Zumpano Patricios, P.A. Breach Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ZPL2202922112025)

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Zumpano Patricios, P.A. breach identified under incident ID ZPL2202922112025.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Zumpano Patricios, P.A.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/zplaw, the number of followers: 377, the industry type: Law Practice and the number of employees: 48 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 735 and after the incident was 714 with a difference of -21 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Zumpano Patricios, P.A. and their customers.

Zumpano Patricios recently reported "Zumpano Patricios Cybersecurity Incident and Class Action Dismissal", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Judge Beth Bloom of the U.S.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing True.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Breach notifications sent to affected individuals; public statement issued post-dismissal.

The case underscores how Closed (lawsuit dismissed; no further proceedings), teams are taking away lessons such as The ruling clarifies that federal courts require plaintiffs in data breach lawsuits to demonstrate concrete harm (e.g., verified financial losses, evidence of data misuse) rather than speculative or hypothetical risks of future harm. This sets a precedent for future cybersecurity litigation, emphasizing the need for tangible evidence of injury to establish Article III standing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Public statement issued by Zumpano Patricios emphasizing the ruling's importance in clarifying data breach standing requirements.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating cybersecurity incident with breach notifications sent (implies unauthorized access, method unspecified). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating personal information exposed; personally identifiable information (PII) alleged. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data compromised (no method specified, but exposure of PII suggests exfiltration occurred). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Abuse Legal Process: Frivolous Lawsuits (T1598.003) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating class-action lawsuit... dismissed for lack of standing (legal process abused despite no concrete harm) and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (10%), supported by evidence indicating no ransomware (explicitly ruled out, but included for completeness at low confidence). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.