Comparison Overview
Publix Super Markets

Publix Super Markets
3300 Publix Corporate Parkway, Lakeland, 33811, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Founded in 1930, Publix Super Markets is the largest and fastest-growing employee-owned supermarket chain in the United States. Publix employs over 200,000 associates. We are privately-owned, hold no long-term debt, have avoided layoffs, and continue to grow year after ...

Foot Locker
330 West 34th Street, New York City, New York, US, 10001
Last Update: 11/09/2026
Foot Locker, Inc. is a leading footwear and apparel retailer that unlocks the “inner sneakerhead” in all of us. With approximately 2,500 retail stores in 26 countries across North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand, and a franchised store presence in the ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Publix Super Markets







Foot Locker






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Publix Super Markets in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Foot Locker in 2026.
Incident History - Publix Super Markets (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Publix Super Markets cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Foot Locker (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Foot Locker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Publix Super Markets

Foot Locker
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.