RRRF
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
ruby-on-rails-org
Website:
Employees number:
19
Number of followers:
12,056
NAICS:
513
Industry Type:
Homepage:
rubyonrails.org
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
RUB_2875702
Scan Status:
In-progress
Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation Company CyberSecurity Posture
rubyonrails.org
The Rails Foundation is a non-profit foundation set up to improve the documentation, education, marketing, and events of the Ruby on Rails framework to the benefit of all new and existing Rails developers, and to ensure a prosperous ecosystem that continues to improve for decades to come. In alphabetical order, the eight founding core members of the foundation are: Cookpad, Doximity, Fleetio, GitHub, Intercom, Procore, Shopify, and 37signals.
Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
RRRF Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
RRRF
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
RRRF Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
RRRF
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
RRRF Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
Ruby on Rails
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: On April 26, 2025, security experts disclosed a critical flaw in Ruby on Rails’ CSRF protection mechanism that effectively nullifies the framework’s primary defence against cross-site request forgery attacks. By concatenating the one-time pad (OTP) with the XOR-encrypted token, Rails inadvertently exposed the very key needed to reconstruct valid CSRF tokens, allowing attackers to forge requests seamlessly. This vulnerability affects every current Rails release and all versions dating back to the 2022/2023 “fix,” placing thousands of web applications at risk. Malicious actors can exploit the flaw to perform unauthorized actions—such as changing user passwords, transferring funds, or exfiltrating sensitive data—on behalf of authenticated users without their knowledge. The failure of this core security layer not only threatens customer privacy but also opens avenues for large-scale data leakage, fraudulent transactions, and significant reputational damage for organizations relying on Rails. Immediate patching and token-masking redesign are essential to prevent widespread compromise of personal and financial information across the Rails ecosystem.
RRRF Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for RRRF
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation in 2025.
Incident Types RRRF vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation in 2025.
Incident History — RRRF (X = Date, Y = Severity)
RRRF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
RRRF Company Subsidiaries
The Rails Foundation is a non-profit foundation set up to improve the documentation, education, marketing, and events of the Ruby on Rails framework to the benefit of all new and existing Rails developers, and to ensure a prosperous ecosystem that continues to improve for decades to come. In alphabetical order, the eight founding core members of the foundation are: Cookpad, Doximity, Fleetio, GitHub, Intercom, Procore, Shopify, and 37signals.
Loading...
RRRF Similar Companies
Booking Holdings is the world’s leading provider of online travel & related services, provided to consumers and local partners in more than 220 countries and territories through six primary consumer-facing brands: Booking.com, Priceline, Agoda, Rentalcars.com, KAYAK and OpenTable. Collectively, Book
Independiente / Freelance
La etimología de la palabra deriva del término medieval inglés usado para un mercenario (free-independiente o lance-lanza), es decir, un caballero que no servía a ningún señor en concreto y cuyos servicios podían ser alquilados por cualquiera. El término fue acuñado inicialmente por Sir Walter Scot
Meesho is India’s fastest growing internet commerce company. We want to make eCommerce accessible to all. Our vision is to enable 100 million small businesses in India, including individual entrepreneurs, to succeed online. Our mission is to democratise internet commerce by bringing a range of produ
Launched in May 2003, Taobao Marketplace (www.taobao.com) is the online shopping destination of choice for Chinese consumers looking for wide selection, value and convenience. Shoppers choose from a wide range of products and services on Taobao Marketplace, which features hundreds of millions of pro
As the world’s leading local delivery platform, our mission is to deliver an amazing experience, fast, easy, and to your door. We operate in over 70+ countries worldwide, powered by tech but driven by people. As one of Europe’s largest tech platforms, we enable ambitious talent to deliver solutions
Arrow Electronics
Arrow Electronics (NYSE:ARW) guides innovation forward for thousands of leading technology manufacturers and service providers. With 2024 sales of $27.9 billion, Arrow develops technology solutions that help improve business and daily life. Our broad portfolio that spans the entire technology lands
Zomato’s mission statement is “better food for more people.” Since our inception in 2010, we have grown tremendously, both in scope and scale - and emerged as India’s most trusted brand during the pandemic, along with being one of the largest hyperlocal delivery networks in the country. Today, Zoma
Times Internet
At Times Internet, we create premium digital products that simplify and enhance the lives of millions. As India’s largest digital products company, we have a significant presence across a wide range of categories, including News, Sports, Fintech, and Enterprise solutions. Our portfolio features mar
NetEase
As a leading internet technology company based in China, NetEase, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTES and HKEX:9999, "NetEase") provides premium online services centered around content creation. With extensive offerings across its expanding gaming ecosystem, NetEase develops and operates some of China's most popula
.png)
RRRF CyberSecurity News
July 08, 2025 07:00 AM
CISA Warns of Rails Ruby on Rails Path Traversal Vulnerability Exploited in Attacks
CISA has issued a critical warning regarding a path traversal vulnerability in Ruby on Rails framework that poses significant risks to web...
May 14, 2019 07:00 AM
KnowBe4 Donates $1.75 Million to Anti-Phishing Research and to Train Students for a Widening Job Market
A prominent cybersecurity training company in Clearwater will donate $1.75 million in cash and software to the USF Foundation to teach and train Muma College...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
RRRF CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation
The official website of Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation is https://rubyonrails.org.
Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 752, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation
Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation operates primarily in the Technology, Information and Internet industry.
Number of Employees at Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation
Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation employs approximately 19 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation
Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation’s LinkedIn Followers
Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 12,056 followers.
NAICS Classification of Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation
Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation is classified under the NAICS code 513, which corresponds to Others.
Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ruby-on-rails-org.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation
As of December 07, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation has an estimated 12,911 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Vulnerability.
How does Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an remediation measures with immediate patching, remediation measures with token-masking redesign..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Critical Flaw in Ruby on Rails’ CSRF Protection Mechanism
Description: A critical flaw in Ruby on Rails’ CSRF protection mechanism nullifies the framework’s primary defence against cross-site request forgery attacks. By concatenating the one-time pad (OTP) with the XOR-encrypted token, Rails inadvertently exposed the very key needed to reconstruct valid CSRF tokens, allowing attackers to forge requests seamlessly. This vulnerability affects every current Rails release and all versions dating back to the 2022/2023 “fix,” placing thousands of web applications at risk. Malicious actors can exploit the flaw to perform unauthorized actions—such as changing user passwords, transferring funds, or exfiltrating sensitive data—on behalf of authenticated users without their knowledge.
Date Detected: 2025-04-26
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-04-26
Type: Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Vulnerability Exploited: CSRF Protection Mechanism in Ruby on Rails
Motivation: Unauthorized actionsData exfiltrationFraudulent transactions
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Vulnerability.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability RUB300050125
Data Compromised: Personal information, Financial information
Systems Affected: Thousands of web applications
Brand Reputation Impact: Significant reputational damage
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Information, Financial Information and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability RUB300050125
Entity Name: Ruby on Rails
Entity Type: Framework
Industry: Software Development
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability RUB300050125
Remediation Measures: Immediate patchingToken-masking redesign
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Vulnerability RUB300050125
Type of Data Compromised: Personal information, Financial information
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Immediate patching, Token-masking redesign, .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Vulnerability RUB300050125
Recommendations: Immediate patching, Token-masking redesignImmediate patching, Token-masking redesign
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability RUB300050125
Root Causes: Concatenating the one-time pad (OTP) with the XOR-encrypted token
Corrective Actions: Immediate Patching, Token-Masking Redesign,
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Immediate Patching, Token-Masking Redesign, .
Additional Questions
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2025-04-26.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-04-26.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal information, Financial information and .
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Financial information and Personal information.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Immediate patching and Token-masking redesign.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: hide VRAM sysfs attributes on GPUs without VRAM Otherwise accessing them can cause a crash.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: Fix NULL pointer dereference in VRAM logic for APU devices Previously, APU platforms (and other scenarios with uninitialized VRAM managers) triggered a NULL pointer dereference in `ttm_resource_manager_usage()`. The root cause is not that the `struct ttm_resource_manager *man` pointer itself is NULL, but that `man->bdev` (the backing device pointer within the manager) remains uninitialized (NULL) on APUs—since APUs lack dedicated VRAM and do not fully set up VRAM manager structures. When `ttm_resource_manager_usage()` attempts to acquire `man->bdev->lru_lock`, it dereferences the NULL `man->bdev`, leading to a kernel OOPS. 1. **amdgpu_cs.c**: Extend the existing bandwidth control check in `amdgpu_cs_get_threshold_for_moves()` to include a check for `ttm_resource_manager_used()`. If the manager is not used (uninitialized `bdev`), return 0 for migration thresholds immediately—skipping VRAM-specific logic that would trigger the NULL dereference. 2. **amdgpu_kms.c**: Update the `AMDGPU_INFO_VRAM_USAGE` ioctl and memory info reporting to use a conditional: if the manager is used, return the real VRAM usage; otherwise, return 0. This avoids accessing `man->bdev` when it is NULL. 3. **amdgpu_virt.c**: Modify the vf2pf (virtual function to physical function) data write path. Use `ttm_resource_manager_used()` to check validity: if the manager is usable, calculate `fb_usage` from VRAM usage; otherwise, set `fb_usage` to 0 (APUs have no discrete framebuffer to report). This approach is more robust than APU-specific checks because it: - Works for all scenarios where the VRAM manager is uninitialized (not just APUs), - Aligns with TTM's design by using its native helper function, - Preserves correct behavior for discrete GPUs (which have fully initialized `man->bdev` and pass the `ttm_resource_manager_used()` check). v4: use ttm_resource_manager_used(&adev->mman.vram_mgr.manager) instead of checking the adev->gmc.is_app_apu flag (Christian)
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/070bdce18fb12a49eb9c421e57df17d2ad29bf5f
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1243e396148a65bb6c42a2b70fe43e50c16c494f
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/43aa61c18a3a45042b098b7a1186ffb29364002c
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/883f309add55060233bf11c1ea6947140372920f
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e70113b741ba253886cd71dbadfe3ea444bb2f5c
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: exfat: fix improper check of dentry.stream.valid_size We found an infinite loop bug in the exFAT file system that can lead to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) condition. When a dentry in an exFAT filesystem is malformed, the following system calls — SYS_openat, SYS_ftruncate, and SYS_pwrite64 — can cause the kernel to hang. Root cause analysis shows that the size validation code in exfat_find() does not check whether dentry.stream.valid_size is negative. As a result, the system calls mentioned above can succeed and eventually trigger the DoS issue. This patch adds a check for negative dentry.stream.valid_size to prevent this vulnerability.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb/server: fix possible memory leak in smb2_read() Memory leak occurs when ksmbd_vfs_read() fails. Fix this by adding the missing kvfree().
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0797c6cf3b857cc229ab2bc69552938dcd738d78
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63d8706a2c09a0c29b8b0e8a44bc7a1339685de9
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6fced056d2cc8d01b326e6fcfabaacb9850b71a4
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bfda5422a16651d0bf864ec468b1c216e1b10d91
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1305587731886da37a214cda812ade246c653b0
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb/server: fix possible refcount leak in smb2_sess_setup() Reference count of ksmbd_session will leak when session need reconnect. Fix this by adding the missing ksmbd_user_session_put().
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/379510a815cb2e64eb0a379cb62295d6ade65df0
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6fc935f798d44a8eb8a5e6659198399fbf57b981
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d37b2c81c83d6c0d5ca582f4fe73c672983f9e0d
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dcc51dfe6ff26b52cac106865a172ac982d78401
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e671f9bb97805771380c98de944e2ceab6949188
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=ruby-on-rails-org' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
