application firewalls
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR705072025
Systems Affected: Google ChromeFortinet FortiWeb
Incident : Vulnerability FOR453081325
Systems Affected: FortiSIEM versions 7.3.0–7.3.1, 7.2.0–7.2.5, 7.1.0–7.1.7, 7.0.0–7.0.3, 6.7.0–6.7.9, and older branches (6.6, 6.5, 6.4, 6.3, 6.2, 6.1, 5.4)
Operational Impact: Potential unauthorized code executionRisk of system compromise via phMonitor service (TCP/7900)
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to unpatched systems being exploitable
Incident : Ransomware Attack FOR753081525
Data Compromised: High (critical infrastructure and supply chain data)
Systems Affected: Fortinet FortiClientEMSProgress Telerik UI for ASP.NET AJAXCitrix NetScaler ADC/GatewayMicrosoft SharePointGovernment/Law Enforcement SystemsEnergy/Utilities InfrastructureTelecommunications NetworksApplication Software Providers (Supply Chain)
Operational Impact: Severe (critical infrastructure disruption, supply chain risks)
Brand Reputation Impact: High (public disclosure of 73 victims)
Identity Theft Risk: Likely (given data exfiltration patterns)
Payment Information Risk: Possible (depends on compromised systems)
Incident : Data Breach FOR3202332101525
Operational Impact: Increased Breach Frequency (86% of orgs in 2024)Heightened Risk Due to Skill Shortages (67%)Reactive Cybersecurity Posture
Brand Reputation Impact: Erosion of Trust Due to Repeated BreachesPerception of Inadequate Security Measures
Incident : Unauthorized Access FOR1532815111725
Systems Affected: FortiWeb appliances (unpatched versions)
Operational Impact: Potential unauthorized administrative accessRisk of lateral movement into corporate networks
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage for Fortinet and affected organizations
Incident : Zero-day vulnerability FOR5592655111725
Systems Affected: FortiWeb WAF devices (versions prior to 7.0.7 and 7.2.2)
Operational Impact: Potential exposure of mission-critical assets due to delayed patchingIncreased risk of post-compromise activity if unpatched
Brand Reputation Impact: Criticism from security community over lack of transparencyErosion of trust in vendor disclosure practices
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2232822111825
Systems Affected: Fortinet FortiWeb Web Application Firewall
Operational Impact: Potential Bypass of Security ControlsNetwork Visibility for AttackersLateral Movement Risk
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential Reputation Damage Due to Exploitation of Critical Security Flaw
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4992549111825
Data Compromised: Potential interception of sensitive data passing through waf
Systems Affected: Fortinet FortiWeb WAFProtected applicationsDownstream infrastructure
Operational Impact: Administrative access to WAFCommand execution with full privilegesSecurity control bypassLateral movement risk
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to exploitation of critical infrastructure
Payment Information Risk: ['Potential interception of sensitive data (e.g., payment info) if transmitted through WAF']
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR0562105111925
Systems Affected: FortiWeb Firewall Products (versions 7.6.0–7.6.4, 7.4.0–7.4.8, 7.2.0–7.2.11, 7.0.2–7.0.11)
Operational Impact: Potential unauthorized code executionRisk to federal enterprise systems (per CISA)
Brand Reputation Impact: Negative publicity due to repeated vulnerabilities in Fortinet products
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2762227111925
Systems Affected: FortiWeb WAF appliances (unpatched versions)
Operational Impact: Potential disruption of web application securityRisk of lateral movement into corporate networks
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential erosion of trust in Fortinet security productsReputational damage for affected organizations
Legal Liabilities: Non-compliance with CISA BOD 22-01 for federal agenciesPotential regulatory scrutiny for delayed patching
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR3793237111925
Systems Affected: Fortinet FortiWeb appliancesPotentially protected infrastructure behind the firewall
Operational Impact: Unauthorized code executionPrivilege escalationPotential lateral movement to protected systemsCompromise of web application firewall functionality
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to exploitation of critical security product
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4002340112025
Systems Affected: FortiWeb deployments running unpatched versions (pre-8.0.2, 7.6.6, 7.4.11, 7.2.12, 7.0.12)
Operational Impact: Potential for complete system compromise, lateral movement, or data exfiltration if exploited
Brand Reputation Impact: High (due to active exploitation of a widely used security platform)
Incident : Zero-day exploitation FOR1102211112125
Systems Affected: FortiWeb web application firewall
Brand Reputation Impact: Criticism for silent patching without customer notification
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Vpn Login Names, Vpn Passwords, , Personal Identification Data, Financial Details, Security Credentials, , Sensitive data, Sensitive Government/Law Enforcement Data, Energy/Utilities Operational Data, Telecommunications Customer/Network Data, Supply Chain Software Source Code/Propietary Data, , Potentially Any Data Transmitted Through Or Stored On Fortiweb Waf and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Unauthorized Access FOR1022050824
Entity Name: Fortinet
Entity Type: Organization
Industry: Cybersecurity
Incident : Ransomware FOR001032225
Entity Name: Fortinet
Entity Type: Technology Company
Industry: Cybersecurity
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR548051425
Entity Name: Fortinet
Entity Type: Technology Company
Industry: Cybersecurity
Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability FOR300060925
Entity Name: Fortinet
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Cybersecurity
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR553070925
Entity Name: Fortinet
Entity Type: Organization
Industry: Cybersecurity
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR705072025
Entity Name: Google
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR705072025
Entity Name: Fortinet
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Cybersecurity
Incident : Vulnerability FOR453081325
Entity Name: Fortinet
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Cybersecurity
Location: Sunnyvale, California, USA
Incident : Ransomware Attack FOR753081525
Entity Type: Government Agencies, Law Enforcement, Energy/Utilities Providers, Telecommunications Companies, Software Providers (Supply Chain)
Industry: Public Sector, Critical Infrastructure, Energy, Telecommunications, Technology (Software)
Location: United StatesCanadaOther (Global)
Incident : Data Breach FOR3202332101525
Entity Name: Global Enterprises (1,850 surveyed)
Entity Type: Private Companies, Public Organizations
Industry: Multiple (Including Technology, Finance, Healthcare, etc.)
Location: Global (29 countries, including U.S.)
Incident : Unauthorized Access FOR1532815111725
Entity Name: Fortinet
Entity Type: Vendor
Industry: Cybersecurity
Location: Global
Size: Large Enterprise
Customers Affected: Unknown (all organizations using unpatched FortiWeb 8.0.1 or earlier)
Incident : Zero-day vulnerability FOR5592655111725
Entity Name: Fortinet
Entity Type: Cybersecurity vendor
Industry: Network security
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2232822111825
Entity Name: Fortinet
Entity Type: Technology Vendor
Industry: Cybersecurity
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4992549111825
Entity Name: Federal Civilian Executive Branch Agencies (U.S.)
Entity Type: Government
Industry: Public Sector
Location: United States
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4992549111825
Entity Type: Organizations using Fortinet FortiWeb WAF
Location: Global
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR0562105111925
Entity Name: Fortinet
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Cyber Security
Location: Global
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2762227111925
Entity Name: U.S. Federal Agencies (mandated remediation)
Entity Type: Government
Industry: Public Sector
Location: United States
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2762227111925
Entity Type: Organizations
Industry: Finance, Healthcare, Managed Hosting
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR3793237111925
Entity Name: Organizations using Fortinet FortiWeb
Entity Type: Enterprises, Government Agencies, Cloud Service Providers
Location: Global
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4002340112025
Entity Name: Fortinet
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Cybersecurity
Location: Global
Incident : Zero-day exploitation FOR1102211112125
Entity Name: Fortinet
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Cybersecurity
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach FOR223227123
Remediation Measures: Patching the vulnerability
Incident : Data Breach FOR912050824
Third Party Assistance: Cybersecurity experts
Incident : Unauthorized Access FOR1022050824
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR548051425
Remediation Measures: Users are advised to upgrade to fixed releases for the affected solutions.
Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability FOR300060925
Containment Measures: Disable HTTP/HTTPS administrative interfaces on affected devices
Remediation Measures: Apply security patches to the following minimum versions: FortiVoice 7.2.1+, 7.0.7+, or 6.4.11+; FortiMail 7.6.3+, 7.4.5+, 7.2.8+, or 7.0.9+; FortiNDR 7.6.1+, 7.4.8+, 7.2.5+, or 7.0.7+; FortiRecorder 7.2.4+, 7.0.6+, or 6.4.6+; and FortiCamera 2.1.4+
Enhanced Monitoring: Block and monitor for connections from the following IP addresses: 198.105.127.124, 43.228.217.173, 43.228.217.82, 156.236.76.90, 218.187.69.244, and 218.187.69.59
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR553070925
Containment Measures: Disable the HTTP/HTTPS administrative interface
Remediation Measures: Upgrade to patched versionsNetwork segmentationAccess controlsContinuous monitoring
Network Segmentation: True
Incident : Vulnerability FOR453081325
Containment Measures: Restrict access to phMonitor port (TCP/7900) to trusted internal hosts/IPs
Remediation Measures: Upgrade to patched versions: FortiSIEM 7.4, 7.3.2+, 7.2.6+, 7.1.8+, 7.0.4+, or 6.7.10+
Communication Strategy: Public advisory with patch recommendationsSubscription-based breaking news alerts
Incident : Ransomware Attack FOR753081525
Remediation Measures: Proactive Patch Management (Recommended)Vulnerability Remediation Programs (Recommended)Securing Internet-Facing Applications (Recommended)Robust Network Segmentation (Recommended)
Network Segmentation: Recommended to limit blast radius
Enhanced Monitoring: Recommended for early detection
Incident : Data Breach FOR3202332101525
Containment Measures: Upskilling Programs (61% report improved skills via certifications)Mandatory Cybersecurity Training (62% post-breach)
Remediation Measures: Investment in AI Security ToolsCross-Functional Collaboration (AI Specialists + Security Teams)Prompt Engineering Training
Recovery Measures: Reskilling Employees (48% retention tactic)Partnerships with Universities/Certification Bodies
Communication Strategy: Public Report (Oct. 8, 2024)Media Interviews (e.g., Dice, Fortinet Experts)
Enhanced Monitoring: AI-Driven Threat DetectionReal-Time Visibility Tools
Incident : Unauthorized Access FOR1532815111725
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Pwndefend, Defused Research Team, Watchtowr Labs, Rapid7.
Containment Measures: Update to FortiWeb 8.0.2Review administrative user lists for unexpected accountsInspect logs for requests to `fwbcgi` pathBlock public internet access to management interfacesRestrict access to trusted networks or VPN-only channels
Remediation Measures: Apply firmware patch (8.0.2)Remove unauthorized admin accounts
Communication Strategy: Security advisories from researchers (PwnDefend, watchTowr Labs)Media reports urging immediate action
Network Segmentation: ['Restrict management interface access']
Enhanced Monitoring: Log inspection for `fwbcgi` endpoint activity
Incident : Zero-day vulnerability FOR5592655111725
Third Party Assistance: Watchtowr (Threat Intelligence Firm).
