Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025
ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Oil and Gas, Manufacturing, Accounting and Finance, Environmental, Health & Safety, and Private Equity and Venture backed Executive and Management roles.

White Oak Search Group A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

WOSG

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

white-oak-search-group

Employees number:

1

Number of followers:

445

NAICS:

5613

Industry Type:

Staffing and Recruiting

Homepage:

whiteoaksearchgroup.com

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

WHI_2039065

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreWOSG Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 700 and 749

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/white-oak-search-group.jpeg
WOSG Staffing and Recruiting
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreWOSG Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/white-oak-search-group.jpeg
WOSG Staffing and Recruiting
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

WOSG Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsSupply Chain SourceIncident DetailsView
White Oak Search GroupCyber Attack10051/2025NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: Sophisticated Chinese-Linked Cyberattack Targets US Officials, Journalists, and Tech Figures via Mobile Devices Cybersecurity investigators uncovered a highly sophisticated cyberattack targeting the smartphones of US government officials, political figures, tech professionals, and journalists many with ties to China’s strategic interests. The campaign, which began in late 2024 and extended into 2025, exploited vulnerabilities to infiltrate devices *without requiring user interaction*, leaving no clear traces of the attackers’ identities. Researchers at cybersecurity firm iVerify identified the victims as individuals previously targeted by Chinese state-linked hackers, suggesting a deliberate focus on high-value intelligence. The attack underscores the growing threat to mobile security, with experts warning that smartphones often overlooked in cyber defenses have become prime targets for espionage. "The world is in a mobile security crisis right now," said Rocky Cole, former NSA and Google cybersecurity expert and COO of iVerify. "No one is watching the phones." The incident aligns with broader US intelligence assessments of China’s cyber capabilities. In December 2024, US authorities revealed a large-scale Chinese hacking operation that accessed text messages and real-time phone calls of an unknown number of Americans. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, confirmed hackers had attempted to breach devices used by Donald Trump and JD Vance during the 2024 presidential campaign. China has denied the allegations, accusing the US of hypocrisy and citing its own claims of American cyberespionage. Mobile devices, particularly those used by senior officials, present a lucrative intelligence opportunity, containing sensitive communications, passwords, and policy discussions. However, their security often lags behind their ubiquity. While smartphones themselves may have robust protections, third-party apps, connected devices, and outdated software create vulnerabilities. Fitness trackers, smart appliances, and even internet-connected toys (such as a hacked Barbie doll with a microphone) have been exploited as entry points for malware and network infiltration. The US has taken steps to mitigate risks, including banning Chinese telecom firms from domestic networks and launching a "cyber trust mark" program for secure IoT devices. Yet concerns persist, particularly around Chinese state-owned companies that maintain routing and cloud infrastructure in the US. Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), chair of the House China Committee, issued subpoenas in April 2025 to investigate whether these firms pose a backdoor threat to critical infrastructure. User behavior also remains a critical weak point. High-profile security lapses have highlighted the dangers of unsecured communications, even among top officials. Former Trump national security adviser Mike Waltz accidentally added a journalist to a Signal chat discussing military plans, while Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly bypassed Pentagon security protocols to use Signal on a personal device despite the app’s lack of approval for classified communications. Experts stress that such oversights provide adversaries like China with exploitable openings. As mobile devices grow more integrated into national security and daily operations, the attack serves as a stark reminder of their dual role as tools and targets and the urgent need for stronger safeguards in an era of escalating digital conflict.

