What is the official website of NIKKEI FORUM ?

The official website of NIKKEI FORUM is https://futureofasia.net/asia2024/eng/index.

What is NIKKEI FORUM's cybersecurity risk score?

NIKKEI FORUM has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 758 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has NIKKEI FORUM experienced?

According to Rankiteo, NIKKEI FORUM currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has NIKKEI FORUM been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, NIKKEI FORUM has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does NIKKEI FORUM have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, NIKKEI FORUM is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does NIKKEI FORUM have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, NIKKEI FORUM does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does NIKKEI FORUM comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, NIKKEI FORUM is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does NIKKEI FORUM have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, NIKKEI FORUM does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does NIKKEI FORUM comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, NIKKEI FORUM is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does NIKKEI FORUM have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,NIKKEI FORUM is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does NIKKEI FORUM operate in ?

NIKKEI FORUM operates primarily in the Events Services industry.

How many employees does NIKKEI FORUM have ?

NIKKEI FORUM employs approximately None employees people worldwide.

Does NIKKEI FORUM own any subsidiaries ?

NIKKEI FORUM presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does NIKKEI FORUM have ?

NIKKEI FORUM's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 459 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for NIKKEI FORUM ?

NIKKEI FORUM is classified under the NAICS code 56192, which corresponds to Convention and Trade Show Organizers.

Does NIKKEI FORUM have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, NIKKEI FORUM does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does NIKKEI FORUM have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, NIKKEI FORUM maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/nikkei-forum.

How many cybersecurity incidents has NIKKEI FORUM experienced ?

As of August 11, 2026, Rankiteo reports that NIKKEI FORUM has experienced 10 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does NIKKEI FORUM have ?

NIKKEI FORUM has an estimated 7,953 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has NIKKEI FORUM faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Data Leak, Breach and Ransomware.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

NIKKEI FORUM

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

758

/1000

Fair

783

/1000

Fair

NIKKEI FORUM Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

futureofasia.net

Add Your Compliance Badge

NIKKEI FORUM is a series of global events organized by Nikkei Inc.

NIKKEI FORUM A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

NIKKEI FORUM

NIKKEI FORUM CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Nikkei

Breach

3/2026

WORNOTGOOZOONIK...

Nikkei Asia

Ransomware

100

1/2026

NIK1776752855

NIKKEI FORUM

Breach

11/2025

NIK311014311104...

NIKKEI FORUM

Breach

9/2025

NIK170221711072...

NIKKEI FORUM

Breach

5/2025

NIK073290711062...

NIKKEI FORUM

Breach

6/2022

NIK399203911052...

NIKKEI FORUM

Ransomware

100

05/2022

NIK174123522

NIKKEI FORUM

Data Leak

03/2021

NIK2344291222

NIKKEI FORUM

Data Leak

05/2020

NIK1332301222

NIKKEI FORUM

Breach

6/2019

NIK170221711062...

Loading…

A.I.

NIKKEI FORUM Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for NIKKEI FORUM

Incidents vs Events Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NIKKEI FORUM in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NIKKEI FORUM in 2026.

Incident Types NIKKEI FORUM vs Events Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NIKKEI FORUM in 2026.

Incident History - NIKKEI FORUM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

NIKKEI FORUM Subsidiaries

NIKKEI FORUM

Events Services

Website: https://futureofasia.net/asia2024/eng/index

Company Size: 1,001-5,000 employees

Financial TimesNewspaper Publishing

FT LiveEvents Services

The BankerBanking

FT StrategiesBusiness Consulting and Services

FT AdviserFinancial Services

fDi IntelligenceFinancial Services

FundFireNewspaper Publishing

FundFire AltsFinancial Services

IgnitesNewspaper Publishing

Banking Risk and RegulationBanking

FT ForumsEvents Services

FT Partner ContentTechnology, Information and Media

Financial Times SofiaIT Services and IT Consulting

Professional Wealth Management (PWM)Book and Periodical Publishing

Sustainable ViewsFinancial Services

Investors' ChronicleFinancial Services

Ignites AsiaNewspaper Publishing

MandateWireInformation Services

Ignites EuropeNewspaper Publishing

FT ProfessionalInformation Services

FT ChannelsBook and Periodical Publishing

AgendaNewspaper Publishing

FT FLIC | Financial Literacy & Inclusion CampaignNon-profit Organization Management

