ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Louvre Museum is a national art museum in Paris, France. It is located on the Right Bank of the Seine in the city's 1st arrondissement (district or ward) and home to some of the most canonical works of Western art, including the Mona Lisa and the Venus de Milo. The museum is housed in the Louvre Palace, originally built in the late 12th to 13th century under Philip II. Remnants of the Medieval Louvre fortress are visible in the basement of the museum. Due to urban expansion, the fortress eventually lost its defensive function, and in 1546 Francis I converted it into the primary residence of the French Kings.

Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

MDL

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

etablissement-public-du-musee-du-louvre

Employees number:

27

Number of followers:

1,277

NAICS:

712

Industry Type:

Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos

Homepage:

louvre.fr

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

MUS_1100776

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreMDL Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 700 and 749

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/etablissement-public-du-musee-du-louvre.jpeg
MDL Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreMDL Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/etablissement-public-du-musee-du-louvre.jpeg
MDL Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

MDL Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
3
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsIncident DetailsView
Louvre MuseumVulnerability50211/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: The Louvre Museum in Paris faced a **digital security lapse** exposed by a physical burglary, where thieves stole eight jewelry pieces after breaking in through a second-floor window. While alarm systems functioned and police responded promptly, an audit revealed **longstanding cybersecurity vulnerabilities**, including **outdated Windows software** and **unpatched video surveillance systems**. The museum had failed to address these issues for years, leaving critical infrastructure exposed. A full security overhaul—including governance policy updates, camera upgrades, and cybersecurity protocol revisions—is now mandated by year-end. The incident highlights systemic neglect in maintaining **basic IT hygiene**, raising concerns about potential **future breaches or data leaks** due to unsecured legacy systems. Though no digital data was confirmed stolen in this event, the **underlying cybersecurity failures** pose a significant risk for exploitation by malicious actors, particularly given the museum’s high-profile status and sensitive operational data (e.g., visitor records, financial transactions).

Louvre MuseumVulnerability6026/2003
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: The Louvre Museum in Paris suffered a **$100 million jewel heist** due to severe cybersecurity and physical security lapses. Investigations revealed that the museum’s surveillance system used weak passwords like **'Louvre'** and **'Thales'**, with one visibly displayed on the login screen. A decade-old audit exposed additional vulnerabilities, including **outdated Windows Server 2003 software** and **unguarded rooftop access**, which thieves exploited using an electric ladder to breach a balcony. The incident highlighted systemic negligence in digital defenses, leaving the world’s most visited museum exposed to both cyber and physical intrusions. While no direct data breach of customer or employee records was reported, the reputational damage and financial loss were substantial, underscoring how poor password hygiene and unpatched systems can enable high-stakes crimes. The Louvre’s failure to address long-standing security flaws—despite prior warnings—raises concerns about institutional accountability in safeguarding high-value assets against evolving threats.

Louvre MuseumVulnerability6036/2000
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: A series of security audits spanning from 2014 to recent years exposed severe cybersecurity vulnerabilities at the **Louvre Museum**, France’s iconic cultural institution. Investigative reports by *CheckNews* (Libération) revealed egregious failures, including the use of trivial passwords like **"LOUVRE"** for video surveillance servers and **"THALES"** for a critical software platform provided by Thales. Penetration testers easily exploited these weak credentials to infiltrate systems, gaining unauthorized access to **badge access controls**—enabling them to modify employee permissions remotely. Audits also uncovered **obsolete, unsupported systems** (e.g., Windows 2000, XP, and Server 2003) still operational on the network, leaving them exposed to unpatched exploits. While the recent **physical jewel heist** (unrelated to cyberattacks) dominated headlines, the audits confirmed that a cyber intruder could have **compromised surveillance feeds, access systems, or internal data** with minimal effort. Museum management refused to comment on remediation efforts, raising concerns that these critical flaws may persist, endangering both **physical security and digital assets** tied to France’s cultural heritage.

Louvre Museum
Vulnerability
Severity: 50
Impact: 2
Seen: 11/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: The Louvre Museum in Paris faced a **digital security lapse** exposed by a physical burglary, where thieves stole eight jewelry pieces after breaking in through a second-floor window. While alarm systems functioned and police responded promptly, an audit revealed **longstanding cybersecurity vulnerabilities**, including **outdated Windows software** and **unpatched video surveillance systems**. The museum had failed to address these issues for years, leaving critical infrastructure exposed. A full security overhaul—including governance policy updates, camera upgrades, and cybersecurity protocol revisions—is now mandated by year-end. The incident highlights systemic neglect in maintaining **basic IT hygiene**, raising concerns about potential **future breaches or data leaks** due to unsecured legacy systems. Though no digital data was confirmed stolen in this event, the **underlying cybersecurity failures** pose a significant risk for exploitation by malicious actors, particularly given the museum’s high-profile status and sensitive operational data (e.g., visitor records, financial transactions).

Louvre Museum
Vulnerability
Severity: 60
Impact: 2
Seen: 6/2003
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: The Louvre Museum in Paris suffered a **$100 million jewel heist** due to severe cybersecurity and physical security lapses. Investigations revealed that the museum’s surveillance system used weak passwords like **'Louvre'** and **'Thales'**, with one visibly displayed on the login screen. A decade-old audit exposed additional vulnerabilities, including **outdated Windows Server 2003 software** and **unguarded rooftop access**, which thieves exploited using an electric ladder to breach a balcony. The incident highlighted systemic negligence in digital defenses, leaving the world’s most visited museum exposed to both cyber and physical intrusions. While no direct data breach of customer or employee records was reported, the reputational damage and financial loss were substantial, underscoring how poor password hygiene and unpatched systems can enable high-stakes crimes. The Louvre’s failure to address long-standing security flaws—despite prior warnings—raises concerns about institutional accountability in safeguarding high-value assets against evolving threats.

Louvre Museum
Vulnerability
Severity: 60
Impact: 3
Seen: 6/2000
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: A series of security audits spanning from 2014 to recent years exposed severe cybersecurity vulnerabilities at the **Louvre Museum**, France’s iconic cultural institution. Investigative reports by *CheckNews* (Libération) revealed egregious failures, including the use of trivial passwords like **"LOUVRE"** for video surveillance servers and **"THALES"** for a critical software platform provided by Thales. Penetration testers easily exploited these weak credentials to infiltrate systems, gaining unauthorized access to **badge access controls**—enabling them to modify employee permissions remotely. Audits also uncovered **obsolete, unsupported systems** (e.g., Windows 2000, XP, and Server 2003) still operational on the network, leaving them exposed to unpatched exploits. While the recent **physical jewel heist** (unrelated to cyberattacks) dominated headlines, the audits confirmed that a cyber intruder could have **compromised surveillance feeds, access systems, or internal data** with minimal effort. Museum management refused to comment on remediation efforts, raising concerns that these critical flaws may persist, endangering both **physical security and digital assets** tied to France’s cultural heritage.

Ailogo

MDL Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for MDL

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) has 20.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) has 56.25% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident Types MDL vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Avg (This Year)

Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 1 vulnerabilities, 0 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.

Incident History — MDL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MDL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

MDL Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Louvre Museum is a national art museum in Paris, France. It is located on the Right Bank of the Seine in the city's 1st arrondissement (district or ward) and home to some of the most canonical works of Western art, including the Mona Lisa and the Venus de Milo. The museum is housed in the Louvre Palace, originally built in the late 12th to 13th century under Philip II. Remnants of the Medieval Louvre fortress are visible in the basement of the museum. Due to urban expansion, the fortress eventually lost its defensive function, and in 1546 Francis I converted it into the primary residence of the French Kings.

Loading...
similarCompanies

MDL Similar Companies

The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum

Founded in 1977, The Art Museum at Florida International University (MMC/FIU) started as a student gallery. Since then, it has grown to achieve official recognition as a major cultural institution of the State of Florida for its unprecedented collection of Latin American and 20th century American ar

Bellevue Arts Museum

Bellevue Arts Museum is a place that ignites the mind and fuels creativity. With its unique focus on art, craft and design, BAM connects people of all ages with extraordinary works by Northwest artists while bringing national and international exhibitions to our community. We are dedicated to conver

di Rosa Center for Contemporary Art

di Rosa Center for Contemporary Art presents contemporary exhibitions and educational programs for all ages and maintains a permanent collection of notable works by artists living or working in the San Francisco Bay Area from the mid-twentieth century to the present day. A wide range of styles, medi

Heritage Square Museum

Heritage Square's eight rescued historic structures take you back to a time when electricity was a novelty, a trip to the beach was often a full-weekend activity, and customs were distinctly different from those of today. Guided tours, exhibits, events, ongoing restoration work and educational progr

Technopolis

Alle initiatieven hebben echter één en hetzelfde doel voor ogen: informeren en sensibiliseren betreffende het belang van wetenschap en technologie en de in-, uit- en doorstroom in exacte en toegepaste wetenschappen verhogen. Technopolis ontwikkelt daarom initiatieven onder het motto: 'Ik hoor

National Sporting Library & Museum

The National Sporting Library & Museum (NSLM) in Middleburg, Virginia, is dedicated to preserving, promoting, and sharing the literature, art, and culture of equestrian, angling, and field sports. Founded as the National Sporting Library in 1954, the NSLM has expanded to become a library, research

newsone

MDL CyberSecurity News

November 18, 2025 04:08 PM
Louvre closes gallery and office spaces due to structural problems

The Musée du Louvre in Paris has been forced to close a public gallery and staff offices due to structural weaknesses.

November 11, 2025 08:00 AM
In the wake of the Louvre heist, Proton steps in to offer free password protection

The recent robbery at the Louvre Museum highlighted the vulnerability of digital systems in cultural institutions; Investigators found that...

November 09, 2025 08:00 AM
Louvre cybersecurity an absolute mess, secret audits reveal

Infosec in brief There's no indication that the brazen bandits who stole jewels from the Louvre attacked the famed French museum's systems,...

November 09, 2025 08:00 AM
Thieves steal $100M in jewels from Louvre after museum used own name as surveillance password

By Kurt Knutsson, CyberGuy Report. Published November 09, 2025. Fox News · La investigación del atraco al Louvre da un gran paso adelante después de que los...

November 08, 2025 08:00 AM
No wonder it got hit - report claims password for the Louvre’s video surveillance system was...“LOUVRE”

The recent major jewelry theft at the Louvre, where thieves disguised as construction workers stole eight Crown Jewel pieces worth an...

November 07, 2025 08:00 AM
Louvre's security password was 'Louvre'?

The information came from a reputable French newspaper's report that cited a confidential security audit of the museum in 2014.

November 06, 2025 08:00 AM
You’ll never guess the Louvre’s onetime CCTV password. (You absolutely will)

A French court released a report Thursday slamming the leadership of the Louvre for its focus on headline-grabbing purchases and renovation...

November 06, 2025 08:00 AM
Louvre heist reveals museum used ‘LOUVRE’ as password for its video surveillance, still has workstations with Windows 2000 - glaring security weaknesses revealed in previous report

Is the Louvre's weak cybersecurity a deeper symptom?

November 06, 2025 08:00 AM
Revealed: The shockingly weak password for the Louvre’s security system during heist

The cybersecurity audit warned that access to controls, alarms and video surveillance were at risk due to cybersecurity negligence.

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

MDL CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum)

The official website of Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) is https://www.louvre.fr/en.

Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum)’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum)’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 748, reflecting their Moderate security posture.

How many security badges does Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum)’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Does Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum)

Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) operates primarily in the Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos industry.

Number of Employees at Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum)

Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) employs approximately 27 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum)

Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum)’s LinkedIn Followers

Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum)’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 1,277 followers.

NAICS Classification of Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum)

Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) is classified under the NAICS code 712, which corresponds to Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions.

Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum)’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum)’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/etablissement-public-du-musee-du-louvre.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum)

As of December 04, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) has experienced 3 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) has an estimated 2,140 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Vulnerability.

