Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025

White Oak Search Group Breach Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (IVEWHI1767166021)

The Rankiteo video explains how the company White Oak Search Group has been impacted by a Cyber Attack on the date January 01, 2025.

newsone

Incident Summary

Rankiteo Incident Impact
-24
Company Score Before Incident
755 / 1000
Company Score After Incident
731 / 1000
Company Link
Incident ID
IVEWHI1767166021
Type of Cyber Incident
Cyber Attack
Primary Vector
Zero-click exploit
Data Exposed
Text messages, phone calls, sensitive government information, passwords, policy discussions
First Detected by Rankiteo
January 01, 2025
Last Updated Score
December 31, 2025

If the player does not load, you can open the video directly.

newsone

Key Highlights From This Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of White Oak Search Group's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteoโ€™s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts White Oak Search Group Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteoโ€™s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
newsone

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the White Oak Search Group breach identified under incident ID IVEWHI1767166021.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of White Oak Search Group's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/white-oak-search-group, the number of followers: 445, the industry type: Staffing and Recruiting and the number of employees: 1 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 755 and after the incident was 731 with a difference of -24 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on White Oak Search Group and their customers.

On 01 December 2024, Government officials disclosed Cyber Espionage issues under the banner "Sophisticated Cyberattack Targeting Smartphones of Government, Political, Tech, and Journalism Professionals".

Cybersecurity investigators discovered a highly unusual software crash affecting smartphones of individuals in government, politics, tech, and journalism.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Smartphones (unspecified models), and exposing Text messages, phone calls, sensitive government information, passwords, policy discussions.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Mobile devices and apps are a weak link in cyber defenses, requiring enhanced security measures and user precautions. Basic security lapses can expose sensitive information to state-sponsored hackers, and recommending next steps like Implement stricter security protocols for mobile devices handling sensitive information, Enhance monitoring of mobile networks and connected devices and Educate users on basic security precautions, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering US authorities have warned about Chinese hacking campaigns targeting mobile devices. National security officials are urged to use approved secure communications platforms.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (T1566.001) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating exploited vulnerabilities to infiltrate devices *without requiring user interaction* and Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including zero-click exploit, and mobile device and app security weaknesses. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder (T1547.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating infiltrate devices without user interaction, leaving no clear traces. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including mobile device and app security weaknesses, and zero-click exploit. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating leaving no clear traces of the attackersโ€™ identities and Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating highly sophisticated cyberattack without user interaction. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including passwords, and sensitive communications, passwords, and policy discussions. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Automated Collection (T1119) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating text messages, phone calls, sensitive government information and Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating accessed text messages and real-time phone calls. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including data exfiltration such as Yes, and accessed text messages and real-time phone calls. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including state-sponsored hackers, and highly sophisticated cyberattack. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.