Containment Measures: Immediate patching to versions 7.0.7 or 7.2.2 recommended
Remediation Measures: Traffic analysis for signs of post-compromise activityStrengthened monitoring of WAF logs for anomalous requests
Communication Strategy: Generic patch notes referencing 'security hardening'No direct acknowledgment of in-the-wild exploitation initially
Enhanced Monitoring: Monitoring of WAF logs for anomalous requests
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2232822111825
Containment Measures: Apply Security PatchesDiscontinue Use of Affected Products (if mitigations unavailable)
Remediation Measures: Patch FortiWeb deployments per Fortinet’s vendor instructionsFollow BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud servicesReview access logs for suspicious HTTP/HTTPS requests
Communication Strategy: CISA Advisory (KEV Catalog Addition)Vendor Notification (Fortinet)
Network Segmentation: ['Implement to limit lateral movement if FortiWeb is compromised']
Enhanced Monitoring: Monitor for exploitation attempts via HTTP/HTTPS requests
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4992549111825
Containment Measures: Network segmentation to limit lateral movement
Remediation Measures: Apply security patches per Fortinet’s vendor instructionsImplement BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud servicesDiscontinue use of affected products if mitigations unavailableReview access logs for suspicious HTTP/HTTPS requests
Network Segmentation: True
Enhanced Monitoring: Review access logs for exploitation attempts
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR0562105111925
Third Party Assistance: Reported By Jason Mcfadyen (Trend Micro) Under Responsible Disclosure.
Remediation Measures: CISA added to Known Exploited Vulnerabilities CatalogFortinet likely working on patches (not explicitly stated)
Communication Strategy: Public advisory by FortiGuard LabsCISA advisory issued
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2762227111925
Incident Response Plan Activated: ['CISA Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01 for federal agencies']
Containment Measures: Isolate affected FortiWeb appliances from broader network communicationRestrict administrative access via network segmentation and VPN-only pathwaysMonitor for unfamiliar administrative activity or web traffic anomalies
Remediation Measures: Apply patches (7.4.8 or 7.6.6) immediatelyRemove or replace unpatchable appliances
Communication Strategy: CISA advisoryFortinet security bulletin (FG-IR-25-910)
Network Segmentation: ['Restrict administrative access to FortiWeb appliances']
Enhanced Monitoring: Sustained monitoring of access logs, unexpected requests, and outbound connections
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR3793237111925
Containment Measures: Network segmentation to restrict management accessDiscontinuing use of affected product if patches/workarounds are insufficient
Remediation Measures: Apply security patches provided by FortinetFollow BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud deploymentsVerify FortiWeb version and cross-reference with Fortinet’s advisory
Communication Strategy: CISA alert issuedFortinet advisory publishedPublic disclosure via media (e.g., Google News, LinkedIn, X)
Network Segmentation: Recommended to restrict management access
Enhanced Monitoring: Monitor FortiWeb logs for suspicious authentication attemptsTrack unusual CLI commandsDetect command execution activities deviating from normal operations
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4002340112025
Containment Measures: Upgrade to patched versions (8.0.2+, 7.6.6+, 7.4.11+, 7.2.12+, 7.0.12+)Restrict authenticated access to FortiWeb systemsMonitor logs for suspicious command execution patterns
Remediation Measures: Patch management (priority testing in non-production environments before deployment)Review historical logs for exploitation attemptsVerify system integrity on affected deployments
Enhanced Monitoring: Recommended for unpatched systems
Incident : Zero-day exploitation FOR1102211112125
Remediation Measures: Silent patching of vulnerabilities (criticized for lack of transparency)
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as CISA Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01 for federal agencies, .
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Cybersecurity experts, , PwnDefend, Defused Research Team, watchTowr Labs, Rapid7, , WatchTowr (threat intelligence firm), , Reported by Jason McFadyen (Trend Micro) under responsible disclosure, .
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach FOR223227123
Type of Data Compromised: Vpn login names, Vpn passwords
Number of Records Exposed: 500,000
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Incident : Data Breach FOR912050824
Type of Data Compromised: Personal identification data, Financial details, Security credentials
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Ransomware FOR001032225
Data Exfiltration: High-value assets
Data Encryption: SuperBlack ransomware
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR553070925
Type of Data Compromised: Sensitive data
Incident : Ransomware Attack FOR753081525
Type of Data Compromised: Sensitive government/law enforcement data, Energy/utilities operational data, Telecommunications customer/network data, Supply chain software source code/propietary data
Sensitivity of Data: High (critical infrastructure and proprietary software)
Data Exfiltration: Likely (based on Qilin's double-extortion tactics)
Data Encryption: Confirmed (ransomware encryption)
Personally Identifiable Information: Possible (not explicitly detailed)
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4992549111825
Type of Data Compromised: Potentially any data transmitted through or stored on fortiweb waf
Sensitivity of Data: High (potential for intercepted sensitive data, including PII or payment info)
Data Exfiltration: Possible if attackers intercept or pivot to other systems
Personally Identifiable Information: Potential risk if PII transmitted through WAF
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2762227111925
Data Exfiltration: Potential risk if exploited
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4002340112025
Data Exfiltration: Potential (if vulnerability is exploited)
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Patching the vulnerability, Users are advised to upgrade to fixed releases for the affected solutions., Apply security patches to the following minimum versions: FortiVoice 7.2.1+, 7.0.7+, or 6.4.11+; FortiMail 7.6.3+, 7.4.5+, 7.2.8+, or 7.0.9+; FortiNDR 7.6.1+, 7.4.8+, 7.2.5+, or 7.0.7+; FortiRecorder 7.2.4+, 7.0.6+, or 6.4.6+; and FortiCamera 2.1.4+, Upgrade to patched versions, Network segmentation, Access controls, Continuous monitoring, , Upgrade to patched versions: FortiSIEM 7.4, 7.3.2+, 7.2.6+, 7.1.8+, 7.0.4+, or 6.7.10+, , Proactive Patch Management (Recommended), Vulnerability Remediation Programs (Recommended), Securing Internet-Facing Applications (Recommended), Robust Network Segmentation (Recommended), , Investment in AI Security Tools, Cross-Functional Collaboration (AI Specialists + Security Teams), Prompt Engineering Training, , Apply firmware patch (8.0.2), Remove unauthorized admin accounts, , Traffic analysis for signs of post-compromise activity, Strengthened monitoring of WAF logs for anomalous requests, , Patch FortiWeb deployments per Fortinet’s vendor instructions, Follow BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, Review access logs for suspicious HTTP/HTTPS requests, , Apply security patches per Fortinet’s vendor instructions, Implement BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, Discontinue use of affected products if mitigations unavailable, Review access logs for suspicious HTTP/HTTPS requests, , CISA added to Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, Fortinet likely working on patches (not explicitly stated), , Apply patches (7.4.8 or 7.6.6) immediately, Remove or replace unpatchable appliances, , Apply security patches provided by Fortinet, Follow BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud deployments, Verify FortiWeb version and cross-reference with Fortinet’s advisory, , Patch management (priority testing in non-production environments before deployment), Review historical logs for exploitation attempts, Verify system integrity on affected deployments, , Silent patching of vulnerabilities (criticized for lack of transparency), .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by disable http/https administrative interfaces on affected devices, disable the http/https administrative interface, , restrict access to phmonitor port (tcp/7900) to trusted internal hosts/ips, , upskilling programs (61% report improved skills via certifications), mandatory cybersecurity training (62% post-breach), , update to fortiweb 8.0.2, review administrative user lists for unexpected accounts, inspect logs for requests to `fwbcgi` path, block public internet access to management interfaces, restrict access to trusted networks or vpn-only channels, , immediate patching to versions 7.0.7 or 7.2.2 recommended, , apply security patches, discontinue use of affected products (if mitigations unavailable), , network segmentation to limit lateral movement, , isolate affected fortiweb appliances from broader network communication, restrict administrative access via network segmentation and vpn-only pathways, monitor for unfamiliar administrative activity or web traffic anomalies, , network segmentation to restrict management access, discontinuing use of affected product if patches/workarounds are insufficient, , upgrade to patched versions (8.0.2+, 7.6.6+, 7.4.11+, 7.2.12+, 7.0.12+), restrict authenticated access to fortiweb systems, monitor logs for suspicious command execution patterns and .
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Incident : Ransomware FOR001032225
Ransomware Strain: SuperBlack
Data Encryption: Yes
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Incident : Ransomware Attack FOR753081525
Ransomware Strain: Qilin
Data Encryption: Confirmed
Data Exfiltration: Likely (double-extortion model)
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through Reskilling Employees (48% retention tactic), Partnerships with Universities/Certification Bodies, .
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2232822111825
Regulatory Notifications: CISA KEV Catalog Inclusion (BOD 22-01 for Federal Agencies)
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4992549111825
Regulations Violated: Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01 (for U.S. federal agencies),
Regulatory Notifications: CISA KEV catalog inclusion (2025-11-14)
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR0562105111925
Regulatory Notifications: CISA advisory (added to Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog)
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2762227111925
Regulations Violated: CISA Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01 (if unpatched by deadline),
Regulatory Notifications: Mandatory remediation deadline of November 21, 2025, for federal agencies
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR3793237111925
Regulatory Notifications: CISA alert (prioritized vulnerability)BOD 22-01 guidance for federal compliance (cloud deployments)
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach FOR912050824
Lessons Learned: The importance of robust cybersecurity measures
Incident : Unauthorized Access FOR1022050824
Lessons Learned: The importance of advanced security protocols and swift response strategies to protect digital assets and maintain trust.
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR553070925
Lessons Learned: Implement coordinated vulnerability disclosure processes and ensure input validation mechanisms are robust.
Incident : Vulnerability FOR453081325
Lessons Learned: Proactive patching is critical for vulnerabilities with public exploit code, Restricting access to vulnerable services (e.g., TCP/7900) can mitigate risk when immediate patching is not possible, Lack of distinctive IoCs makes detection of exploits challenging
Incident : Ransomware Attack FOR753081525
Lessons Learned: Critical importance of **proactive patch management** for internet-facing systems., Need for **robust network segmentation** to limit lateral movement., Rising threat of **supply chain compromises** via software providers., Persistent targeting of **critical infrastructure** by sophisticated RaaS groups., Exploitation of **known vulnerabilities** remains a primary attack vector.
Incident : Data Breach FOR3202332101525
Lessons Learned: AI enhances security roles (87%) but requires upskilling to mitigate risks like prompt injection., Skill shortages (48% AI expertise, 47% data privacy) directly correlate with breach frequency (86% in 2024)., Proactive cybersecurity (training, certifications) reduces operational risks and improves resilience., Cross-functional collaboration (AI + security teams) is critical for addressing evolving threats.
Incident : Unauthorized Access FOR1532815111725
Lessons Learned: Critical importance of timely patching for publicly exposed devices, Need for continuous monitoring of administrative account changes, Risks of automated mass exploitation for unpatched vulnerabilities, Value of third-party research in identifying and mitigating zero-day threats
Incident : Zero-day vulnerability FOR5592655111725
Lessons Learned: Vendors must balance technical secrecy with the imperative to protect users from real-world threats through transparent communication., Enterprises should scrutinize all firmware updates for critical infrastructure, especially perimeter-facing devices like WAFs., Defense-in-depth and strong vulnerability management processes are essential for mitigating risks from zero-day exploits., Delayed disclosures of actively exploited vulnerabilities can pose systemic risks to enterprises relying on affected devices.
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2232822111825
Lessons Learned: Critical vulnerabilities in security appliances (e.g., WAFs) can enable deep network compromise if exploited., Path traversal flaws in authentication mechanisms pose severe risks for unauthorized administrative access., Proactive patching and log monitoring are essential for mitigating zero-day and known exploited vulnerabilities.
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4992549111825
Lessons Learned: Critical vulnerabilities in perimeter security devices (e.g., WAFs) pose severe risks due to their privileged network position., Unauthenticated flaws with administrative access capabilities are high-priority targets for threat actors., Federal mandates (e.g., BOD 22-01) enforce rapid remediation timelines for known exploited vulnerabilities., Network segmentation and log monitoring are essential for limiting post-exploitation impact.
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2762227111925
Lessons Learned: Security appliances (e.g., WAFs, firewalls) are high-value targets due to their network edge position and elevated privileges., Vulnerabilities in security tools can invert defensive controls into attack vectors., Organizations must accelerate patching timelines for edge appliances to mitigate exploitation risks., Network segmentation and strict access controls are critical for limiting exposure when patches are delayed.