What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) ?

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $100 million.

How does Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an remediation measures with potential password policy updates, remediation measures with physical security reinforcements (post-incident), and communication strategy with media statements (no direct response to cyberguy by deadline), communication strategy with public advisories on security improvements, and communication strategy with no public comment; audits marked confidential, and law enforcement notified with yes (police responded within minutes), and remediation measures with full security review, remediation measures with governance policy updates, remediation measures with camera upgrades, remediation measures with cybersecurity protocol updates..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Physical Theft

Title: Louvre Museum Jewel Heist Exposing Weak Password Security

Description: Thieves stole $100 million in jewels from the Louvre Museum in Paris, France, exploiting weak digital security measures, including the use of 'Louvre' and 'Thales' as passwords for the surveillance system. The incident also revealed outdated software (Windows Server 2003) and unguarded physical access points (rooftop). The heist highlighted systemic cybersecurity failures, including poor password practices and inadequate system updates.

Type: Physical Theft

Attack Vector: Weak/Default PasswordsPhysical Intrusion (Rooftop Access)Outdated Software Exploitation

Vulnerability Exploited: Weak Password Policy (Password: 'Louvre', 'Thales')Unpatched/Outdated Systems (Windows Server 2003)Unguarded Physical Access Points

Motivation: Financial Gain (Jewel Theft)

Incident : Security Audit Findings

Title: Louvre Museum's Decade-Long Cybersecurity Failures Exposed in Security Audits

Description: A series of security audits conducted between 2014 and 2023 revealed severe cybersecurity vulnerabilities at the Louvre Museum, including weak passwords (e.g., 'LOUVRE' for video surveillance, 'THALES' for Thales software), outdated systems (Windows 2000, XP, Server 2003), and unpatched flaws allowing external attackers to compromise access badge systems and other critical infrastructure. Penetration testers demonstrated ease of exploitation, but the Louvre declined to comment on remediation efforts. The audits were marked confidential, and it remains unclear whether corrective actions were taken.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2023-10-13

Type: Security Audit Findings

Attack Vector: Weak/Default CredentialsOutdated Software ExploitationLack of Network Segmentation

Vulnerability Exploited: Weak passwords (e.g., 'LOUVRE', 'THALES')Unsupported OS (Windows 2000, XP, Server 2003)Unpatched systems in video surveillance and access control

Incident : Physical Burglary

Title: Cybersecurity Lapse and Physical Burglary at the Louvre Museum

Description: The Louvre Museum in Paris faced a burglary that exposed longstanding cybersecurity vulnerabilities, including outdated Windows software in its video surveillance systems. Thieves stole eight pieces of jewelry by breaking in through a second-floor window. While alarm systems functioned, a French audit report highlighted persistent IT security failures. A full security review, including governance policy updates, camera upgrades, and cybersecurity protocol enhancements, is planned by year-end.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2023-11-12

Type: Physical Burglary

Attack Vector: Physical Intrusion (Second-floor window breach)

Vulnerability Exploited: Outdated Windows software (including video surveillance systems)

Threat Actor: Unknown thieves (physical burglary)

Motivation: Theft of jewelry (potential opportunistic exploitation of cybersecurity gaps)

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Vulnerability.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Weak Password ('Louvre'/'Thales')Unguarded Rooftop Access.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Physical Theft ETA4592045110925

Financial Loss: $100 million (Stolen Jewels)

Systems Affected: Surveillance SystemPhysical Security (Rooftop Access)

Operational Impact: Compromised Physical and Digital Security, Reputation Damage

Brand Reputation Impact: Severe (Global Media Coverage, Erosion of Trust in Security Measures)

Incident : Security Audit Findings ETA5132551111025

Systems Affected: Video surveillance serverThales software platformAccess badge control systemLegacy Windows systems (2000, XP, Server 2003)

Operational Impact: High (potential for unauthorized physical access, surveillance compromise, and lateral movement across networks)

Brand Reputation Impact: Moderate (negative media coverage highlighting negligence)

Incident : Physical Burglary ETA2102621111325

Data Compromised: No data breach reported (physical theft only)

Systems Affected: Video surveillance systemsAlarm systems (functioned but tied to outdated infrastructure)

Operational Impact: Exposure of cybersecurity deficiencies; reputational harm

Brand Reputation Impact: Negative (global media coverage of security failures)

What is the average financial loss per incident ?

