Cox Enterprises
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
cox-enterprises
Website:
Employees number:
34,920
Number of followers:
122,740
NAICS:
51
Industry Type:
Homepage:
coxenterprises.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
COX_6514943
Scan Status:
In-progress
Cox Enterprises Company CyberSecurity Posture
coxenterprises.com
Thousands of employees, one goal: empower people today to build a better future for the next generation. How do we do that? By disrupting industries. By treating our employees as our most important resource. By improving the quality of life in our communities and by protecting our planet. We create a culture with flexible career growth, generous benefits and an environment where you’re empowered to make time for teammates, family, friends and yourself. Founded in 1898, Cox’s legacy of innovation continues to drive us forward today. We know great things never came from comfort zones. Today we’re powering smart cities with powerhouse broadband communications, pioneering greener modes of transportation and hatching new technologies to slash the glut of global waste. Through our investments and our major divisions — Cox Communications and Cox Automotive — we’re focused on the future of mobility, connectivity and sustainability. We are a global, family-owned organization with a purpose. Come build a better future with us and make your mark.
Cox Enterprises A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Cox Enterprises Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 650 and 699
Cox Enterprises
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Cox Enterprises Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Cox Enterprises
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Cox Enterprises Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
6
Attack Types
4
Autotrader US
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: In January 2023, 1.4M records from the Autotrader online vehicle marketplace appeared on a popular hacking forum. The data relates to aged listing data that was generally publicly available on our site at the time and open to automated collection methods. The data contained 20k unique email addresses alongside physical addresses and phone numbers of dealers and vehicle details including VIN numbers.
Cox Communications
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Cox Communications, a large cable company recently suffered a data breach incident in December 2021. The attackers impersonated a Cox agent through a social engineering attack and managed to access the company's customer data. The compromised data includes address, telephone number, Cox account number, usernames, and other personal information of the customers. The company with the help of cyber security experts investigated the attack and secured its data from such future attacks and notified the affected customers of the breach.
Cox Communications
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region
Description: Cox Communications suffered a cyber attack that caused an internet outage that affected the Tucson region. no customer information was compromised in the attack. however, the Cox says their efforts to stop the attack were the reason for the internet outage.
Cox Enterprises
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: Cox Enterprises, a U.S.-based conglomerate with operations in telecommunications, media, and automotive services (e.g., Cox Communications, Autotrader), suffered a **sophisticated data breach** via a **zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882)** in Oracle’s E-Business Suite. Hackers, linked to the **Cl0p ransomware group**, infiltrated the network between **August 9–14, 2025**, exfiltrating **1.6TB of data**—including **sensitive personal information of 9,479 individuals** (names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and internal documents). The breach was detected in **late September 2025**, with Cl0p leaking the data on the dark web. The attack exploited an **unpatched critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.8)** allowing unauthorized database access, heightening risks of **identity theft, financial fraud, and reputational damage**. Oracle released an emergency patch post-breach, but the delay enabled widespread exploitation across other high-profile targets (e.g., The Washington Post, Harvard University). Cox offered affected parties **credit monitoring**, though long-term risks persist. The incident underscores vulnerabilities in **ERP systems**, **supply chain security gaps**, and the escalating threat of **ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS)** campaigns targeting enterprise software.
Cox Enterprises
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: Cox Enterprises disclosed a data breach stemming from a zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite, discovered in late September 2024 after hackers breached its network in August. The Cl0p ransomware group claimed responsibility, exploiting the vulnerability before Oracle released a patch on October 5. While the company confirmed exposure of personal data, the specific types of compromised information (e.g., financial, employee, or customer records) were not disclosed. The delayed detection suggests prolonged unauthorized access, though the full scope of the leak—including whether sensitive data like SSNs, financial details, or proprietary business information was exfiltrated—remains unclear. The incident underscores the risks of third-party software vulnerabilities and the operational gaps in timely threat detection.
