What is the official website of FT Partner Content ?

The official website of FT Partner Content is https://linktr.ee/ftpartnercontent.

What is FT Partner Content's cybersecurity risk score?

FT Partner Content has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 758 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has FT Partner Content experienced?

According to Rankiteo, FT Partner Content currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has FT Partner Content been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, FT Partner Content has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does FT Partner Content have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, FT Partner Content is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does FT Partner Content have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, FT Partner Content does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does FT Partner Content comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, FT Partner Content is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does FT Partner Content have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, FT Partner Content does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does FT Partner Content comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, FT Partner Content is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does FT Partner Content have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,FT Partner Content is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does FT Partner Content operate in ?

FT Partner Content operates primarily in the Technology, Information and Media industry.

How many employees does FT Partner Content have ?

FT Partner Content employs approximately None employees people worldwide.

Does FT Partner Content own any subsidiaries ?

FT Partner Content presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does FT Partner Content have ?

FT Partner Content's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 7,080 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for FT Partner Content ?

FT Partner Content is classified under the NAICS code 51, which corresponds to Information.

Does FT Partner Content have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, FT Partner Content does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does FT Partner Content have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, FT Partner Content maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ft-partner-content.

How many cybersecurity incidents has FT Partner Content experienced ?

As of August 11, 2026, Rankiteo reports that FT Partner Content has experienced 10 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does FT Partner Content have ?

FT Partner Content has an estimated 1,392 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has FT Partner Content faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Data Leak, Breach and Ransomware.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

FPC

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

758

/1000

Fair

783

/1000

Fair

FT Partner Content Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

linktr.ee

Add Your Compliance Badge

The Financial Times' content marketing proposition, FT Partner Content helps brands tell powerful stories that are relevant to our audiences. The FT’s world-renowned content studio crafts exceptional multimedia storytelling that aligns our editorial strategy with your commercial objectives. Whether your brand needs a suite of content or one key piece, the FT can bring your narrative to life. The news and editorial staff of the Financial Times have no role in the preparation of Partner Content.

FPC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

FPC

FT Partner Content CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Nikkei

Breach

3/2026

WORNOTGOOZOONIK...

Nikkei Asia

Ransomware

100

1/2026

NIK1776752855

FT Partner Content

Breach

11/2025

NIK311014311104...

FT Partner Content

Breach

9/2025

NIK170221711072...

FT Partner Content

Breach

5/2025

NIK073290711062...

FT Partner Content

Breach

6/2022

NIK399203911052...

FT Partner Content

Ransomware

100

05/2022

NIK174123522

FT Partner Content

Data Leak

03/2021

NIK2344291222

FT Partner Content

Data Leak

05/2020

NIK1332301222

FT Partner Content

Breach

6/2019

NIK170221711062...

Loading…

A.I.

FPC Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for FPC

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Media Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FT Partner Content in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FT Partner Content in 2026.

Incident Types FPC vs Technology, Information and Media Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FT Partner Content in 2026.

Incident History - FPC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

FT Partner Content Subsidiaries

FPC

Technology, Information and Media

Website: https://linktr.ee/ftpartnercontent

Company Size: 1,001-5,000 employees

Financial TimesNewspaper Publishing

FT LiveEvents Services

The BankerBanking

NikkeiNewspaper Publishing

Nikkei AsiaNewspaper Publishing

Nikkei ScoutAsiaInformation Services

Nikkei AmericaInformation Services

Nikkei Market DataFinancial Services

NIKKEI FORUMイベントサービス

Nikkei Europe LtdNewspaper Publishing

FT StrategiesBusiness Consulting and Services

Loading…

FT Partner Content Similar Companies

Globo

g.globo

A globo é feita de gente que quer fazer diferente, fazer junto, fazer o futuro. Gente espalhada por todo o país (e mundo!) trabalhando com conteúdo, notícias, negócios, tecnologia e brasilidade de sobra. Canais na TV aberta e por assinatura, produtos digitais como globoplay, Cartola, g1, ge, gshow e outros serviços estão reunidos no mesmo lugar, na mesma Globo. Novos modelos de negócios digitais estão sendo pensados e desenvolvidos, buscando nos aproximar cada vez mais do usuário e dos seus desejos. As oportunidades de novos negócios também trazem a chance e o desafio de construirmos novos times data-driven e que coloquem o consumidor no centro das nossas decisões. Vem conhecer milhões de oportunidades. Vem pra Globo :)

