Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » The Pensions Ombudsman » PEN1775673518

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PEN1775673518)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-67
Company Score Before Incident755 / 1000
Company Score After Incident688 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPEN1775673518
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORSystem Misconfiguration
DATA EXPOSEDFinancial information, personal annual benefit...
INCIDENT DATE29/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of The Pensions Ombudsman's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts The Pensions Ombudsman Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the The Pensions Ombudsman breach identified under incident ID PEN1775673518.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of The Pensions Ombudsman's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pensions-ombudsman-service, the number of followers: 5000, the industry type: Alternative Dispute Resolution and the number of employees: 123 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 755 and after the incident was 688 with a difference of -67 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on The Pensions Ombudsman and their customers.

On 03 April 2026, UK Civil Service Pension Scheme (CSPS) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "UK Civil Service Pension Scheme Suffers Data Breach, Exposing Members’ Financial Data".

A data breach in the UK Civil Service Pension Scheme (CSPS) exposed the financial information of nearly 140 members after a flaw in its online portal, managed by outsourcing firm Capita, allowed users to view others’ personal annual benefit statements (ABS).

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting UK Civil Service Pension Scheme online portal, and exposing Financial information, personal annual benefit statements (ABS), with nearly 140 records at risk.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Portal functionality suspended, ABS access disabled, and began remediation that includes Investigation launched, portal remains offline pending remediation, and stakeholders are being briefed through Affected members notified on 3 April 2026.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Ongoing vulnerabilities in third-party-managed systems handling sensitive financial and personal information; risks of outsourcing critical services, and recommending next steps like Review and strengthen security protocols for online portals; consider bringing outsourced services back in-house to mitigate risks, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering UK Cabinet Office and Capita are assessing the breach and determining further steps.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating flaw in its online portal...allowed users to view others’ personal annual benefit statements. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Credential Access (T1212) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to personal annual benefit statements (ABS) containing financial data. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating financial information of nearly 140 members exposed via online portal flaw. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating users could view others’ personal annual benefit statements (ABS) for 35 minutes. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating portal malfunctioned...incorrectly displaying ABS documents to unauthorized users and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating flaw in online portal allowed unauthorized access to personal annual benefit statements. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (80%)
Credential Access
Exploitation for Credential Access (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (50%)

Sources & References