RapidScale, Inc.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: On May 16, 2019, the Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation reported a data breach involving RapidScale, Inc. The breach affected 2 residents and compromised electronic records, specifically credit and debit numbers. This incident highlights the vulnerability of financial information in digital systems and the potential impact on individuals' financial security.
Cox Enterprises Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Cox Enterprises
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Media Industry Average (This Year)
Cox Enterprises has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
Cox Enterprises has 56.25% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types Cox Enterprises vs Technology, Information and Media Industry Avg (This Year)
Cox Enterprises reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 1 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — Cox Enterprises (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cox Enterprises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Cox Enterprises Company Subsidiaries
Thousands of employees, one goal: empower people today to build a better future for the next generation. How do we do that? By disrupting industries. By treating our employees as our most important resource. By improving the quality of life in our communities and by protecting our planet. We create a culture with flexible career growth, generous benefits and an environment where you’re empowered to make time for teammates, family, friends and yourself. Founded in 1898, Cox’s legacy of innovation continues to drive us forward today. We know great things never came from comfort zones. Today we’re powering smart cities with powerhouse broadband communications, pioneering greener modes of transportation and hatching new technologies to slash the glut of global waste. Through our investments and our major divisions — Cox Communications and Cox Automotive — we’re focused on the future of mobility, connectivity and sustainability. We are a global, family-owned organization with a purpose. Come build a better future with us and make your mark.
Loading...
Cox Enterprises Similar Companies
Globo
A globo é feita de gente que quer fazer diferente, fazer junto, fazer o futuro. Gente espalhada por todo o país (e mundo!) trabalhando com conteúdo, notícias, negócios, tecnologia e brasilidade de sobra. Canais na TV aberta e por assinatura, produtos digitais como globoplay, Cartola, g1, ge, gsho
.png)
Cox Enterprises CyberSecurity News
November 26, 2025 10:03 AM
Have you thought about how AI will change cybersecurity? You should.
Some Atlantans and companies are dabbling in AI, while others have fully embraced it. But with any fast-changing technology promising opportunity,...
November 25, 2025 03:20 PM
Cox Enterprises hit by Oracle data breach - but it won't name who carried out the attack
Cox Enterprises breached via Oracle E-Business Suite zero‑day, exposing data of 9,479 individuals; Cl0p ransomware group claimed...
November 25, 2025 12:23 PM
Canon Confirms Subsidiary Breach in the Cl0p Oracle EBS Hack Campaign
Canon confirms a U.S. subsidiary was impacted by the Oracle EBS hacking campaign linked to the Cl0p ransomware group, but states the breach...
November 24, 2025 05:38 PM
Security and AI news from the week beginning 17 November 2025 -
Cybercriminals use command-and-control (C2) servers to manage botnets and distribute malware. Last week, Kaspersky revealed that the...
November 24, 2025 04:58 PM
Cox Enterprises Data Breach: Cl0p Exploits Oracle Zero-Day Flaw
The Silent Siege: Cox Enterprises' Oracle Breach and the Shadowy World of Zero-Day Exploits. In the ever-evolving landscape of cybersecurity...
November 24, 2025 11:00 AM
Cybersecurity News: CrowdStrike insider catch, Spanish airline breach, AI not insurable
CrowdStrike catches insider selling data, Spanish airline Iberia suffers breach and data leak, AI is too risky to insure, say insurers.
November 24, 2025 10:52 AM
Cox Confirms Oracle EBS Hack as Cybercriminals Name 100 Alleged Victims
Cox Enterprises has confirmed that its Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS) instance was impacted in the recent cybercrime campaign that has...
November 22, 2025 03:16 PM
Cox Enterprises discloses Oracle E-Business Suite data breach
Cox Enterprises is notifying impacted individuals of a data breach that exposed their personal data to hackers who breached the company...
