ZPP
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
zplaw
Website:
Employees number:
48
Number of followers:
377
NAICS:
54111
Industry Type:
Homepage:
zplaw.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
ZUM_2913497
Scan Status:
In-progress
Zumpano Patricios, P.A. Company CyberSecurity Posture
zplaw.com
Zumpano Patricios is a law firm focused on the delivery of high impact, value oriented legal services. We do not strive to occupy either the highest or lowest pricing tiers. We provide our services at a reasonable price. We are very selective about our attorneys and our clientele. The firm does not seek to be all things to all people, rather our focus is maintained on the areas of practice we truly enjoy. We love what we do. LOCATIONS: MIAMI (Headquarters): Located in the heart of the "City Beautiful," the Zumpano Patricios headquarters in downtown Coral Gables reflects a tempered elegance. NEW YORK CITY (MANHATTAN): Our New York City (Manhattan) Office - Zumpano Patricios - operates out of our Midtown flagship office in the epicenter of global financial services and business. LAS VEGAS: The Las Vegas Office of the firm - Zumpano Patricios & Helsten - is led by veteran litigator Amanda Brookhyser, and in coordination with prominent attorneys in our other offices across the country. SALT LAKE CITY: The Salt Lake City Office serves a diverse population in one of the fastest growing areas; it is one of the largest hubs for pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and medical device manufacturers. CHICAGO: Our Chicago office handles a variety of legal matters including complex corporate, litigation, regulatory, and real estate matters, seamlessly drawing from other Zumpano Patricios offices to provide the support and assistance our clients expect. PRACTICE AREAS Administrative Antiterrorism Antitrust Corporate Criminal Defense Employment Estate Planning Family Gaming Health Immigration International Commercial Litigation Trial Practice Real Estate
Zumpano Patricios, P.A. A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
ZPP Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 700 and 749
ZPP
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
ZPP Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
ZPP
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
ZPP Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
1
Zumpano Patricios
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences: Attack in which data is not compromised
Description: Zumpano Patricios, a Miami-based law firm, faced a **cybersecurity incident** that triggered a class-action lawsuit after plaintiffs received breach notifications. The attack exposed personal information, but the **U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida dismissed the case**, ruling that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate **actual injury**—only alleging **speculative future harm** (e.g., increased risk of identity theft or fraud). Judge Beth Bloom determined that **no concrete misuse of data, financial losses, or imminent harm** was proven, emphasizing that **theoretical risk alone does not meet Article III standing requirements** for federal litigation. The firm avoided liability as the breach did not result in verified damages, fraud, or operational disruption. The incident highlights the legal threshold for data breach claims, reinforcing that **exposure without evidence of misuse lacks standing**. No ransomware, system outages, or confirmed data exploitation were reported.
Zumpano Patricios
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences: Attack in which data is not compromised
Description: Zumpano Patricios, a law firm, experienced a **cybersecurity incident** that prompted a class-action lawsuit from affected individuals. The plaintiffs claimed their **personal information was exposed**, increasing the risk of future misuse. However, **U.S. District Court Judge Beth Bloom dismissed the case** on November 3, 2025, ruling that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate **actual injury**—only speculative harm. The breach involved **notification to affected parties**, but no evidence of **data theft, financial loss, or identity fraud** was substantiated. The court emphasized that **hypothetical risk alone does not meet legal standing** under Article III of the U.S. Constitution. While the attack was confirmed, the lack of **concrete damages** (e.g., fraud, leaked sensitive data, or operational disruption) led to the case’s early dismissal. The ruling reinforces that **data breach notifications alone are insufficient** for litigation without proof of tangible harm. The firm avoided reputational or financial penalties, as the incident did not escalate beyond **potential risk exposure** without verified consequences.
