What is the official website of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP ?

The official website of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP is https://www.orrick.com.

What is Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP's cybersecurity risk score?

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 529 out of 1000, indicating a Critical security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP operate in ?

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP operates primarily in the Law Practice industry.

How many employees does Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP have ?

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP employs approximately 3,100 people worldwide.

Does Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP own any subsidiaries ?

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP have ?

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 65,035 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP ?

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP is classified under the NAICS code 54111, which corresponds to Offices of Lawyers.

Does Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/orrick.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP experienced ?

As of August 29, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP has experienced 4 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP have ?

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP has an estimated 16,222 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

OHSL

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

529

/1000

Critical

554

/1000

Very Poor

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

orrick.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

Orrick is a global law firm focused on serving the Technology & Innovation, Energy & Infrastructure, Finance and Life Sciences & HealthTech sectors. Leading companies and new entrants call on our teams in 25+ markets worldwide for forward-looking, pragmatic advice on transactions, litigation and compliance matters. We bring distinctive quality, teamwork, and value to the table – and innovate in everything we do. We’re especially focused on attracting and inspiring the best legal talent.

OHSL A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

OHSL

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Orrick, Herrington ...

Breach

1/2026

ORR1777062892

Orrick, Herrington ...

Breach

100

3/2023

ORR164231610052...

Orrick, Herrington ...

Breach

2/2023

ORR223072725

Orrick, Herrington ...

Breach

7/2022

ORRWEICRAMOSPRO...

Loading…

A.I.

OHSL Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for OHSL

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP has 30.56% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident Types OHSL vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 1 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.

Incident History - OHSL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Subsidiaries

OHSL

Law Practice

Website: https://www.orrick.com

Company Size: 1,001-5,000 employees

Orrick ItalyLaw Practice

Orrick UKLaw Practice

Orrick AsiaLegal Services

Orrick GermanyLaw Practice

Orrick FranceLaw Practice

Loading…

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Similar Companies

DLA Piper

dlapiper.com

DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver exceptional outcomes on cross-border projects, critical transactions and high-stakes disputes. Every day we help trailblazing organizations seize business opportunities and successfully manage growth and change at speed. Through our pro bono work and community investment around the world, we help create a more just and sustainable future. Visit dlapiper.com to discover more.

Loading…

NEWS

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

March 09, 2026 07:56 PM

FDIC publishes January 2026 enforcement actions

On February 27, the FDIC published its list of administrative enforcement actions issued in January. The agency reported eight orders,...

Read Article

March 09, 2026 07:23 PM

Fed’s Bowman previews Basel revisions to bolster banks’ mortgage activity

On February 16, the Fed's Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman discussed proposed changes to the Basel capital framework aimed at...

Read Article

March 09, 2026 06:56 PM

Democratic senators urge agencies to reinstate disparate impact liability references

On February 25, a group of Democratic senators issued a letter urging the OCC, FDIC, and NCUA to reinstate references to disparate impact...

Read Article

March 09, 2026 06:53 PM

Congressional Research Service examines regulatory complexity surrounding bank-fintech partnerships

On February 25, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) published a report examining the regulatory complexity posed by increasing...

Read Article

March 09, 2026 05:38 PM

States argue Education department’s student lending rule will exacerbate healthcare shortages

On March 3, a coalition of 24 state attorneys general and two governors issued a comment letter to the U.S. Department of Education opposing...

Read Article

March 09, 2026 05:26 PM

U.S. Supreme Court denies lender’s cert. petition in case upholding CFPB’s $134M restitution award

On March 2, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari in a case challenging a 9th Circuit ruling that upheld a $134...

Read Article

March 09, 2026 05:21 PM

OCC finalizes rules to reduce burdens for community banks

On March 3, the OCC announced it has finalized two rules intended to reduce regulatory burdens for community banks, adopting its earlier...

Read Article

March 09, 2026 05:18 PM

Connecticut regulator fines collection agency and control persons over alleged unlicensed activity

On February 10, the Connecticut Department of Banking ordered a collection agency and two control persons to cease and desist from multiple...

Read Article

March 09, 2026 04:28 PM

Washington state fines mortgage lender $100K, bars it from industry for alleged compliance failures

On February 20, the state of Washington's Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) issued a consent order against a licensed mortgage...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-55867

SUMMARY

Graylog is a free and open log management platform. From 6.2.0 until 6.3.12, 7.0.7, and 7.1.2, the DELETE /users/{userId}/tokens/{idOrToken} endpoint implemented by UsersResource.revokeToken() in graylog2-server/src/main/java/org/graylog2/rest/resources/users/UsersResource.java checks USERS_TOKENREMOVE permission against the attacker-controlled userId path parameter before resolving the token selected by idOrToken. An authenticated user can provide an authorized userId while accessTokenService.loadById() or accessTokenService.load() resolves a token belonging to another user, including a service account or administrator, after which accessTokenService.destroy() deletes that token without checking AccessToken.getUserName(). The issue does not expose token contents, but unauthorized deletion causes integrity impact and can disrupt access-token-based integrations. This issue is fixed in versions 6.3.12, 7.0.7, and 7.1.2.

Published

Date2026-08-28

Updated

Date2026-08-28

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55860

SUMMARY

MariaDB Connector/R2DBC is a non-blocking MariaDB and MySQL client implemented in Java. Prior to 1.4.1, org.mariadb:r2dbc-mariadb does not gate clear-text password authentication plugins on transport encryption because the AuthenticationPlugin interface has no capability for a plugin to require a secure connection. A hostile or man-in-the-middle MariaDB server can send an AuthSwitchRequest naming mysql_clear_password or dialog (PAM) over a plain-TCP unencrypted connection, and AuthenticationFlow permits ClearPasswordPluginFlow or PamPluginFlow to return the user's password as cleartext bytes on the wire. The disclosed credentials can subsequently be used to authenticate directly to the database server. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-28

Updated

Date2026-08-28

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.9

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55859

SUMMARY

MariaDB Connector/R2DBC is a non-blocking MariaDB and MySQL client implemented in Java. Prior to 1.4.1, org.mariadb:r2dbc-mariadb encodes and decodes all character data under the assumption that the connection character set is UTF-8. A server can announce a mid-session change to character_set_client through the OK-packet session-state-tracking mechanism, including through SET NAMES executed by a stored routine or trigger, server configuration, or a hostile or man-in-the-middle server. If the new character set is not UTF-8, the driver continues to exchange UTF-8 while the server interprets the same bytes under a different encoding, causing silent data corruption and a client/server charset-confusion mismatch that can defeat byte-wise quoting or escaping. The fix accepts only utf8, utf8mb3, or utf8mb4 after initialization; any other value raises R2dbcNonTransientResourceException with SQLState 08000 and closes the connection. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-28

Updated

Date2026-08-28

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.9

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55858

SUMMARY

MariaDB Connector/J is used to connect applications developed in Java to MariaDB and MySQL databases. Prior to 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9, the connector encodes and decodes protocol text and performs client-side escaping under the assumption that the connection character set is UTF-8. The server can report a mid-session change to character_set_client through OK-packet session-state tracking, including a change caused by SET NAMES, a stored routine or trigger, server configuration, or a hostile server. If character_set_client changes to a non-UTF-8 value, the driver continues to read and write UTF-8 while the server interprets the same bytes under another encoding, causing silent data corruption and a client/server charset-confusion mismatch that can defeat byte-wise quoting or escaping. The fix accepts only utf8, utf8mb3, or utf8mb4 after initialization; any other value causes SQLException with SQLState 08000 and closes the connection. This issue is fixed in versions 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9.

Published

Date2026-08-28

Updated

Date2026-08-28

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.9

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55857

SUMMARY

MariaDB Connector/J is used to connect applications developed in Java to MariaDB and MySQL databases. Prior to 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9, PAM dialog authentication can be coerced into transmitting the account password over an insecure connection. The mysql_clear_password plugin is gated behind a secure transport, but the sibling PAM handler SendPamAuthPacketFactory, named dialog by the server, does not declare that requirement and inherits the default secure-required value false; older branches implement the same affected behavior in SendPamAuthPacket. A hostile or man-in-the-middle server can send an Authentication Switch Request for dialog over plain TCP, causing the driver to return the user's password in cleartext when sslMode=DISABLE and restrictedAuth=null, which is the default configuration. Properly verified TLS and local Unix sockets are not exposed to this transport vector. This issue is fixed in versions 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9.

Published

Date2026-08-28

Updated

Date2026-08-28

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.9

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…