What is the official website of Federal Maritime Commission ?

The official website of Federal Maritime Commission is https://www.fmc.gov.

What is Federal Maritime Commission's cybersecurity risk score?

Federal Maritime Commission has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 651 out of 1000, indicating a Weak security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Federal Maritime Commission experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Federal Maritime Commission currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Federal Maritime Commission been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Federal Maritime Commission has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Federal Maritime Commission have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Federal Maritime Commission is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Federal Maritime Commission have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Federal Maritime Commission does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Federal Maritime Commission comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Federal Maritime Commission is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Federal Maritime Commission have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Federal Maritime Commission does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Federal Maritime Commission comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Federal Maritime Commission is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Federal Maritime Commission have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Federal Maritime Commission is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Federal Maritime Commission operate in ?

Federal Maritime Commission operates primarily in the Maritime Transportation industry.

How many employees does Federal Maritime Commission have ?

Federal Maritime Commission employs approximately 116 people worldwide.

Does Federal Maritime Commission own any subsidiaries ?

Federal Maritime Commission presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Federal Maritime Commission have ?

Federal Maritime Commission's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 9,613 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Federal Maritime Commission ?

Federal Maritime Commission is classified under the NAICS code 483, which corresponds to Water Transportation.

Does Federal Maritime Commission have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Federal Maritime Commission does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Federal Maritime Commission have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Federal Maritime Commission maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/federal-maritime-commission.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Federal Maritime Commission experienced ?

As of July 20, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Federal Maritime Commission has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Federal Maritime Commission have ?

Federal Maritime Commission has an estimated 2,224 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Federal Maritime Commission faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Cyber Attack and Ransomware.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

FMC

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

651

/1000

Weak

676

/1000

Weak

Federal Maritime Commission Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

fmc.gov

Add Your Compliance Badge

The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) Mission is to ensure a competitive and reliable international ocean transportation supply system that supports the U.S. economy and protects the public from unfair and deceptive practices.

FMC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

FMC

Federal Maritime Commission CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Federal Maritime Co...

Ransomware

100

1/2026

CHAFED178175706...

Federal Maritime Co...

Cyber Attack

1/2017

FEDUSD177020890...

Loading…

A.I.

FMC Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for FMC

Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

Federal Maritime Commission has 40.12% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Federal Maritime Commission has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident Types FMC vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

Federal Maritime Commission reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 1 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 0 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.

Incident History - FMC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Federal Maritime Commission Subsidiaries

Parent Company

FMC

Maritime Transportation

Website: https://www.fmc.gov

Company Size: 51-200 employees

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

Federal Maritime Commission Similar Companies

Hapag-Lloyd AG

hapag-lloyd.com

About Hapag-Lloyd With a fleet of 313 modern container ships and a total transport capacity of 2.5 million TEU, Hapag-Lloyd is one of the world’s leading liner shipping companies. In the Liner Shipping segment, the Company has around 14,000 employees and 400 offices in 140 countries. Hapag-Lloyd has a container capacity of 3.7 million TEU – including one of the largest and most modern fleets of reefer containers. A total of 133 liner services worldwide ensure fast and reliable connections between more than 600 ports on all the continents. In the Terminal & Infrastructure segment, Hapag-Lloyd has equity stakes in 21 terminals in Europe, Latin America, the United States, India and North Africa. Around 3,000 employees are assigned to the Terminal & Infrastructure segment and provide complementary logistics services at selected locations in addition to the terminal activities.

Anglo-Eastern

angloeastern.com

Anglo-Eastern's rich maritime heritage spans over 50 years of ship management, crew management, cruise & leisure management and technical services. We manage a diverse fleet of vessels worldwide on behalf of our global partners, and uniquely offer both cadet and crew training through our highly regarded maritime academy and strategically located training centres. From humble beginnings to industry pioneer, we are always looking to the future yet are never far from our roots, and it is this distinct blend of proactive forward-thinking and traditional values, coupled with our commitment to developing and nurturing our people and communities, that drives Anglo-Eastern and sets us apart from our peers. Leading with integrity and doing the right things the right way are at the heart of our work ethic and the foundation upon which we are able to build trust, drive performance and shape a better maritime future for generations to follow. Join us on our voyage in delivering excellence. ------------------------ IMPORTANT NOTICE | Anglo-Eastern does NOT use agents, and we do NOT charge fees in exchange for employment or AEMA sponsorship. We offer employment and sponsorship based on merit and suitability. Anyone asking for money in exchange for Anglo-Eastern employment or AEMA sponsorship is a fraudster. Please report such scammers and do NOT make any payments to them. COMMUNITY POLICY | We welcome our followers and other members of the LinkedIn community to comment on our posts and express their views. However, we have a zero-tolerance policy regarding comments that are obscene, threatening, discriminatory or of a harassing nature (including trolling), as well as those that intend to purposely mislead through false claims and misinformation, solicit, phish and/or otherwise scam. Such comments may be reported and/or removed at any time without notice.

Loading…

NEWS

Federal Maritime Commission CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

February 16, 2026 12:15 PM

Comment The rain in Spain falls mainly on your supply chain

If you route cargo through the western Mediterranean, you might want to mark 20 February in your diary. That's the deadline for public...

Read Article

November 03, 2025 08:00 AM

US Homeland Security Committee warns of rising cyber threats, as federal shutdown and lapsed law hamper defenses

The U.S. House Committee on Homeland Security published an updated 'Cyber Threat Snapshot,' outlining the heightened threats posed by malign...

Read Article

October 10, 2025 07:00 AM

FDD shows how CSC turned recommendations into actions that reshaped US cybersecurity strategy and policy

Building on the rare success story in U.S. government commissions, the FDD recognized that the Cyberspace Solarium Commission (CSC) stands...

Read Article

September 16, 2025 01:58 AM

Commission on U.S. Cyber Force Generation

The CSIS Commission on U.S. Cyber Force Generation will convene leading experts to examine how the United States can best build a dedicated cyber service.

Read Article

September 12, 2025 07:00 AM

Industry giants sign MoU at Gastech to address U.S. maritime cyber regulations

Hanwha announced at Gastech 2025 a research collaboration with ABS to address U.S. maritime cybersecurity regulations.

Read Article

August 21, 2025 07:00 AM

Bill would give hackers letters of marque against US enemies

It's been more than 200 years since the United States issued a letter of marque allowing privateers to attack the vessels of foreign nations...

Read Article

August 07, 2025 07:00 AM

Handling Our Cargo: How the People's Republic of China Invests Strategically in the U.S. Maritime Industry

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party Chairman John Moolenaar (R-MI), House Committee on Homeland...

Read Article

July 31, 2025 07:00 AM

Expiring cyber information-sharing law puts US maritime infrastructure at risk, experts warn

A congressional probe last year found Chinese‑made technology embedded in many U.S. ports, raising fears of espionage and sabotage.

Read Article

July 23, 2025 07:00 AM

New Maritime Cybersecurity Era Begins: Coast Guard Rule Takes Effect

First phase of the Cybersecurity in the Marine Transportation System final rule under the US Coast Guard takes effect for reporting to...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-12484

SUMMARY

A vulnerability in keras-team/keras version 3.15.0 allows unsafe deserialization of attacker-controlled PyTorch pickle data through the public `keras.layers.TorchModuleWrapper.from_config` method. This method invokes `torch.load(..., weights_only=False)` without requiring an explicit unsafe opt-in, such as a `safe_mode=False` parameter. When called outside a `SafeModeScope(True)` context, the absence of an ambient safe mode state permits unsafe deserialization by default. This issue can lead to arbitrary code execution if untrusted Keras layer configurations are processed using this method. The vulnerability arises because the method does not enforce safe deserialization practices unless explicitly guarded by Keras safe mode.

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

https://huntr.com/bounties/ab14df49-13b5-4442-b754-3189430bfa28

CVE-2026-64186

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommu/amd: Remove latent out-of-bounds access in IOMMU debugfs In iommu_mmio_write() and iommu_capability_write(), the variables dbg_mmio_offset and dbg_cap_offset are declared as int. However, they are populated using kstrtou32_from_user(). If a user provides a sufficiently large value, it can become a negative integer. Prior to this patch, the AMD IOMMU debugfs implementation was already protected by different mechanisms. 1. #define OFS_IN_SZ 8 ensures the user string <= 8 bytes, so e.g. 0xffffffff isn't a valid input. if (cnt > OFS_IN_SZ) return -EINVAL; 2. Implicit type promotion in iommu_mmio_write(), dbg_mmio_offset is int and iommu->mmio_phys_end is u64 if (dbg_mmio_offset > iommu->mmio_phys_end - sizeof(u64)) return -EINVAL; 3. The show handlers would currently catch the negative number and refuse to perform the read. Replace kstrtou32_from_user() with kstrtos32_from_user() to parse the input, and check for negative values to explicitly prevent out-of-bounds memory accesses directly in iommu_mmio_write() and iommu_capability_write().

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-64185

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sysfs: don't remove existing directory on update failure When sysfs_update_group() is called for a named group and create_files() fails (e.g. -ENOMEM), internal_create_group() calls kernfs_remove(kn) on the group directory. In the update path, kn was obtained via kernfs_find_and_get() and refers to a directory that already existed before this call. Removing it silently destroys a sysfs group that the caller did not create. Only remove the directory if we created it ourselves. On update failure the directory remains as it is left empty by remove_files() inside create_files(), but can be repopulated by a retry.

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-64184

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: call missing mem_cgroup_iter_break() damon_sysfs_memcg_path_to_id() breaks mem_cgroup_iter() loop without calling mem_cgroup_iter_break(). This leaks the cgroup reference. Fix the issue by calling mem_cgroup_iter_break() before the break. The issue was discovered [1] by Sashiko.

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-64183

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: efi: Allocate runtime workqueue before ACPI init Since commit 5894cf571e14 ("acpi/prmt: Use EFI runtime sandbox to invoke PRM handlers") ACPI PRM calls are delegated to a workqueue which runs in a kernel thread, making it easier to detect and mitigate faulting memory accesses performed by the firmware. Rafael reports that such PRM accesses may occur before efisubsys_init() executes, which is where the workqueue is allocated, leading to NULL pointer dereferences. Since acpi_init() [which triggers the early PRM accesses] executes as a subsys_initcall() as well, and has its own dependencies that may be sensitive to initcall ordering, deferring acpi_init() is not an option. So instead, split off the workqueue allocation into its own postcore initcall, as this is the only missing piece to allow EFI runtime calls to be made. This ensures that EFI runtime call (including PRM calls) are accessible to all code running at subsys_initcall() level.

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…