iVerify and The White House: Chinese hackers, user lapses turn smartphones into 'mobile security crisis'
Cyber Attack
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 1/2025
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: Sophisticated Chinese-Linked Cyberattack Targets US Officials, Journalists, and Tech Figures via Mobile Devices Cybersecurity investigators uncovered a highly sophisticated cyberattack targeting the smartphones of US government officials, political figures, tech professionals, and journalists many with ties to China’s strategic interests. The campaign, which began in late 2024 and extended into 2025, exploited vulnerabilities to infiltrate devices *without requiring user interaction*, leaving no clear traces of the attackers’ identities. Researchers at cybersecurity firm iVerify identified the victims as individuals previously targeted by Chinese state-linked hackers, suggesting a deliberate focus on high-value intelligence. The attack underscores the growing threat to mobile security, with experts warning that smartphones often overlooked in cyber defenses have become prime targets for espionage. "The world is in a mobile security crisis right now," said Rocky Cole, former NSA and Google cybersecurity expert and COO of iVerify. "No one is watching the phones." The incident aligns with broader US intelligence assessments of China’s cyber capabilities. In December 2024, US authorities revealed a large-scale Chinese hacking operation that accessed text messages and real-time phone calls of an unknown number of Americans. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, confirmed hackers had attempted to breach devices used by Donald Trump and JD Vance during the 2024 presidential campaign. China has denied the allegations, accusing the US of hypocrisy and citing its own claims of American cyberespionage. Mobile devices, particularly those used by senior officials, present a lucrative intelligence opportunity, containing sensitive communications, passwords, and policy discussions. However, their security often lags behind their ubiquity. While smartphones themselves may have robust protections, third-party apps, connected devices, and outdated software create vulnerabilities. Fitness trackers, smart appliances, and even internet-connected toys (such as a hacked Barbie doll with a microphone) have been exploited as entry points for malware and network infiltration. The US has taken steps to mitigate risks, including banning Chinese telecom firms from domestic networks and launching a "cyber trust mark" program for secure IoT devices. Yet concerns persist, particularly around Chinese state-owned companies that maintain routing and cloud infrastructure in the US. Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), chair of the House China Committee, issued subpoenas in April 2025 to investigate whether these firms pose a backdoor threat to critical infrastructure. User behavior also remains a critical weak point. High-profile security lapses have highlighted the dangers of unsecured communications, even among top officials. Former Trump national security adviser Mike Waltz accidentally added a journalist to a Signal chat discussing military plans, while Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly bypassed Pentagon security protocols to use Signal on a personal device despite the app’s lack of approval for classified communications. Experts stress that such oversights provide adversaries like China with exploitable openings. As mobile devices grow more integrated into national security and daily operations, the attack serves as a stark reminder of their dual role as tools and targets and the urgent need for stronger safeguards in an era of escalating digital conflict.

Ailogo

WOSG Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for WOSG

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for White Oak Search Group in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for White Oak Search Group in 2026.

Incident Types WOSG vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for White Oak Search Group in 2026.

Incident History — WOSG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WOSG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

WOSG Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Oil and Gas, Manufacturing, Accounting and Finance, Environmental, Health & Safety, and Private Equity and Venture backed Executive and Management roles.

Loading...
similarCompanies

WOSG Similar Companies

Robert Half

🔒 At Robert Half, we prioritize your security—if you believe you've encountered a scam or fraudulent recruiter, please report it immediately to https://www.roberthalf.com/us/en/fraud-alert. All Robert Half recruiters communicate using their corporate email address, ending in roberthalf.com. 👋 Welc

Randstad USA

Randstad North America, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Randstad N.V., the world's largest HR services provider. Driven to become the world's most valued 'working life partner', supporting as many people as possible in realizing their true potential throughout their working life, we provide com

Manpower

Manpower is the global leader in contingent and permanent recruitment workforce solutions. We provide the agility businesses need with a continuum of staffing solutions. By leveraging our trusted brands, we have built a deeper talent pool to provide our clients access to the people they need, faster

Express Employment International

Founded in 1983 and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Express Employment International supports the Express Employment Professionals franchise and related brands. The Express franchise brand is an industry-leading, international staffing company with franchise locations across the U.S., Canada, South

Insight Global

Insight Global is an international professional services and staffing company specializing in delivering talent and technical solutions to Fortune 1000 companies across the IT, Non-IT, Healthcare, and Engineering industries. Fueled by staffing and talent experts, Evergreen, our professional services

🚀 Welcome to JobsAICopilot, the pioneering platform in AI-driven job application automation! As featured on Yahoo Finance, Business Insider, ProductHunt, and Marketwatch, we're the leaders in transforming how job seekers engage with the market. 🔍 How It Works: Setup Once, Apply Forever: Begin with

Gi Group

Welcome to Gi Group! Your job, Our work! Gi Group is one of the world’s leading companies providing a full range of HR Services. We offer Temporary, Permanent and Professional Staffing Services, Search & Selection and Executive Search as well as Outsourcing, Training, Outplacement and HR Consultan

We’ve been helping organizations find the people they need longer than any other company in the world. Since inventing the staffing industry in 1946, we have become experts in the many industries and markets we serve. With a network of suppliers and partners around the world, we connect more than 45

Aya Healthcare

Aya Healthcare is the largest healthcare talent software and staffing company in the United States. Aya operates the world’s largest digital staffing platform delivering every component of healthcare-focused labor services, including travel nursing and allied health, per diem, permanent staff hiring

newsone

WOSG CyberSecurity News

October 16, 2025 07:00 AM
‘It broke me’: Inside the FBI hunt for the online predators who persuaded a 13-year-old to die

The suicide of a 13-year-old from Washington state set off a years-long global investigation to find an elusive online user called “White...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

WOSG CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of White Oak Search Group

The official website of White Oak Search Group is http://www.whiteoaksearchgroup.com.

