Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » PowerSchool » MICHOTGOOPOW1779697543

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MICHOTGOOPOW1779697543)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-104
Company Score Before Incident745 / 1000
Company Score After Incident641 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERMICHOTGOOPOW1779697543
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORThird-party tracking tool (Heap)
DATA EXPOSEDKeystrokes, clicks, mouse movements, private...
INCIDENT DATE17/08/2021
STATUSSettled (pending final approval)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of PowerSchool's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts PowerSchool Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the PowerSchool breach identified under incident ID MICHOTGOOPOW1779697543.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of PowerSchool's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/powerschool-group-llc, the number of followers: 159772, the industry type: E-Learning Providers and the number of employees: 3504 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 745 and after the incident was 641 with a difference of -104 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on PowerSchool and their customers.

On 01 April 2026, PowerSchool (Naviance) disclosed Data Harvesting issues under the banner "PowerSchool Naviance Data Harvesting Lawsuit Settlement".

A lawsuit alleged that PowerSchool's Naviance platform embedded Heap, a third-party tracking tool, which collected sensitive student data including keystrokes, clicks, mouse movements, and private messages to counselors without consent.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Naviance platform, and exposing Keystrokes, clicks, mouse movements, private messages to counselors, plus an estimated financial loss of $17.25 million settlement.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Heap, Google, Microsoft, and Hotjar agreed to delete all stored student data, and began remediation that includes Settlement agreement to delete data and pay affected students, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notifications to affected students.

The case underscores how Settled (pending final approval), teams are taking away lessons such as EdTech platforms must ensure compliance with privacy laws and obtain explicit consent for data collection. Third-party tracking tools pose significant risks to user privacy, and recommending next steps like Implement stricter data collection policies, conduct regular audits of third-party tools, and enhance transparency with users regarding data usage, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notifications sent to affected students with settlement details.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating embedded Heap, a third-party tracking tool, which collected sensitive student data. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Screen Capture (T1113) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating collected sensitive student data including keystrokes, clicks, mouse movements, Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating private messages to counselors without consent, and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating naviance, a widely used college and career readiness platform. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating harvested data was reportedly sent to Google, Microsoft, and Hotjar and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data sent to Google, Microsoft, and Hotjar (cloud services). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Web Session Cookie (T1539) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating tracking tool collected keystrokes, clicks, mouse movements (potential session data). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating embedded Heap tracking tool without user consent or transparency. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating violation of Electronic Communications Privacy Act and California Invasion of Privacy Act and Financial Theft (T1657) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating $17.25 million settlement for unauthorized data collection. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (90%)
Collection
Screen Capture (80%)
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (80%)
Credential Access
Steal Web Session Cookie (60%)
Defense Evasion
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (70%)
Impact
Defacement: Internal Defacement (50%)
Financial Theft (80%)