Cox Enterprises

coxenterprises.com

Thousands of employees, one goal: empower people today to build a better future for the next generation. How do we do that? By disrupting industries. By treating our employees as our most important resource. By improving the quality of life in our communities and by protecting our planet. We create a culture with flexible career growth, generous benefits and an environment where you’re empowered to make time for teammates, family, friends and yourself. Founded in 1898, Cox’s legacy of innovation continues to drive us forward today. We know great things never came from comfort zones. Today we’re powering smart cities with powerhouse broadband communications, pioneering greener modes of transportation and hatching new technologies to slash the glut of global waste. Through our investments and our major divisions — Cox Communications and Cox Automotive — we’re focused on the future of mobility, connectivity and sustainability. We are a global, family-owned organization with a purpose. Come build a better future with us and make your mark.

Loading…

NEWS

FT Partner Content CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

January 20, 2026 02:35 PM

GrackerAI Launches Industry's First Generative Engine Optimization Platform for Cybersecurity SaaS Companies

Platform helps cybersecurity GTM teams capture AI-driven buyer demand as 40% of security decision-makers shift from Google to AI assistants...

Read Article

January 02, 2026 08:00 AM

Europe has lost the internet, Belgium’s cyber security chief warns

De Bruycker's warning reflects growing concerns among European policymakers about the dominance of US cloud and digital infrastructure...

Read Article

December 19, 2025 10:41 AM

How cyber leaders can get boards to buy into data resilience

CISOs know cyber resilience is mission critical, but securing investment and ensuring the success of the organisation means telling a clear and compelling...

Read Article

November 19, 2025 08:00 AM

Vodafone chief bets on selling AI and cyber security to businesses

Chief executive Margherita Della Valle says telecoms group is back on the front foot after selling European assets.

Read Article

November 19, 2025 08:00 AM

Big Four partner promotions sink to five-year low in UK

Deloitte, EY, KPMG and PwC bosses strive to protect profits amid slowing revenues.

Read Article

November 10, 2025 08:00 AM

Domino effect: after Norway, UK now also probing Chinese Yutong e-buses

According to experts, if the manufacturer could deactivate the buses, it would likely wreak havoc on Britain's transport network at a...

Read Article

November 07, 2025 08:00 AM

Tax raid on UK partnerships to be less aggressive than feared

Senior City figures have been reassured that accountancy and law firms will not pay full national insurance rate.

Read Article

November 02, 2025 07:00 AM

Tech groups step up efforts to solve AI’s big security flaw

Google DeepMind, Anthropic and Microsoft are trying to prevent 'indirect prompt injection attacks' by hackers.

Read Article

October 17, 2025 07:00 AM

An unlikely couple, a doomed affair and their €64mn ransomware scam

How a mysterious tip-off led investigators to uncover the inner workings of a highly unusual hacking operation.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-8718

SUMMARY

tls_opt_dtls_peer_connection_id_value_get() in subsys/net/lib/sockets/sockets_tls.c, which handles getsockopt(SOL_TLS, TLS_DTLS_PEER_CID_VALUE), passed the caller-supplied optval directly to mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() without verifying the buffer was at least MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX (default 32) bytes. mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() copies the peer-negotiated DTLS Connection ID (length 1..MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX) into that buffer without a destination-size parameter, so a caller-supplied optlen smaller than the CID causes a write of up to 31 bytes past the buffer end. In CONFIG_USERSPACE builds the getsockopt syscall verifier (z_vrfy_zsock_getsockopt) bounce-buffers the user's optval into a kernel allocation of exactly optlen bytes (k_usermode_alloc_from_copy -> z_thread_malloc), so an unprivileged user thread that passes a small optlen on a connected DTLS socket with Connection ID enabled induces a kernel-heap buffer overflow, with the overflowing content being the remote peer's CID. The defect requires CONFIG_MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_CONNECTION_ID, an established DTLS session with a negotiated peer CID, and (for the kernel-crossing case) CONFIG_USERSPACE. Introduced when the TLS_DTLS_CID option was added (v3.5.0). The fix rejects callers whose optlen is below MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX with -EINVAL.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.4)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.8

