Comparison Overview

Jupiter Medical Center

VS

Community Health Systems

Jupiter Medical Center

1210 S Old Dixie Hwy, Jupiter, 33458, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 550 and 599

Highly rated for quality, patient safety and patient satisfaction, Jupiter Medical Center is the leading destination for world-class health care in Palm Beach County and the greater Treasure Coast. In 2023, the Leapfrog Group named Jupiter Medical Center a “Top General Hospital,” a distinction earned by only 35 hospitals nationwide. Jupiter Medical Center is also the only hospital in Palm Beach, Martin, St. Lucie and Indian River counties to receive a 4-star quality and safety rating from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Outstanding physicians, state-of-the-art facilities, innovative techniques, and a commitment to serving the community enable Jupiter Medical Center to meet a broad range of patient needs. The region’s only independent, not-for-profit hospital, Jupiter Medical Center offers specialty concentrations in orthopedics and spine care; cancer care and oncology; cardiac and vascular care; neuroscience and stroke care; women’s and children’s services; urgent care; and other key areas.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 1,675
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Community Health Systems

4000 Meridian Boulevard, Franklin, 37067, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 650 and 699

Community Health Systems is one of the nation’s leading healthcare providers. Developing and operating healthcare delivery systems across 14 states, CHS is committed to helping people get well and live healthier. CHS affiliates operate 70 acute-care hospitals and more than 1,000 other sites of care, including physician practices, urgent care centers, freestanding emergency departments, occupational medicine clinics, imaging centers, cancer centers and ambulatory surgery centers.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 24,576
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jupiter-medical-center.jpeg
Jupiter Medical Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/community-health-systems.jpeg
Community Health Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jupiter Medical Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Community Health Systems
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Jupiter Medical Center has 18.03% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Community Health Systems in 2026.

Incident History — Jupiter Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jupiter Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Community Health Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Community Health Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jupiter-medical-center.jpeg
Jupiter Medical Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-Party Vendor Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/community-health-systems.jpeg
Community Health Systems
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Zero-day vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 01/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2014
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: External Criminal Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Community Health Systems company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jupiter Medical Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Jupiter Medical Center and Community Health Systems have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Jupiter Medical Center company has reported more cyber incidents than Community Health Systems company.

Jupiter Medical Center company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Community Health Systems company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Community Health Systems company and Jupiter Medical Center company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Community Health Systems company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Jupiter Medical Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center company nor Community Health Systems company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center nor Community Health Systems holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center company nor Community Health Systems company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Community Health Systems company employs more people globally than Jupiter Medical Center company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center nor Community Health Systems holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center nor Community Health Systems holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center nor Community Health Systems holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center nor Community Health Systems holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center nor Community Health Systems holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jupiter Medical Center nor Community Health Systems holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H