ZPP Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for ZPP
Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Average (This Year)
Zumpano Patricios, P.A. has 115.05% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
Zumpano Patricios, P.A. has 212.5% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types ZPP vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)
Zumpano Patricios, P.A. reported 2 incidents this year: 2 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 0 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — ZPP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ZPP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
ZPP Company Subsidiaries
Zumpano Patricios is a law firm focused on the delivery of high impact, value oriented legal services. We do not strive to occupy either the highest or lowest pricing tiers. We provide our services at a reasonable price. We are very selective about our attorneys and our clientele. The firm does not seek to be all things to all people, rather our focus is maintained on the areas of practice we truly enjoy. We love what we do. LOCATIONS: MIAMI (Headquarters): Located in the heart of the "City Beautiful," the Zumpano Patricios headquarters in downtown Coral Gables reflects a tempered elegance. NEW YORK CITY (MANHATTAN): Our New York City (Manhattan) Office - Zumpano Patricios - operates out of our Midtown flagship office in the epicenter of global financial services and business. LAS VEGAS: The Las Vegas Office of the firm - Zumpano Patricios & Helsten - is led by veteran litigator Amanda Brookhyser, and in coordination with prominent attorneys in our other offices across the country. SALT LAKE CITY: The Salt Lake City Office serves a diverse population in one of the fastest growing areas; it is one of the largest hubs for pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and medical device manufacturers. CHICAGO: Our Chicago office handles a variety of legal matters including complex corporate, litigation, regulatory, and real estate matters, seamlessly drawing from other Zumpano Patricios offices to provide the support and assistance our clients expect. PRACTICE AREAS Administrative Antiterrorism Antitrust Corporate Criminal Defense Employment Estate Planning Family Gaming Health Immigration International Commercial Litigation Trial Practice Real Estate
Loading...
ZPP Similar Companies
DLA Piper
DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver exceptional outcomes on cross-border
Baker McKenzie
Integrated legal solutions to complex business challenges. The global business community is more interconnected than ever before. Opportunities and risks spill across different markets, sectors and areas of law. A connected perspective is essential in delivering business objectives while mitigating
.png)
ZPP CyberSecurity News
November 19, 2025 07:32 PM
Zumpano Patricios Defeats Data Breach Class Action in Federal Court
MIAMI--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov 19, 2025--. Zumpano Patricios has defeated a class action lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Southern...
November 19, 2025 07:32 PM
Zumpano Patricios Defeats Data Breach Class Action in Federal Court
Zumpano Patricios has defeated a class action lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida after Judge Beth Bloom...
November 06, 2025 08:00 AM
Zumpano Patricios Secures Dismissal of Cybersecurity Class Action Lawsuit
Federal court rules plaintiffs failed to demonstrate actual injury from data breach MIAMI, FL / ACCESS Newswire / November 6, 2025 / Zumpano...
November 05, 2025 08:00 AM
Miami Federal Court Rejects Speculative Harm in Law Firm Data Breach Case
A Miami federal court dismissed a proposed class action lawsuit Monday against Coral Gables-based Zumpano Patricios, ruling that plaintiffs...
November 04, 2025 03:40 PM
ZP Law Defeats Cybersecurity Breach Class Action
Zumpano Patricios, P.A. (“ZP Law”) has defeated a class action lawsuit filed within days of ZP Law sending notices of a cyber-security...
November 03, 2025 08:00 AM
Fla. Law Firm Escapes Data Breach Class Suit
A Florida federal judge Monday tossed a proposed class action suit claiming Miami-headquartered national law firm Zumpano Patricios PA...
July 18, 2025 07:00 AM
Cyberattack on Medical Imaging Provider Affects 1.4 Million Patients
At the start of the month, The HIPAA Journal reported on a cybersecurity incident at Radiology Associates of Richmond, a provider of medical...
July 18, 2025 07:00 AM
Zumpano Patricios Data Breach Affects 279,275 Individuals
Zumpano Patricios, P.A., a national law firm headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida, experienced a massive data breach affecting 279,275...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
ZPP CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Zumpano Patricios, P.A.
The official website of Zumpano Patricios, P.A. is http://zplaw.com.
Zumpano Patricios, P.A.’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Zumpano Patricios, P.A.’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 714, reflecting their Moderate security posture.
How many security badges does Zumpano Patricios, P.A.’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Zumpano Patricios, P.A. currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Zumpano Patricios, P.A. have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Zumpano Patricios, P.A. is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Zumpano Patricios, P.A. have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Zumpano Patricios, P.A. does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Zumpano Patricios, P.A. comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Zumpano Patricios, P.A. is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Zumpano Patricios, P.A. have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Zumpano Patricios, P.A. does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Zumpano Patricios, P.A. comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Zumpano Patricios, P.A. is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Zumpano Patricios, P.A. have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Zumpano Patricios, P.A. is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Zumpano Patricios, P.A.
Zumpano Patricios, P.A. operates primarily in the Law Practice industry.
Number of Employees at Zumpano Patricios, P.A.
Zumpano Patricios, P.A. employs approximately 48 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Zumpano Patricios, P.A.
Zumpano Patricios, P.A. presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Zumpano Patricios, P.A.’s LinkedIn Followers
Zumpano Patricios, P.A.’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 377 followers.
NAICS Classification of Zumpano Patricios, P.A.
Zumpano Patricios, P.A. is classified under the NAICS code 54111, which corresponds to Offices of Lawyers.
Zumpano Patricios, P.A.’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Zumpano Patricios, P.A. does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Zumpano Patricios, P.A.’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Zumpano Patricios, P.A. maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/zplaw.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Zumpano Patricios, P.A.
As of November 29, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Zumpano Patricios, P.A. has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Zumpano Patricios, P.A. has an estimated 15,624 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Zumpano Patricios, P.A. ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Cyber Attack.
How does Zumpano Patricios, P.A. detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an communication strategy with notices sent to affected individuals, and communication strategy with breach notifications sent to affected individuals; public statement issued post-dismissal..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Zumpano Patricios Data Breach Class Action Dismissal
Description: U.S. District Court Judge Beth Bloom dismissed a class action lawsuit against Zumpano Patricios, ruling that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate actual injury from a cybersecurity incident affecting the firm. The plaintiffs alleged increased risk of future misuse of personal information, but the court determined this was speculative and insufficient to establish standing under federal law. The case was resolved at the pleading stage, emphasizing that evidence of a data breach alone does not satisfy injury requirements for litigation.
Type: Data Breach
Title: Zumpano Patricios Cybersecurity Incident and Class Action Dismissal
Description: Judge Beth Bloom of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida dismissed a class action lawsuit against Zumpano Patricios on November 3, 2025, ruling that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate actual injury from a cybersecurity incident affecting the Miami-based law firm. The court determined that allegations of increased risk of future misuse of personal information did not meet constitutional standing requirements under Article III. The incident involved a cybersecurity attack that prompted breach notifications to affected individuals, though no concrete evidence of data misuse or financial harm was presented in the lawsuit.
Type: Data Breach / Cybersecurity Incident
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Cyber Attack.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach ZPL4893648110625
Data Compromised: Personal information
Customer Complaints: ['Class action lawsuit filed']
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational risk (though lawsuit dismissed)
Legal Liabilities: Class action lawsuit dismissed (no standing established)
Identity Theft Risk: Alleged increased risk (not substantiated in court)
Incident : Data Breach / Cybersecurity Incident ZPL2202922112025
Customer Complaints: True
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential (due to lawsuit and public disclosure)
Legal Liabilities: Class action lawsuit filed (later dismissed)
Identity Theft Risk: Alleged (but not substantiated)
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Information and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach ZPL4893648110625
Entity Name: Zumpano Patricios
Entity Type: Law Firm
Industry: Legal Services
Location: Miami, FL, USA
Incident : Data Breach / Cybersecurity Incident ZPL2202922112025
Entity Name: Zumpano Patricios
Entity Type: Law Firm
Industry: Legal Services
Location: Coral Gables, Miami, Florida, USA (with offices in New York City, White Plains, Chicago, Salt Lake City, and Las Vegas)
Customers Affected: Unknown (breach notifications sent, but exact number not specified)
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach ZPL4893648110625
Communication Strategy: Notices sent to affected individuals
Incident : Data Breach / Cybersecurity Incident ZPL2202922112025
Communication Strategy: Breach notifications sent to affected individuals; public statement issued post-dismissal
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach ZPL4893648110625
Type of Data Compromised: Personal information
Incident : Data Breach / Cybersecurity Incident ZPL2202922112025
Personally Identifiable Information: Alleged (specifics not disclosed)
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach ZPL4893648110625
Legal Actions: Class action lawsuit filed (dismissed for lack of standing),
Incident : Data Breach / Cybersecurity Incident ZPL2202922112025
Legal Actions: Class action lawsuit filed (dismissed on November 3, 2025, for lack of standing)
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Class action lawsuit filed (dismissed for lack of standing), , Class action lawsuit filed (dismissed on November 3, 2025, for lack of standing).
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach ZPL4893648110625
Lessons Learned: Courts require demonstration of actual harm (not speculative risk) for data breach lawsuits to proceed, setting a precedent that may reduce frivolous litigation following cybersecurity incidents.
Incident : Data Breach / Cybersecurity Incident ZPL2202922112025
Lessons Learned: The ruling clarifies that federal courts require plaintiffs in data breach lawsuits to demonstrate concrete harm (e.g., verified financial losses, evidence of data misuse) rather than speculative or hypothetical risks of future harm. This sets a precedent for future cybersecurity litigation, emphasizing the need for tangible evidence of injury to establish Article III standing.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Courts require demonstration of actual harm (not speculative risk) for data breach lawsuits to proceed, setting a precedent that may reduce frivolous litigation following cybersecurity incidents.The ruling clarifies that federal courts require plaintiffs in data breach lawsuits to demonstrate concrete harm (e.g., verified financial losses, evidence of data misuse) rather than speculative or hypothetical risks of future harm. This sets a precedent for future cybersecurity litigation, emphasizing the need for tangible evidence of injury to establish Article III standing.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach / Cybersecurity Incident ZPL2202922112025
Source: Business Wire Press Release
Incident : Data Breach / Cybersecurity Incident ZPL2202922112025
Source: Bloomberg Law
Incident : Data Breach / Cybersecurity Incident ZPL2202922112025
Source: Law360
Incident : Data Breach / Cybersecurity Incident ZPL2202922112025
Source: Daily Business Review
Incident : Data Breach / Cybersecurity Incident ZPL2202922112025
Source: Zumpano Patricios Website
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: ACCESS NewswireDate Accessed: 2025-11-06, and Source: Business Wire Press Release, and Source: Bloomberg Law, and Source: Law360, and Source: Daily Business Review, and Source: Zumpano Patricios WebsiteUrl: https://www.zplaw.com.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach ZPL4893648110625
Investigation Status: Closed (lawsuit dismissed)
Incident : Data Breach / Cybersecurity Incident ZPL2202922112025
Investigation Status: Closed (lawsuit dismissed; no further proceedings)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Notices Sent To Affected Individuals and Breach notifications sent to affected individuals; public statement issued post-dismissal.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach ZPL4893648110625
Customer Advisories: Notices sent to affected individuals about the cybersecurity incident
Incident : Data Breach / Cybersecurity Incident ZPL2202922112025
Stakeholder Advisories: Public statement issued by Zumpano Patricios emphasizing the ruling's importance in clarifying data breach standing requirements.
Customer Advisories: Breach notifications sent to affected individuals (content not specified).
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Notices Sent To Affected Individuals About The Cybersecurity Incident, , Public statement issued by Zumpano Patricios emphasizing the ruling's importance in clarifying data breach standing requirements. and Breach notifications sent to affected individuals (content not specified)..
Additional Questions
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal Information, and .
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was Personal Information.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Class action lawsuit filed (dismissed for lack of standing), , Class action lawsuit filed (dismissed on November 3, 2025, for lack of standing).
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Courts require demonstration of actual harm (not speculative risk) for data breach lawsuits to proceed, setting a precedent that may reduce frivolous litigation following cybersecurity incidents., The ruling clarifies that federal courts require plaintiffs in data breach lawsuits to demonstrate concrete harm (e.g., verified financial losses, evidence of data misuse) rather than speculative or hypothetical risks of future harm. This sets a precedent for future cybersecurity litigation, emphasizing the need for tangible evidence of injury to establish Article III standing.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are ACCESS Newswire, Law360, Bloomberg Law, Zumpano Patricios Website, Business Wire Press Release and Daily Business Review.
What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.zplaw.com .
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Closed (lawsuit dismissed).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Public statement issued by Zumpano Patricios emphasizing the ruling's importance in clarifying data breach standing requirements., .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Notices sent to affected individuals about the cybersecurity incident and Breach notifications sent to affected individuals (content not specified).
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description
Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description
Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.
Description
Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=zplaw' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