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR3793237111925
Lessons Learned: Critical vulnerabilities in security products (e.g., WAFs) can enable broad exploitation if unpatched., Active exploitation underscores the need for immediate patching and mitigation., Network segmentation and monitoring are essential temporary controls when patches cannot be deployed promptly.
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4002340112025
Lessons Learned: Critical vulnerabilities in security products can undermine enterprise defenses if left unpatched., Active exploitation elevates remediation priority regardless of CVSS score., Access controls and logging are essential mitigations when patching is delayed.
Incident : Zero-day exploitation FOR1102211112125
Lessons Learned: Transparency in vulnerability disclosure and patching is critical to maintain customer trust and security posture.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR548051425
Recommendations: Users are advised to upgrade to fixed releases for the affected solutions.
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR553070925
Recommendations: Upgrade FortiWeb installations to patched versions, Disable administrative interfaces as a precaution, Implement network segmentation, access controls, and continuous monitoringUpgrade FortiWeb installations to patched versions, Disable administrative interfaces as a precaution, Implement network segmentation, access controls, and continuous monitoringUpgrade FortiWeb installations to patched versions, Disable administrative interfaces as a precaution, Implement network segmentation, access controls, and continuous monitoring
Incident : Vulnerability FOR453081325
Recommendations: Upgrade FortiSIEM to patched versions immediately (7.4, 7.3.2+, 7.2.6+, etc.), Restrict access to phMonitor port (TCP/7900) to trusted internal hosts/IPs if patching is delayed, Monitor for unusual activity on TCP/7900, though exploits may lack distinctive IoCs, Subscribe to threat intelligence feeds for updates on emerging exploitsUpgrade FortiSIEM to patched versions immediately (7.4, 7.3.2+, 7.2.6+, etc.), Restrict access to phMonitor port (TCP/7900) to trusted internal hosts/IPs if patching is delayed, Monitor for unusual activity on TCP/7900, though exploits may lack distinctive IoCs, Subscribe to threat intelligence feeds for updates on emerging exploitsUpgrade FortiSIEM to patched versions immediately (7.4, 7.3.2+, 7.2.6+, etc.), Restrict access to phMonitor port (TCP/7900) to trusted internal hosts/IPs if patching is delayed, Monitor for unusual activity on TCP/7900, though exploits may lack distinctive IoCs, Subscribe to threat intelligence feeds for updates on emerging exploitsUpgrade FortiSIEM to patched versions immediately (7.4, 7.3.2+, 7.2.6+, etc.), Restrict access to phMonitor port (TCP/7900) to trusted internal hosts/IPs if patching is delayed, Monitor for unusual activity on TCP/7900, though exploits may lack distinctive IoCs, Subscribe to threat intelligence feeds for updates on emerging exploits
Incident : Ransomware Attack FOR753081525
Recommendations: Immediate patching of **CVE-2023-48788 (Fortinet)**, **CVE-2019-18935 (Telerik)**, and **CVE-2025-5777 (Citrix)**., Enhanced monitoring for **Microsoft SharePoint vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-53770/71, CVE-2025-49704/06)**., Implementation of **network segmentation** to isolate critical systems., Regular **vulnerability assessments** and penetration testing for internet-facing applications., Supply chain risk management, including **third-party software provider audits**., Deployment of **adaptive behavioral WAFs** to detect exploitation attempts., Preparation for **ransomware response**, including offline backups and incident playbooks.Immediate patching of **CVE-2023-48788 (Fortinet)**, **CVE-2019-18935 (Telerik)**, and **CVE-2025-5777 (Citrix)**., Enhanced monitoring for **Microsoft SharePoint vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-53770/71, CVE-2025-49704/06)**., Implementation of **network segmentation** to isolate critical systems., Regular **vulnerability assessments** and penetration testing for internet-facing applications., Supply chain risk management, including **third-party software provider audits**., Deployment of **adaptive behavioral WAFs** to detect exploitation attempts., Preparation for **ransomware response**, including offline backups and incident playbooks.Immediate patching of **CVE-2023-48788 (Fortinet)**, **CVE-2019-18935 (Telerik)**, and **CVE-2025-5777 (Citrix)**., Enhanced monitoring for **Microsoft SharePoint vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-53770/71, CVE-2025-49704/06)**., Implementation of **network segmentation** to isolate critical systems., Regular **vulnerability assessments** and penetration testing for internet-facing applications., Supply chain risk management, including **third-party software provider audits**., Deployment of **adaptive behavioral WAFs** to detect exploitation attempts., Preparation for **ransomware response**, including offline backups and incident playbooks.Immediate patching of **CVE-2023-48788 (Fortinet)**, **CVE-2019-18935 (Telerik)**, and **CVE-2025-5777 (Citrix)**., Enhanced monitoring for **Microsoft SharePoint vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-53770/71, CVE-2025-49704/06)**., Implementation of **network segmentation** to isolate critical systems., Regular **vulnerability assessments** and penetration testing for internet-facing applications., Supply chain risk management, including **third-party software provider audits**., Deployment of **adaptive behavioral WAFs** to detect exploitation attempts., Preparation for **ransomware response**, including offline backups and incident playbooks.Immediate patching of **CVE-2023-48788 (Fortinet)**, **CVE-2019-18935 (Telerik)**, and **CVE-2025-5777 (Citrix)**., Enhanced monitoring for **Microsoft SharePoint vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-53770/71, CVE-2025-49704/06)**., Implementation of **network segmentation** to isolate critical systems., Regular **vulnerability assessments** and penetration testing for internet-facing applications., Supply chain risk management, including **third-party software provider audits**., Deployment of **adaptive behavioral WAFs** to detect exploitation attempts., Preparation for **ransomware response**, including offline backups and incident playbooks.Immediate patching of **CVE-2023-48788 (Fortinet)**, **CVE-2019-18935 (Telerik)**, and **CVE-2025-5777 (Citrix)**., Enhanced monitoring for **Microsoft SharePoint vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-53770/71, CVE-2025-49704/06)**., Implementation of **network segmentation** to isolate critical systems., Regular **vulnerability assessments** and penetration testing for internet-facing applications., Supply chain risk management, including **third-party software provider audits**., Deployment of **adaptive behavioral WAFs** to detect exploitation attempts., Preparation for **ransomware response**, including offline backups and incident playbooks.Immediate patching of **CVE-2023-48788 (Fortinet)**, **CVE-2019-18935 (Telerik)**, and **CVE-2025-5777 (Citrix)**., Enhanced monitoring for **Microsoft SharePoint vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-53770/71, CVE-2025-49704/06)**., Implementation of **network segmentation** to isolate critical systems., Regular **vulnerability assessments** and penetration testing for internet-facing applications., Supply chain risk management, including **third-party software provider audits**., Deployment of **adaptive behavioral WAFs** to detect exploitation attempts., Preparation for **ransomware response**, including offline backups and incident playbooks.
Incident : Data Breach FOR3202332101525
Recommendations: Invest in AI-specific upskilling (e.g., prompt engineering, agentic AI) for security teams., Mandate certifications for IT/security personnel post-breach (62% preference)., Partner with universities/industry bodies to standardize AI security curricula., Balance AI automation with human expertise for contextual threat analysis., Treat cybersecurity as a strategic, companywide initiative (not reactive)., Focus hiring/retention on cloud, network, and data security skills (top gaps).Invest in AI-specific upskilling (e.g., prompt engineering, agentic AI) for security teams., Mandate certifications for IT/security personnel post-breach (62% preference)., Partner with universities/industry bodies to standardize AI security curricula., Balance AI automation with human expertise for contextual threat analysis., Treat cybersecurity as a strategic, companywide initiative (not reactive)., Focus hiring/retention on cloud, network, and data security skills (top gaps).Invest in AI-specific upskilling (e.g., prompt engineering, agentic AI) for security teams., Mandate certifications for IT/security personnel post-breach (62% preference)., Partner with universities/industry bodies to standardize AI security curricula., Balance AI automation with human expertise for contextual threat analysis., Treat cybersecurity as a strategic, companywide initiative (not reactive)., Focus hiring/retention on cloud, network, and data security skills (top gaps).Invest in AI-specific upskilling (e.g., prompt engineering, agentic AI) for security teams., Mandate certifications for IT/security personnel post-breach (62% preference)., Partner with universities/industry bodies to standardize AI security curricula., Balance AI automation with human expertise for contextual threat analysis., Treat cybersecurity as a strategic, companywide initiative (not reactive)., Focus hiring/retention on cloud, network, and data security skills (top gaps).Invest in AI-specific upskilling (e.g., prompt engineering, agentic AI) for security teams., Mandate certifications for IT/security personnel post-breach (62% preference)., Partner with universities/industry bodies to standardize AI security curricula., Balance AI automation with human expertise for contextual threat analysis., Treat cybersecurity as a strategic, companywide initiative (not reactive)., Focus hiring/retention on cloud, network, and data security skills (top gaps).Invest in AI-specific upskilling (e.g., prompt engineering, agentic AI) for security teams., Mandate certifications for IT/security personnel post-breach (62% preference)., Partner with universities/industry bodies to standardize AI security curricula., Balance AI automation with human expertise for contextual threat analysis., Treat cybersecurity as a strategic, companywide initiative (not reactive)., Focus hiring/retention on cloud, network, and data security skills (top gaps).
Incident : Unauthorized Access FOR1532815111725
Recommendations: Immediately patch FortiWeb to version 8.0.2 or later, Audit all administrative accounts for unauthorized entries, Restrict management interface access to trusted networks/VPNs, Monitor logs for suspicious activity (e.g., requests to `fwbcgi`), Assume compromise if running vulnerable versions and investigate thoroughly, Use artifact-generation tools (e.g., from watchTowr Labs) to detect vulnerable systemsImmediately patch FortiWeb to version 8.0.2 or later, Audit all administrative accounts for unauthorized entries, Restrict management interface access to trusted networks/VPNs, Monitor logs for suspicious activity (e.g., requests to `fwbcgi`), Assume compromise if running vulnerable versions and investigate thoroughly, Use artifact-generation tools (e.g., from watchTowr Labs) to detect vulnerable systemsImmediately patch FortiWeb to version 8.0.2 or later, Audit all administrative accounts for unauthorized entries, Restrict management interface access to trusted networks/VPNs, Monitor logs for suspicious activity (e.g., requests to `fwbcgi`), Assume compromise if running vulnerable versions and investigate thoroughly, Use artifact-generation tools (e.g., from watchTowr Labs) to detect vulnerable systemsImmediately patch FortiWeb to version 8.0.2 or later, Audit all administrative accounts for unauthorized entries, Restrict management interface access to trusted networks/VPNs, Monitor logs for suspicious activity (e.g., requests to `fwbcgi`), Assume compromise if running vulnerable versions and investigate thoroughly, Use artifact-generation tools (e.g., from watchTowr Labs) to detect vulnerable systemsImmediately patch FortiWeb to version 8.0.2 or later, Audit all administrative accounts for unauthorized entries, Restrict management interface access to trusted networks/VPNs, Monitor logs for suspicious activity (e.g., requests to `fwbcgi`), Assume compromise if running vulnerable versions and investigate thoroughly, Use artifact-generation tools (e.g., from watchTowr Labs) to detect vulnerable systemsImmediately patch FortiWeb to version 8.0.2 or later, Audit all administrative accounts for unauthorized entries, Restrict management interface access to trusted networks/VPNs, Monitor logs for suspicious activity (e.g., requests to `fwbcgi`), Assume compromise if running vulnerable versions and investigate thoroughly, Use artifact-generation tools (e.g., from watchTowr Labs) to detect vulnerable systems
Incident : Zero-day vulnerability FOR5592655111725
Recommendations: Immediately apply updates to FortiWeb versions 7.0.7 and 7.2.2., Conduct traffic analysis for signs of post-compromise activity., Strengthen monitoring of WAF logs, particularly for anomalous requests., Treat firmware updates for critical infrastructure with urgency, even when details are minimal., Prioritize patching based on threat intelligence, especially for frontline defense devices.Immediately apply updates to FortiWeb versions 7.0.7 and 7.2.2., Conduct traffic analysis for signs of post-compromise activity., Strengthen monitoring of WAF logs, particularly for anomalous requests., Treat firmware updates for critical infrastructure with urgency, even when details are minimal., Prioritize patching based on threat intelligence, especially for frontline defense devices.Immediately apply updates to FortiWeb versions 7.0.7 and 7.2.2., Conduct traffic analysis for signs of post-compromise activity., Strengthen monitoring of WAF logs, particularly for anomalous requests., Treat firmware updates for critical infrastructure with urgency, even when details are minimal., Prioritize patching based on threat intelligence, especially for frontline defense devices.Immediately apply updates to FortiWeb versions 7.0.7 and 7.2.2., Conduct traffic analysis for signs of post-compromise activity., Strengthen monitoring of WAF logs, particularly for anomalous requests., Treat firmware updates for critical infrastructure with urgency, even when details are minimal., Prioritize patching based on threat intelligence, especially for frontline defense devices.Immediately apply updates to FortiWeb versions 7.0.7 and 7.2.2., Conduct traffic analysis for signs of post-compromise activity., Strengthen monitoring of WAF logs, particularly for anomalous requests., Treat firmware updates for critical infrastructure with urgency, even when details are minimal., Prioritize patching based on threat intelligence, especially for frontline defense devices.
