Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Padget Technologies, Inc. » PAD1785796242

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PAD1785796242)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-106
Company Score Before Incident744 / 1000
Company Score After Incident638 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPAD1785796242
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized Access
DATA EXPOSEDNames, Social Security numbers
INCIDENT DATE03/06/2026
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Padget Technologies, Inc.'s Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Padget Technologies, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Padget Technologies, Inc. breach identified under incident ID PAD1785796242.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Padget Technologies, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/padget-technologies, the number of followers: 551, the industry type: Automation Machinery Manufacturing and the number of employees: 31 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 744 and after the incident was 638 with a difference of -106 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Padget Technologies, Inc. and their customers.

On 25 June 2026, Padget Technologies Inc. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Padget Technologies Data Breach Impacting Employee Personal Information".

Padget Technologies Inc., an industrial automation firm based in Cedar Falls, Iowa, confirmed a data breach exposing sensitive personal information of current and former employees.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Names, Social Security numbers.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notifications sent to affected individuals, credit monitoring offered.

The case underscores how Completed, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering 12 months of complimentary credit monitoring and identity protection services through IDX, enrollment available until October 23, 2026. Dedicated assistance line and mailing address provided.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actor accessed and exfiltrated files from Padget’s networks and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating suspicious activity within its systems detected on June 4, 2026. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating names and Social Security numbers compromised and Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating w-9 forms, contracts, and NDAs claimed to be stolen. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating files containing names and Social Security numbers exfiltrated and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating driver’s licenses, W-9 forms, contracts claimed stolen. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating akira ransomware group claimed responsibility for data exfiltration and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data posted on Tor network by Akira group. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating akira ransomware group involvement suggests possible encryption and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating high identity theft risk for affected individuals. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (T1070.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating suspicious activity detected late; possible log tampering and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access went undetected initially. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (50%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (40%)
Defense Evasion
Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (60%)
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (50%)

Sources & References