November 13, 2025 08:00 AM
NHS Investigating Oracle EBS Hack Claims as Hackers Name Over 40 Alleged Victims
The UK's national healthcare system is working with the country's National Cyber Security Centre to investigate the incident.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Cox Enterprises CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Cox Enterprises
The official website of Cox Enterprises is http://www.coxenterprises.com.
Cox Enterprises’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Cox Enterprises’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 668, reflecting their Weak security posture.
How many security badges does Cox Enterprises’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Enterprises currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Cox Enterprises have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Enterprises is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Cox Enterprises have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Enterprises does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Cox Enterprises comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Enterprises is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Cox Enterprises have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Enterprises does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Cox Enterprises comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Enterprises is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Cox Enterprises have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Cox Enterprises is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Cox Enterprises
Cox Enterprises operates primarily in the Technology, Information and Media industry.
Number of Employees at Cox Enterprises
Cox Enterprises employs approximately 34,920 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Cox Enterprises
Cox Enterprises presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Cox Enterprises’s LinkedIn Followers
Cox Enterprises’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 122,740 followers.
NAICS Classification of Cox Enterprises
Cox Enterprises is classified under the NAICS code 51, which corresponds to Information.
Cox Enterprises’s Presence on Crunchbase
Yes, Cox Enterprises has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/cox-enterprises.
Cox Enterprises’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Cox Enterprises maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cox-enterprises.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Cox Enterprises
As of November 27, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Cox Enterprises has experienced 6 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Cox Enterprises has an estimated 949 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Cox Enterprises ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Data Leak, Breach, Cyber Attack and Ransomware.
How does Cox Enterprises detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with cyber security experts, and recovery measures with investigated the attack and secured its data from such future attacks, and communication strategy with notified the affected customers of the breach, and containment measures with efforts to stop the attack, and and communication strategy with public disclosure emphasizing no customer data compromise, and and third party assistance with potential involvement of mandiant (forensic investigation), and containment measures with patch application (oracle emergency patch on 2025-10-04), containment measures with network segmentation (assumed), and remediation measures with free credit monitoring for affected individuals, remediation measures with ongoing forensic investigation, and communication strategy with notification letters to affected parties, communication strategy with public disclosure via maine attorney general’s office filing, and network segmentation with recommended (not explicitly confirmed), and enhanced monitoring with recommended (not explicitly confirmed)..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Cox Communications Data Breach
Description: Cox Communications suffered a data breach incident in December 2021 where attackers impersonated a Cox agent through a social engineering attack and accessed customer data.
Date Detected: December 2021
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering
Vulnerability Exploited: Human vulnerability through impersonation
Title: Cyber Attack on Cox Communications
Description: Cox Communications suffered a cyber attack that caused an internet outage affecting the Tucson region. No customer information was compromised in the attack. The efforts to stop the attack were the reason for the internet outage.
Type: Cyber Attack
Title: Autotrader Data Breach
Description: In January 2023, 1.4 million records from the Autotrader online vehicle marketplace appeared on a popular hacking forum. The data relates to aged listing data that was generally publicly available on our site at the time and open to automated collection methods. The data contained 20,000 unique email addresses alongside physical addresses and phone numbers of dealers and vehicle details including VIN numbers.
Date Detected: 2023-01-01
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Automated Collection Methods
Vulnerability Exploited: Publicly Available Data
Title: RapidScale, Inc. Data Breach
Description: A data breach involving RapidScale, Inc. was reported by the Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation. The breach affected 2 residents and compromised electronic records, specifically credit and debit numbers.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2019-05-16
Type: Data Breach
Title: CrowdStrike Insider Threat Incident
Description: CrowdStrike confirmed that an insider shared screenshots taken on internal systems. The company emphasized that its systems were not breached, and customers’ data was not compromised. The threat group responsible was not specified.
