Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Nintendo » NIN1789460618

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (NIN1789460618)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-3
Company Score Before Incident624 / 1000
Company Score After Incident621 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERNIN1789460618
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORWireless Proximity Exploit (QR Code-Based)
DATA EXPOSEDStored account information
INCIDENT DATE09/09/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Nintendo's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Nintendo Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Nintendo breach identified under incident ID NIN1789460618.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Nintendo's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/nintendo, the number of followers: 888875, the industry type: Computer Games and the number of employees: 7752 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 624 and after the incident was 621 with a difference of -3 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Nintendo and their customers.

On 10 September 2026, Nintendo disclosed Vulnerability Exploitation issues under the banner "Nintendo Switch Vulnerability Exposes Original Consoles to Remote Exploits".

Nintendo has disclosed a critical vulnerability (CVE-2026-82079) affecting the original Nintendo Switch, prompting an urgent firmware update for users who play in public spaces.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Original Nintendo Switch consoles, and exposing Stored account information.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Firmware update (version 23.0.0) released on September 9, 2026, and began remediation that includes Avoid public use of vulnerable features and refrain from scanning QR codes with untrusted devices, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public advisory via firmware update notification and system settings.

The case underscores how and recommending next steps like Apply firmware update (version 23.0.0) immediately and avoid using vulnerable features in public spaces, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Users advised to update firmware via System Settings > System > System Update and avoid scanning QR codes with untrusted devices.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including stack-based buffer overflow...execute unauthorized code, and cVE-2026-82079 (Stack-Based Buffer Overflow) and Software Deployment Tools (T1072) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exploiting the **Send to Smartphone** feature or **Super Mario Kart such as Home Circuit**. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including allows attackers...to execute unauthorized code, and stack-based buffer overflow and User Execution: Malicious Link (T1204.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating qR code mechanism used to transfer screenshots or establish local wireless connections. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Adversary-in-the-Middle: LLMNR/NBT-NS Poisoning and SMB Relay (T1557.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating if an attacker scans the code before the intended user, they can gain access to the console and Steal Web Session Cookie (T1539) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating potentially compromising stored account information. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including extract data from the console, and stored account information. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including data exfiltration such as Potential, and extract data from the console. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Defense Evasion (T1211) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including stack-based buffer overflow...execute unauthorized code, and cVE-2026-82079 and Indicator Removal: File Deletion (T1070.004) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no details on malware’s origin or extent of breach. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploitation for Client Execution (90%)
Software Deployment Tools (70%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (90%)
User Execution: Malicious Link (80%)
Credential Access
Adversary-in-the-Middle: LLMNR/NBT-NS Poisoning and SMB Relay (60%)
Steal Web Session Cookie (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Defense Evasion
Exploitation for Defense Evasion (80%)
Indicator Removal: File Deletion (40%)

Sources & References