RGU
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
russell-group-of-universities
Website:
Employees number:
35
Number of followers:
12,446
NAICS:
None
Industry Type:
Homepage:
russellgroup.ac.uk
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
RUS_1015661
Scan Status:
In-progress
Russell Group of Universities Company CyberSecurity Posture
russellgroup.ac.uk
The Russell Group represents 24 leading UK universities which are committed to maintaining the very best research, an outstanding teaching and learning experience and unrivalled links with business and the public sector. We aim to ensure that policy development in a wide range of issues relating to higher education is underpinned by a robust evidence base and a commitment to civic responsibility, improving life chances, raising aspirations and contributing to economic prosperity and innovation.
Russell Group of Universities A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
RGU Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 700 and 749
RGU
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
RGU Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
RGU
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
RGU Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
Russell Group Universities (UK)
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: Between June 2022 and May 2025, **11 leading Russell Group universities** (including UCL, University of Cambridge, University of Manchester, and Liverpool University) reported **670 lost or stolen devices**—395 laptops, 75 tablets, and 200 phones—costing over **£300,000 in replacements**. Beyond financial losses, the incident exposes severe **data security risks**, as each device potentially grants cybercriminals access to cached credentials, email/cloud sessions, or sensitive research. The loss amplifies vulnerabilities in an already high-risk sector, where **73% of UK educational institutions faced cyberattacks in the past five years**.Experts warn that stolen devices could enable **data breaches, intellectual property theft, or targeted phishing**, particularly as ransomware groups increasingly exploit university research data. While encryption may mitigate some risks, the sheer volume of missing devices—combined with universities’ role as custodians of **student records, staff data, and classified research**—creates a critical exposure point. Industry leaders emphasize the need for **endpoint security reinforcement and cyber resilience training** to counter the escalating threat of physical device loss leading to digital compromise.
RGU Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for RGU
Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Russell Group of Universities in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Russell Group of Universities in 2025.
Incident Types RGU vs Government Relations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Russell Group of Universities in 2025.
Incident History — RGU (X = Date, Y = Severity)
RGU cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
RGU Company Subsidiaries
The Russell Group represents 24 leading UK universities which are committed to maintaining the very best research, an outstanding teaching and learning experience and unrivalled links with business and the public sector. We aim to ensure that policy development in a wide range of issues relating to higher education is underpinned by a robust evidence base and a commitment to civic responsibility, improving life chances, raising aspirations and contributing to economic prosperity and innovation.
Loading...
RGU Similar Companies
Arnold & Associates
Arnold & Associates provides proven Governmental Consulting, Public Affairs, and Lobbying services at many levels of State and Local Government. Our firm specializes in helping small and medium sized businesses, corporations, and professional organizations accomplish their legislative goals. By
Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation
The Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation is a non-profit, public benefit 501(c)(3) educational and scientific charity. Much of the world depends upon satellite systems for precise navigation and timing services. These are exceptionally accurate and dependable, yet jamming, spoofing, and othe
Agency for Strategic Initiatives
Агентство стратегических инициатив по продвижению новых проектов создано в целях поддержки уникальных общественно значимых проектов и инициатив среднего предпринимательства, содействия профессиональной мобильности и поддержки молодых профессиональных коллективов в социальной сфере. Агентство созд
The Tatman Group
The Tatman Group is a full-service Government Relations firm, established in 1997. We have extensive experience and training in government relations. Our experience is backed by memberships in both the Louisiana Society of Association Executives and the Association of Louisiana Lobbyists. Our te
gemeente Someren
Gemeente Someren is een natuurlijke gemeente in Noord-Brabant die bestaat uit de kernen Someren-Dorp, Someren-Eind, Someren-Heide en Lierop. Binnen de gemeentelijke organisatie van Someren wordt resultaatgericht gewerkt door 125 medewerkers. Onze organisatie kenmerkt zich door weinig hiërarchie, ko
McAllister & Quinn
McAllister & Quinn is a Washington, DC consulting firm that provides a comprehensive range of services to a diverse group of clients with issues before the federal government. Based in Washington, DC, our unique approach has helped client secure federal resources for nearly two decades. John McAllis
.png)
RGU CyberSecurity News
December 17, 2025 09:32 AM
Southampton Inks UK-Australia Pact for Defense Research
The University of Southampton has signed a landmark pact with the UK and Australian governments to support the security agreements between...
October 21, 2025 07:00 AM
Hundreds of Misplaced Devices Put University Data at Risk
FOI data reveals almost 700 laptops, phones, and tablets were lost or stolen across UK universities over the past three years.
October 05, 2025 07:00 AM
Inside the 'Trinity of Chaos': How young hackers are uniting to hit big companies
Cybersecurity analysts warn that three of the most notorious English-speaking cybercrime groups are still operating as the "super group"...
September 12, 2025 01:57 AM
Rizwan’s Story: From Pakistan to a Career in Cybersecurity and AI
My experience as an international student at the University of Sheffield has been incredibly transformative. Coming here on a fully funded scholarship has...
September 08, 2025 07:00 AM
Russell Group responds to new Defence Industrial Strategy
The government announces investment in skills to boost defence capabilities and economic growth.
August 20, 2025 07:00 AM
IIT-K’s tech innovation hub to host ‘Startup Demo Day’ in Delhi
Kanpur: C3iHub, the Technology Innovation Hub at IIT Kanpur, is hosting the Startup Demo Day 2025 on 21–22 August in New Delhi.
August 20, 2025 07:00 AM
Wrexham student wins University of Warwick place to study cybersecurity
A Wrexham A-level student has secured a place to study cybersecurity at the University of Warwick.
August 20, 2025 07:00 AM
GIFT IFSC set to cross 1k registrations, $100 billion assets
Ahmedabad: GIFT International Financial Services Centre (IFSC) is set to cross a key milestone by the end of the current quarter,...
August 19, 2025 07:00 AM
Wrexham Student Secures Place on Prestigious Cyber Security Degree
Judo player Alex Roberts is on course for a promising future after achieving top A Level results at Coleg Cambria Yale in Wrexham.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
RGU CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Russell Group of Universities
The official website of Russell Group of Universities is http://www.russellgroup.ac.uk.
Russell Group of Universities’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Russell Group of Universities’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 712, reflecting their Moderate security posture.
How many security badges does Russell Group of Universities’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Russell Group of Universities currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Russell Group of Universities have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Russell Group of Universities is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Russell Group of Universities have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Russell Group of Universities does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Russell Group of Universities comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Russell Group of Universities is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Russell Group of Universities have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Russell Group of Universities does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Russell Group of Universities comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Russell Group of Universities is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Russell Group of Universities have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Russell Group of Universities is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Russell Group of Universities
Russell Group of Universities operates primarily in the Government Relations industry.
Number of Employees at Russell Group of Universities
Russell Group of Universities employs approximately 35 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Russell Group of Universities
Russell Group of Universities presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Russell Group of Universities’s LinkedIn Followers
Russell Group of Universities’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 12,446 followers.
NAICS Classification of Russell Group of Universities
Russell Group of Universities is classified under the NAICS code None, which corresponds to Others.
Russell Group of Universities’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Russell Group of Universities does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Russell Group of Universities’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Russell Group of Universities maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/russell-group-of-universities.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Russell Group of Universities
As of December 17, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Russell Group of Universities has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Russell Group of Universities has an estimated 420 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Russell Group of Universities ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Russell Group of Universities ?
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $300 thousand.
How does Russell Group of Universities detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an remediation measures with recommendations: endpoint security strengthening, remediation measures with cyber resilience training, remediation measures with device encryption/tracking, and recovery measures with device replacement (£300,000+), and communication strategy with public disclosure via foi/think tank report..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Loss and Theft of 670 Devices Across UK Russell Group Universities (2022–2025)
Description: The UK’s leading Russell Group universities reported the loss or theft of 670 laptops, tablets, and phones over three years (June 2022–May 2025), raising concerns about data security. The incidents include 395 laptops, 75 tablets, and 200 phones across 11 institutions, with an estimated replacement cost exceeding £300,000. The lost/stolen devices pose risks of unauthorized access to sensitive student, staff, and research data, including cached credentials, email/cloud sessions, and potential exploitation for cyber-attacks (e.g., ransomware, phishing, or intellectual property theft). The sector is already a prime target, with 73% of UK educational institutions experiencing cyber-attacks in the past five years.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-05-01
Type: Data Security Incident
Attack Vector: Physical TheftLost DevicesUnauthorized Access (Potential)
Vulnerability Exploited: Unsecured EndpointsCached CredentialsLack of Device Encryption/Tracking
Motivation: Opportunistic TheftPotential Data ExfiltrationFinancial Gain (Resale/Black Market)Cyber-Attack Enablement
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Lost/Stolen Devices.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Security Incident RUS1193411102125
Financial Loss: £300,000+ (replacement costs)
Data Compromised: Potential: student/staff data, Research data, Intellectual property, Email/cloud session credentials
Operational Impact: Increased Cyber RiskReputation Damage
Brand Reputation Impact: High (sector-wide concern over data security)
Identity Theft Risk: Potential (if credentials exploited)
What is the average financial loss per incident ?
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $300.00 thousand.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Potential: Personal Data (Students/Staff), Research Data, Intellectual Property, Credentials and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Security Incident RUS1193411102125
Entity Name: University College London (UCL)
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: London, UK
Incident : Data Security Incident RUS1193411102125
Entity Name: University of Cambridge
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: Cambridge, UK
Incident : Data Security Incident RUS1193411102125
Entity Name: University of Manchester
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: Manchester, UK
Incident : Data Security Incident RUS1193411102125
Entity Name: University of Liverpool
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: Liverpool, UK
Incident : Data Security Incident RUS1193411102125
Entity Name: 7 Other Russell Group Universities (Unspecified)
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: UK
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Security Incident RUS1193411102125
Remediation Measures: Recommendations: Endpoint Security StrengtheningCyber Resilience TrainingDevice Encryption/Tracking
Recovery Measures: Device Replacement (£300,000+)
Communication Strategy: Public Disclosure via FOI/Think Tank Report
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Security Incident RUS1193411102125
Type of Data Compromised: Potential: personal data (students/staff), Research data, Intellectual property, Credentials
Sensitivity of Data: High (academic/research data)
Data Exfiltration: Potential (if devices accessed by threat actors)
Data Encryption: Partial (some devices may have had encryption)
Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (if stored on devices)
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Recommendations: Endpoint Security Strengthening, Cyber Resilience Training, Device Encryption/Tracking, .
Ransomware Information
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through Device Replacement (£300,000+), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Security Incident RUS1193411102125
Lessons Learned: Physical device loss compounds digital cyber risks in higher education., Universities are high-value targets due to sensitive data (research, PII)., Endpoint security and cyber resilience must be prioritized to mitigate risks from lost/stolen devices.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Security Incident RUS1193411102125
Recommendations: Invest in **endpoint security** (e.g., encryption, remote wipe, tracking)., Enhance **cyber resilience training** for staff/students on device security., Implement **continuous monitoring** for suspicious access from lost/stolen devices., Prioritize **incident response plans** for physical device loss., Collaborate with **law enforcement** to recover devices and investigate theft patterns., Adopt **zero-trust principles** to limit access from unsecured endpoints.Invest in **endpoint security** (e.g., encryption, remote wipe, tracking)., Enhance **cyber resilience training** for staff/students on device security., Implement **continuous monitoring** for suspicious access from lost/stolen devices., Prioritize **incident response plans** for physical device loss., Collaborate with **law enforcement** to recover devices and investigate theft patterns., Adopt **zero-trust principles** to limit access from unsecured endpoints.Invest in **endpoint security** (e.g., encryption, remote wipe, tracking)., Enhance **cyber resilience training** for staff/students on device security., Implement **continuous monitoring** for suspicious access from lost/stolen devices., Prioritize **incident response plans** for physical device loss., Collaborate with **law enforcement** to recover devices and investigate theft patterns., Adopt **zero-trust principles** to limit access from unsecured endpoints.Invest in **endpoint security** (e.g., encryption, remote wipe, tracking)., Enhance **cyber resilience training** for staff/students on device security., Implement **continuous monitoring** for suspicious access from lost/stolen devices., Prioritize **incident response plans** for physical device loss., Collaborate with **law enforcement** to recover devices and investigate theft patterns., Adopt **zero-trust principles** to limit access from unsecured endpoints.Invest in **endpoint security** (e.g., encryption, remote wipe, tracking)., Enhance **cyber resilience training** for staff/students on device security., Implement **continuous monitoring** for suspicious access from lost/stolen devices., Prioritize **incident response plans** for physical device loss., Collaborate with **law enforcement** to recover devices and investigate theft patterns., Adopt **zero-trust principles** to limit access from unsecured endpoints.Invest in **endpoint security** (e.g., encryption, remote wipe, tracking)., Enhance **cyber resilience training** for staff/students on device security., Implement **continuous monitoring** for suspicious access from lost/stolen devices., Prioritize **incident response plans** for physical device loss., Collaborate with **law enforcement** to recover devices and investigate theft patterns., Adopt **zero-trust principles** to limit access from unsecured endpoints.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Physical device loss compounds digital cyber risks in higher education.,Universities are high-value targets due to sensitive data (research, PII).,Endpoint security and cyber resilience must be prioritized to mitigate risks from lost/stolen devices.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Security Incident RUS1193411102125
Source: Parliament Street Think Tank (FOI Analysis)
Incident : Data Security Incident RUS1193411102125
Source: FDM Group (Sawan Joshi, Group Director of Information Security)
Incident : Data Security Incident RUS1193411102125
Source: Absolute Security (Andy Ward, SVP International)
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Parliament Street Think Tank (FOI Analysis), and Source: FDM Group (Sawan Joshi, Group Director of Information Security), and Source: Absolute Security (Andy Ward, SVP International).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Security Incident RUS1193411102125
Investigation Status: Ongoing (analysis via FOI request; no formal investigation details provided)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Disclosure Via Foi/Think Tank Report.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Security Incident RUS1193411102125
Entry Point: Lost/Stolen Devices,
Backdoors Established: Potential (if devices accessed)
High Value Targets: Student/Staff Data, Research Data,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Student/Staff Data, Research Data,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Security Incident RUS1193411102125
Root Causes: Lack Of **Physical Security** For Devices., Insufficient **Endpoint Protection** (E.G., Encryption, Tracking)., **Human Error** (Misplacement/Theft Of Devices)., **Sector-Wide Vulnerability** (Higher Education As A Target For Cyber-Attacks).,
Corrective Actions: Strengthen **Device Management Policies** (E.G., Mandatory Encryption)., Deploy **Remote Wipe/Tracking Tools** For Lost Devices., Conduct **Regular Audits** Of Device Inventory And Security Compliance., Enhance **Awareness Programs** On Cyber Hygiene For Remote/Work-From-Anywhere Scenarios.,
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Strengthen **Device Management Policies** (E.G., Mandatory Encryption)., Deploy **Remote Wipe/Tracking Tools** For Lost Devices., Conduct **Regular Audits** Of Device Inventory And Security Compliance., Enhance **Awareness Programs** On Cyber Hygiene For Remote/Work-From-Anywhere Scenarios., .
Additional Questions
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-05-01.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was £300,000+ (replacement costs).
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Potential: Student/Staff Data, Research Data, Intellectual Property, Email/Cloud Session Credentials and .
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Email/Cloud Session Credentials, Research Data, Potential: Student/Staff Data and Intellectual Property.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Endpoint security and cyber resilience must be prioritized to mitigate risks from lost/stolen devices.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Enhance **cyber resilience training** for staff/students on device security., Implement **continuous monitoring** for suspicious access from lost/stolen devices., Adopt **zero-trust principles** to limit access from unsecured endpoints., Collaborate with **law enforcement** to recover devices and investigate theft patterns., Invest in **endpoint security** (e.g., encryption, remote wipe, tracking). and Prioritize **incident response plans** for physical device loss..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Absolute Security (Andy Ward, SVP International), FDM Group (Sawan Joshi, Group Director of Information Security) and Parliament Street Think Tank (FOI Analysis).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (analysis via FOI request; no formal investigation details provided).
Initial Access Broker
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Description
Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Description
SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=russell-group-of-universities' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
