Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ACI's Ship Recycling CongressACI's Ship Recycling Congress
VS
Hapag-Lloyd AGHapag-Lloyd AG
ACI's Ship Recycling Congress

ACI's Ship Recycling Congress

N/A

Last Update: 25/03/2026

View Profile

The 13th Ship Recycling Congress, taking place in Rotterdam on 15–16 April 2026, will bring together ship owners, cash buyers, brokers, recycling yards, policymakers and industry leaders to discuss the future of global ship recycling. The event will focus on sustainable...

NAICS:483
NAICS Definition:Water Transportation
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:55
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hapag-Lloyd AG

Hapag-Lloyd AG

Ballindamm 25, Hamburg, 20095, DE

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.hapag-lloyd.com
784/1000Fair

With a fleet of 302 modern container ships and a total transport capacity of 2.5 million TEU, Hapag-Lloyd is one of the world’s leading liner shipping companies. In the Liner Shipping segment, the Company has 15,200 employees and 400 offices in 140 countries. Hapag-Lloy...

NAICS:483
NAICS Definition:Water Transportation
Employees:15,801
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ACI's Ship Recycling Congress

ACI's Ship Recycling Congress

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hapag-Lloyd AG

Hapag-Lloyd AG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ACI's Ship Recycling Congress in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

Hapag-Lloyd AG has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - ACI's Ship Recycling Congress (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ACI's Ship Recycling Congress cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hapag-Lloyd AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hapag-Lloyd AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ACI's Ship Recycling Congress

ACI's Ship Recycling Congress

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hapag-Lloyd AG

Hapag-Lloyd AG

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
HAP1789129613
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
HAP508092125

FAQ

Between ACI's Ship Recycling Congress company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ACI's Ship Recycling Congress company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ACI's Ship Recycling Congress company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ACI's Ship Recycling Congress company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ACI's Ship Recycling Congress company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ACI's Ship Recycling Congress company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ACI's Ship Recycling Congress company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ACI's Ship Recycling Congress company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ACI's Ship Recycling Congress company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ACI's Ship Recycling Congress company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ACI's Ship Recycling Congress company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ACI's Ship Recycling Congress and Hapag-Lloyd AG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ACI's Ship Recycling Congress and Hapag-Lloyd AG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ACI's Ship Recycling Congress or Hapag-Lloyd AG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ACI's Ship Recycling Congress or Hapag-Lloyd AG ?
Between ACI's Ship Recycling Congress and Hapag-Lloyd AG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ACI's Ship Recycling Congress and Hapag-Lloyd AG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-111865
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-111934
SUMMARY

Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-111933
SUMMARY

Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-111932
SUMMARY

Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-111931
SUMMARY

Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8