White Oak Search Group’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, White Oak Search Group’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 737, reflecting their Moderate security posture.

How many security badges does White Oak Search Group’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, White Oak Search Group currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has White Oak Search Group been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, White Oak Search Group has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does White Oak Search Group have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, White Oak Search Group is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does White Oak Search Group have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, White Oak Search Group does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does White Oak Search Group comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, White Oak Search Group is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does White Oak Search Group have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, White Oak Search Group does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does White Oak Search Group comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, White Oak Search Group is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does White Oak Search Group have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,White Oak Search Group is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of White Oak Search Group

White Oak Search Group operates primarily in the Staffing and Recruiting industry.

Number of Employees at White Oak Search Group

White Oak Search Group employs approximately 1 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by White Oak Search Group

White Oak Search Group presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

White Oak Search Group’s LinkedIn Followers

White Oak Search Group’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 445 followers.

NAICS Classification of White Oak Search Group

White Oak Search Group is classified under the NAICS code 5613, which corresponds to Employment Services.

White Oak Search Group’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, White Oak Search Group does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

White Oak Search Group’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, White Oak Search Group maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/white-oak-search-group.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving White Oak Search Group

As of January 21, 2026, Rankiteo reports that White Oak Search Group has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

White Oak Search Group has an estimated 12,131 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at White Oak Search Group ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Cyber Attack.

How does White Oak Search Group detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with iverify (cybersecurity firm)..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Cyber Espionage

Title: Sophisticated Cyberattack Targeting Smartphones of Government, Political, Tech, and Journalism Professionals

Description: Cybersecurity investigators discovered a highly unusual software crash affecting smartphones of individuals in government, politics, tech, and journalism. The crashes, occurring from late 2024 into 2025, were part of a sophisticated cyberattack allowing hackers to infiltrate phones without user interaction. Victims had ties to fields of interest to China's government and had been previously targeted by Chinese hackers.

Date Detected: 2024-12-01

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025

Type: Cyber Espionage

Attack Vector: Zero-click exploit

Vulnerability Exploited: Mobile device and app security weaknesses

Threat Actor: Chinese state-sponsored hackers

Motivation: Espionage, access to sensitive information, and geopolitical advantage

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Cyber Attack.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Mobile devices and apps.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Cyber Espionage IVEWHI1767166021

Data Compromised: Text messages, phone calls, sensitive government information, passwords, policy discussions

Systems Affected: Smartphones (unspecified models)

Operational Impact: Potential exposure of classified or sensitive information

Identity Theft Risk: High

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Text Messages, Phone Calls, Sensitive Government Information, Passwords, Policy Discussions and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Cyber Espionage IVEWHI1767166021

Entity Name: Government officials

Entity Type: Individuals

Industry: Government

Location: United States

Incident : Cyber Espionage IVEWHI1767166021

Entity Name: Political figures

Entity Type: Individuals

Industry: Politics

Location: United States

Incident : Cyber Espionage IVEWHI1767166021

Entity Name: Tech professionals

Entity Type: Individuals

Industry: Technology

Location: United States

Incident : Cyber Espionage IVEWHI1767166021

Entity Name: Journalists

Entity Type: Individuals

Industry: Media

Location: United States

Incident : Cyber Espionage IVEWHI1767166021

Entity Name: Donald Trump and JD Vance

Entity Type: Individuals

Industry: Politics

Location: United States

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Cyber Espionage IVEWHI1767166021

Third Party Assistance: iVerify (cybersecurity firm)

How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through iVerify (cybersecurity firm).