Asset AllocatorInvestment Management

BoardIQNewspaper Publishing

Nikkei AsiaNewspaper Publishing

NikkeiNewspaper Publishing

Nikkei ScoutAsiaInformation Services

Nikkei AmericaInformation Services

Loading…

NIKKEI FORUM Similar Companies

Encore

encoreglobal.com

Encore is your full-service event production partner with more than 80 years of experience. Each year, Encore delivers more than 350,000 events in 20 countries across North America, Europe, the Middle East, Australia and Asia Pacific. Through event technology, rigging infrastructure, production and creative services, our team brings a unique blend of technical expertise with a commitment to delivering excellent service for every event. Proud to be one of the Fortune 100 Best Companies to Work For® in 2025 and a Certified Great Place to Work™ for three years running. Encore: events that transform.

Loading…

NEWS

NIKKEI FORUM CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

February 27, 2026 06:47 AM

Vietnamese AI firm Namitech provides live translation support at Nikkei Digital Forum in Asia 2026

Namitech deployed its artificial intelligence-based translation system at the Nikkei Digital Forum in Asia 2026 to offer real-time language...

Read Article

December 07, 2025 08:00 AM

Allies must aid collective defense or face 'consequences:' Pentagon chief

WASHINGTON -- U.S. allies who continue to be "free riders," refuse to spend appropriately on defense and avoid contributions to collective...

Read Article

November 04, 2025 08:00 AM

Nikkei struck by cyberattack after employee error

Japanese media giant Nikkei has suffered a data breach after malware infected an employee's computer.

Read Article

July 14, 2025 07:00 AM

ASEAN asserts global role as internal rifts cloud regional unity

KUALA LUMPUR -- ASEAN projected its growing global influence last week as ministers from major powers gathered in Kuala Lumpur for the...

Read Article

June 02, 2025 07:00 AM

US pushes Asian allies, China defense chief absent: 5 Shangri-La takeaways

SINGAPORE -- The Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's biggest defense conference, concluded on Sunday against the backdrop of a deepening U.S.-China...

Read Article

August 13, 2024 07:00 AM

Philippines-Vietnam drills show ASEAN a solution to China

MANILA -- The Philippine and Vietnamese coast guards have completed joint training exercises near the West Philippine Sea, a not-so-subtle...

Read Article

July 18, 2024 07:00 AM

Japan, Pacific islands to boost security ties as China's influence grows

TOKYO -- Japan and Pacific island nations agreed on Thursday to increase security, trade and climate cooperation following a three-day...

Read Article

July 15, 2024 07:00 AM

Indonesian cyberattack signals growing threat in Southeast Asia

JAKARTA -- A recent ransomware attack in Indonesia in which hackers locked up government data at more than 200 agencies highlights the need...

Read Article

July 10, 2024 07:00 AM

NATO to launch 4 projects with Indo-Pacific partners, including AI and cyber

WASHINGTON -- NATO and its Indo-Pacific partners of Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand will launch four new joint projects to...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-8718

SUMMARY

tls_opt_dtls_peer_connection_id_value_get() in subsys/net/lib/sockets/sockets_tls.c, which handles getsockopt(SOL_TLS, TLS_DTLS_PEER_CID_VALUE), passed the caller-supplied optval directly to mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() without verifying the buffer was at least MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX (default 32) bytes. mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() copies the peer-negotiated DTLS Connection ID (length 1..MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX) into that buffer without a destination-size parameter, so a caller-supplied optlen smaller than the CID causes a write of up to 31 bytes past the buffer end. In CONFIG_USERSPACE builds the getsockopt syscall verifier (z_vrfy_zsock_getsockopt) bounce-buffers the user's optval into a kernel allocation of exactly optlen bytes (k_usermode_alloc_from_copy -> z_thread_malloc), so an unprivileged user thread that passes a small optlen on a connected DTLS socket with Connection ID enabled induces a kernel-heap buffer overflow, with the overflowing content being the remote peer's CID. The defect requires CONFIG_MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_CONNECTION_ID, an established DTLS session with a negotiated peer CID, and (for the kernel-crossing case) CONFIG_USERSPACE. Introduced when the TLS_DTLS_CID option was added (v3.5.0). The fix rejects callers whose optlen is below MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX with -EINVAL.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.4)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.8

