Comparison Overview
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
405 Howard St, San Francisco, 94105, US
Last Update: 24/04/2026
Orrick is a global law firm focused on serving the Technology & Innovation, Energy & Infrastructure, Finance and Life Sciences & HealthTech sectors. Leading companies and new entrants call on our teams in 25+ markets worldwide for forward-looking, pragmatic advice on tr...

DLA Piper
160 Aldersgate Street, London, EC1A 4HT, GB
Last Update: 03/04/2026
DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver excepti...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP







DLA Piper






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP has 31.51% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DLA Piper in 2026.
Incident History - Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - DLA Piper (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DLA Piper cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

DLA Piper
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.