Type: Insider Threat
Attack Vector: Internal (Insider)
Title: The Silent Siege: Cox Enterprises’ Oracle Breach and the Shadowy World of Zero-Day Exploits
Description: Cox Enterprises, a U.S. conglomerate in telecommunications, media, and automotive services, suffered a data breach due to a zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle’s E-Business Suite. The breach, attributed to the Cl0p ransomware group, exposed sensitive personal data of 9,479 individuals, including names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and other identifiers. The incident occurred between August 9–14, 2025, but was detected in late September. Cl0p leaked 1.6 TB of stolen data on the dark web, and Cox offered affected parties free credit monitoring. The breach highlights vulnerabilities in ERP systems and the risks of delayed patching, with broader implications for supply chain security and regulatory compliance.
Date Detected: 2025-09-01T00:00:00Z
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-09-30T00:00:00Z
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Exploit (CVE-2025-61882)Unauthenticated AccessMulti-Stage Java ImplantsData Exfiltration
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-61882 (Critical Authentication Bypass in Oracle E-Business Suite)
Threat Actor: Cl0p Ransomware Group (alleged)
Motivation: Financial GainData TheftExtortion
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX152930322
Data Compromised: Address, Telephone number, Cox account number, Usernames, Other personal information
Incident : Cyber Attack COX2035161122
Systems Affected: Internet Services
Downtime: Internet Outage
Operational Impact: Internet Services Disrupted
Incident : Data Breach AUT221524123
Data Compromised: Email addresses, Physical addresses, Phone numbers, Vehicle details including vin numbers
Incident : Data Breach RAP419072225
Data Compromised: Credit and debit numbers
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Data Compromised: Internal screenshots (no customer data)
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational risk due to insider incident
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Dates of birth, Social security numbers, Personal identifiers, Internal documents, Employee records, Customer details
Systems Affected: Oracle E-Business SuiteERP SystemsDatabases
Operational Impact: Potential disruption to HR, financial, and supply chain operations
Brand Reputation Impact: High (potential erosion of customer trust, regulatory scrutiny)
Legal Liabilities: Potential lawsuits (e.g., Bloomberg Law report on Oracle’s liability)Regulatory fines under GDPR/CCPA
Identity Theft Risk: High (9,479 individuals affected)
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Address, Telephone Number, Cox Account Number, Usernames, Other Personal Information, , Email Addresses, Physical Addresses, Phone Numbers, Vehicle Details Including Vin Numbers, , credit and debit numbers, Internal screenshots, Pii (Personally Identifiable Information), Internal Documents, Employee Records, Customer Details and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX152930322
Entity Name: Cox Communications
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Telecommunications
Size: Large
Incident : Cyber Attack COX2035161122
Entity Name: Cox Communications
Entity Type: Telecommunications Company
Industry: Telecommunications
Location: Tucson Region
Incident : Data Breach AUT221524123
Entity Name: Autotrader
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Online Vehicle Marketplace
Incident : Data Breach RAP419072225
Entity Name: RapidScale, Inc.
Entity Type: Company
Customers Affected: 2
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Entity Name: CrowdStrike
Entity Type: Cybersecurity Company
Industry: Technology
Location: Global (HQ: USA)
Customers Affected: None (no customer data compromised)
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Entity Name: Cox Enterprises
Entity Type: Conglomerate
Industry: Telecommunications, Media, Automotive Services
Location: United States
Size: 55,000+ employees, $23B+ annual revenue
Customers Affected: 9,479 individuals
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX152930322
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Cyber security experts
Recovery Measures: Investigated the attack and secured its data from such future attacks
Communication Strategy: Notified the affected customers of the breach
Incident : Cyber Attack COX2035161122
Containment Measures: Efforts to stop the attack
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure emphasizing no customer data compromise
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Potential Involvement Of Mandiant (Forensic Investigation).
Containment Measures: Patch application (Oracle emergency patch on 2025-10-04)Network segmentation (assumed)
Remediation Measures: Free credit monitoring for affected individualsOngoing forensic investigation
Communication Strategy: Notification letters to affected partiesPublic disclosure via Maine Attorney General’s Office filing
Network Segmentation: Recommended (not explicitly confirmed)
Enhanced Monitoring: Recommended (not explicitly confirmed)
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Cyber security experts, Potential involvement of Mandiant (forensic investigation), .
