Company Details
jupiter-medical-center
1,675
16,897
62
jupitermed.com
0
JUP_2583859
In-progress


Jupiter Medical Center Company CyberSecurity Posture
jupitermed.comHighly rated for quality, patient safety and patient satisfaction, Jupiter Medical Center is the leading destination for world-class health care in Palm Beach County and the greater Treasure Coast. In 2023, the Leapfrog Group named Jupiter Medical Center a “Top General Hospital,” a distinction earned by only 35 hospitals nationwide. Jupiter Medical Center is also the only hospital in Palm Beach, Martin, St. Lucie and Indian River counties to receive a 4-star quality and safety rating from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Outstanding physicians, state-of-the-art facilities, innovative techniques, and a commitment to serving the community enable Jupiter Medical Center to meet a broad range of patient needs. The region’s only independent, not-for-profit hospital, Jupiter Medical Center offers specialty concentrations in orthopedics and spine care; cancer care and oncology; cardiac and vascular care; neuroscience and stroke care; women’s and children’s services; urgent care; and other key areas.
Company Details
jupiter-medical-center
1,675
16,897
62
jupitermed.com
0
JUP_2583859
In-progress
Between 700 and 749

JMC Global Score (TPRM)XXXX

Description: Jupiter Medical Center Notifies Patients of Third-Party Data Breach Impacting Health Records On January 21, 2026, Jupiter Medical Center informed stakeholders about a data security incident involving Cerner Corporation, its third-party electronic health record (EHR) vendor. The breach did not compromise Jupiter Medical’s internal systems but exposed sensitive patient data held by Cerner. The medical center confirmed that affected individuals are being notified and provided with guidance on protecting their personal information. While details on the scope of the breach remain limited, the incident underscores the risks of third-party vendor vulnerabilities in healthcare cybersecurity. No further specifics on the number of impacted patients or the nature of the exposed data were disclosed at this time.


Jupiter Medical Center has 18.03% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Jupiter Medical Center has 25.37% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Jupiter Medical Center reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 1 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
JMC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Highly rated for quality, patient safety and patient satisfaction, Jupiter Medical Center is the leading destination for world-class health care in Palm Beach County and the greater Treasure Coast. In 2023, the Leapfrog Group named Jupiter Medical Center a “Top General Hospital,” a distinction earned by only 35 hospitals nationwide. Jupiter Medical Center is also the only hospital in Palm Beach, Martin, St. Lucie and Indian River counties to receive a 4-star quality and safety rating from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Outstanding physicians, state-of-the-art facilities, innovative techniques, and a commitment to serving the community enable Jupiter Medical Center to meet a broad range of patient needs. The region’s only independent, not-for-profit hospital, Jupiter Medical Center offers specialty concentrations in orthopedics and spine care; cancer care and oncology; cardiac and vascular care; neuroscience and stroke care; women’s and children’s services; urgent care; and other key areas.


Boston Children's Hospital is a 404-bed comprehensive center for pediatric health care. As one of the largest pediatric medical centers in the United States, Boston Children's offers a complete range of health care services for children from birth through 21 years of age. (Our services can begin int
Community Health Systems is one of the nation’s leading healthcare providers. Developing and operating healthcare delivery systems across 14 states, CHS is committed to helping people get well and live healthier. CHS affiliates operate 70 acute-care hospitals and more than 1,000 other sites of care,
Alberta Health Services (AHS) is proud to be part of Canada’s first and largest provincewide, integrated health system, responsible for delivering health services to more than 4.5 million people living in Alberta, as well as occasionally to some residents of other provinces and territories Our skil

Mediclinic Southern Africa is a private hospital group operating in South Africa and Namibia focused on providing acute care, specialist-orientated, multi-disciplinary hospital services and related service offerings. We place science at the heart of our care process by striving to provide evidence-b

A world-leading multinational healthcare provider, IHH believes that making a difference starts with our aspiration to Care. For Good. Our team of 70,000 people commit to deliver greater good to our patients, people, the public and our planet, as we live our purpose each day to touch lives and tr

Rochester Regional Health, headquartered in Rochester, NY, is an integrated health services organization serving the people of Western New York, the Finger Lakes, St. Lawrence County, and beyond. We are dedicated to helping our community stay healthy and live fulfilling lives. Together, we find the

Our mission is to improve the health and well-being of North Carolinians and others whom we serve. We accomplish this by providing leadership and excellence in the interrelated areas of patient care, education and research. UNC Health and its 40,000 teammates, continue to serve as North Carolina’s

