SC
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
shinhan-card
Website:
Employees number:
257
Number of followers:
554
NAICS:
None
Industry Type:
Homepage:
shinhancard.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
신한카_1861433
Scan Status:
In-progress
신한카드 Shinhan Card Company CyberSecurity Posture
shinhancard.com
Shinhan Card Co., Ltd. (“Shinhan Card”) is Korea's largest credit card company. Shinhan Card was incorporated on December 17, 1985, and is headquartered in Pine Avenue A(Euljiro 100, Jung-Gu), Seoul, Korea. Shinhan Card provides credit card services, factoring, installment financing and lease financing under the Credit Specialized Financial Business Act. ShinhanCard is a wholly owned subsidiary of Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd. (“Shinhan Financial Group”). As of 2019 the company has over 23 million personal card holders.
신한카드 Shinhan Card A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
SC Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 600 and 649
SC
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
SC Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
SC
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
SC Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
Shinhan Card: Shinhan Card reports data breach involving 190,000 merchant records
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Shinhan Card Reports Data Breach Affecting 190,000 Merchant Representatives Shinhan Card disclosed a data breach involving approximately 192,088 records of merchant representatives, marking the latest in a series of recent leaks affecting major South Korean firms, including Coupang, KT, SK Telecom, and Lotte Card. The incident, reported to the Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC) on Tuesday, was attributed to internal employee misconduct related to new card solicitation rather than external hacking. The exposed data included: - 181,585 records containing only mobile phone numbers - 8,120 records with phone numbers and names - 2,310 records with phone numbers, names, birth years, and gender - 73 records with phone numbers, names, and full dates of birth Shinhan Card confirmed that no highly sensitive information such as resident registration numbers, card details, or bank accounts was compromised. The breach was limited to merchant representatives, with no impact on individual cardholders. The company stated that the leak stemmed from isolated employee actions and posed no further dissemination risk. The case came to light after a whistleblower submitted evidence to the PIPC, prompting an investigation. Shinhan Card began reviewing the allegations on November 13, verifying the breach through internal records. Following the findings, the company issued a public apology, notified affected merchants, and launched a webpage for individuals to check their exposure. While Shinhan Card has taken measures equivalent to those for a data breach, further review is needed to classify the incident officially. The company pledged to strengthen protections to prevent future occurrences. Security Investment Trends Lag Despite Rising Breaches A recent survey by market tracker Leaders Index revealed that while major South Korean firms increased IT spending by 31.2% (from 16.5 trillion won in 2022 to 21.6 trillion won in 2024), information security investment grew only marginally in proportion from 5.8% to 5.9% of total IT budgets. Security staffing saw a similar trend, with dedicated personnel rising 22.3% but remaining at just 6.7% of IT workforce share. Analysts noted that despite absolute increases, security priorities continue to trail broader technology spending.
SC Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for SC
Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for 신한카드 Shinhan Card in 2026.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for 신한카드 Shinhan Card in 2026.
Incident Types SC vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for 신한카드 Shinhan Card in 2026.
Incident History — SC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
SC Company Subsidiaries
Shinhan Card Co., Ltd. (“Shinhan Card”) is Korea's largest credit card company. Shinhan Card was incorporated on December 17, 1985, and is headquartered in Pine Avenue A(Euljiro 100, Jung-Gu), Seoul, Korea. Shinhan Card provides credit card services, factoring, installment financing and lease financing under the Credit Specialized Financial Business Act. ShinhanCard is a wholly owned subsidiary of Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd. (“Shinhan Financial Group”). As of 2019 the company has over 23 million personal card holders.
Loading...
SC Similar Companies
VINCI Energies
In a world undergoing constant change, VINCI Energies contributes to the environmental transition by helping bring about major trends in the digital landscape and energy sector. VINCI Energies’ teams roll out technologies and integrate customised multi-technical solutions, from design to implementat
Thoughtworks
We are a global technology consultancy that delivers extraordinary impact by blending design, engineering and AI expertise. For 30 years, our commitment to design-led thinking, engineering excellence and innovation means we prioritize people, build teams with strong technical foundations and embed
Computacenter
Computacenter is a leading independent technology and services provider, trusted by large corporate and public sector organisations. We are a responsible business that believes in winning together for our people and our planet. We help our customers to Source, Transform and Manage their technol
SONDA
We are at the forefront of digital transformation in the Americas, positively impacting the lives of over 500 million people. As a key player in emerging industries, we drive innovation and change through ambitious modernization projects and cutting-edge solutions. By understanding the region's chal
.png)
SC CyberSecurity News
January 21, 2026 08:40 PM
Trusting AI SOC Agents with Critical Activities
Large language models (LLMs) and AI agents are having a significant impact in many fields, including cybersecurity.
