Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Rituals (B Corp™) » RIT1776861527

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (RIT1776861527)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-58
Company Score Before Incident776 / 1000
Company Score After Incident718 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERRIT1776861527
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDFull names, addresses, phone numbers,...
INCIDENT DATE31/01/2026
STATUSOngoing (collaboration with external specialists)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Rituals (B Corp™)'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Rituals (B Corp™) Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Rituals (B Corp™) breach identified under incident ID RIT1776861527.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Rituals (B Corp™)'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/rituals, the number of followers: 226012, the industry type: Personal Care Product Manufacturing and the number of employees: 8732 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 776 and after the incident was 718 with a difference of -58 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Rituals (B Corp™) and their customers.

Rituals Cosmetics recently reported "Rituals Cosmetics Data Breach Exposing Customer Personal Information", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Amsterdam-based cosmetics retailer Rituals has confirmed a data breach exposing sensitive customer information, including full names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, dates of birth, and gender, as well as details about account types and preferred stores.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Full names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, dates of birth, gender, account types, preferred stores.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Customer notifications and advisories against phishing attempts.

The case underscores how Ongoing (collaboration with external specialists), and recommending next steps like Customers advised to remain vigilant against phishing attempts using exposed personal information, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Warning against phishing attempts and vigilance for fraudulent messages.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data breach exposing sensitive customer information and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating recurring issues with scammers impersonating the brand. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating account types and preferred stores details compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating full names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating details about account types and preferred stores exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach exposing sensitive customer information and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating external specialists monitoring the dark web for leaked data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence the stolen information has been published online and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating potential phishing attacks using exposed personal information. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
Trusted Relationship (50%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (40%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (60%)

Sources & References