What is the official website of BoardIQ ?

The official website of BoardIQ is http://www.BoardIQ.com.

What is BoardIQ's cybersecurity risk score?

BoardIQ has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 749 out of 1000, indicating a Moderate security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has BoardIQ experienced?

According to Rankiteo, BoardIQ currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has BoardIQ been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, BoardIQ has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does BoardIQ have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, BoardIQ is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does BoardIQ have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, BoardIQ does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does BoardIQ comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, BoardIQ is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does BoardIQ have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, BoardIQ does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does BoardIQ comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, BoardIQ is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does BoardIQ have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,BoardIQ is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does BoardIQ operate in ?

BoardIQ operates primarily in the Newspaper Publishing industry.

How many employees does BoardIQ have ?

BoardIQ employs approximately 2 people worldwide.

Does BoardIQ own any subsidiaries ?

BoardIQ presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does BoardIQ have ?

BoardIQ's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 984 followers.

Does BoardIQ have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, BoardIQ does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does BoardIQ have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, BoardIQ maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/boardiq.

How many cybersecurity incidents has BoardIQ experienced ?

As of June 16, 2026, Rankiteo reports that BoardIQ has experienced 8 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does BoardIQ have ?

BoardIQ has an estimated 2,093 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has BoardIQ faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Data Leak and Breach.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

BoardIQ

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

749

/1000

Moderate

774

/1000

Fair

BoardIQ Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

boardiq.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

BoardIQ is an original publication for mutual fund boards that analyzes news and trends from the trustee's perspective. Our team of reporters provides independent, exclusive insights that thousands of industry professionals rely on. To sign-up for a free five-week trial visit: www.BoardIQ.com/trial. If your company has an existing license you'll be automatically added to the license at no additional cost..

BoardIQ A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

BoardIQ

BoardIQ CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Nikkei

Breach

3/2026

WORNOTGOOZOONIK...

BoardIQ

Breach

11/2025

NIK311014311104...

BoardIQ

Breach

9/2025

NIK170221711072...

BoardIQ

Breach

5/2025

NIK073290711062...

BoardIQ

Breach

6/2022

NIK399203911052...

BoardIQ

Data Leak

03/2021

NIK2344291222

BoardIQ

Data Leak

05/2020

NIK1332301222

BoardIQ

Breach

6/2019

NIK170221711062...

Loading…

A.I.

BoardIQ Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for BoardIQ

Incidents vs Newspaper Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BoardIQ in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BoardIQ in 2026.

Incident Types BoardIQ vs Newspaper Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BoardIQ in 2026.

Incident History - BoardIQ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

BoardIQ Subsidiaries

BoardIQ

Newspaper Publishing

Website: http://www.BoardIQ.com

Company Size: 2

Financial TimesNewspaper Publishing

The BankerBanking

NikkeiNewspaper Publishing

NIKKEI FORUMイベントサービス

Nikkei Market DataFinancial Services

FT StrategiesBusiness Consulting and Services

FundFireNewspaper Publishing

FundFire AltsFinancial Services

IgnitesNewspaper Publishing

Financial Times SofiaIT Services and IT Consulting

Ignites AsiaNewspaper Publishing

AgendaNewspaper Publishing

Ignites EuropeNewspaper Publishing

Investors' ChronicleFinancial Services

Banking Risk and RegulationBanking

FT Partner ContentTechnology, Information and Media

FT AdviserFinancial Services

fDi IntelligenceFinancial Services

Professional Wealth Management (PWM)Book and Periodical Publishing

Asset Owner ExchangePension Funds

FT LiveEvents Services

FT ChannelsBook and Periodical Publishing

Sustainable ViewsFinancial Services

FT ProfessionalInformation Services

FT FLIC | Financial Literacy & Inclusion CampaignNon-profit Organization Management

MandateWireInformation Services

FT Executive ProgrammesEvents Services

Asset AllocatorInvestment Management

Risk & Regulation HubBanking

Life@FTTechnology, Information and Media

Loading…

BoardIQ Similar Companies

The Wall Street Journal

cb wsj.com

Winner of 40 Pulitzer Prizes for outstanding journalism, The Wall Street Journal includes coverage of U.S. and world news, politics, arts, culture, lifestyle, sports, health and more. It's a critical resource of curated content in print, online and mobile apps, complete with breaking news streams, interactive features, video, online columns and blogs. Since 1889, readers have trusted the Journal for accurate, objective information to fuel their decisions as well as enlighten, educate and inspire them. On LinkedIn, we will share articles to help you navigate your career, including stories from our business, management, leisure and technology sections. Subscribe: http://on.wsj.com/1n1uvCH Job opportunities: http://www.dowjones.com/careers

Nikkei

nikkei.co.jp

Nikkei is a world-renowned media brand for Asian news, respected for quality journalism and for being a trusted provider of business news and information. Founded as a market news provider in Japan in 1876, Nikkei has grown into one of the world’s largest media corporations, with 37 foreign editorial bureaus and approximately 1,500 journalists worldwide. Nikkei acquired the Financial Times in 2015. Combined digital and print readership of the Nikkei and the FT totals about 4 million.