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48161

SUMMARY

react18-use is a React 19 use hook shim. Between 2026-05-19 01:07:01 and 2026-05-19 15:20:43, the default branch contained malicious commits 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 through 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 that executed remote attacker-controlled code on developer machines during `npm install`. The commits were removed by force-push, but local clones, forks, and direct-SHA URLs may still contain them, and `npm install` against an affected checkout will still execute the code today. The package was not published to npm. `src/install.js` was added and wired into the `postinstall` script. It fetched a JavaScript payload from an attacker-controlled HTTPS endpoint (configurable via an environment variable), disabled TLS verification, and evaluated the response as code with `require` available. Execution was deliberately skipped on CI and cloud/serverless environments, targeting developer workstations. The second-stage payload was attacker-hosted and cannot be reconstructed. Assume full compromise of anything reachable from a Node process with the user's permissions. Those who ran `npm install` against an affected checkout on a developer machine on or after 2026-05-19 01:07:01 should treat the machine as compromised, rotate every credential the machine could reach, audit account activity since 2026-05-19 01:07:01, and clean local clones.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/dai-shi/react18-use/security/advisories/GHSA-32xh-vg5f-64fm

CVE-2026-11812

SUMMARY

The UpdateHub management subsystem (subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c) drives every update operation through a single file-scope ctx structure that holds the CoAP block context, payload buffer, status code, socket, and a one-element poll-fd array fds[1]. Access to ctx was not serialized, and prepare_fds() wrote ctx.fds[ctx.nfds] and incremented ctx.nfds with no bounds check. Two independent paths mutate ctx concurrently: the background autohandler running on the system workqueue, and user-triggered operations reached through the updatehub run shell command, direct API calls, or — since the operations are exposed as syscalls — userspace threads. When a second flow enters prepare_fds() while ctx.nfds is already 1, the write lands one element past the array; by struct layout it overlaps the adjacent ctx.sock/ctx.nfds members. More broadly, the unsynchronized sharing lets two flows interleave connection setup and teardown, double-closing a socket descriptor or scribbling the shared buffers. The result is corruption of the update subsystem's internal state and denial of service of the firmware-update path; the out-of-bounds write is contained within the ctx structure and there is no demonstrated path to memory outside it or to code execution. Triggering requires a local actor able to invoke update operations (or, with CONFIG_USERSPACE, an unprivileged userspace thread) and to win a timing race against the background handler; remote peers cannot control the race timing. The fix serializes the entry points with a mutex and adds a bounds check to prepare_fds().

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 2.5

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-11811

SUMMARY

The UpdateHub over-the-air update client's start_coap_client() in subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c leaks the CoAP/DTLS socket descriptor on its connection-setup failure paths. The shared error: cleanup gated socket closing on a ret > 0 flag, but ret was set to -1 immediately after the socket was created, so when zsock_setsockopt() (DTLS) or zsock_connect() subsequently failed the gate was false and cleanup_connection() was never called. The open descriptor in the global ctx.sock was then overwritten by the next attempt, permanently leaking it from the socket / net_context pool until reboot. The failing setup path is reached every time the OTA client tries to contact the UpdateHub server and the connection cannot be established — driven automatically by the periodic autohandler() poll (and on demand via the updatehub_probe()/updatehub_update() API or the updatehub run shell command). The DTLS handshake/connect outcome is influenceable by a network or on-path attacker who drops, resets, or otherwise disrupts traffic to the server, and also fails naturally whenever the server is unreachable. Each failed attempt permanently leaks one descriptor; once the shared socket pool is exhausted, networking degrades device-wide until the device is rebooted, a denial-of-service condition. Severity is low because the leak rate is bounded by the configured OTA poll interval (default once per 24 hours), the effect is gradual and recovered by reboot, and only builds with the UpdateHub client enabled are affected. There is no memory-corruption, information-disclosure, or authentication impact.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2025-30241

SUMMARY

Certain web interface components in affected TP-Link Aginet devices do not validate and sanitize user-supplied input properly before passing it to system-level command execution functions. An authenticated adjacent attacker may inject specially crafted input to execute arbitrary operation system commands with elevated privileges. Successful exploitation may allow execution of arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full device compromise.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/5239/

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…