Comparison Overview

Russell Group of Universities

VS

Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation

Russell Group of Universities

Great George Street, London, England, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-10

The Russell Group represents 24 leading UK universities which are committed to maintaining the very best research, an outstanding teaching and learning experience and unrivalled links with business and the public sector. We aim to ensure that policy development in a wide range of issues relating to higher education is underpinned by a robust evidence base and a commitment to civic responsibility, improving life chances, raising aspirations and contributing to economic prosperity and innovation.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation

4558 Shetland Green Rd, Alexandria, VA, US, 22312
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 700 and 749

The Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation is a non-profit, public benefit 501(c)(3) educational and scientific charity. Much of the world depends upon satellite systems for precise navigation and timing services. These are exceptionally accurate and dependable, yet jamming, spoofing, and other forms of interference appear to be growing in frequency and severity. Neither are space systems immune to severe space weather or cyber-attack. This has the potential for devastating effects on our lives and economic activity. We promote multiple and resilient systems for balanced and healthy navigation and timing eco-systems, promote appropriate laws and enforcement to prevent GNSS jamming and spoofing, and educate leaders and the public about the importance of navigation and timing, existing vulnerabilities and the need for resilience. Learn More: https://rntfnd.org/ Become a Member: https://rntfnd.org/membership/

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/russell-group-of-universities.jpeg
Russell Group of Universities
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Russell Group of Universities
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Russell Group of Universities in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Russell Group of Universities (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Russell Group of Universities cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/russell-group-of-universities.jpeg
Russell Group of Universities
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft, Lost Devices, Unauthorized Access (Potential)
Motivation: Opportunistic Theft, Potential Data Exfiltration, Financial Gain (Resale/Black Market), Cyber-Attack Enablement
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resilient-navigation-and-timing-foundation.jpeg
Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: GPS Signal Manipulation
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Russell Group of Universities company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Russell Group of Universities and Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation company has reported more cyber incidents than Russell Group of Universities company.

Neither Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation company nor Russell Group of Universities company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Russell Group of Universities company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Russell Group of Universities company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Russell Group of Universities company nor Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Russell Group of Universities nor Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Russell Group of Universities company nor Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Russell Group of Universities company employs more people globally than Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Russell Group of Universities nor Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Russell Group of Universities nor Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Russell Group of Universities nor Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Russell Group of Universities nor Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Russell Group of Universities nor Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Russell Group of Universities nor Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N