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48161

SUMMARY

react18-use is a React 19 use hook shim. Between 2026-05-19 01:07:01 and 2026-05-19 15:20:43, the default branch contained malicious commits 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 through 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 that executed remote attacker-controlled code on developer machines during `npm install`. The commits were removed by force-push, but local clones, forks, and direct-SHA URLs may still contain them, and `npm install` against an affected checkout will still execute the code today. The package was not published to npm. `src/install.js` was added and wired into the `postinstall` script. It fetched a JavaScript payload from an attacker-controlled HTTPS endpoint (configurable via an environment variable), disabled TLS verification, and evaluated the response as code with `require` available. Execution was deliberately skipped on CI and cloud/serverless environments, targeting developer workstations. The second-stage payload was attacker-hosted and cannot be reconstructed. Assume full compromise of anything reachable from a Node process with the user's permissions. Those who ran `npm install` against an affected checkout on a developer machine on or after 2026-05-19 01:07:01 should treat the machine as compromised, rotate every credential the machine could reach, audit account activity since 2026-05-19 01:07:01, and clean local clones.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/dai-shi/react18-use/security/advisories/GHSA-32xh-vg5f-64fm

CVE-2026-11812

SUMMARY

The UpdateHub management subsystem (subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c) drives every update operation through a single file-scope ctx structure that holds the CoAP block context, payload buffer, status code, socket, and a one-element poll-fd array fds[1]. Access to ctx was not serialized, and prepare_fds() wrote ctx.fds[ctx.nfds] and incremented ctx.nfds with no bounds check. Two independent paths mutate ctx concurrently: the background autohandler running on the system workqueue, and user-triggered operations reached through the updatehub run shell command, direct API calls, or — since the operations are exposed as syscalls — userspace threads. When a second flow enters prepare_fds() while ctx.nfds is already 1, the write lands one element past the array; by struct layout it overlaps the adjacent ctx.sock/ctx.nfds members. More broadly, the unsynchronized sharing lets two flows interleave connection setup and teardown, double-closing a socket descriptor or scribbling the shared buffers. The result is corruption of the update subsystem's internal state and denial of service of the firmware-update path; the out-of-bounds write is contained within the ctx structure and there is no demonstrated path to memory outside it or to code execution. Triggering requires a local actor able to invoke update operations (or, with CONFIG_USERSPACE, an unprivileged userspace thread) and to win a timing race against the background handler; remote peers cannot control the race timing. The fix serializes the entry points with a mutex and adds a bounds check to prepare_fds().

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 2.5

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-11811

SUMMARY

The UpdateHub over-the-air update client's start_coap_client() in subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c leaks the CoAP/DTLS socket descriptor on its connection-setup failure paths. The shared error: cleanup gated socket closing on a ret > 0 flag, but ret was set to -1 immediately after the socket was created, so when zsock_setsockopt() (DTLS) or zsock_connect() subsequently failed the gate was false and cleanup_connection() was never called. The open descriptor in the global ctx.sock was then overwritten by the next attempt, permanently leaking it from the socket / net_context pool until reboot. The failing setup path is reached every time the OTA client tries to contact the UpdateHub server and the connection cannot be established — driven automatically by the periodic autohandler() poll (and on demand via the updatehub_probe()/updatehub_update() API or the updatehub run shell command). The DTLS handshake/connect outcome is influenceable by a network or on-path attacker who drops, resets, or otherwise disrupts traffic to the server, and also fails naturally whenever the server is unreachable. Each failed attempt permanently leaks one descriptor; once the shared socket pool is exhausted, networking degrades device-wide until the device is rebooted, a denial-of-service condition. Severity is low because the leak rate is bounded by the configured OTA poll interval (default once per 24 hours), the effect is gradual and recovered by reboot, and only builds with the UpdateHub client enabled are affected. There is no memory-corruption, information-disclosure, or authentication impact.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2025-30241

SUMMARY

Certain web interface components in affected TP-Link Aginet devices do not validate and sanitize user-supplied input properly before passing it to system-level command execution functions. An authenticated adjacent attacker may inject specially crafted input to execute arbitrary operation system commands with elevated privileges. Successful exploitation may allow execution of arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full device compromise.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/5239/

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…