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2232822111825
Recommendations: Immediately patch Fortinet FortiWeb deployments to the latest secure version., Implement network segmentation to contain potential breaches involving FortiWeb devices., Monitor access logs for anomalous HTTP/HTTPS requests targeting FortiWeb appliances., Prioritize remediation of CISA KEV-listed vulnerabilities to reduce exposure to active threats., Evaluate compensatory controls (e.g., WAF rules, IPS signatures) if patching is delayed.Immediately patch Fortinet FortiWeb deployments to the latest secure version., Implement network segmentation to contain potential breaches involving FortiWeb devices., Monitor access logs for anomalous HTTP/HTTPS requests targeting FortiWeb appliances., Prioritize remediation of CISA KEV-listed vulnerabilities to reduce exposure to active threats., Evaluate compensatory controls (e.g., WAF rules, IPS signatures) if patching is delayed.Immediately patch Fortinet FortiWeb deployments to the latest secure version., Implement network segmentation to contain potential breaches involving FortiWeb devices., Monitor access logs for anomalous HTTP/HTTPS requests targeting FortiWeb appliances., Prioritize remediation of CISA KEV-listed vulnerabilities to reduce exposure to active threats., Evaluate compensatory controls (e.g., WAF rules, IPS signatures) if patching is delayed.Immediately patch Fortinet FortiWeb deployments to the latest secure version., Implement network segmentation to contain potential breaches involving FortiWeb devices., Monitor access logs for anomalous HTTP/HTTPS requests targeting FortiWeb appliances., Prioritize remediation of CISA KEV-listed vulnerabilities to reduce exposure to active threats., Evaluate compensatory controls (e.g., WAF rules, IPS signatures) if patching is delayed.Immediately patch Fortinet FortiWeb deployments to the latest secure version., Implement network segmentation to contain potential breaches involving FortiWeb devices., Monitor access logs for anomalous HTTP/HTTPS requests targeting FortiWeb appliances., Prioritize remediation of CISA KEV-listed vulnerabilities to reduce exposure to active threats., Evaluate compensatory controls (e.g., WAF rules, IPS signatures) if patching is delayed.
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4992549111825
Recommendations: Immediately patch Fortinet FortiWeb WAF systems to the latest version per vendor guidance., Prioritize remediation for internet-facing FortiWeb deployments., Implement network segmentation to isolate WAF systems and limit lateral movement., Monitor access logs for indicators of exploitation (e.g., unusual HTTP/HTTPS requests)., Review and update incident response plans to include WAF-specific compromise scenarios., Consider compensating controls (e.g., enhanced monitoring) if patches cannot be applied immediately., Evaluate the necessity of FortiWeb in the architecture if vendor mitigations are delayed or unavailable.Immediately patch Fortinet FortiWeb WAF systems to the latest version per vendor guidance., Prioritize remediation for internet-facing FortiWeb deployments., Implement network segmentation to isolate WAF systems and limit lateral movement., Monitor access logs for indicators of exploitation (e.g., unusual HTTP/HTTPS requests)., Review and update incident response plans to include WAF-specific compromise scenarios., Consider compensating controls (e.g., enhanced monitoring) if patches cannot be applied immediately., Evaluate the necessity of FortiWeb in the architecture if vendor mitigations are delayed or unavailable.Immediately patch Fortinet FortiWeb WAF systems to the latest version per vendor guidance., Prioritize remediation for internet-facing FortiWeb deployments., Implement network segmentation to isolate WAF systems and limit lateral movement., Monitor access logs for indicators of exploitation (e.g., unusual HTTP/HTTPS requests)., Review and update incident response plans to include WAF-specific compromise scenarios., Consider compensating controls (e.g., enhanced monitoring) if patches cannot be applied immediately., Evaluate the necessity of FortiWeb in the architecture if vendor mitigations are delayed or unavailable.Immediately patch Fortinet FortiWeb WAF systems to the latest version per vendor guidance., Prioritize remediation for internet-facing FortiWeb deployments., Implement network segmentation to isolate WAF systems and limit lateral movement., Monitor access logs for indicators of exploitation (e.g., unusual HTTP/HTTPS requests)., Review and update incident response plans to include WAF-specific compromise scenarios., Consider compensating controls (e.g., enhanced monitoring) if patches cannot be applied immediately., Evaluate the necessity of FortiWeb in the architecture if vendor mitigations are delayed or unavailable.Immediately patch Fortinet FortiWeb WAF systems to the latest version per vendor guidance., Prioritize remediation for internet-facing FortiWeb deployments., Implement network segmentation to isolate WAF systems and limit lateral movement., Monitor access logs for indicators of exploitation (e.g., unusual HTTP/HTTPS requests)., Review and update incident response plans to include WAF-specific compromise scenarios., Consider compensating controls (e.g., enhanced monitoring) if patches cannot be applied immediately., Evaluate the necessity of FortiWeb in the architecture if vendor mitigations are delayed or unavailable.Immediately patch Fortinet FortiWeb WAF systems to the latest version per vendor guidance., Prioritize remediation for internet-facing FortiWeb deployments., Implement network segmentation to isolate WAF systems and limit lateral movement., Monitor access logs for indicators of exploitation (e.g., unusual HTTP/HTTPS requests)., Review and update incident response plans to include WAF-specific compromise scenarios., Consider compensating controls (e.g., enhanced monitoring) if patches cannot be applied immediately., Evaluate the necessity of FortiWeb in the architecture if vendor mitigations are delayed or unavailable.Immediately patch Fortinet FortiWeb WAF systems to the latest version per vendor guidance., Prioritize remediation for internet-facing FortiWeb deployments., Implement network segmentation to isolate WAF systems and limit lateral movement., Monitor access logs for indicators of exploitation (e.g., unusual HTTP/HTTPS requests)., Review and update incident response plans to include WAF-specific compromise scenarios., Consider compensating controls (e.g., enhanced monitoring) if patches cannot be applied immediately., Evaluate the necessity of FortiWeb in the architecture if vendor mitigations are delayed or unavailable.
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR0562105111925
Recommendations: Apply patches for FortiWeb versions 7.6.0–7.6.4, 7.4.0–7.4.8, 7.2.0–7.2.11, 7.0.2–7.0.11 once available, Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., unusual CLI/HTTP requests), Follow CISA guidance for federal enterprise mitigationApply patches for FortiWeb versions 7.6.0–7.6.4, 7.4.0–7.4.8, 7.2.0–7.2.11, 7.0.2–7.0.11 once available, Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., unusual CLI/HTTP requests), Follow CISA guidance for federal enterprise mitigationApply patches for FortiWeb versions 7.6.0–7.6.4, 7.4.0–7.4.8, 7.2.0–7.2.11, 7.0.2–7.0.11 once available, Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., unusual CLI/HTTP requests), Follow CISA guidance for federal enterprise mitigation
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2762227111925
Recommendations: Immediately apply Fortinet patches (7.4.8 or 7.6.6) for FortiWeb appliances., Isolate unpatched devices and monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., unfamiliar admin activity, traffic anomalies)., Implement network segmentation to restrict administrative access to FortiWeb appliances., Enforce VPN-only access pathways and enable strict logging for administrative actions., Prioritize vulnerability management for security appliances to reduce technical debt and exposure., For cloud deployments, enhance monitoring of access logs and outbound connections.Immediately apply Fortinet patches (7.4.8 or 7.6.6) for FortiWeb appliances., Isolate unpatched devices and monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., unfamiliar admin activity, traffic anomalies)., Implement network segmentation to restrict administrative access to FortiWeb appliances., Enforce VPN-only access pathways and enable strict logging for administrative actions., Prioritize vulnerability management for security appliances to reduce technical debt and exposure., For cloud deployments, enhance monitoring of access logs and outbound connections.Immediately apply Fortinet patches (7.4.8 or 7.6.6) for FortiWeb appliances., Isolate unpatched devices and monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., unfamiliar admin activity, traffic anomalies)., Implement network segmentation to restrict administrative access to FortiWeb appliances., Enforce VPN-only access pathways and enable strict logging for administrative actions., Prioritize vulnerability management for security appliances to reduce technical debt and exposure., For cloud deployments, enhance monitoring of access logs and outbound connections.Immediately apply Fortinet patches (7.4.8 or 7.6.6) for FortiWeb appliances., Isolate unpatched devices and monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., unfamiliar admin activity, traffic anomalies)., Implement network segmentation to restrict administrative access to FortiWeb appliances., Enforce VPN-only access pathways and enable strict logging for administrative actions., Prioritize vulnerability management for security appliances to reduce technical debt and exposure., For cloud deployments, enhance monitoring of access logs and outbound connections.Immediately apply Fortinet patches (7.4.8 or 7.6.6) for FortiWeb appliances., Isolate unpatched devices and monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., unfamiliar admin activity, traffic anomalies)., Implement network segmentation to restrict administrative access to FortiWeb appliances., Enforce VPN-only access pathways and enable strict logging for administrative actions., Prioritize vulnerability management for security appliances to reduce technical debt and exposure., For cloud deployments, enhance monitoring of access logs and outbound connections.Immediately apply Fortinet patches (7.4.8 or 7.6.6) for FortiWeb appliances., Isolate unpatched devices and monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., unfamiliar admin activity, traffic anomalies)., Implement network segmentation to restrict administrative access to FortiWeb appliances., Enforce VPN-only access pathways and enable strict logging for administrative actions., Prioritize vulnerability management for security appliances to reduce technical debt and exposure., For cloud deployments, enhance monitoring of access logs and outbound connections.