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach COX152930322
Type of Data Compromised: Address, Telephone number, Cox account number, Usernames, Other personal information
Incident : Data Breach AUT221524123
Type of Data Compromised: Email addresses, Physical addresses, Phone numbers, Vehicle details including vin numbers
Number of Records Exposed: 1,400,000
Incident : Data Breach RAP419072225
Type of Data Compromised: credit and debit numbers
Number of Records Exposed: 2
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Type of Data Compromised: Internal screenshots
Sensitivity of Data: Moderate (internal systems)
File Types Exposed: Screenshots
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Type of Data Compromised: Pii (personally identifiable information), Internal documents, Employee records, Customer details
Number of Records Exposed: 9,479 individuals
Sensitivity of Data: High (includes SSNs, dates of birth, addresses)
Data Exfiltration: 1.6 TB of data leaked on the dark web
File Types Exposed: DatabasesDocumentsHR/Employee Records
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Free credit monitoring for affected individuals, Ongoing forensic investigation, .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by efforts to stop the attack, patch application (oracle emergency patch on 2025-10-04), network segmentation (assumed) and .
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through Investigated the attack and secured its data from such future attacks.
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Regulations Violated: Potential GDPR (EU), CCPA (California), State breach notification laws (e.g., Maine),
Legal Actions: Potential lawsuits (e.g., against Oracle for delayed patching),
Regulatory Notifications: Maine Attorney General’s Office filingCISA alerts for related vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61757)
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Potential lawsuits (e.g., against Oracle for delayed patching), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Lessons Learned: Zero-day exploits in ERP systems pose severe risks due to their central role in operations., Delayed detection (weeks between breach and discovery) exacerbates impact., Supply chain vulnerabilities (e.g., Oracle software) require proactive patch management., Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) models enable scalable, sophisticated attacks., Public disclosure strategies must balance transparency with investigative integrity.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Recommendations: Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Zero-day exploits in ERP systems pose severe risks due to their central role in operations.,Delayed detection (weeks between breach and discovery) exacerbates impact.,Supply chain vulnerabilities (e.g., Oracle software) require proactive patch management.,Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) models enable scalable, sophisticated attacks.,Public disclosure strategies must balance transparency with investigative integrity.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches. and Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)..
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach RAP419072225
Source: Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation
Date Accessed: 2019-05-16
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Source: BleepingComputer
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Source: BleepingComputer
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Source: Maine Attorney General’s Office (Breach Notification)
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Source: IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business RegulationDate Accessed: 2019-05-16, and Source: BleepingComputer, and Source: BleepingComputerUrl: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com, and Source: SecurityWeekUrl: https://www.securityweek.com, and Source: The Hacker NewsUrl: https://thehackernews.com, and Source: TechRadarUrl: https://www.techradar.com, and Source: Bloomberg LawUrl: https://news.bloomberglaw.com, and Source: Maine Attorney General’s Office (Breach Notification), and Source: CISA AlertsUrl: https://www.cisa.gov, and Source: IBM Cost of a Data Breach ReportUrl: https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Investigation Status: Confirmed (insider incident)
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Investigation Status: Ongoing (forensic investigation, potential third-party involvement)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Notified the affected customers of the breach, Public disclosure emphasizing no customer data compromise, Notification Letters To Affected Parties and Public Disclosure Via Maine Attorney General’S Office Filing.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Customer Advisories: No customer data compromised
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Stakeholder Advisories: Notification Letters To Affected Individuals, Public Statements Via Regulatory Filings.