Houston Methodist is one of the nation’s leading health systems and academic medical centers. The health system consists of eight hospitals: Houston Methodist Hospital, its flagship academic hospital in the Texas Medical Center, seven community hospitals and one long-term acute care hospital through

CHRISTUS Health is a Catholic not-for-profit health care system comprising more than 600 centers, including long-term care facilities, community hospitals, walk-in clinics and health ministries. We are a community of 50,000 Associates, with over 15,000 physicians providing personalized care. Our m
.png)
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. (CBS12) — Twins that commit the crime together can do the time together. The Jacksonville Sheriff's Office says on...
Jupiter Medical Center has notified patients about a data breach from last year involving a healthcare technology company,...
A data breach at a third-party corporation has put the Jupiter Medical Center on alert.
VERO BEACH, Fla. (CBS12) — After turning to the community for help in finding a missing 8-year-old girl, Indian River County deputies...
Wells Fargo is relocating its wealth management headquarters to West Palm Beach, making it the first major U.S. bank to do so.
A data breach affecting a technology company has prompted Jupiter Medical Center (JMC) to issue a notice to patients.
Former client Michael Smith fatally stabbed therapist Rebecca White in her Orange County office after demanding to see her and refusing to...
A 65-year-old Florida Keys boat captain was arrested Monday after deputies say he was selling kilos of drugs that he found at sea.
New details reveal a Pompano Beach man is accused of fatally shooting his cousin, whose body was found in a sleeping area of a semi-truck in...

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
The official website of Jupiter Medical Center is http://www.jupitermed.com.
According to Rankiteo, Jupiter Medical Center’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 705, reflecting their Moderate security posture.
According to Rankiteo, Jupiter Medical Center currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
According to Rankiteo, Jupiter Medical Center has been affected by a supply chain cyber incident involving Cerner Corporation, with the incident ID CERJUP1769037969.
According to Rankiteo, Jupiter Medical Center is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
According to Rankiteo, Jupiter Medical Center does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
According to Rankiteo, Jupiter Medical Center is not listed as GDPR compliant.
According to Rankiteo, Jupiter Medical Center does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
According to Rankiteo, Jupiter Medical Center is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
According to Rankiteo,Jupiter Medical Center is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Jupiter Medical Center operates primarily in the Hospitals and Health Care industry.
Jupiter Medical Center employs approximately 1,675 people worldwide.
Jupiter Medical Center presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Jupiter Medical Center’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 16,897 followers.
Jupiter Medical Center is classified under the NAICS code 62, which corresponds to Health Care and Social Assistance.
No, Jupiter Medical Center does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Yes, Jupiter Medical Center maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/jupiter-medical-center.
As of January 22, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Jupiter Medical Center has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Jupiter Medical Center has an estimated 31,593 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an communication strategy with patient notifications and guidance on protecting personal information..
Title: Jupiter Medical Center Third-Party Data Breach Impacting Health Records
Description: Jupiter Medical Center informed stakeholders about a data security incident involving Cerner Corporation, its third-party electronic health record (EHR) vendor. The breach did not compromise Jupiter Medical’s internal systems but exposed sensitive patient data held by Cerner.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2026-01-21
Type: Data Breach
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party vendor vulnerability
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

Data Compromised: Sensitive patient data
Systems Affected: Third-party EHR system (Cerner Corporation)
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Health records.

Entity Name: Jupiter Medical Center
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare

Entity Name: Cerner Corporation
Entity Type: Third-party EHR Vendor
Industry: Healthcare IT

Communication Strategy: Patient notifications and guidance on protecting personal information

Type of Data Compromised: Health records
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes

Source: Jupiter Medical Center Notification
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Jupiter Medical Center Notification.
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Patient notifications and guidance on protecting personal information.

Stakeholder Advisories: Guidance on protecting personal information provided to affected individuals
Customer Advisories: Patient notifications and guidance on protecting personal information
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Guidance on protecting personal information provided to affected individuals and Patient notifications and guidance on protecting personal information.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2026-01-21.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was Sensitive patient data.
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was Sensitive patient data.
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is Jupiter Medical Center Notification.
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Guidance on protecting personal information provided to affected individuals, .
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an Patient notifications and guidance on protecting personal information.
.png)
Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.
Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.
Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.
FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.
The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Get company history
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.