Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » PowerSchool » ILLPOW1777933701

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ILLPOW1777933701)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-79
Company Score Before Incident679 / 1000
Company Score After Incident600 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERILLPOW1777933701
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORThird-party vendor compromise
DATA EXPOSEDStudent and staff personal information
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2022
STATUSOngoing (follow-up audit planned in one year)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of PowerSchool's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts PowerSchool Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the PowerSchool breach identified under incident ID ILLPOW1777933701.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of PowerSchool's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/powerschool-group-llc, the number of followers: 159772, the industry type: E-Learning Providers and the number of employees: 3504 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 679 and after the incident was 600 with a difference of -79 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on PowerSchool and their customers.

New York City Public Schools (NYCPS) recently reported "New York City Public Schools Face Critical Gaps in Student Data Security, Audit Finds", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A five-year audit by New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli revealed significant vulnerabilities in how New York City Public Schools (NYCPS) manage and protect student data, including systemic weaknesses in data security policies, third-party vendor oversight, and complian...

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Illuminate (grading platform), PowerSchool (school records program), 70+ additional applications, and exposing Student and staff personal information, with nearly 820,000 (Illuminate), 3,000+ (PowerSchool) records at risk.

In response, and began remediation that includes New student privacy webpage, data privacy working group, and stakeholders are being briefed through Late notifications to families in 11% of cases.

The case underscores how Ongoing (follow-up audit planned in one year), teams are taking away lessons such as Need for centralized oversight of third-party vendors, improved compliance with data privacy training, timely incident reporting, and better coordination of technology adoption across schools, and recommending next steps like Implement a comprehensive inventory of software and third-party platforms, enforce mandatory data privacy training, improve incident detection and response times, and consider a moratorium on AI adoption until safeguards are in place, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Critics and education advocates calling for a moratorium on AI adoption due to insufficient safeguards.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including third-party vendor compromise, and illuminate and PowerSchool breaches via vendors and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including lack of centralized oversight of third-party vendors, and 70+ applications used beyond central systems. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 25% of staff (~43,000) did not complete mandatory data privacy training and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including untrained personnel accessing sensitive information, and delayed breach detection (PowerSchool breach discovered in 2025). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating student names, birthdates, and personal information compromised via Illuminate/PowerSchool and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 70+ applications used across schools with sensitive data. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including 820,000 students data exposed (Illuminate breach), and 3,000+ students/staff data (PowerSchool breach) and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating third-party vendor platforms (Illuminate/PowerSchool) involved in breaches. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating untrained staff accessing systems, delayed breach detection and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating lack of system to prevent untrained personnel from accessing data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential FERPA noncompliance risks due to systemic weaknesses and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating uncoordinated technology adoption across 528 schools. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (90%)
Trusted Relationship (80%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (70%)
Valid Accounts (80%)
Collection
Data from Information Repositories (90%)
Data from Local System (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (80%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (60%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (50%)