Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) Company CyberSecurity Posture

louvre.fr
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Louvre Museum is a national art museum in Paris, France. It is located on the Right Bank of the Seine in the city's 1st arrondissement (district or ward) and home to some of the most canonical works of Western art, including the Mona Lisa and the Venus de Milo. The museum is housed in the Louvre Palace, originally built in the late 12th to 13th century under Philip II. Remnants of the Medieval Louvre fortress are visible in the basement of the museum. Due to urban expansion, the fortress eventually lost its defensive function, and in 1546 Francis I converted it into the primary residence of the French Kings.

Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

MDL

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

etablissement-public-du-musee-du-louvre

Website:

https://www.louvre.fr/en

Employees number:

27

Number of followers:

1,277

NAICS:

712

Industry Type:

Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos

Homepage:

louvre.fr

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

MUS_1100776

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreMDL Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 700 and 749

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/etablissement-public-du-musee-du-louvre.jpeg
MDL Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreMDL Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/etablissement-public-du-musee-du-louvre.jpeg
MDL Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum)

Moderate
Current Score
748
Ba (Moderate)
01000
3 incidents
-5.0 avg impact

Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.

DECEMBER 2025
748
NOVEMBER 2025
753
Vulnerability
12 Nov 2025 • Louvre Museum
Cybersecurity Lapse and Physical Burglary at the Louvre Museum

The Louvre Museum in Paris faced a **digital security lapse** exposed by a physical burglary, where thieves stole eight jewelry pieces after breaking in through a second-floor window. While alarm systems functioned and police responded promptly, an audit revealed **longstanding cybersecurity vulnerabilities**, including **outdated Windows software** and **unpatched video surveillance systems**. The museum had failed to address these issues for years, leaving critical infrastructure exposed. A full security overhaul—including governance policy updates, camera upgrades, and cybersecurity protocol revisions—is now mandated by year-end. The incident highlights systemic neglect in maintaining **basic IT hygiene**, raising concerns about potential **future breaches or data leaks** due to unsecured legacy systems. Though no digital data was confirmed stolen in this event, the **underlying cybersecurity failures** pose a significant risk for exploitation by malicious actors, particularly given the museum’s high-profile status and sensitive operational data (e.g., visitor records, financial transactions).

748
medium -5
ETA2102621111325
Incident Details -
Type
Physical Burglary Cybersecurity Negligence
Attack Vector
Physical Intrusion (Second-floor window breach)
Vulnerability Exploited
Outdated Windows software (including video surveillance systems)
Motivation
Theft of jewelry (potential opportunistic exploitation of cybersecurity gaps)
Impact
Data Compromised: No data breach reported (physical theft only) Video surveillance systems Alarm systems (functioned but tied to outdated infrastructure) Operational Impact: Exposure of cybersecurity deficiencies; reputational harm Brand Reputation Impact: Negative (global media coverage of security failures)
Response
Law Enforcement Notified: Yes (police responded within minutes) Full security review Governance policy updates Camera upgrades Cybersecurity protocol updates
Lessons Learned
Outdated software in critical infrastructure (e.g., surveillance systems) can enable physical security breaches and expose organizational vulnerabilities. Proactive cybersecurity audits and timely system updates are essential for risk mitigation.
Recommendations
Conduct immediate patching of outdated Windows systems, prioritizing security-critical infrastructure. Implement continuous monitoring for both physical and cybersecurity threats. Establish cross-functional governance to align IT security with physical security protocols. Publicly disclose remediation timelines to rebuild stakeholder trust.
Investigation Status
['Ongoing (French audit report cited; full security review planned by end of 2023)']
Post Incident Analysis
Outdated Windows software in surveillance systems Lack of timely cybersecurity updates Insufficient integration of physical and cybersecurity measures Security review with governance policy updates Camera and cybersecurity protocol upgrades End-of-year deadline for remediation
References
Blog URL Source URL
OCTOBER 2025
753
SEPTEMBER 2025
753
AUGUST 2025
753
JULY 2025
753
JUNE 2025
753
MAY 2025
753
APRIL 2025
753
MARCH 2025
753
FEBRUARY 2025
753
JANUARY 2025
753
JUNE 2003
752
Vulnerability
16 Jun 2003 • Louvre Museum
Louvre Museum Jewel Heist Exposing Weak Password Security

The Louvre Museum in Paris suffered a **$100 million jewel heist** due to severe cybersecurity and physical security lapses. Investigations revealed that the museum’s surveillance system used weak passwords like **'Louvre'** and **'Thales'**, with one visibly displayed on the login screen. A decade-old audit exposed additional vulnerabilities, including **outdated Windows Server 2003 software** and **unguarded rooftop access**, which thieves exploited using an electric ladder to breach a balcony. The incident highlighted systemic negligence in digital defenses, leaving the world’s most visited museum exposed to both cyber and physical intrusions. While no direct data breach of customer or employee records was reported, the reputational damage and financial loss were substantial, underscoring how poor password hygiene and unpatched systems can enable high-stakes crimes. The Louvre’s failure to address long-standing security flaws—despite prior warnings—raises concerns about institutional accountability in safeguarding high-value assets against evolving threats.

738
high -14
ETA4592045110925
Incident Details -
Type
Physical Theft Cybersecurity Negligence Unauthorized Access
Attack Vector
Weak/Default Passwords Physical Intrusion (Rooftop Access) Outdated Software Exploitation
Vulnerability Exploited
Weak Password Policy (Password: 'Louvre', 'Thales') Unpatched/Outdated Systems (Windows Server 2003) Unguarded Physical Access Points
Motivation
Financial Gain (Jewel Theft)
Impact
Financial Loss: $100 million (Stolen Jewels) Surveillance System Physical Security (Rooftop Access) Operational Impact: Compromised Physical and Digital Security, Reputation Damage Brand Reputation Impact: Severe (Global Media Coverage, Erosion of Trust in Security Measures)
Response
Potential Password Policy Updates Physical Security Reinforcements (Post-Incident) Media Statements (No Direct Response to CyberGuy by Deadline) Public Advisories on Security Improvements
Lessons Learned
Even high-profile institutions can fall victim to basic cybersecurity oversights (e.g., weak passwords, outdated systems). Physical and digital security are intertwined; vulnerabilities in one can exacerbate risks in the other. Password hygiene (e.g., avoiding default/guessable passwords, using password managers) is critical for all organizations. Regular audits and updates to security systems (software, physical access controls) are essential to mitigate risks.
Recommendations
Implement strong password policies (e.g., complexity requirements, regular rotation, multi-factor authentication). Conduct regular cybersecurity audits to identify and remediate vulnerabilities (e.g., outdated software, unguarded access points). Use password managers to generate and store unique, complex credentials securely. Integrate physical and digital security measures to create layered defenses. Educate employees and stakeholders on cybersecurity best practices, especially during high-risk periods (e.g., holiday seasons). Monitor dark web and breach databases for exposed credentials linked to organizational accounts.
Investigation Status
Ongoing (Media Reports; Louvre Did Not Respond to Requests for Comment)
Customer Advisories
General Public Warnings on Password Security (via CyberGuy.com)
Initial Access Broker
Weak Password ('Louvre'/'Thales') Unguarded Rooftop Access Jewelry Exhibits Surveillance System
Post Incident Analysis
Use of easily guessable passwords ('Louvre', 'Thales') for critical systems. Failure to update outdated software (Windows Server 2003). Inadequate physical security (unguarded rooftop access). Lack of proactive cybersecurity measures (e.g., regular audits, employee training). Password policy overhaul (enforced complexity, MFA). System upgrades (modern OS, patch management). Physical security enhancements (e.g., rooftop surveillance, access controls). Public awareness campaigns on cybersecurity risks.
References
Blog URL Source URL
JUNE 2000
762
Vulnerability
16 Jun 2000 • Louvre Museum
Louvre Museum's Decade-Long Cybersecurity Failures Exposed in Security Audits

A series of security audits spanning from 2014 to recent years exposed severe cybersecurity vulnerabilities at the **Louvre Museum**, France’s iconic cultural institution. Investigative reports by *CheckNews* (Libération) revealed egregious failures, including the use of trivial passwords like **"LOUVRE"** for video surveillance servers and **"THALES"** for a critical software platform provided by Thales. Penetration testers easily exploited these weak credentials to infiltrate systems, gaining unauthorized access to **badge access controls**—enabling them to modify employee permissions remotely. Audits also uncovered **obsolete, unsupported systems** (e.g., Windows 2000, XP, and Server 2003) still operational on the network, leaving them exposed to unpatched exploits. While the recent **physical jewel heist** (unrelated to cyberattacks) dominated headlines, the audits confirmed that a cyber intruder could have **compromised surveillance feeds, access systems, or internal data** with minimal effort. Museum management refused to comment on remediation efforts, raising concerns that these critical flaws may persist, endangering both **physical security and digital assets** tied to France’s cultural heritage.

748
high -14
ETA5132551111025
Incident Details -
Type
Security Audit Findings Unauthorized Access Risk Outdated Systems Weak Authentication
Attack Vector
Weak/Default Credentials Outdated Software Exploitation Lack of Network Segmentation
Vulnerability Exploited
Weak passwords (e.g., 'LOUVRE', 'THALES') Unsupported OS (Windows 2000, XP, Server 2003) Unpatched systems in video surveillance and access control
Impact
Video surveillance server Thales software platform Access badge control system Legacy Windows systems (2000, XP, Server 2003) Operational Impact: High (potential for unauthorized physical access, surveillance compromise, and lateral movement across networks) Brand Reputation Impact: Moderate (negative media coverage highlighting negligence)
Response
Communication Strategy: No public comment; audits marked confidential
Lessons Learned
Critical infrastructure like cultural institutions must prioritize cybersecurity hygiene, including: (1) Enforcing strong password policies and MFA, (2) Phasing out unsupported legacy systems, (3) Regular penetration testing and audit transparency, (4) Segmenting networks to limit lateral movement.
Recommendations
Immediate patching/upgrade of outdated systems (Windows 2000/XP/Server 2003). Implementation of network segmentation and zero-trust principles. Mandatory multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all critical systems. Third-party red team exercises to validate defenses. Public disclosure of remediation progress to rebuild trust.
Investigation Status
['Unclear (Louvre declined to comment; audits marked confidential)']
Post Incident Analysis
Chronic underinvestment in cybersecurity Lack of accountability for audit findings Overreliance on legacy systems Absence of basic security controls (e.g., password complexity)
References
Blog URL Source URL

Frequently Asked Questions

According to Rankiteo, the current A.I.-based Cyber Score for Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum) is 748, which corresponds to a Moderate rating.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for November 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for October 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for September 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for August 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for July 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for June 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for May 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for April 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for March 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for February 2025 was 753.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for January 2025 was 753.

Over the past 12 months, the average per-incident point impact on Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum)’s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score has been -5.0 points.

You can access Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum)’s cyber incident details on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/etablissement-public-du-musee-du-louvre.

You can find the summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: Rankiteo Algorithm.

You can view Musée du Louvre (Louvre Museum)’s profile page on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/etablissement-public-du-musee-du-louvre.

With scores of 18.5/20 from OpenAI ChatGPT, 20/20 from Mistral AI, and 17/20 from Claude AI, the A.I. Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology is validated as a market leader.