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Cyber Espionage IVEWHI1767166021

Type of Data Compromised: Text messages, Phone calls, Sensitive government information, Passwords, Policy discussions

Sensitivity of Data: High

Data Exfiltration: Yes

Personally Identifiable Information: Yes

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Cyber Espionage IVEWHI1767166021

Lessons Learned: Mobile devices and apps are a weak link in cyber defenses, requiring enhanced security measures and user precautions. Basic security lapses can expose sensitive information to state-sponsored hackers.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Cyber Espionage IVEWHI1767166021

Recommendations: Implement stricter security protocols for mobile devices handling sensitive information, Enhance monitoring of mobile networks and connected devices, Educate users on basic security precautions, Phase out involvement of state-controlled telecom firms in critical infrastructure, Adopt federal security standards for connected devices (e.g., 'cyber trust mark')Implement stricter security protocols for mobile devices handling sensitive information, Enhance monitoring of mobile networks and connected devices, Educate users on basic security precautions, Phase out involvement of state-controlled telecom firms in critical infrastructure, Adopt federal security standards for connected devices (e.g., 'cyber trust mark')Implement stricter security protocols for mobile devices handling sensitive information, Enhance monitoring of mobile networks and connected devices, Educate users on basic security precautions, Phase out involvement of state-controlled telecom firms in critical infrastructure, Adopt federal security standards for connected devices (e.g., 'cyber trust mark')Implement stricter security protocols for mobile devices handling sensitive information, Enhance monitoring of mobile networks and connected devices, Educate users on basic security precautions, Phase out involvement of state-controlled telecom firms in critical infrastructure, Adopt federal security standards for connected devices (e.g., 'cyber trust mark')Implement stricter security protocols for mobile devices handling sensitive information, Enhance monitoring of mobile networks and connected devices, Educate users on basic security precautions, Phase out involvement of state-controlled telecom firms in critical infrastructure, Adopt federal security standards for connected devices (e.g., 'cyber trust mark')

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Mobile devices and apps are a weak link in cyber defenses, requiring enhanced security measures and user precautions. Basic security lapses can expose sensitive information to state-sponsored hackers.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Cyber Espionage IVEWHI1767166021

Source: The Economic Times

Incident : Cyber Espionage IVEWHI1767166021

Source: The Wall Street Journal

Incident : Cyber Espionage IVEWHI1767166021

Source: AP News

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: The Economic Times, and Source: The Wall Street Journal, and Source: AP News.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Cyber Espionage IVEWHI1767166021

Investigation Status: Ongoing

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : Cyber Espionage IVEWHI1767166021

Stakeholder Advisories: US authorities have warned about Chinese hacking campaigns targeting mobile devices. National security officials are urged to use approved secure communications platforms.

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: was US authorities have warned about Chinese hacking campaigns targeting mobile devices. National security officials are urged to use approved secure communications platforms..

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Cyber Espionage IVEWHI1767166021

Entry Point: Mobile devices and apps

High Value Targets: Government officials, political figures, tech professionals, journalists

Data Sold on Dark Web: Government officials, political figures, tech professionals, journalists

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Cyber Espionage IVEWHI1767166021

Root Causes: Mobile Device And App Security Weaknesses, Lack Of User Precautions, Involvement Of State-Controlled Telecom Firms In Critical Infrastructure,

Corrective Actions: Enhanced Monitoring Of Mobile Networks, Stricter Security Protocols For Sensitive Information, Phasing Out Chinese Telecom Firms From Critical Infrastructure,

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as iVerify (cybersecurity firm).

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Enhanced Monitoring Of Mobile Networks, Stricter Security Protocols For Sensitive Information, Phasing Out Chinese Telecom Firms From Critical Infrastructure, .

Additional Questions

General Information

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Chinese state-sponsored hackers.

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident detected ?

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2024-12-01.

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Text messages, phone calls, sensitive government information, passwords and policy discussions.

Response to the Incidents

What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was iVerify (cybersecurity firm).

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Text messages, phone calls, sensitive government information, passwords and policy discussions.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Mobile devices and apps are a weak link in cyber defenses, requiring enhanced security measures and user precautions. Basic security lapses can expose sensitive information to state-sponsored hackers.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Adopt federal security standards for connected devices (e.g., 'cyber trust mark'), Implement stricter security protocols for mobile devices handling sensitive information, Enhance monitoring of mobile networks and connected devices, Phase out involvement of state-controlled telecom firms in critical infrastructure and Educate users on basic security precautions.

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are AP News, The Wall Street Journal and The Economic Times.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was US authorities have warned about Chinese hacking campaigns targeting mobile devices. National security officials are urged to use approved secure communications platforms., .

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Mobile devices and apps.

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=white-oak-search-group' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge