Comparison Overview

신한카드 Shinhan Card

VS

VINCI Energies

신한카드 Shinhan Card

Euljiro 100, Seoul, 04551, KR
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://shinhancard.com

Shinhan Card Co., Ltd. (“Shinhan Card”) is Korea's largest credit card company. Shinhan Card was incorporated on December 17, 1985, and is headquartered in Pine Avenue A(Euljiro 100, Jung-Gu), Seoul, Korea. Shinhan Card provides credit card services, factoring, installment financing and lease financing under the Credit Specialized Financial Business Act. ShinhanCard is a wholly owned subsidiary of Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd. (“Shinhan Financial Group”). As of 2019 the company has over 23 million personal card holders.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 257
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

VINCI Energies

2169, Boulevard de la Défense, Nanterre, 92000, FR
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vinci-energies.com

In a world undergoing constant change, VINCI Energies contributes to the environmental transition by helping bring about major trends in the digital landscape and energy sector. VINCI Energies’ teams roll out technologies and integrate customised multi-technical solutions, from design to implementation, operation and maintenance. With their strong local roots and agile and innovative structure, VINCI Energies’ 2,100 business units have positioned themselves at the heart of the energy choices of their customers, boosting the reliability, efficiency and sustainability of their infrastructure and processes. VINCI Energies strives for global performance, caring for the planet, useful to people and committed to local communities. 2024: €20.4 billion // 102,600 employees // 2,100 Business Units // 61 countries

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 24,873
Subsidiaries: 109
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shinhan-card.jpeg
신한카드 Shinhan Card
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci-energies.jpeg
VINCI Energies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
신한카드 Shinhan Card
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VINCI Energies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 신한카드 Shinhan Card in 2026.

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VINCI Energies in 2026.

Incident History — 신한카드 Shinhan Card (X = Date, Y = Severity)

신한카드 Shinhan Card cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VINCI Energies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VINCI Energies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shinhan-card.jpeg
신한카드 Shinhan Card
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Internal Misconduct
Motivation: New Card Solicitation (Non-Malicious)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci-energies.jpeg
VINCI Energies
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: phishing, exploiting vulnerabilities, supply chain compromises, third-party breaches, cookie hijacking
Motivation: financial gain, operational disruption, geopolitical influence, strategic hybrid warfare
Blog: Blog

FAQ

VINCI Energies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to 신한카드 Shinhan Card company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

신한카드 Shinhan Card and VINCI Energies have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, VINCI Energies company and 신한카드 Shinhan Card company have not reported any cyber incidents.

VINCI Energies company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while 신한카드 Shinhan Card company has not reported such incidents publicly.

신한카드 Shinhan Card company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other VINCI Energies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither VINCI Energies company nor 신한카드 Shinhan Card company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 신한카드 Shinhan Card company nor VINCI Energies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 신한카드 Shinhan Card nor VINCI Energies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

VINCI Energies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to 신한카드 Shinhan Card company.

VINCI Energies company employs more people globally than 신한카드 Shinhan Card company, reflecting its scale as a Information Technology & Services.

Neither 신한카드 Shinhan Card nor VINCI Energies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 신한카드 Shinhan Card nor VINCI Energies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 신한카드 Shinhan Card nor VINCI Energies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 신한카드 Shinhan Card nor VINCI Energies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 신한카드 Shinhan Card nor VINCI Energies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 신한카드 Shinhan Card nor VINCI Energies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References