Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » SolarWinds » SOL1770196151

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SOL1770196151)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-20
Company Score Before Incident592 / 1000
Company Score After Incident572 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERSOL1770196151
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORSoftware update mechanism
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE02/02/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of SolarWinds's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts SolarWinds Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the SolarWinds breach identified under incident ID SOL1770196151.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of SolarWinds's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/solarwinds, the number of followers: 294900, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 2823 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 592 and after the incident was 572 with a difference of -20 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on SolarWinds and their customers.

SolarWinds recently reported "SolarWinds Supply Chain Cyberattack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

SolarWinds experienced a high-profile supply chain cyberattack in 2020 that exploited vulnerabilities in its software update mechanism, impacting numerous government agencies and private sector organizations.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Orion platform.

In response, and began remediation that includes Stricter security measures, enhanced monitoring, third-party audits.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Importance of cybersecurity governance, transparency, and supply chain security, and recommending next steps like Implement stricter security measures, enhance monitoring, conduct third-party audits, improve legal and compliance posture.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including exploited vulnerabilities in its software update mechanism, and high-profile supply chain cyberattack in 2020. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Server Software Component: Transport Agent (T1505.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including exposed weaknesses in SolarWinds Orion platform, and infiltrate networks of major U.S. agencies. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including russian state-sponsored hackers, and infiltration of major U.S. agencies and private sector networks. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including exploited weaknesses in SolarWinds Orion platform, and software update mechanism and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating enhanced monitoring and third-party audits implemented post-breach. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating impacted numerous government agencies and private sector organizations. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including espionage motivation, and infiltration of major U.S. agencies. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including russian state-sponsored hackers, and software update mechanism exploitation. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including espionage motivation, and impacted numerous government agencies. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including significant reputational damage, and sEC lawsuit (later dismissed). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (95%)
Persistence
Server Software Component: Transport Agent (70%)
Privilege Escalation
Valid Accounts (80%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (70%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (60%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (85%)
Collection
Data from Local System (70%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Impact
Defacement: Internal Defacement (60%)

Sources & References