Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Take-Two Interactive » ROCTAKANO1775910501

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ROCTAKANO1775910501)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-13
Company Score Before Incident820 / 1000
Company Score After Incident807 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERROCTAKANO1775910501
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORExploitation of third-party integration (Anodot-Snowflake)
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive corporate and player data
INCIDENT DATE10/04/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Take-Two Interactive's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Take-Two Interactive Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Take-Two Interactive breach identified under incident ID ROCTAKANO1775910501.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Take-Two Interactive's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/take-2-interactive-software-inc-, the number of followers: 108419, the industry type: Entertainment Providers and the number of employees: 1145 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 820 and after the incident was 807 with a difference of -13 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Take-Two Interactive and their customers.

Rockstar Games recently reported "ShinyHunters Claims Rockstar Games Breach via Anodot-Snowflake Integration", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Threat group ShinyHunters has listed Rockstar Games on its leak site, alleging a data breach through a compromised Anodot-Snowflake integration.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Snowflake environment (analytical data and player telemetry), and exposing Sensitive corporate and player data, with nearly Over 100 million (across multiple targets) records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including exploiting an automated integration with Anodot, and compromised Anodot-Snowflake integration and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including harvesting authentication tokens from Anodot, and bypass multi-factor authentication using long-lived service tokens. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including harvesting authentication tokens from Anodot, and bypass multi-factor authentication using long-lived service tokens and Unsecured Credentials: Container API (T1552.007) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating accessed Rockstar’s Snowflake environment via Anodot integration. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Cloud Services (T1021.007) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating accessed Rockstar’s Snowflake environment via Anodot integration. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Cloud Storage Object: Code Repositories (T1213.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating snowflake environment (analytical data and player telemetry) and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive corporate and player data exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including allegedly compromised over 100 million records, and listed on leak site with ransom deadline and Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating shinyHunters claims breach, threatens data release. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransom demands set with April 14 deadline and Defacement: External Defacement (T1491.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating listed Rockstar Games on its leak site. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Use Alternate Authentication Material: Application Access Token (T1550.004) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating bypass multi-factor authentication using long-lived service tokens and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating harvested authentication tokens from Anodot. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (90%)
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (80%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (90%)
Unsecured Credentials: Container API (70%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services: Cloud Services (80%)
Collection
Data from Cloud Storage Object: Code Repositories (70%)
Data from Local System (60%)
Exfiltration
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (80%)
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (50%)
Defacement: External Defacement (60%)
Defense Evasion
Use Alternate Authentication Material: Application Access Token (90%)
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (80%)