Comparison Overview
Fortinet
Fortinet
899 Kifer Road, Sunnyvale, 94086, US
Last Update: 14/05/2026
Fortinet makes possible a digital world that we can always trust through its mission to protect people, devices, and data everywhere. This is why the world’s largest enterprises, service providers, and government organizations choose Fortinet to securely accelerate thei...
Palo Alto Networks
3000 Tannery Way, SANTA CLARA, California, US, 95054
Last Update: 30/05/2026
Palo Alto Networks, the global cybersecurity leader, is shaping the cloud-centric future with technology that is transforming the way people and organizations operate. Our mission is to be the cybersecurity partner of choice, protecting our digital way of life. We help ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Fortinet
Palo Alto Networks
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)
Fortinet has 1227.43% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)
Palo Alto Networks has 548.15% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Fortinet (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fortinet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Palo Alto Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Palo Alto Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Fortinet
Palo Alto Networks
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Fides is an open-source privacy engineering platform. From version 2.33.0 to before version 2.84.5, there is a DOM-based XSS vulnerability in fides.js via the fides_description override. This issue has been patched in version 2.84.5.
WACRM prior to commit 73041bf contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the automation engine that allows authenticated attackers to access and modify contacts belonging to other tenants by supplying an arbitrary caller-controlled contact_id in the POST request body without tenant ownership verification. Attackers can exploit the service-role client that bypasses row-level security to modify victim contact fields including name, email, and company across tenant boundaries using only a known contact UUID.
Namespace attributes are not encoded correctly during HTML serialization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.
When ALLOW_INSECURE_RAW_TEXT is enabled, whitespace-variant closing tags (e.g., </style\t>) are not recognized by the sanitizer but accepted by browsers as valid end tags, allowing subsequent content to escape sanitization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.
Headplane is a feature-complete Web UI for Headscale. Prior to versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3, Headplane was vulnerable to a path traversal / authorization bypass in the Headscale API client used by node and user rename operations. This issue has been patched in versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3.