Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Police Scotland » POL1773319619

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (POL1773319619)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-97
Company Score Before Incident771 / 1000
Company Score After Incident674 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPOL1773319619
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSpecial category data (health records,...
INCIDENT DATE31/08/2022
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Police Scotland's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Police Scotland Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Police Scotland breach identified under incident ID POL1773319619.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Police Scotland's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/police-scotland, the number of followers: 41464, the industry type: Law Enforcement and the number of employees: 3920 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 771 and after the incident was 674 with a difference of -97 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Police Scotland and their customers.

On 01 September 2022, Police Scotland disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "ICO Fines Police Scotland £66,000 for Mishandling Crime Victim’s Sensitive Data".

The UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has fined Police Scotland £66,000 following a series of data protection failures involving a crime victim’s mobile phone.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Special category data (health records, religious beliefs, personal details), plus an estimated financial loss of £66,000 (fine imposed).

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Improved oversight and revised processes, and began remediation that includes Additional training for officers.

The case underscores how Completed, teams are taking away lessons such as Importance of lawful and proportionate data collection, safeguarding sensitive information, and timely breach reporting, and recommending next steps like Implement stricter data handling protocols, enhance training for officers, and ensure compliance with data protection regulations.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating officers sought text messages between the victim and the accused. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating full download of the phone’s contents, including special category data and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating extracted...highly sensitive personal information from the victim’s device. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating full dataset...was shared with Police Scotland’s Professional Standards Department and Data Transfer to Cloud Account (T1530) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating shared with multiple departments and even the officer facing disciplinary action. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating failing to ensure lawful data collection, adequately safeguard the information and Disabling Security Tools (T1089) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating lack of safeguards...violated the Data Protection Act 2018. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating improperly share highly sensitive personal information and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating exposing the victim’s data unnecessarily. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (90%)
Collection
Data from Local System (95%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (85%)
Data Transfer to Cloud Account (70%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (60%)
Disabling Security Tools (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (30%)

Sources & References