January 21, 2026 08:37 PM
AHA podcast: Cybersecurity on the Health Care Front Lines Against AI and Ransomware
Larry Pierce, director of cybersecurity and information security officer for Atlantic Health, unpacks how the growth of artificial...
January 21, 2026 08:27 PM
Fortinet pushes cybercrime collaboration at WEF
Fortinet is participating in the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos, championing cross-sector collaboration and new incentive...
January 21, 2026 08:02 PM
Privacy and Cybersecurity 2025–2026: Insights, challenges, and trends ahead
As organizations across the country adapt to an ever-changing digital environment, 2025 brought a wave of important updates in data privacy...
January 21, 2026 08:00 PM
Misleading text in the physical world can hijack AI-enabled robots, cybersecurity study shows
As a self-driving car cruises down a street, it uses cameras and sensors to perceive its environment, taking in information on pedestrians,...
January 21, 2026 08:00 PM
Top 6 Cybersecurity And AI Predictions For 2026
Among the top cybersecurity and AI predictions for 2026 are a surge in AI-generated vulnerabilities, more-autonomous cyber defense agents...
January 21, 2026 07:53 PM
Chinese firms directed to not buy US, Israeli cybersecurity software
Experts say the move is performative, as Beijing does not permit that many U.S. and Israeli cyber products to enter China.
January 21, 2026 07:05 PM
Murtra: "If we are going into an era of areas of influence, Europe had better start building cybersecurity
The Chairman of Telefónica defends in Davos the need for Europe to develop its own technology to strengthen strategic sovereignty.
January 21, 2026 06:20 PM
The new Cyber Trinity: Humans, AI agents, and trust in Asia/Pacific
Asia/Pacific enterprises are redefining cybersecurity by uniting human judgment, AI agents, and trust frameworks to govern risk in an...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
SC CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of 신한카드 Shinhan Card
The official website of 신한카드 Shinhan Card is https://shinhancard.com.
신한카드 Shinhan Card’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, 신한카드 Shinhan Card’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 626, reflecting their Poor security posture.
How many security badges does 신한카드 Shinhan Card’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, 신한카드 Shinhan Card currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has 신한카드 Shinhan Card been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, 신한카드 Shinhan Card has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.
Does 신한카드 Shinhan Card have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, 신한카드 Shinhan Card is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does 신한카드 Shinhan Card have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, 신한카드 Shinhan Card does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does 신한카드 Shinhan Card comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, 신한카드 Shinhan Card is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does 신한카드 Shinhan Card have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, 신한카드 Shinhan Card does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does 신한카드 Shinhan Card comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, 신한카드 Shinhan Card is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does 신한카드 Shinhan Card have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,신한카드 Shinhan Card is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of 신한카드 Shinhan Card
신한카드 Shinhan Card operates primarily in the Information Technology & Services industry.
Number of Employees at 신한카드 Shinhan Card
신한카드 Shinhan Card employs approximately 257 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by 신한카드 Shinhan Card
신한카드 Shinhan Card presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
신한카드 Shinhan Card’s LinkedIn Followers
신한카드 Shinhan Card’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 554 followers.
NAICS Classification of 신한카드 Shinhan Card
신한카드 Shinhan Card is classified under the NAICS code None, which corresponds to Others.