Customer Advisories: Free credit monitoring offered to affected parties
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were No customer data compromised, Notification Letters To Affected Individuals, Public Statements Via Regulatory Filings and Free credit monitoring offered to affected parties.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Entry Point: Zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite
Reconnaissance Period: Potentially since July 2025 (part of broader Cl0p campaign)
Backdoors Established: ['Multi-stage Java implants']
High Value Targets: Erp Databases, Hr Systems, Financial Records,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Erp Databases, Hr Systems, Financial Records,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Root Causes: Insider threat (unauthorized screenshot sharing)
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Root Causes: Unpatched Zero-Day Vulnerability (Cve-2025-61882) In Oracle E-Business Suite., Delayed Detection (Weeks Between Intrusion And Discovery)., Lack Of Proactive Threat Hunting For Erp-Specific Attacks., Potential Gaps In Network Segmentation Or Access Controls.,
Corrective Actions: Applied Oracle’S Emergency Patch (2025-10-04)., Enhanced Monitoring For Erp Systems., Review Of Third-Party Software Patching Policies., Potential Restructuring Of Incident Response Protocols To Reduce Detection Lag.,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Cyber security experts, Potential Involvement Of Mandiant (Forensic Investigation), , Recommended (not explicitly confirmed).
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Applied Oracle’S Emergency Patch (2025-10-04)., Enhanced Monitoring For Erp Systems., Review Of Third-Party Software Patching Policies., Potential Restructuring Of Incident Response Protocols To Reduce Detection Lag., .
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Cl0p Ransomware Group (alleged).
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on December 2021.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-09-30T00:00:00Z.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Address, Telephone number, Cox account number, Usernames, Other personal information, , Email addresses, Physical addresses, Phone numbers, Vehicle details including VIN numbers, , credit and debit numbers, , Internal screenshots (no customer data), Names, Addresses, Dates of Birth, Social Security Numbers, Personal Identifiers, Internal Documents, Employee Records, Customer Details and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Oracle E-Business SuiteERP SystemsDatabases.
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was Cyber security experts, potential involvement of mandiant (forensic investigation), .
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Efforts to stop the attack and Patch application (Oracle emergency patch on 2025-10-04)Network segmentation (assumed).
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Vehicle details including VIN numbers, Phone numbers, Dates of Birth, Address, Internal screenshots (no customer data), Cox account number, Social Security Numbers, Email addresses, Other personal information, Internal Documents, Customer Details, Physical addresses, Employee Records, credit and debit numbers, Names, Usernames, Addresses, Personal Identifiers and Telephone number.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 1.4M.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Potential lawsuits (e.g., against Oracle for delayed patching), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Public disclosure strategies must balance transparency with investigative integrity.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches. and Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report, Maine Attorney General’s Office (Breach Notification), CISA Alerts, SecurityWeek, Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, TechRadar, Bloomberg Law, The Hacker News and BleepingComputer.
What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.bleepingcomputer.com, https://www.securityweek.com, https://thehackernews.com, https://www.techradar.com, https://news.bloomberglaw.com, https://www.cisa.gov, https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach .
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Confirmed (insider incident).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Notification letters to affected individuals, Public statements via regulatory filings, .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an No customer data compromised and Free credit monitoring offered to affected parties.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite.
What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was Potentially since July 2025 (part of broader Cl0p campaign).
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Insider threat (unauthorized screenshot sharing), Unpatched zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite.Delayed detection (weeks between intrusion and discovery).Lack of proactive threat hunting for ERP-specific attacks.Potential gaps in network segmentation or access controls..
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Applied Oracle’s emergency patch (2025-10-04).Enhanced monitoring for ERP systems.Review of third-party software patching policies.Potential restructuring of incident response protocols to reduce detection lag..
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/0276479e7d0e280e0f8d26fa567d3b7aa97a516f
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/05fe6686a97fa0bcd3cf157805b3612033f975bc
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/3240d856d942727372a705252f7c8c115394a41e
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/19.2.16
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/20.3.14
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/21.0.1
- https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=cox-enterprises' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