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR3793237111925
Recommendations: Apply Fortinet-provided patches immediately., Implement network segmentation to restrict FortiWeb management access., Enhance monitoring for suspicious CLI commands and authentication attempts., Discontinue use of affected FortiWeb versions if patches/workarounds are insufficient., Follow BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud deployments., Deploy additional network-based security controls to detect exploitation attempts.Apply Fortinet-provided patches immediately., Implement network segmentation to restrict FortiWeb management access., Enhance monitoring for suspicious CLI commands and authentication attempts., Discontinue use of affected FortiWeb versions if patches/workarounds are insufficient., Follow BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud deployments., Deploy additional network-based security controls to detect exploitation attempts.Apply Fortinet-provided patches immediately., Implement network segmentation to restrict FortiWeb management access., Enhance monitoring for suspicious CLI commands and authentication attempts., Discontinue use of affected FortiWeb versions if patches/workarounds are insufficient., Follow BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud deployments., Deploy additional network-based security controls to detect exploitation attempts.Apply Fortinet-provided patches immediately., Implement network segmentation to restrict FortiWeb management access., Enhance monitoring for suspicious CLI commands and authentication attempts., Discontinue use of affected FortiWeb versions if patches/workarounds are insufficient., Follow BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud deployments., Deploy additional network-based security controls to detect exploitation attempts.Apply Fortinet-provided patches immediately., Implement network segmentation to restrict FortiWeb management access., Enhance monitoring for suspicious CLI commands and authentication attempts., Discontinue use of affected FortiWeb versions if patches/workarounds are insufficient., Follow BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud deployments., Deploy additional network-based security controls to detect exploitation attempts.Apply Fortinet-provided patches immediately., Implement network segmentation to restrict FortiWeb management access., Enhance monitoring for suspicious CLI commands and authentication attempts., Discontinue use of affected FortiWeb versions if patches/workarounds are insufficient., Follow BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud deployments., Deploy additional network-based security controls to detect exploitation attempts.
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4002340112025
Recommendations: Immediately inventory all FortiWeb deployments and verify versions., Prioritize patching in a staged rollout (non-production first)., Enforce least-privilege access and multi-factor authentication (MFA) for FortiWeb management interfaces., Deploy network segmentation to limit lateral movement risks., Integrate Fortinet’s CVRF/CSAF advisories into vulnerability management tools for automated tracking.Immediately inventory all FortiWeb deployments and verify versions., Prioritize patching in a staged rollout (non-production first)., Enforce least-privilege access and multi-factor authentication (MFA) for FortiWeb management interfaces., Deploy network segmentation to limit lateral movement risks., Integrate Fortinet’s CVRF/CSAF advisories into vulnerability management tools for automated tracking.Immediately inventory all FortiWeb deployments and verify versions., Prioritize patching in a staged rollout (non-production first)., Enforce least-privilege access and multi-factor authentication (MFA) for FortiWeb management interfaces., Deploy network segmentation to limit lateral movement risks., Integrate Fortinet’s CVRF/CSAF advisories into vulnerability management tools for automated tracking.Immediately inventory all FortiWeb deployments and verify versions., Prioritize patching in a staged rollout (non-production first)., Enforce least-privilege access and multi-factor authentication (MFA) for FortiWeb management interfaces., Deploy network segmentation to limit lateral movement risks., Integrate Fortinet’s CVRF/CSAF advisories into vulnerability management tools for automated tracking.Immediately inventory all FortiWeb deployments and verify versions., Prioritize patching in a staged rollout (non-production first)., Enforce least-privilege access and multi-factor authentication (MFA) for FortiWeb management interfaces., Deploy network segmentation to limit lateral movement risks., Integrate Fortinet’s CVRF/CSAF advisories into vulnerability management tools for automated tracking.
Incident : Zero-day exploitation FOR1102211112125
Recommendations: Improve communication with customers regarding vulnerability patches and potential risks., Conduct thorough audits of patching processes to ensure compliance with best practices for transparency.Improve communication with customers regarding vulnerability patches and potential risks., Conduct thorough audits of patching processes to ensure compliance with best practices for transparency.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are The importance of robust cybersecurity measuresThe importance of advanced security protocols and swift response strategies to protect digital assets and maintain trust.Implement coordinated vulnerability disclosure processes and ensure input validation mechanisms are robust.Proactive patching is critical for vulnerabilities with public exploit code,Restricting access to vulnerable services (e.g., TCP/7900) can mitigate risk when immediate patching is not possible,Lack of distinctive IoCs makes detection of exploits challengingCritical importance of **proactive patch management** for internet-facing systems.,Need for **robust network segmentation** to limit lateral movement.,Rising threat of **supply chain compromises** via software providers.,Persistent targeting of **critical infrastructure** by sophisticated RaaS groups.,Exploitation of **known vulnerabilities** remains a primary attack vector.AI enhances security roles (87%) but requires upskilling to mitigate risks like prompt injection.,Skill shortages (48% AI expertise, 47% data privacy) directly correlate with breach frequency (86% in 2024).,Proactive cybersecurity (training, certifications) reduces operational risks and improves resilience.,Cross-functional collaboration (AI + security teams) is critical for addressing evolving threats.Critical importance of timely patching for publicly exposed devices,Need for continuous monitoring of administrative account changes,Risks of automated mass exploitation for unpatched vulnerabilities,Value of third-party research in identifying and mitigating zero-day threatsVendors must balance technical secrecy with the imperative to protect users from real-world threats through transparent communication.,Enterprises should scrutinize all firmware updates for critical infrastructure, especially perimeter-facing devices like WAFs.,Defense-in-depth and strong vulnerability management processes are essential for mitigating risks from zero-day exploits.,Delayed disclosures of actively exploited vulnerabilities can pose systemic risks to enterprises relying on affected devices.Critical vulnerabilities in security appliances (e.g., WAFs) can enable deep network compromise if exploited.,Path traversal flaws in authentication mechanisms pose severe risks for unauthorized administrative access.,Proactive patching and log monitoring are essential for mitigating zero-day and known exploited vulnerabilities.Critical vulnerabilities in perimeter security devices (e.g., WAFs) pose severe risks due to their privileged network position.,Unauthenticated flaws with administrative access capabilities are high-priority targets for threat actors.,Federal mandates (e.g., BOD 22-01) enforce rapid remediation timelines for known exploited vulnerabilities.,Network segmentation and log monitoring are essential for limiting post-exploitation impact.Security appliances (e.g., WAFs, firewalls) are high-value targets due to their network edge position and elevated privileges.,Vulnerabilities in security tools can invert defensive controls into attack vectors.,Organizations must accelerate patching timelines for edge appliances to mitigate exploitation risks.,Network segmentation and strict access controls are critical for limiting exposure when patches are delayed.Critical vulnerabilities in security products (e.g., WAFs) can enable broad exploitation if unpatched.,Active exploitation underscores the need for immediate patching and mitigation.,Network segmentation and monitoring are essential temporary controls when patches cannot be deployed promptly.Critical vulnerabilities in security products can undermine enterprise defenses if left unpatched.,Active exploitation elevates remediation priority regardless of CVSS score.,Access controls and logging are essential mitigations when patching is delayed.Transparency in vulnerability disclosure and patching is critical to maintain customer trust and security posture.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Preparation for **ransomware response**, including offline backups and incident playbooks., Users are advised to upgrade to fixed releases for the affected solutions., Regular **vulnerability assessments** and penetration testing for internet-facing applications., Deployment of **adaptive behavioral WAFs** to detect exploitation attempts., Immediate patching of **CVE-2023-48788 (Fortinet)**, **CVE-2019-18935 (Telerik)**, and **CVE-2025-5777 (Citrix)**., Supply chain risk management, including **third-party software provider audits**., Integrate Fortinet’s CVRF/CSAF advisories into vulnerability management tools for automated tracking., Enforce least-privilege access and multi-factor authentication (MFA) for FortiWeb management interfaces., Immediately inventory all FortiWeb deployments and verify versions., Enhanced monitoring for **Microsoft SharePoint vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-53770/71, CVE-2025-49704/06)**., Implementation of **network segmentation** to isolate critical systems., Prioritize patching in a staged rollout (non-production first). and Deploy network segmentation to limit lateral movement risks..
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR553070925
Source: GMO Cybersecurity by Ierae
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR705072025
Source: Help Net Security
Incident : Vulnerability FOR453081325
Source: Fortinet Advisory (Hypothetical, not provided in text)
Incident : Vulnerability FOR453081325
Source: Horizon3.ai Research (Prior PoCs for CVE-2023-34992 and CVE-2024-23108)
Incident : Data Breach FOR3202332101525
Source: Sapio Research & Fortinet Report
Date Accessed: 2024-10-08
Incident : Data Breach FOR3202332101525
Source: Dice Interview with Melonia da Gama (Fortinet)
Date Accessed: 2024-10-08
Incident : Data Breach FOR3202332101525
Source: Dice Interview with Diana Kelley (Noma Security)
Date Accessed: 2024-10-08
Incident : Data Breach FOR3202332101525
Source: Dice Interview with Amit Zimerman (Oasis Security)
Date Accessed: 2024-10-08
Incident : Data Breach FOR3202332101525
Source: Cyberseek Job Board (500,000+ U.S. Openings)
Incident : Unauthorized Access FOR1532815111725
Source: PwnDefend & Defused Research Team Analysis
Date Accessed: 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z
Incident : Unauthorized Access FOR1532815111725
Source: watchTowr Labs Exploit Confirmation
Date Accessed: 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z
Incident : Unauthorized Access FOR1532815111725
Source: Rapid7 Vulnerability Testing Report
Date Accessed: 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z
Incident : Zero-day vulnerability FOR5592655111725
Source: WatchTowr (Threat Intelligence Firm)
Incident : Zero-day vulnerability FOR5592655111725
Source: Fortinet Advisory Database (generic patch notes)
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2232822111825
Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog
Date Accessed: 2025-11-14
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2232822111825
Source: Fortinet Security Advisory (CVE-2025-64446)
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2232822111825
Source: CISA Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4992549111825
Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog
Date Accessed: 2025-11-14
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4992549111825
Source: Fortinet Security Advisory for CVE-2025-64446
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4992549111825
Source: CISA Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR0562105111925
Source: FortiGuard Labs Advisory
Date Accessed: 2024-11-18
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR0562105111925
Source: CISA Advisory (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog)
Date Accessed: 2024-11-18
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR0562105111925
Source: Cyber Daily Article by David Hollingworth
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR0562105111925
Source: watchTowr (Benjamin Harris) Tweet
Date Accessed: 2024-11-14
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2762227111925
Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog
Date Accessed: 2025-11-14
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2762227111925
Source: Fortinet Security Advisory (FG-IR-25-910)
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR3793237111925
Source: CISA Alert
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR3793237111925
Source: Fortinet Advisory for CVE-2025-58034
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR3793237111925
Source: GBHackers (GBH) News Report
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4002340112025
Source: Fortinet Advisory (FG-IR-25-513)
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4002340112025
Source: Trend Micro Research (Jason McFadyen)
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: GMO Cybersecurity by Ierae, and Source: Help Net Security, and Source: Fortinet Advisory (Hypothetical, not provided in text), and Source: Horizon3.ai Research (Prior PoCs for CVE-2023-34992 and CVE-2024-23108), and Source: Cyble ResearchDate Accessed: 2025-08-01, and Source: Sapio Research & Fortinet ReportDate Accessed: 2024-10-08, and Source: Dice Interview with Melonia da Gama (Fortinet)Date Accessed: 2024-10-08, and Source: Dice Interview with Diana Kelley (Noma Security)Date Accessed: 2024-10-08, and Source: Dice Interview with Amit Zimerman (Oasis Security)Date Accessed: 2024-10-08, and Source: Cyberseek Job Board (500,000+ U.S. Openings)Url: https://www.cyberseek.org/, and Source: PwnDefend & Defused Research Team AnalysisDate Accessed: 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z, and Source: watchTowr Labs Exploit ConfirmationDate Accessed: 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z, and Source: Rapid7 Vulnerability Testing ReportDate Accessed: 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z, and Source: WatchTowr (Threat Intelligence Firm), and Source: Fortinet Advisory Database (generic patch notes), and Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) CatalogDate Accessed: 2025-11-14, and Source: Fortinet Security Advisory (CVE-2025-64446), and Source: CISA Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01, and Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) CatalogDate Accessed: 2025-11-14, and Source: Fortinet Security Advisory for CVE-2025-64446, and Source: CISA Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01, and Source: FortiGuard Labs AdvisoryDate Accessed: 2024-11-18, and Source: CISA Advisory (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog)Date Accessed: 2024-11-18, and Source: Cyber Daily Article by David Hollingworth, and Source: watchTowr (Benjamin Harris) TweetDate Accessed: 2024-11-14, and Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) CatalogDate Accessed: 2025-11-14, and Source: Fortinet Security Advisory (FG-IR-25-910), and Source: CISA Alert, and Source: Fortinet Advisory for CVE-2025-58034, and Source: GBHackers (GBH) News Report, and Source: Fortinet Advisory (FG-IR-25-513), and Source: Trend Micro Research (Jason McFadyen).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability FOR453081325
Investigation Status: Ongoing (No confirmed exploits in the wild reported yet)
Incident : Ransomware Attack FOR753081525
Investigation Status: Ongoing (as of August 2025)
Incident : Data Breach FOR3202332101525
Investigation Status: Ongoing (Industry-Wide Analysis)
Incident : Unauthorized Access FOR1532815111725
Investigation Status: Ongoing (active exploitation confirmed; patch available)
Incident : Zero-day vulnerability FOR5592655111725
Investigation Status: Ongoing (limited details released by Fortinet; WatchTowr provided reverse-engineered analysis)
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2232822111825
Investigation Status: Active Exploitation Confirmed (per CISA KEV Catalog)
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4992549111825
Investigation Status: Active exploitation confirmed; remediation ongoing
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR0562105111925
Investigation Status: Ongoing (exploitation confirmed, patches likely in development)
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2762227111925
Investigation Status: Ongoing (active exploitation confirmed; no attribution disclosed)
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR3793237111925
Investigation Status: Ongoing (active exploitation confirmed; remediation urged)
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4002340112025
Investigation Status: Ongoing (active exploitation confirmed; organizations urged to check for compromise)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Advisory With Patch Recommendations, Subscription-Based Breaking News Alerts, Public Report (Oct. 8, 2024), Media Interviews (E.G., Dice, Fortinet Experts), Security Advisories From Researchers (Pwndefend, Watchtowr Labs), Media Reports Urging Immediate Action, Generic Patch Notes Referencing 'Security Hardening', No Direct Acknowledgment Of In-The-Wild Exploitation Initially, Cisa Advisory (Kev Catalog Addition), Vendor Notification (Fortinet), Public Advisory By Fortiguard Labs, Cisa Advisory Issued, Cisa Advisory, Fortinet Security Bulletin (Fg-Ir-25-910), Cisa Alert Issued, Fortinet Advisory Published, Public Disclosure Via Media (E.G., Google News, Linkedin and X).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability FOR453081325
Stakeholder Advisories: Public Patch Advisory Issued By Fortinet.
Customer Advisories: Admins advised to upgrade or restrict access to TCP/7900
Incident : Data Breach FOR3202332101525
Stakeholder Advisories: Executives Urged To Prioritize Upskilling And Strategic Cybersecurity Investments., It/Security Teams Advised To Pursue Ai-Related Certifications (E.G., Prompt Engineering)., Organizations Recommended To Foster Cross-Functional Ai-Security Collaboration..
Incident : Unauthorized Access FOR1532815111725
Stakeholder Advisories: Urgent Patching And System Review Recommended For All Fortiweb Users.
Customer Advisories: Fortinet customers advised to update to 8.0.2 and check for unauthorized accounts
Incident : Zero-day vulnerability FOR5592655111725
Stakeholder Advisories: Enterprises Urged To Monitor Vendor Release Notes Carefully And Prioritize Patching For Waf Devices.
Customer Advisories: Immediate patching recommended; enhanced monitoring of WAF logs advised
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2232822111825
Stakeholder Advisories: Cisa Advisory For Federal Agencies (Bod 22-01), Fortinet Customer Notification.
Customer Advisories: Apply patches immediately or discontinue use of affected FortiWeb versions.Review logs for indicators of exploitation (e.g., unusual admin commands via HTTP/HTTPS).
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4992549111825
Stakeholder Advisories: Cisa Advisory For Federal Agencies (Remediation Deadline: 2025-11-21).
Customer Advisories: Fortinet customer advisory to patch FortiWeb WAF systems
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR0562105111925
Stakeholder Advisories: Cisa Advisory For Federal Enterprises.
Customer Advisories: FortiGuard Labs public disclosure
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2762227111925
Stakeholder Advisories: Cisa Urgent Warning, Fortinet Patch Advisory.
Customer Advisories: Federal agencies: Mandatory remediation by November 21, 2025
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR3793237111925
Stakeholder Advisories: Cisa Alert For Federal And Private Sector Stakeholders, Fortinet Customer Advisory.
Customer Advisories: Patch FortiWeb systems immediatelyMonitor for suspicious activityConsider temporary mitigations if patching is delayed
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4002340112025
Customer Advisories: Fortinet has released comprehensive documentation, including CVRF and CSAF files, for customer integration into security tools.
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Public Patch Advisory Issued By Fortinet, Admins Advised To Upgrade Or Restrict Access To Tcp/7900, , Executives Urged To Prioritize Upskilling And Strategic Cybersecurity Investments., It/Security Teams Advised To Pursue Ai-Related Certifications (E.G., Prompt Engineering)., Organizations Recommended To Foster Cross-Functional Ai-Security Collaboration., Urgent Patching And System Review Recommended For All Fortiweb Users, Fortinet Customers Advised To Update To 8.0.2 And Check For Unauthorized Accounts, , Enterprises Urged To Monitor Vendor Release Notes Carefully And Prioritize Patching For Waf Devices, Immediate Patching Recommended; Enhanced Monitoring Of Waf Logs Advised, , Cisa Advisory For Federal Agencies (Bod 22-01), Fortinet Customer Notification, Apply Patches Immediately Or Discontinue Use Of Affected Fortiweb Versions., Review Logs For Indicators Of Exploitation (E.G., Unusual Admin Commands Via Http/Https)., , Cisa Advisory For Federal Agencies (Remediation Deadline: 2025-11-21), Fortinet Customer Advisory To Patch Fortiweb Waf Systems, , Cisa Advisory For Federal Enterprises, Fortiguard Labs Public Disclosure, , Cisa Urgent Warning, Fortinet Patch Advisory, Federal Agencies: Mandatory Remediation By November 21, 2025, , Cisa Alert For Federal And Private Sector Stakeholders, Fortinet Customer Advisory, Patch Fortiweb Systems Immediately, Monitor For Suspicious Activity, Consider Temporary Mitigations If Patching Is Delayed, , Fortinet has released comprehensive documentation, including CVRF and CSAF files and for customer integration into security tools..
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach FOR223227123
Entry Point: Fortinet VPN vulnerability
Incident : Ransomware FOR001032225
Entry Point: Vulnerabilities in Fortinet firewalls
Backdoors Established: Deceptive local VPN accounts
High Value Targets: High-value assets
Data Sold on Dark Web: High-value assets
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR548051425
Entry Point: Unauthenticated attackers exploiting the vulnerability
Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability FOR300060925
Entry Point: AuthHash cookie parameter within the /remote/hostcheck_validate endpoint
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR553070925
Entry Point: HTTP/HTTPS administrative interface
Incident : Vulnerability FOR453081325
Entry Point: Phmonitor Service (Tcp/7900) Via Crafted Cli Requests,
Incident : Ransomware Attack FOR753081525
Entry Point: Exploited Vulnerabilities (E.G., Fortinet, Telerik, Citrix, Sharepoint), Compromised Software Providers (Supply Chain),
High Value Targets: U.S. Critical Infrastructure, Government/Law Enforcement, Energy/Utilities, Telecommunications,
Data Sold on Dark Web: U.S. Critical Infrastructure, Government/Law Enforcement, Energy/Utilities, Telecommunications,
Incident : Data Breach FOR3202332101525
Entry Point: Phishing (Likely), Exploited Ai Tools, Unpatched Systems Due To Skill Gaps,
High Value Targets: Sensitive Data, Ai Training Datasets, Intellectual Property,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Sensitive Data, Ai Training Datasets, Intellectual Property,
Incident : Unauthorized Access FOR1532815111725
Entry Point: Path traversal vulnerability in `/api/v2.0/cmdb/system/admin%3f/../../../../../cgi-bin/fwbcgi`
Reconnaissance Period: Observed since early October 2024
Backdoors Established: ["Unauthorized admin accounts (e.g., 'Testpoint', 'trader1')"]
High Value Targets: Fortiweb Management Interfaces, Corporate Networks (Potential Lateral Movement),
Data Sold on Dark Web: Fortiweb Management Interfaces, Corporate Networks (Potential Lateral Movement),
Incident : Zero-day vulnerability FOR5592655111725
High Value Targets: Fortiweb Waf Devices (Perimeter Defense For Web Applications),
Data Sold on Dark Web: Fortiweb Waf Devices (Perimeter Defense For Web Applications),
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2232822111825
Entry Point: Fortiweb Path Traversal (Cve-2025-64446),
High Value Targets: Web Application Firewall (Waf) Configurations, Protected Applications, Network Security Controls,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Web Application Firewall (Waf) Configurations, Protected Applications, Network Security Controls,
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4992549111825
Entry Point: Exposed Fortiweb Waf (Http/Https),
Backdoors Established: ['Potential if attackers maintain access post-exploitation']
High Value Targets: Protected Applications Behind Waf, Downstream Infrastructure,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Protected Applications Behind Waf, Downstream Infrastructure,
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR0562105111925
Entry Point: Fortiweb Cli, Http Requests,
High Value Targets: Federal Enterprise Systems (Per Cisa),
Data Sold on Dark Web: Federal Enterprise Systems (Per Cisa),
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2762227111925
Entry Point: Fortiweb Waf Path Traversal Vulnerability (Cve-2025-64446),
Backdoors Established: ['Potential for persistent malware deployment']
High Value Targets: Finance, Healthcare, And Managed Hosting Sectors,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Finance, Healthcare, And Managed Hosting Sectors,
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR3793237111925
Entry Point: Fortiweb Management Interface, Api Access,
High Value Targets: Protected Infrastructure Behind Fortiweb Firewall,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Protected Infrastructure Behind Fortiweb Firewall,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach FOR223227123
Root Causes: Exploitation of Fortinet VPN vulnerability
Corrective Actions: Patching the vulnerability
Incident : Ransomware FOR001032225
Root Causes: Vulnerabilities in Fortinet firewalls
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR548051425
Root Causes: Stack-based overflow vulnerability
Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability FOR300060925
Root Causes: Improper bounds checking when handling the 'enc' parameter
Corrective Actions: Apply security patches and disable HTTP/HTTPS administrative interfaces as an interim workaround
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR553070925
Root Causes: Improper input validation mechanisms in the GUI component
Corrective Actions: Patch The Vulnerability, Disable Administrative Interfaces, Implement Additional Security Measures,
Incident : Vulnerability FOR453081325
Root Causes: Improper Neutralization Of Special Elements In Fortisiem'S Cli Request Handling,
Corrective Actions: Released Patches For Affected Versions, Advisory To Restrict Access To Vulnerable Port,
Incident : Ransomware Attack FOR753081525
Root Causes: Unpatched Critical Vulnerabilities In Enterprise Software, Inadequate Network Segmentation Allowing Lateral Movement, Supply Chain Security Gaps In Software Providers, Persistent Targeting By Sophisticated Raas Groups,
Corrective Actions: Mandatory Patching Timelines For Critical Cves., Zero-Trust Architecture Implementation., Supply Chain Security Frameworks (E.G., Nist Ssdf)., Enhanced Threat Intelligence Sharing For Raas Groups.,
Incident : Data Breach FOR3202332101525
Root Causes: Lack Of Ai/It Security Expertise (48% Of Orgs), Insufficient Training Programs (54% Cite Lack Of It Security Skills), Over-Reliance On Ai Without Human Oversight, Reactive (Vs. Proactive) Cybersecurity Culture,
Corrective Actions: Expand Certification Programs (E.G., Fortinet, Noma Security)., Integrate Ai Security Into University Curricula., Implement Mandatory Upskilling For Security Teams., Develop Ai Governance Frameworks To Mitigate Prompt Injection/Other Risks., Enhance Collaboration Between Ai Developers And Security Teams.,
Incident : Unauthorized Access FOR1532815111725
Root Causes: Unpatched Path Traversal Vulnerability In Fortiweb, Public Exposure Of Management Interfaces, Lack Of Timely Vendor Advisory (No Cve Assigned As Of Disclosure),
Corrective Actions: Patch Management Process Review, Enhanced Monitoring Of Administrative Account Changes, Restriction Of Management Interface Access, Proactive Vulnerability Scanning For Exposed Devices,
Incident : Zero-day vulnerability FOR5592655111725
Root Causes: Delayed Public Disclosure Of Actively Exploited Zero-Day Vulnerability, Lack Of Detailed Security Advisory Or Cve Designation At Time Of Patch Release, Underestimation Of Waf Devices As High-Value Targets In Patch Management Cycles,
Corrective Actions: Fortinet Updated Advisory Database With Generic Patch Notes (Post-Facto), Security Community Emphasized Need For Transparent, Timely Disclosure Of Critical Vulnerabilities, Recommendations Issued For Immediate Patching And Enhanced Monitoring,
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2232822111825
Root Causes: Relative Path Traversal Vulnerability (Cwe-23) In Fortiweb’S Authentication Mechanism., Insufficient Input Validation For Pathname Construction In Http/Https Request Handling.,
Corrective Actions: Fortinet To Release Patches Addressing Cve-2025-64446., Organizations To Enforce Strict Patch Management For Security Appliances., Enhance Waf Rule Sets To Detect And Block Path Traversal Attempts.,
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4992549111825
Root Causes: Improper Validation Of Path Elements In Fortiweb Waf (Cwe-23), Lack Of Authentication Requirements For Critical Administrative Functions, Potential Misconfigurations In Internet-Facing Deployments,
Corrective Actions: Vendor Patch To Validate And Neutralize Path Traversal Attempts, Enhanced Default Security Configurations For Fortiweb, Improved Logging And Detection For Path-Traversal Attempts,
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR0562105111925
Root Causes: Command Injection Vulnerability In Fortiweb, Insufficient Input Validation For Cli/Http Requests,
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR2762227111925
Root Causes: Relative Path Traversal Weakness (Cwe-23) In Fortiweb Waf, Delayed Patching Due To Operational Constraints Or Technical Debt, Insufficient Network Segmentation For Security Appliances,
Corrective Actions: Apply Vendor-Provided Patches Promptly, Implement Compensatory Controls (E.G., Segmentation, Monitoring) For Unpatchable Systems, Review And Update Vulnerability Management Processes For Edge Appliances,
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR3793237111925
Root Causes: Improper Neutralization Of Os Command Inputs (Cwe-78), Authenticated Access To Management Interface/Api Exploited,
Corrective Actions: Patch Management Improvements, Enhanced Access Controls For Management Interfaces, Proactive Vulnerability Scanning For Critical Security Products,
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation FOR4002340112025
Root Causes: Improper neutralization of special elements in OS commands (CWE-78) within FortiWeb’s HTTP request/CLI command processing.
Corrective Actions: Code-Level Fixes In Patched Versions To Prevent Command Injection., Enhanced Input Validation For Authenticated Commands.,
Incident : Zero-day exploitation FOR1102211112125
Root Causes: Silent Patching Of Zero-Day Vulnerabilities Without Customer Notification, Lack Of Transparency In Vulnerability Management,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Cybersecurity experts, , Block and monitor for connections from the following IP addresses: 198.105.127.124, 43.228.217.173, 43.228.217.82, 156.236.76.90, 218.187.69.244, and 218.187.69.59, , Recommended for early detection, Ai-Driven Threat Detection, Real-Time Visibility Tools, , Pwndefend, Defused Research Team, Watchtowr Labs, Rapid7, , Log Inspection For `Fwbcgi` Endpoint Activity, , Watchtowr (Threat Intelligence Firm), , Monitoring Of Waf Logs For Anomalous Requests, , Monitor For Exploitation Attempts Via Http/Https Requests, , Review Access Logs For Exploitation Attempts, , Reported By Jason Mcfadyen (Trend Micro) Under Responsible Disclosure, , Sustained Monitoring Of Access Logs, Unexpected Requests, And Outbound Connections, , Monitor Fortiweb Logs For Suspicious Authentication Attempts, Track Unusual Cli Commands, Detect Command Execution Activities Deviating From Normal Operations, , Recommended for unpatched systems.
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Patching the vulnerability, Apply security patches and disable HTTP/HTTPS administrative interfaces as an interim workaround, Patch The Vulnerability, Disable Administrative Interfaces, Implement Additional Security Measures, , Released Patches For Affected Versions, Advisory To Restrict Access To Vulnerable Port, , Mandatory Patching Timelines For Critical Cves., Zero-Trust Architecture Implementation., Supply Chain Security Frameworks (E.G., Nist Ssdf)., Enhanced Threat Intelligence Sharing For Raas Groups., , Expand Certification Programs (E.G., Fortinet, Noma Security)., Integrate Ai Security Into University Curricula., Implement Mandatory Upskilling For Security Teams., Develop Ai Governance Frameworks To Mitigate Prompt Injection/Other Risks., Enhance Collaboration Between Ai Developers And Security Teams., , Patch Management Process Review, Enhanced Monitoring Of Administrative Account Changes, Restriction Of Management Interface Access, Proactive Vulnerability Scanning For Exposed Devices, , Fortinet Updated Advisory Database With Generic Patch Notes (Post-Facto), Security Community Emphasized Need For Transparent, Timely Disclosure Of Critical Vulnerabilities, Recommendations Issued For Immediate Patching And Enhanced Monitoring, , Fortinet To Release Patches Addressing Cve-2025-64446., Organizations To Enforce Strict Patch Management For Security Appliances., Enhance Waf Rule Sets To Detect And Block Path Traversal Attempts., , Vendor Patch To Validate And Neutralize Path Traversal Attempts, Enhanced Default Security Configurations For Fortiweb, Improved Logging And Detection For Path-Traversal Attempts, , Apply Vendor-Provided Patches Promptly, Implement Compensatory Controls (E.G., Segmentation, Monitoring) For Unpatchable Systems, Review And Update Vulnerability Management Processes For Edge Appliances, , Patch Management Improvements, Enhanced Access Controls For Management Interfaces, Proactive Vulnerability Scanning For Critical Security Products, , Code-Level Fixes In Patched Versions To Prevent Command Injection., Enhanced Input Validation For Authenticated Commands., .
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Orange, SuperBlack ransomware operators, Name: Qilin Ransomware GroupType: Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) OperatorAttribution: {'confidence': 'High', 'source': 'Cyble Research'}Tactics: ['Persistent Targeting of High-Value Western Entities', 'Exploitation of Critical Infrastructure', 'Supply Chain Compromise via Software Providers', 'Systematic Vulnerability Weaponization']Historical Activity: Dominant for 3 of the last 4 months (as of July 2025), Cybercriminals Leveraging AIInternal Threats Due to Lack of Awareness and Unknown (Automated Mass Scanning)Multiple Attackers.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2025-07-01.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-11-14.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were VPN login names, VPN passwords, , Personal identification data, Financial details, Security credentials, , Sensitive data stored in the backend database, High (critical infrastructure and supply chain data), Potential interception of sensitive data passing through WAF and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident were FortiVoiceFortiMailFortiNDRFortiRecorderFortiCamera and FortiVoiceFortiMailFortiNDRFortiRecorderFortiCamera and and Google ChromeFortinet FortiWeb and FortiSIEM versions 7.3.0–7.3.1, 7.2.0–7.2.5, 7.1.0–7.1.7, 7.0.0–7.0.3, 6.7.0–6.7.9, and older branches (6.6, 6.5, 6.4, 6.3, 6.2, 6.1, 5.4) and Fortinet FortiClientEMSProgress Telerik UI for ASP.NET AJAXCitrix NetScaler ADC/GatewayMicrosoft SharePointGovernment/Law Enforcement SystemsEnergy/Utilities InfrastructureTelecommunications NetworksApplication Software Providers (Supply Chain) and FortiWeb appliances (unpatched versions) and FortiWeb WAF devices (versions prior to 7.0.7 and 7.2.2) and Fortinet FortiWeb Web Application Firewall and Fortinet FortiWeb WAFProtected applicationsDownstream infrastructure and FortiWeb Firewall Products (versions 7.6.0–7.6.4, 7.4.0–7.4.8, 7.2.0–7.2.11, 7.0.2–7.0.11) and FortiWeb WAF appliances (unpatched versions) and Fortinet FortiWeb appliancesPotentially protected infrastructure behind the firewall and FortiWeb deployments running unpatched versions (pre-8.0.2, 7.6.6, 7.4.11, 7.2.12, 7.0.12) and FortiWeb web application firewall.
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was Cybersecurity experts, , pwndefend, defused research team, watchtowr labs, rapid7, , watchtowr (threat intelligence firm), , reported by jason mcfadyen (trend micro) under responsible disclosure, .
