Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

신한카드 Shinhan Card신한카드 Shinhan Card
VS
SONDASONDA
신한카드 Shinhan Card

신한카드 Shinhan Card

Euljiro 100, Seoul, 04551, KR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://shinhancard.com
686/1000Weak

Shinhan Card Co., Ltd. (“Shinhan Card”) is Korea's largest credit card company. Shinhan Card was incorporated on December 17, 1985, and is headquartered in Pine Avenue A(Euljiro 100, Jung-Gu), Seoul, Korea. Shinhan Card provides credit card services, factoring, instal...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:257
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
SONDA

SONDA

Teatinos 500, Santiago, CL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sonda.com
794/1000Fair

We are at the forefront of digital transformation in the Americas, positively impacting the lives of over 500 million people. As a key player in emerging industries, we drive innovation and change through ambitious modernization projects and cutting-edge solutions. By u...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:14,805
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
신한카드 Shinhan Card

신한카드 Shinhan Card

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SONDA

SONDA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 신한카드 Shinhan Card in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SONDA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 신한카드 Shinhan Card (X = Date, Y = Severity)

신한카드 Shinhan Card cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SONDA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SONDA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
신한카드 Shinhan Card

신한카드 Shinhan Card

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SHI1766477260
SONDA

SONDA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 신한카드 Shinhan Card company and SONDA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 신한카드 Shinhan Card company and SONDA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 신한카드 Shinhan Card company and SONDA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 신한카드 Shinhan Card company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 신한카드 Shinhan Card company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 신한카드 Shinhan Card company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 신한카드 Shinhan Card company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 신한카드 Shinhan Card company and SONDA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 신한카드 Shinhan Card company and SONDA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 신한카드 Shinhan Card company and SONDA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 신한카드 Shinhan Card company and SONDA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 신한카드 Shinhan Card and SONDA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 신한카드 Shinhan Card and SONDA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 신한카드 Shinhan Card or SONDA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 신한카드 Shinhan Card or SONDA ?
Between 신한카드 Shinhan Card and SONDA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 신한카드 Shinhan Card and SONDA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2