Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (UND1769125431)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Under Armour's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Under Armour Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Under Armour breach identified under incident ID UND1769125431.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Under Armour's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/under-armour, the number of followers: 946514, the industry type: Retail Apparel and Fashion and the number of employees: 12755 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 100 and after the incident was 100 with a difference of 0 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Under Armour and their customers.
Under Armour recently reported "Under Armour Data Breach Affecting 72 Million Customers", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
Under Armour is investigating a data breach that exposed 72 million email addresses and personal details, including names, genders, birthdates, and ZIP codes.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Email addresses, names, genders, birthdates, ZIP codes, with nearly 72 million records at risk.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Limited public acknowledgment; no official disclosure yet.
The case underscores how Ongoing.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating incident believed to have occurred late last year, no details on attack vector and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence that e-commerce platform or payment systems were compromised. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating 72 million email addresses and personal details exposed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, genders, birthdates, and ZIP codes compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 72 million records exposed, flagged by Have I Been Pwned. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data destruction, but breach scale suggests impact and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating personal details exposed, identity theft risk labeled as high. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Under Armour Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/under-armour/incident/UND1769125431
- Under Armour CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/under-armour
- Under Armour Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/und1769125431-under-armour-breach-february-2024/
- Under Armour CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/under-armour/history
- Under Armour CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.bastillepost.com/global/article/5552210-under-armour-looking-into-data-breach-affecting-customers-email-addresses
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf