Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (UND1769117511)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Under Armour's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Under Armour Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Under Armour breach identified under incident ID UND1769117511.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Under Armour's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/under-armour, the number of followers: 946514, the industry type: Retail Apparel and Fashion and the number of employees: 12755 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 100 and after the incident was 100 with a difference of 0 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Under Armour and their customers.
On 22 January 2026, Under Armour disclosed Potential Data Exposure issues under the banner "Under Armour Data Exposure Incident Highlights Password Reset Security Risks".
A recent security incident involving Under Armour has drawn attention to potential vulnerabilities in password reset mechanisms.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Under Armour user account platforms.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as The incident serves as a reminder of the importance of monitoring unexpected account notifications and verifying the legitimacy of password reset requests, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Users advised to monitor unexpected account notifications and verify the legitimacy of password reset requests.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating users...received unsolicited password reset emails and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating potential vulnerabilities in password reset mechanisms. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Gather Victim Identity Information: Email Addresses (T1589.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unsolicited password reset emails sent to registered account holders and Brute Force: Password Spraying (T1110.003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating account enumeration attacks...targeting authentication processes. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Gather Victim Identity Information (T1589) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating phishing susceptibility or account enumeration attacks. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating misconfigured security protocols in password reset systems. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating potential reputational risk due to unsolicited password reset emails. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Under Armour Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/under-armour/incident/UND1769117511
- Under Armour CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/under-armour
- Under Armour Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/und1769117511-under-armour-breach-january-2026/
- Under Armour CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/under-armour/history
- Under Armour CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.galvnews.com/under-armour-data-breach/image_3c0372bf-bf75-56c2-bd92-67e98a341937.html
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf