Comparison Overview

Russell Group of Universities

VS

The Tatman Group

Russell Group of Universities

Great George Street, London, England, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.russellgroup.ac.uk

The Russell Group represents 24 leading UK universities which are committed to maintaining the very best research, an outstanding teaching and learning experience and unrivalled links with business and the public sector. We aim to ensure that policy development in a wide range of issues relating to higher education is underpinned by a robust evidence base and a commitment to civic responsibility, improving life chances, raising aspirations and contributing to economic prosperity and innovation.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

The Tatman Group

609 Lakeland Dr, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70802, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tatmangroup.com/

The Tatman Group is a full-service Government Relations firm, established in 1997. We have extensive experience and training in government relations. Our experience is backed by memberships in both the Louisiana Society of Association Executives and the Association of Louisiana Lobbyists. ​ Our team of experienced, highly-trained professionals offers more than 30 years of combined government relations. At The Tatman Group, we don't look for contracts, we seek to build long-lasting relationships. We are client-focused and solution-driven.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/russell-group-of-universities.jpeg
Russell Group of Universities
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-tatman-group.jpeg
The Tatman Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Russell Group of Universities
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Tatman Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Russell Group of Universities in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Tatman Group in 2025.

Incident History — Russell Group of Universities (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Russell Group of Universities cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Tatman Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Tatman Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/russell-group-of-universities.jpeg
Russell Group of Universities
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft, Lost Devices, Unauthorized Access (Potential)
Motivation: Opportunistic Theft, Potential Data Exfiltration, Financial Gain (Resale/Black Market), Cyber-Attack Enablement
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-tatman-group.jpeg
The Tatman Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Tatman Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Russell Group of Universities company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Russell Group of Universities company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The Tatman Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, The Tatman Group company and Russell Group of Universities company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Tatman Group company nor Russell Group of Universities company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Russell Group of Universities company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other The Tatman Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The Tatman Group company nor Russell Group of Universities company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Russell Group of Universities company nor The Tatman Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Russell Group of Universities nor The Tatman Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Tatman Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Russell Group of Universities company.

Russell Group of Universities company employs more people globally than The Tatman Group company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Russell Group of Universities nor The Tatman Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Russell Group of Universities nor The Tatman Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Russell Group of Universities nor The Tatman Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Russell Group of Universities nor The Tatman Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Russell Group of Universities nor The Tatman Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Russell Group of Universities nor The Tatman Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References