Comparison Overview

Jupiter Medical Center

VS

Mediclinic

Jupiter Medical Center

1210 S Old Dixie Hwy, Jupiter, 33458, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 550 and 599

Highly rated for quality, patient safety and patient satisfaction, Jupiter Medical Center is the leading destination for world-class health care in Palm Beach County and the greater Treasure Coast. In 2023, the Leapfrog Group named Jupiter Medical Center a “Top General Hospital,” a distinction earned by only 35 hospitals nationwide. Jupiter Medical Center is also the only hospital in Palm Beach, Martin, St. Lucie and Indian River counties to receive a 4-star quality and safety rating from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Outstanding physicians, state-of-the-art facilities, innovative techniques, and a commitment to serving the community enable Jupiter Medical Center to meet a broad range of patient needs. The region’s only independent, not-for-profit hospital, Jupiter Medical Center offers specialty concentrations in orthopedics and spine care; cancer care and oncology; cardiac and vascular care; neuroscience and stroke care; women’s and children’s services; urgent care; and other key areas.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 1,675
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Mediclinic

25 Du Toit St, Stellenbosch, 7600, ZA
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Mediclinic Southern Africa is a private hospital group operating in South Africa and Namibia focused on providing acute care, specialist-orientated, multi-disciplinary hospital services and related service offerings. We place science at the heart of our care process by striving to provide evidence-based care of the highest standard. The group currently operates 53 private hospitals and five day clinics throughout South Africa and three hospitals in Namibia with more than 8 000 beds in total. Mediclinic Southern Africa is a wholly owned subsidiary of the international private healthcare group Mediclinic International PLC, listed on the LSE (London Stock Exchange) with a secondary listing on the JSE (Johannesburg Stock Exchange) and the NSX (Namibian Stock Exchange). Mediclinic International comprises 78 hospitals, five sub-acute hospitals, 13 day case clinics and 21 outpatient clinics. Hirslanden operates 18 hospitals, two day case clinics and three outpatient clinics in Switzerland with more than 1 900 inpatient beds; Mediclinic Southern Africa operates 53 hospitals, five sub-acute hospitals and nine day case clinics with more than 8 500 inpatient beds; and Mediclinic Middle East operates seven hospitals, two day case clinics and 18 outpatient clinics with more than 900 inpatient beds in the United Arab Emirates. Mediclinic also holds a 29.9% interest in Spire Healthcare Group plc, a leading private healthcare group based in the United Kingdom and listed on the LSE.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 13,616
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jupiter-medical-center.jpeg
Jupiter Medical Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mediclinic.jpeg
Mediclinic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jupiter Medical Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mediclinic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Jupiter Medical Center has 21.26% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mediclinic in 2026.

Incident History — Jupiter Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jupiter Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mediclinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mediclinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jupiter-medical-center.jpeg
Jupiter Medical Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-Party Vendor Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mediclinic.jpeg
Mediclinic
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mediclinic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jupiter Medical Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Jupiter Medical Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Mediclinic company has not reported any.

In the current year, Jupiter Medical Center company has reported more cyber incidents than Mediclinic company.

Jupiter Medical Center company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Mediclinic company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Jupiter Medical Center company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Mediclinic company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mediclinic company nor Jupiter Medical Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center company nor Mediclinic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center nor Mediclinic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center company nor Mediclinic company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mediclinic company employs more people globally than Jupiter Medical Center company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center nor Mediclinic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center nor Mediclinic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center nor Mediclinic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center nor Mediclinic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center nor Mediclinic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center nor Mediclinic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H