Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (UND1769138941)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Under Armour's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Under Armour Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Under Armour breach identified under incident ID UND1769138941.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Under Armour's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/under-armour, the number of followers: 946514, the industry type: Retail Apparel and Fashion and the number of employees: 12755 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 356 and after the incident was 100 with a difference of -256 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Under Armour and their customers.
Under Armour recently reported "Under Armour Data Breach After Ransomware Attack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
Under Armour is investigating a potential data breach after the Everest ransomware group claimed to have stolen 343GB of corporate data, including customer information.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 343GB of corporate data, including 72 million email addresses, names, dates of birth, and purchase details, with nearly 72 million email addresses records at risk.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through No public acknowledgment on website or financial filings.
The case underscores how Ongoing.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating infiltrated the company’s systems (no specific vector disclosed) and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating everest ransomware group claimed to have stolen 343GB of data. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data breach includes names, dates of birth, and purchase details and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating 343GB of corporate data exfiltrated (implied credential access). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 72 million email addresses, names, dates of birth, purchase details. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 343GB of data leaked online after ransom demands ignored and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data circulating in hacker forums (HaveIBeenPwned.com). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating everest ransomware group involved (implied encryption) and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating public disclosure of breach by threat actors. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal (T1070) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of breach on UA.com or payment systems and Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating under Armour has not acknowledged the incident publicly. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Under Armour Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/under-armour/incident/UND1769138941
- Under Armour CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/under-armour
- Under Armour Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/und1769138941-under-armour-ransomware-november-2023/
- Under Armour CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/under-armour/history
- Under Armour CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://uk.pcmag.com/security/162730/under-armour-is-seemingly-dragging-its-feet-on-investigating-data-breach
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf