Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation

Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

rubyonrails.org

The Rails Foundation is a non-profit foundation set up to improve the documentation, education, marketing, and events of the Ruby on Rails framework to the benefit of all new and existing Rails developers, and to ensure a prosperous ecosystem that continues to improve for decades to come. In alphabetical order, the eight founding core members of the foundation are: Cookpad, Doximity, Fleetio, GitHub, Intercom, Procore, Shopify, and 37signals.


RRRF A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

RRRF
Company Information
Website:https://rubyonrails.org
Employees number:19
Number of followers:13,493
NAICS:513
Industry Type:Technology, Information and Internet
Homepage:rubyonrails.org
RRRF Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
RRRFTechnology, Information and Internet
Updated:
01/09/2026
740/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
✖ Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
RRRF Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
RRRFTechnology, Information and Internet
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

RRRFModerate
Current Score
740Ba (MODERATE)
01000
4 incidents
-5 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
OCTOBER 2026
740Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2026
740Before Incident
AUGUST 2026
744Before Incident
Vulnerability
02 Aug 2026 • RRRF
Ruby on Rails: Ethiack Helps Remediate Critical Vulnerability That Exposed More Than 500,000 Websites

KindaRails2Shell: Critical Ruby on Rails Vulnerability Exposes Web Applications to Remote Code Execution

739After Incident
CRITICAL-5
RUB1785673407
Critical Ruby on Rails Vulnerability Exposes Web Applications to Remote Code Execution Cybersecurity firm Ethiack has uncovered a severe remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability, dubbed KindaRails2Shell, in Ruby on Rails, a widely used open-source web framework powering an estimated 500,000 applications, including high-profile platforms and enterprise services. The flaw, tracked as CVE-2026-66066 with a CVSS score of 9.5, resides in the framework’s default image processing component and affects Ruby on Rails versions 7.x and 8.x. Attackers can exploit the vulnerability when users upload images such as profile photos or thumbnails to read sensitive files, execute malicious code, or gain full server control. Discovered by Ethiack researchers André Baptista, Bruno Mendes, and Rafael Castilho, the issue was responsibly disclosed to the Ruby on Rails maintainers. Ethiack later collaborated with Tokyo-based GMO Flatt Security, which independently identified the same flaw, to support a coordinated global remediation effort. Patches have since been released, but Ethiack warns that updating the framework alone may not suffice organizations may also need to update a third-party image processing library, requiring a multi-stage remediation process. While technical details are now public, the vulnerability’s severity underscores the risks of unpatched systems, particularly in environments handling user-uploaded content. Ethiack has published a detailed remediation guide alongside the official advisory.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Remote Code Execution (RCE)
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Sensitive filesSystems Affected: Ruby on Rails applications (versions 7.x and 8.x)Operational Impact: Potential full server control
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Sensitive filesSensitivity Of Data: High (potential for full server control)
JULY 2026
744Before Incident
JUNE 2026
744Before Incident
MAY 2026
743Before Incident
APRIL 2026
743Before Incident
MARCH 2026
742Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
742Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
746Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Jan 2026 • RRRF
Langflow and Ruby on Rails: Hackers Actively Exploiting Critical Langflow RCE and Rails Vulnerability

Critical Vulnerabilities in Langflow and Ruby on Rails Under Active Exploitation

741After Incident
CRITICAL-5
RUBLAN1788272691
Critical Vulnerabilities in Langflow and Ruby on Rails Under Active Exploitation Security researchers at VulnCheck have detected active exploitation of two critical vulnerabilities CVE-2026-0768 in Langflow and CVE-2026-66066 in Ruby on Rails with attackers rapidly moving from reconnaissance to credential harvesting and potential remote code execution (RCE). ### Langflow RCE (CVE-2026-0768) The flaw, an unauthenticated RCE vulnerability in Langflow’s custom component editor, was disclosed via Trend Micro’s Zero Day Initiative in January 2026. Despite the lack of a public proof-of-concept exploit, VulnCheck observed over 360 exploitation attempts targeting its internet-facing Canary systems shortly after the vulnerability was added to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. Attackers primarily sought environment variables linked to Langflow administration, OpenAI APIs, and AWS cloud access. Additional malicious activity included: - Reading Langflow’s secret_key file at `/root/.cache/langflow/secret_key` - Inspecting SSH access and `.bash_history` files to identify admin activity and lateral movement paths - Traffic originating primarily from Russia, targeting systems in the UK This follows a broader trend of Langflow vulnerabilities being added to VulnCheck’s KEV catalog in 2026. ### Ruby on Rails File-Read-to-RCE (CVE-2026-66066) Separately, attackers exploited CVE-2026-66066, a critical Active Storage file-read-to-RCE flaw in Ruby on Rails. Exploitation attempts were detected on Canary systems in Singapore, Israel, and the UK, with activity traced to a single source IP in France and command-and-control (C2) communication linked to a host in Israel. The vulnerability allows attackers to read sensitive files, including: - `secret_key_base` - API tokens - Database credentials - Cloud storage keys Even after patching, compromised secrets such as `secret_key_base` can enable session forgery and further abuse until rotated. ### Impact & Attacker Behavior Both vulnerabilities highlight the growing targeting of AI application platforms and web frameworks. Attackers prioritized credential harvesting over immediate destructive payloads, suggesting a focus on long-term access and lateral movement. Organizations running affected software are advised to patch immediately, restrict public access to admin interfaces, and review logs for suspicious activity particularly commands targeting environment variables, secret files, SSH directories, or shell history. Credential rotation is critical if exploitation is suspected.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Remote Code Execution (RCE)Credential Harvesting
MOTIVATION
Credential HarvestingLong-term AccessLateral Movement
IMPACT
Environment variablesSecret_keyAPI tokensDatabase credentialsCloud storage keysSSH access.bash_historyLangflowRuby on Rails
DATA BREACH
Environment variablesSecret_keyAPI tokensDatabase credentialsCloud storage keysSSH access.bash_historySensitivity Of Data: High
DECEMBER 2025
746Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
746Before Incident
JUNE 2025
751Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Jun 2025 • RRRF
Adobe, Ruby on Rails, CareCloud and Police National Legal Database: image - Security Affairs

Cybersecurity Roundup: Critical Vulnerabilities, Data Breaches, and AI-Driven Threats

744After Incident
CRITICAL-7
ADORUBCARPOL1785775466
Cybersecurity Roundup: Critical Vulnerabilities, Data Breaches, and AI-Driven Threats Recent weeks have seen a surge in cybersecurity incidents, ranging from critical software vulnerabilities to sophisticated AI-powered attacks and high-profile data breaches. Critical Patches and Vulnerabilities Ruby on Rails released an urgent patch for a critical flaw in its Active Storage component, which could allow attackers to exploit image processing functions. Adobe also addressed a maximum-severity vulnerability in Campaign Classic, though details on exploitation remain undisclosed. Data Breaches and Compromised Systems - River Bank reported that attackers behind a June data breach provided assurances the stolen data was deleted, though the reliability of such claims remains uncertain. - CareCloud suffered a breach exposing medical and financial records of 345,000 individuals, highlighting ongoing risks in healthcare data security. - The Police National Legal Database (PNLD) confirmed a breach affecting UK police and justice staff, though the full scope of exposed data is still under investigation. - Żabka, a Polish retail chain, allegedly suffered a breach leaking Jira data, source code, and API keys, raising concerns about supply chain risks. - Analog Devices disclosed a breach after detecting unauthorized system access, though the impact on sensitive data is still being assessed. AI and Automated Cyber Threats - A Chinese threat actor was observed using DeepSeek AI to automate cyberattacks, demonstrating the growing role of AI in offensive security operations. - Anthropic revealed that its AI model, Claude, inadvertently breached real companies during security evaluations, underscoring the risks of AI-driven testing. - Cybercriminals are increasingly deploying autonomous AI agents for offensive operations, reducing the need for manual intervention in attacks. State-Backed and Advanced Campaigns - South Korea warned of state-sponsored watering hole attacks, targeting users through compromised websites. - SilverFox, a sophisticated threat group, launched an advanced ValleyRAT campaign against a Japanese manufacturer, indicating a shift toward industrial espionage. - Russian hackers hijacked hotel Wi-Fi networks to steal Microsoft 365 authentication tokens, exposing corporate credentials. Regulatory and Infrastructure Risks - The FCC imposed restrictions on foreign-made robots and inverters due to national security concerns, citing potential backdoor risks. - CISA urged utilities to remove internet-exposed programmable logic controllers (PLCs) following attacks in Minnesota, emphasizing the need for critical infrastructure hardening. Emerging Threat Vectors - Brand impersonation is increasingly used as an initial access vector, with attackers leveraging trusted identities to bypass security controls. - Google’s AI-driven security enhancements for Chrome led to the discovery and patching of 1,072 bugs, showcasing the potential of AI in defensive cybersecurity. The rapid evolution of cyber threats from AI automation to state-backed campaigns continues to challenge organizations across sectors, reinforcing the need for proactive security measures.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data BreachVulnerability ExploitationAI-Driven AttackState-Backed CampaignRansomware
MOTIVATION
Data TheftIndustrial EspionageFinancial GainCyber Espionage
IMPACT
Medical recordsFinancial recordsJira dataSource codeAPI keysMicrosoft 365 authentication tokensPersonally identifiable informationActive Storage (Ruby on Rails)Adobe Campaign ClassicCareCloud systemsPNLD databaseŻabka internal systemsAnalog Devices systemsHotel Wi-Fi networksProgrammable Logic Controllers (PLCs)HighHigh
DATA BREACH
Medical recordsFinancial recordsJira dataSource codeAPI keysAuthentication tokensPersonally identifiable information345,000 (CareCloud)HighSource codeAPI keysJira dataYes
JUNE 2022
765Before Incident
Vulnerability
16 Jun 2022 • RRRF
Ruby on Rails

Critical Flaw in Ruby on Rails’ CSRF Protection Mechanism

748After Incident
CRITICAL-17
RUB300050125
On April 26, 2025, security experts disclosed a critical flaw in Ruby on Rails’ CSRF protection mechanism that effectively nullifies the framework’s primary defence against cross-site request forgery attacks. By concatenating the one-time pad (OTP) with the XOR-encrypted token, Rails inadvertently exposed the very key needed to reconstruct valid CSRF tokens, allowing attackers to forge requests seamlessly. This vulnerability affects every current Rails release and all versions dating back to the 2022/2023 “fix,” placing thousands of web applications at risk. Malicious actors can exploit the flaw to perform unauthorized actions—such as changing user passwords, transferring funds, or exfiltrating sensitive data—on behalf of authenticated users without their knowledge. The failure of this core security layer not only threatens customer privacy but also opens avenues for large-scale data leakage, fraudulent transactions, and significant reputational damage for organizations relying on Rails. Immediate patching and token-masking redesign are essential to prevent widespread compromise of personal and financial information across the Rails ecosystem.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability
MOTIVATION
Unauthorized actionsData exfiltrationFraudulent transactions
IMPACT
Personal informationFinancial informationSystems Affected: Thousands of web applicationsBrand Reputation Impact: Significant reputational damage
DATA BREACH
Personal informationFinancial information

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for RRRF ?
?
What was RRRF's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2026 ?
?
What was RRRF's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2026 ?
?
What was RRRF's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was RRRF's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was RRRF's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was RRRF's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was RRRF's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was RRRF's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was RRRF's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was RRRF's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was RRRF's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on RRRF's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with RRRF ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view RRRF's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?