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Disable HTTP/HTTPS administrative interfaces on affected devices, Disable the HTTP/HTTPS administrative interface, Restrict access to phMonitor port (TCP/7900) to trusted internal hosts/IPs, Upskilling Programs (61% report improved skills via certifications)Mandatory Cybersecurity Training (62% post-breach), Update to FortiWeb 8.0.2Review administrative user lists for unexpected accountsInspect logs for requests to `fwbcgi` pathBlock public internet access to management interfacesRestrict access to trusted networks or VPN-only channels, Immediate patching to versions 7.0.7 or 7.2.2 recommended, Apply Security PatchesDiscontinue Use of Affected Products (if mitigations unavailable), Network segmentation to limit lateral movement, Isolate affected FortiWeb appliances from broader network communicationRestrict administrative access via network segmentation and VPN-only pathwaysMonitor for unfamiliar administrative activity or web traffic anomalies, Network segmentation to restrict management accessDiscontinuing use of affected product if patches/workarounds are insufficient, Upgrade to patched versions (8.0.2+, 7.6.6+, 7.4.11+, 7.2.12+ and 7.0.12+)Restrict authenticated access to FortiWeb systemsMonitor logs for suspicious command execution patterns.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were VPN login names, Financial details, Personal identification data, Sensitive data stored in the backend database, VPN passwords, Security credentials, High (critical infrastructure and supply chain data) and Potential interception of sensitive data passing through WAF.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 500.0K.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Access controls and logging are essential mitigations when patching is delayed., Transparency in vulnerability disclosure and patching is critical to maintain customer trust and security posture.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Prioritize remediation for internet-facing FortiWeb deployments., Immediately apply updates to FortiWeb versions 7.0.7 and 7.2.2., Conduct thorough audits of patching processes to ensure compliance with best practices for transparency., Isolate unpatched devices and monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., unfamiliar admin activity, traffic anomalies)., Monitor for unusual activity on TCP/7900, though exploits may lack distinctive IoCs, Restrict access to phMonitor port (TCP/7900) to trusted internal hosts/IPs if patching is delayed, Treat cybersecurity as a strategic, companywide initiative (not reactive)., Partner with universities/industry bodies to standardize AI security curricula., Mandate certifications for IT/security personnel post-breach (62% preference)., Improve communication with customers regarding vulnerability patches and potential risks., Preparation for **ransomware response**, including offline backups and incident playbooks., Deployment of **adaptive behavioral WAFs** to detect exploitation attempts., Supply chain risk management, including **third-party software provider audits**., Integrate Fortinet’s CVRF/CSAF advisories into vulnerability management tools for automated tracking., Immediately patch FortiWeb to version 8.0.2 or later, Treat firmware updates for critical infrastructure with urgency, even when details are minimal., Apply Fortinet-provided patches immediately., Monitor logs for suspicious activity (e.g., requests to `fwbcgi`), Enhanced monitoring for **Microsoft SharePoint vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-53770/71, CVE-2025-49704/06)**., Disable administrative interfaces as a precaution, Evaluate compensatory controls (e.g., WAF rules, IPS signatures) if patching is delayed., Evaluate the necessity of FortiWeb in the architecture if vendor mitigations are delayed or unavailable., Monitor access logs for anomalous HTTP/HTTPS requests targeting FortiWeb appliances., Implement network segmentation to isolate WAF systems and limit lateral movement., Audit all administrative accounts for unauthorized entries, Upgrade FortiWeb installations to patched versions, Implement network segmentation, access controls, and continuous monitoring, Prioritize patching based on threat intelligence, especially for frontline defense devices., Prioritize vulnerability management for security appliances to reduce technical debt and exposure., Focus hiring/retention on cloud, network, and data security skills (top gaps)., Use artifact-generation tools (e.g., from watchTowr Labs) to detect vulnerable systems, Enhance monitoring for suspicious CLI commands and authentication attempts., Follow CISA guidance for federal enterprise mitigation, Enforce least-privilege access and multi-factor authentication (MFA) for FortiWeb management interfaces., Conduct traffic analysis for signs of post-compromise activity., Review and update incident response plans to include WAF-specific compromise scenarios., Immediately inventory all FortiWeb deployments and verify versions., Prioritize remediation of CISA KEV-listed vulnerabilities to reduce exposure to active threats., Implementation of **network segmentation** to isolate critical systems., Invest in AI-specific upskilling (e.g., prompt engineering, agentic AI) for security teams., Monitor access logs for indicators of exploitation (e.g., unusual HTTP/HTTPS requests)., Balance AI automation with human expertise for contextual threat analysis., Immediately apply Fortinet patches (7.4.8 or 7.6.6) for FortiWeb appliances., Implement network segmentation to restrict administrative access to FortiWeb appliances., Implement network segmentation to contain potential breaches involving FortiWeb devices., Enforce VPN-only access pathways and enable strict logging for administrative actions., Prioritize patching in a staged rollout (non-production first)., Deploy network segmentation to limit lateral movement risks., For cloud deployments, enhance monitoring of access logs and outbound connections., Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., unusual CLI/HTTP requests), Users are advised to upgrade to fixed releases for the affected solutions., Discontinue use of affected FortiWeb versions if patches/workarounds are insufficient., Regular **vulnerability assessments** and penetration testing for internet-facing applications., Immediate patching of **CVE-2023-48788 (Fortinet)**, **CVE-2019-18935 (Telerik)**, and **CVE-2025-5777 (Citrix)**., Apply patches for FortiWeb versions 7.6.0–7.6.4, 7.4.0–7.4.8, 7.2.0–7.2.11, 7.0.2–7.0.11 once available, Restrict management interface access to trusted networks/VPNs, Follow BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud deployments., Subscribe to threat intelligence feeds for updates on emerging exploits, Strengthen monitoring of WAF logs, particularly for anomalous requests., Implement network segmentation to restrict FortiWeb management access., Upgrade FortiSIEM to patched versions immediately (7.4, 7.3.2+, 7.2.6+, etc.), Consider compensating controls (e.g., enhanced monitoring) if patches cannot be applied immediately., Deploy additional network-based security controls to detect exploitation attempts., Immediately patch Fortinet FortiWeb deployments to the latest secure version., Assume compromise if running vulnerable versions and investigate thoroughly and Immediately patch Fortinet FortiWeb WAF systems to the latest version per vendor guidance..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Horizon3.ai Research (Prior PoCs for CVE-2023-34992 and CVE-2024-23108), FortiGuard Labs Advisory, Trend Micro Research (Jason McFadyen), CISA Alert, PwnDefend & Defused Research Team Analysis, CISA Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01, CISA Advisory (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog), Fortinet Advisory (Hypothetical, not provided in text), Cyble Research, Rapid7 Vulnerability Testing Report, watchTowr (Benjamin Harris) Tweet, Cyber Daily Article by David Hollingworth, watchTowr Labs Exploit Confirmation, Fortinet Security Advisory (CVE-2025-64446), Fortinet Advisory for CVE-2025-58034, Fortinet Security Advisory for CVE-2025-64446, GMO Cybersecurity by Ierae, Cyberseek Job Board (500,000+ U.S. Openings), Sapio Research & Fortinet Report, GBHackers (GBH) News Report, Dice Interview with Amit Zimerman (Oasis Security), Help Net Security, Dice Interview with Diana Kelley (Noma Security), CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog, Fortinet Advisory Database (generic patch notes), Fortinet Security Advisory (FG-IR-25-910), Fortinet Advisory (FG-IR-25-513), WatchTowr (Threat Intelligence Firm) and Dice Interview with Melonia da Gama (Fortinet).
What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.cyberseek.org/ .
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (No confirmed exploits in the wild reported yet).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Public patch advisory issued by Fortinet, Executives urged to prioritize upskilling and strategic cybersecurity investments., IT/security teams advised to pursue AI-related certifications (e.g., prompt engineering)., Organizations recommended to foster cross-functional AI-security collaboration., Urgent patching and system review recommended for all FortiWeb users, Enterprises urged to monitor vendor release notes carefully and prioritize patching for WAF devices, CISA Advisory for Federal Agencies (BOD 22-01), Fortinet Customer Notification, CISA advisory for federal agencies (remediation deadline: 2025-11-21), CISA advisory for federal enterprises, CISA urgent warning, Fortinet patch advisory, CISA alert for federal and private sector stakeholders, Fortinet customer advisory, .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Admins advised to upgrade or restrict access to TCP/7900, Fortinet customers advised to update to 8.0.2 and check for unauthorized accounts, Immediate patching recommended; enhanced monitoring of WAF logs advised, Apply patches immediately or discontinue use of affected FortiWeb versions.Review logs for indicators of exploitation (e.g., unusual admin commands via HTTP/HTTPS)., Fortinet customer advisory to patch FortiWeb WAF systems, FortiGuard Labs public disclosure, Federal agencies: Mandatory remediation by November 21, 2025, Patch FortiWeb systems immediatelyMonitor for suspicious activityConsider temporary mitigations if patching is delayed, Fortinet has released comprehensive documentation, including CVRF and CSAF files and for customer integration into security tools.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker were an Vulnerabilities in Fortinet firewalls, Unauthenticated attackers exploiting the vulnerability, AuthHash cookie parameter within the /remote/hostcheck_validate endpoint, HTTP/HTTPS administrative interface, Fortinet VPN vulnerability and Path traversal vulnerability in `/api/v2.0/cmdb/system/admin%3f/../../../../../cgi-bin/fwbcgi`.
What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was Observed since early October 2024.
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Exploitation of Fortinet VPN vulnerability, Vulnerabilities in Fortinet firewalls, Stack-based overflow vulnerability, Improper bounds checking when handling the 'enc' parameter, Improper input validation mechanisms in the GUI component, Improper neutralization of special elements in FortiSIEM's CLI request handling, Unpatched Critical Vulnerabilities in Enterprise SoftwareInadequate Network Segmentation Allowing Lateral MovementSupply Chain Security Gaps in Software ProvidersPersistent Targeting by Sophisticated RaaS Groups, Lack of AI/IT Security Expertise (48% of orgs)Insufficient Training Programs (54% cite lack of IT security skills)Over-Reliance on AI Without Human OversightReactive (vs. Proactive) Cybersecurity Culture, Unpatched path traversal vulnerability in FortiWebPublic exposure of management interfacesLack of timely vendor advisory (no CVE assigned as of disclosure), Delayed public disclosure of actively exploited zero-day vulnerabilityLack of detailed security advisory or CVE designation at time of patch releaseUnderestimation of WAF devices as high-value targets in patch management cycles, Relative path traversal vulnerability (CWE-23) in FortiWeb’s authentication mechanism.Insufficient input validation for pathname construction in HTTP/HTTPS request handling., Improper validation of path elements in FortiWeb WAF (CWE-23)Lack of authentication requirements for critical administrative functionsPotential misconfigurations in internet-facing deployments, Command injection vulnerability in FortiWebInsufficient input validation for CLI/HTTP requests, Relative path traversal weakness (CWE-23) in FortiWeb WAFDelayed patching due to operational constraints or technical debtInsufficient network segmentation for security appliances, Improper neutralization of OS command inputs (CWE-78)Authenticated access to management interface/API exploited, Improper neutralization of special elements in OS commands (CWE-78) within FortiWeb’s HTTP request/CLI command processing., Silent patching of zero-day vulnerabilities without customer notificationLack of transparency in vulnerability management.
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Patching the vulnerability, Apply security patches and disable HTTP/HTTPS administrative interfaces as an interim workaround, Patch the vulnerabilityDisable administrative interfacesImplement additional security measures, Released patches for affected versionsAdvisory to restrict access to vulnerable port, Mandatory patching timelines for critical CVEs.Zero-trust architecture implementation.Supply chain security frameworks (e.g., NIST SSDF).Enhanced threat intelligence sharing for RaaS groups., Expand certification programs (e.g., Fortinet, Noma Security).Integrate AI security into university curricula.Implement mandatory upskilling for security teams.Develop AI governance frameworks to mitigate prompt injection/other risks.Enhance collaboration between AI developers and security teams., Patch management process reviewEnhanced monitoring of administrative account changesRestriction of management interface accessProactive vulnerability scanning for exposed devices, Fortinet updated advisory database with generic patch notes (post-facto)Security community emphasized need for transparent, timely disclosure of critical vulnerabilitiesRecommendations issued for immediate patching and enhanced monitoring, Fortinet to release patches addressing CVE-2025-64446.Organizations to enforce strict patch management for security appliances.Enhance WAF rule sets to detect and block path traversal attempts., Vendor patch to validate and neutralize path traversal attemptsEnhanced default security configurations for FortiWebImproved logging and detection for path-traversal attempts, Apply vendor-provided patches promptlyImplement compensatory controls (e.g., segmentation, monitoring) for unpatchable systemsReview and update vulnerability management processes for edge appliances, Patch management improvementsEnhanced access controls for management interfacesProactive vulnerability scanning for critical security products, Code-level fixes in patched versions to prevent command injection.Enhanced input validation for authenticated commands..
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server, Remote Desktop Manager on Windows.This issue affects Devolutions Server: through 2025.3.8.0; Remote Desktop Manager: through 2025.3.23.0.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description
Out-of-bounds memory operations in org.lz4:lz4-java 1.8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause denial of service and read adjacent memory via untrusted compressed input.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Reveals plaintext credentials in the MONITOR command vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from 1.0.0 through 2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description
Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from v2.9.0 through v2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description
File upload vulnerability in HCL Technologies Ltd. Unica 12.0.0.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=fortinet' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
