Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP » ORR1777062892

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ORR1777062892)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-62
Company Score Before Incident563 / 1000
Company Score After Incident501 / 1000
Company LinkView Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERORR1777062892
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal information
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2025
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP breach identified under incident ID ORR1777062892.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/orrick, the number of followers: 65035, the industry type: Law Practice and the number of employees: 3100 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 563 and after the incident was 501 with a difference of -62 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP and their customers.

On 01 January 2024, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Orrick Ex-Employee Withdraws Data Breach Lawsuit".

A former employee of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe voluntarily dismissed a data breach lawsuit against the law firm just hours after filing it in a California federal court.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal information.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating former employee...accusing Orrick of failing to safeguard his personal information and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating employee data was compromised in January cyberattack. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating failing to safeguard his personal information (implied credentials). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personal information...compromised in January cyberattack. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data breach lawsuit...alleged victims of a January cyberattack. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack...accusing Orrick of failing to safeguard data and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating lawsuit sought damages for alleged victims of cyberattack. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Trusted Relationship (60%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References