Loading…

NEWS

BoardIQ CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-53430

SUMMARY

Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) vulnerability in elixir-grpc grpc (GRPC.Compressor.Gzip, GRPC.Message modules) allows a denial of service via a gzip decompression bomb. This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/grpc/compressor/gzip.ex, lib/grpc/message.ex and program routines 'Elixir.GRPC.Compressor.Gzip':decompress/1, 'Elixir.GRPC.Message':from_data/2. 'Elixir.GRPC.Compressor.Gzip':decompress/1 calls :zlib.gunzip/1 directly on attacker-controlled bytes with no decompressed-size limit, ratio check, or incremental decoding. Because this module is the registered gzip GRPC.Compressor implementation, it is invoked automatically whenever an incoming gRPC frame carries the grpc-encoding: gzip header. :zlib.gunzip/1 allocates the entire decompressed result as a single binary, so a small highly compressible payload (for example a few kilobytes of zeros, which gzip compresses at roughly 1000:1) expands to multiple gigabytes inside a single call. The max_receive_message_length limit is enforced only against the already-decompressed message, so it provides no protection. An unauthenticated remote peer can send a single crafted frame to exhaust the BEAM node's heap and trigger an out-of-memory kill. This issue affects grpc: from 0.4.0 before 1.0.0.

Published

Date2026-06-15

Updated

Date2026-06-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48854

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in elixir-grpc grpc allows unauthenticated attackers to exhaust the BEAM's memory and crash the server by streaming a large or slow-trickle unary request body. 'Elixir.GRPC.Server.Adapters.Cowboy.Handler':read_full_body/3 (lib/grpc/server/adapters/cowboy/handler.ex) accumulates every received chunk into a single growing binary with no size cap. Additionally, when the client omits the grpc-timeout header, the per-chunk read timeout resolves to :infinity, allowing a slow-trickle client to keep the connection alive indefinitely while memory grows. A single connection is sufficient to exhaust server memory and crash the node. This issue affects grpc from 0.3.1 before 1.0.0.

Published

Date2026-06-15

Updated

Date2026-06-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48853

SUMMARY

Deserialization of Untrusted Data and Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerabilities in elixir-grpc grpc allow unauthenticated attackers to crash the BEAM node via atom table exhaustion and, when a decoded term flows into a call site that invokes it, achieve remote code execution on the server. 'Elixir.GRPC.Codec.Erlpack':decode/2 (lib/grpc/codec/erlpack.ex) calls :erlang.binary_to_term/1 on the raw gRPC message body without the :safe option, no size bound, and no type guard. Any unauthenticated peer that sends a request with Content-Type: application/grpc+erlpack can send a crafted payload that mints arbitrary new atoms (which are never garbage-collected, exhausting the bounded atom table and crashing the VM) or that encodes a fun term which, if applied anywhere downstream, executes attacker-controlled code inside the server process. This issue affects grpc from 0.4.0 before 1.0.0.

Published

Date2026-06-15

Updated

Date2026-06-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48723

SUMMARY

The browserstack-cypress-cli is BrowserStack's CLI which allows users to run Cypress tests on BrowserStack. Versions prior to 1.36.4 are vulnerable to OS command injection via the cypress_config_file configuration parameter. In readCypressConfigUtil.js, the loadJsFile() function constructs a shell command by interpolating the user-controlled cypress_config_filepath value into a template literal, then executes it via child_process.execSync(). Shell metacharacters in the config path (specifically " and ;) allow breaking out of the quoted argument and injecting arbitrary commands. This issue has been fixed in version 1.36.6.

Published

Date2026-06-15

Updated

Date2026-06-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48599

SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in elixir-grpc grpc allows authenticated attackers to access or modify resources belonging to other users by smuggling a conflicting value for any path-bound field via the query string or request body. In 'Elixir.GRPC.Server.Transcode':map_request/5 (lib/grpc/server/transcode.ex), all three clauses use Map.merge/2 with path bindings as the first argument, giving them the lowest merge precedence. A request such as GET /users/me/profile?user_id=victim (or a POST with {"user_id": "victim"} when body: "*") yields a decoded protobuf struct where the path-bound field carries the attacker-supplied value rather than the router-extracted value. Any handler that uses the path-bound field for authorization, multi-tenancy scoping, or ownership checks is silently bypassed. This issue affects grpc from 0.8.0 before 1.0.0.

Published

Date2026-06-15

Updated

Date2026-06-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…