신한카드 Shinhan Card’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, 신한카드 Shinhan Card does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
신한카드 Shinhan Card’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, 신한카드 Shinhan Card maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/shinhan-card.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving 신한카드 Shinhan Card
As of January 21, 2026, Rankiteo reports that 신한카드 Shinhan Card has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
신한카드 Shinhan Card has an estimated 10,441 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at 신한카드 Shinhan Card ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
How does 신한카드 Shinhan Card detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with internal review, whistleblower evidence verification, dedicated webpage for affected individuals to check exposure, and remediation measures with formal apology, notification to affected merchant representatives, measures equivalent to data leak cases, and communication strategy with public disclosure on website, formal apology, dedicated webpage for verification..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Shinhan Card Personal Data Breach Involving Merchant Representatives
Description: Shinhan Card reported a personal data breach involving around 190,000 records, including the mobile phone numbers of merchant representatives, caused by internal misconduct by employees linked to new card solicitation.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Internal Misconduct
Threat Actor: Employees (Internal)
Motivation: New Card Solicitation (Non-Malicious)
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SHI1766477260
Data Compromised: 192,088 records
Brand Reputation Impact: Yes
Identity Theft Risk: Low (No highly sensitive data exposed)
Payment Information Risk: None (No card or bank details compromised)
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Mobile Phone Numbers, Names, Year Of Birth, Gender, Full Dates Of Birth and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SHI1766477260
Entity Name: Shinhan Card
Entity Type: Financial Services (Credit Card Issuer)
Industry: Finance
Location: South Korea
Size: Large (Top 500 by revenue in South Korea)
Customers Affected: 192,088 card merchant representatives
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SHI1766477260
Containment Measures: Internal review, whistleblower evidence verification, dedicated webpage for affected individuals to check exposure
Remediation Measures: Formal apology, notification to affected merchant representatives, measures equivalent to data leak cases
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure on website, formal apology, dedicated webpage for verification
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach SHI1766477260
Type of Data Compromised: Mobile phone numbers, Names, Year of birth, Gender, Full dates of birth
Number of Records Exposed: 192,088
Sensitivity of Data: Low to Moderate (No resident registration numbers, card numbers, or bank details)
Data Exfiltration: No evidence of further dissemination
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (Phone numbers, names, dates of birth)
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Formal apology, notification to affected merchant representatives, measures equivalent to data leak cases.
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by internal review, whistleblower evidence verification and dedicated webpage for affected individuals to check exposure.
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SHI1766477260
Regulations Violated: Potential violation of South Korea's Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)
Regulatory Notifications: Reported to Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC)
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SHI1766477260
Lessons Learned: Internal misconduct can lead to significant data breaches even without external hacking; proportional security investment remains stagnant despite rising threats.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach SHI1766477260
Recommendations: Increase proportional spending on information security, enhance employee training on data handling, implement stricter access controls for sensitive data, and prioritize security in broader IT spending.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Internal misconduct can lead to significant data breaches even without external hacking; proportional security investment remains stagnant despite rising threats.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Increase proportional spending on information security, enhance employee training on data handling, implement stricter access controls for sensitive data and and prioritize security in broader IT spending..
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SHI1766477260
Source: The Korea Herald (Jun Ji-hye)
Incident : Data Breach SHI1766477260
Source: Shinhan Card Official Disclosure
Incident : Data Breach SHI1766477260
Source: Leaders Index Survey
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: The Korea Herald (Jun Ji-hye), and Source: Shinhan Card Official Disclosure, and Source: Leaders Index Survey.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SHI1766477260
Investigation Status: Completed (Initial review by PIPC pending classification)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public disclosure on website, formal apology and dedicated webpage for verification.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SHI1766477260
Stakeholder Advisories: Affected merchant representatives notified; public apology issued.
Customer Advisories: Dedicated webpage for individuals to verify if their data was exposed.
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Affected merchant representatives notified; public apology issued. and Dedicated webpage for individuals to verify if their data was exposed..
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SHI1766477260
Root Causes: Internal employee misconduct related to new card solicitation; lack of proportional security investment and oversight.
Corrective Actions: Enhanced internal controls, potential reclassification of incident, measures to prevent recurrence.
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Enhanced internal controls, potential reclassification of incident, measures to prevent recurrence..
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Employees (Internal).
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were 192 and088 records.
Response to the Incidents
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Internal review, whistleblower evidence verification and dedicated webpage for affected individuals to check exposure.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were 192 and088 records.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 192.1K.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Internal misconduct can lead to significant data breaches even without external hacking; proportional security investment remains stagnant despite rising threats.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Increase proportional spending on information security, enhance employee training on data handling, implement stricter access controls for sensitive data and and prioritize security in broader IT spending..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Leaders Index Survey, The Korea Herald (Jun Ji-hye) and Shinhan Card Official Disclosure.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Completed (Initial review by PIPC pending classification).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Affected merchant representatives notified; public apology issued., .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an Dedicated webpage for individuals to verify if their data was exposed.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g., execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=shinhan-card' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