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $33.33 million.

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Physical Theft ETA4592045110925

Entity Name: Louvre Museum

Entity Type: Museum

Industry: Arts & Culture

Location: Paris, France

Incident : Security Audit Findings ETA5132551111025

Entity Name: Louvre Museum

Entity Type: Cultural Institution

Industry: Arts & Entertainment

Location: Paris, France

Size: Large (3,000+ employees, 10M+ annual visitors)

Incident : Physical Burglary ETA2102621111325

Entity Name: Louvre Museum

Entity Type: Museum (Public Cultural Institution)

Industry: Arts & Culture

Location: Paris, France

Customers Affected: None (physical theft; no customer data involved)

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Physical Theft ETA4592045110925

Remediation Measures: Potential Password Policy UpdatesPhysical Security Reinforcements (Post-Incident)

Communication Strategy: Media Statements (No Direct Response to CyberGuy by Deadline)Public Advisories on Security Improvements

Incident : Security Audit Findings ETA5132551111025

Communication Strategy: No public comment; audits marked confidential

Incident : Physical Burglary ETA2102621111325

Law Enforcement Notified: Yes (police responded within minutes)

Remediation Measures: Full security reviewGovernance policy updatesCamera upgradesCybersecurity protocol updates

Data Breach Information

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Potential Password Policy Updates, Physical Security Reinforcements (Post-Incident), , Full security review, Governance policy updates, Camera upgrades, Cybersecurity protocol updates, .

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Physical Theft ETA4592045110925

Lessons Learned: Even high-profile institutions can fall victim to basic cybersecurity oversights (e.g., weak passwords, outdated systems)., Physical and digital security are intertwined; vulnerabilities in one can exacerbate risks in the other., Password hygiene (e.g., avoiding default/guessable passwords, using password managers) is critical for all organizations., Regular audits and updates to security systems (software, physical access controls) are essential to mitigate risks.

Incident : Security Audit Findings ETA5132551111025

Lessons Learned: Critical infrastructure like cultural institutions must prioritize cybersecurity hygiene, including: (1) Enforcing strong password policies and MFA, (2) Phasing out unsupported legacy systems, (3) Regular penetration testing and audit transparency, (4) Segmenting networks to limit lateral movement.

Incident : Physical Burglary ETA2102621111325

Lessons Learned: Outdated software in critical infrastructure (e.g., surveillance systems) can enable physical security breaches and expose organizational vulnerabilities. Proactive cybersecurity audits and timely system updates are essential for risk mitigation.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Physical Theft ETA4592045110925

Recommendations: Implement strong password policies (e.g., complexity requirements, regular rotation, multi-factor authentication)., Conduct regular cybersecurity audits to identify and remediate vulnerabilities (e.g., outdated software, unguarded access points)., Use password managers to generate and store unique, complex credentials securely., Integrate physical and digital security measures to create layered defenses., Educate employees and stakeholders on cybersecurity best practices, especially during high-risk periods (e.g., holiday seasons)., Monitor dark web and breach databases for exposed credentials linked to organizational accounts.Implement strong password policies (e.g., complexity requirements, regular rotation, multi-factor authentication)., Conduct regular cybersecurity audits to identify and remediate vulnerabilities (e.g., outdated software, unguarded access points)., Use password managers to generate and store unique, complex credentials securely., Integrate physical and digital security measures to create layered defenses., Educate employees and stakeholders on cybersecurity best practices, especially during high-risk periods (e.g., holiday seasons)., Monitor dark web and breach databases for exposed credentials linked to organizational accounts.Implement strong password policies (e.g., complexity requirements, regular rotation, multi-factor authentication)., Conduct regular cybersecurity audits to identify and remediate vulnerabilities (e.g., outdated software, unguarded access points)., Use password managers to generate and store unique, complex credentials securely., Integrate physical and digital security measures to create layered defenses., Educate employees and stakeholders on cybersecurity best practices, especially during high-risk periods (e.g., holiday seasons)., Monitor dark web and breach databases for exposed credentials linked to organizational accounts.Implement strong password policies (e.g., complexity requirements, regular rotation, multi-factor authentication)., Conduct regular cybersecurity audits to identify and remediate vulnerabilities (e.g., outdated software, unguarded access points)., Use password managers to generate and store unique, complex credentials securely., Integrate physical and digital security measures to create layered defenses., Educate employees and stakeholders on cybersecurity best practices, especially during high-risk periods (e.g., holiday seasons)., Monitor dark web and breach databases for exposed credentials linked to organizational accounts.Implement strong password policies (e.g., complexity requirements, regular rotation, multi-factor authentication)., Conduct regular cybersecurity audits to identify and remediate vulnerabilities (e.g., outdated software, unguarded access points)., Use password managers to generate and store unique, complex credentials securely., Integrate physical and digital security measures to create layered defenses., Educate employees and stakeholders on cybersecurity best practices, especially during high-risk periods (e.g., holiday seasons)., Monitor dark web and breach databases for exposed credentials linked to organizational accounts.Implement strong password policies (e.g., complexity requirements, regular rotation, multi-factor authentication)., Conduct regular cybersecurity audits to identify and remediate vulnerabilities (e.g., outdated software, unguarded access points)., Use password managers to generate and store unique, complex credentials securely., Integrate physical and digital security measures to create layered defenses., Educate employees and stakeholders on cybersecurity best practices, especially during high-risk periods (e.g., holiday seasons)., Monitor dark web and breach databases for exposed credentials linked to organizational accounts.

Incident : Security Audit Findings ETA5132551111025

Recommendations: Immediate patching/upgrade of outdated systems (Windows 2000/XP/Server 2003)., Implementation of network segmentation and zero-trust principles., Mandatory multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all critical systems., Third-party red team exercises to validate defenses., Public disclosure of remediation progress to rebuild trust.Immediate patching/upgrade of outdated systems (Windows 2000/XP/Server 2003)., Implementation of network segmentation and zero-trust principles., Mandatory multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all critical systems., Third-party red team exercises to validate defenses., Public disclosure of remediation progress to rebuild trust.Immediate patching/upgrade of outdated systems (Windows 2000/XP/Server 2003)., Implementation of network segmentation and zero-trust principles., Mandatory multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all critical systems., Third-party red team exercises to validate defenses., Public disclosure of remediation progress to rebuild trust.Immediate patching/upgrade of outdated systems (Windows 2000/XP/Server 2003)., Implementation of network segmentation and zero-trust principles., Mandatory multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all critical systems., Third-party red team exercises to validate defenses., Public disclosure of remediation progress to rebuild trust.Immediate patching/upgrade of outdated systems (Windows 2000/XP/Server 2003)., Implementation of network segmentation and zero-trust principles., Mandatory multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all critical systems., Third-party red team exercises to validate defenses., Public disclosure of remediation progress to rebuild trust.

Incident : Physical Burglary ETA2102621111325

Recommendations: Conduct immediate patching of outdated Windows systems, prioritizing security-critical infrastructure., Implement continuous monitoring for both physical and cybersecurity threats., Establish cross-functional governance to align IT security with physical security protocols., Publicly disclose remediation timelines to rebuild stakeholder trust.Conduct immediate patching of outdated Windows systems, prioritizing security-critical infrastructure., Implement continuous monitoring for both physical and cybersecurity threats., Establish cross-functional governance to align IT security with physical security protocols., Publicly disclose remediation timelines to rebuild stakeholder trust.Conduct immediate patching of outdated Windows systems, prioritizing security-critical infrastructure., Implement continuous monitoring for both physical and cybersecurity threats., Establish cross-functional governance to align IT security with physical security protocols., Publicly disclose remediation timelines to rebuild stakeholder trust.Conduct immediate patching of outdated Windows systems, prioritizing security-critical infrastructure., Implement continuous monitoring for both physical and cybersecurity threats., Establish cross-functional governance to align IT security with physical security protocols., Publicly disclose remediation timelines to rebuild stakeholder trust.

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Even high-profile institutions can fall victim to basic cybersecurity oversights (e.g., weak passwords, outdated systems).,Physical and digital security are intertwined; vulnerabilities in one can exacerbate risks in the other.,Password hygiene (e.g., avoiding default/guessable passwords, using password managers) is critical for all organizations.,Regular audits and updates to security systems (software, physical access controls) are essential to mitigate risks.Critical infrastructure like cultural institutions must prioritize cybersecurity hygiene, including: (1) Enforcing strong password policies and MFA, (2) Phasing out unsupported legacy systems, (3) Regular penetration testing and audit transparency, (4) Segmenting networks to limit lateral movement.Outdated software in critical infrastructure (e.g., surveillance systems) can enable physical security breaches and expose organizational vulnerabilities. Proactive cybersecurity audits and timely system updates are essential for risk mitigation.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Physical Theft ETA4592045110925

Source: Fox News / CyberGuy.com

URL: https://www.foxnews.com

Incident : Physical Theft ETA4592045110925

Source: Louvre Museum Security Audit (Decade-Old Report)

Incident : Security Audit Findings ETA5132551111025

Source: Libération (CheckNews)

Date Accessed: 2023-10-13

Incident : Physical Burglary ETA2102621111325

Source: ComputerWorld 2-Minute Tech Briefing

Date Accessed: 2023-11-12

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Fox News / CyberGuy.comUrl: https://www.foxnews.com, and Source: Louvre Museum Security Audit (Decade-Old Report), and Source: Libération (CheckNews)Date Accessed: 2023-10-13, and Source: ComputerWorld 2-Minute Tech BriefingDate Accessed: 2023-11-12.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Physical Theft ETA4592045110925

Investigation Status: Ongoing (Media Reports; Louvre Did Not Respond to Requests for Comment)

Incident : Security Audit Findings ETA5132551111025

Investigation Status: Unclear (Louvre declined to comment; audits marked confidential)

Incident : Physical Burglary ETA2102621111325

Investigation Status: Ongoing (French audit report cited; full security review planned by end of 2023)

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Media Statements (No Direct Response To Cyberguy By Deadline), Public Advisories On Security Improvements and No public comment; audits marked confidential.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : Physical Theft ETA4592045110925

Customer Advisories: General Public Warnings on Password Security (via CyberGuy.com)

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were General Public Warnings On Password Security (Via Cyberguy.Com) and .

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Physical Theft ETA4592045110925

Entry Point: Weak Password ('Louvre'/'Thales'), Unguarded Rooftop Access,

High Value Targets: Jewelry Exhibits, Surveillance System,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Jewelry Exhibits, Surveillance System,

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Physical Theft ETA4592045110925

Root Causes: Use Of Easily Guessable Passwords ('Louvre', 'Thales') For Critical Systems., Failure To Update Outdated Software (Windows Server 2003)., Inadequate Physical Security (Unguarded Rooftop Access)., Lack Of Proactive Cybersecurity Measures (E.G., Regular Audits, Employee Training).,

Corrective Actions: Password Policy Overhaul (Enforced Complexity, Mfa)., System Upgrades (Modern Os, Patch Management)., Physical Security Enhancements (E.G., Rooftop Surveillance, Access Controls)., Public Awareness Campaigns On Cybersecurity Risks.,

Incident : Security Audit Findings ETA5132551111025

Root Causes: Chronic Underinvestment In Cybersecurity, Lack Of Accountability For Audit Findings, Overreliance On Legacy Systems, Absence Of Basic Security Controls (E.G., Password Complexity),

Incident : Physical Burglary ETA2102621111325

Root Causes: Outdated Windows Software In Surveillance Systems, Lack Of Timely Cybersecurity Updates, Insufficient Integration Of Physical And Cybersecurity Measures,

Corrective Actions: Security Review With Governance Policy Updates, Camera And Cybersecurity Protocol Upgrades, End-Of-Year Deadline For Remediation,

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Password Policy Overhaul (Enforced Complexity, Mfa)., System Upgrades (Modern Os, Patch Management)., Physical Security Enhancements (E.G., Rooftop Surveillance, Access Controls)., Public Awareness Campaigns On Cybersecurity Risks., , Security Review With Governance Policy Updates, Camera And Cybersecurity Protocol Upgrades, End-Of-Year Deadline For Remediation, .

Additional Questions

General Information

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Unknown thieves (physical burglary).

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2023-11-12.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was $100 million (Stolen Jewels).

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was No data breach reported (physical theft only).

What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident were Surveillance SystemPhysical Security (Rooftop Access) and Video surveillance serverThales software platformAccess badge control systemLegacy Windows systems (2000, XP, Server 2003) and Video surveillance systemsAlarm systems (functioned but tied to outdated infrastructure).

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was No data breach reported (physical theft only).

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Regular audits and updates to security systems (software, physical access controls) are essential to mitigate risks., Critical infrastructure like cultural institutions must prioritize cybersecurity hygiene, including: (1) Enforcing strong password policies and MFA, (2) Phasing out unsupported legacy systems, (3) Regular penetration testing and audit transparency, (4) Segmenting networks to limit lateral movement., Outdated software in critical infrastructure (e.g., surveillance systems) can enable physical security breaches and expose organizational vulnerabilities. Proactive cybersecurity audits and timely system updates are essential for risk mitigation.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Implement strong password policies (e.g., complexity requirements, regular rotation, multi-factor authentication)., Implement continuous monitoring for both physical and cybersecurity threats., Integrate physical and digital security measures to create layered defenses., Use password managers to generate and store unique, complex credentials securely., Third-party red team exercises to validate defenses., Publicly disclose remediation timelines to rebuild stakeholder trust., Mandatory multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all critical systems., Public disclosure of remediation progress to rebuild trust., Educate employees and stakeholders on cybersecurity best practices, especially during high-risk periods (e.g., holiday seasons)., Conduct immediate patching of outdated Windows systems, prioritizing security-critical infrastructure., Immediate patching/upgrade of outdated systems (Windows 2000/XP/Server 2003)., Establish cross-functional governance to align IT security with physical security protocols., Implementation of network segmentation and zero-trust principles., Monitor dark web and breach databases for exposed credentials linked to organizational accounts., Conduct regular cybersecurity audits to identify and remediate vulnerabilities (e.g., outdated software and unguarded access points)..

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are ComputerWorld 2-Minute Tech Briefing, Louvre Museum Security Audit (Decade-Old Report), Libération (CheckNews) and Fox News / CyberGuy.com.

What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.foxnews.com .

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (Media Reports; Louvre Did Not Respond to Requests for Comment).

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an General Public Warnings on Password Security (via CyberGuy.com).

Initial Access Broker

Post-Incident Analysis

What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Use of easily guessable passwords ('Louvre', 'Thales') for critical systems.Failure to update outdated software (Windows Server 2003).Inadequate physical security (unguarded rooftop access).Lack of proactive cybersecurity measures (e.g., regular audits, employee training)., Chronic underinvestment in cybersecurityLack of accountability for audit findingsOverreliance on legacy systemsAbsence of basic security controls (e.g., password complexity), Outdated Windows software in surveillance systemsLack of timely cybersecurity updatesInsufficient integration of physical and cybersecurity measures.

What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Password policy overhaul (enforced complexity, MFA).System upgrades (modern OS, patch management).Physical security enhancements (e.g., rooftop surveillance, access controls).Public awareness campaigns on cybersecurity risks., Security review with governance policy updatesCamera and cybersecurity protocol upgradesEnd-of-year deadline for remediation.

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=etablissement-public-du-musee-du-louvre' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge