Company Details
opm
5,342
165,112
92
opm.gov
0
U.S_8407199
In-progress

U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Company CyberSecurity Posture
opm.govThe U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) serves as the chief human resources agency for the federal government.
Company Details
opm
5,342
165,112
92
opm.gov
0
U.S_8407199
In-progress
Between 750 and 799

UOPM Global Score (TPRM)XXXX

Description: In 2015, the **Office of Personnel Management (OPM)** suffered a catastrophic cyber breach attributed to Chinese state-sponsored hackers, exposing the sensitive personal data of **21.5 million individuals**, including federal employees, contractors, and their families. The compromised records included **Social Security numbers, birthdates, addresses, fingerprints (1.1 million), financial details, and medical histories**—some of the most valuable data on the dark web. The breach left victims vulnerable to lifelong identity theft, financial fraud, and espionage risks. Despite legislative mandates (e.g., Warner’s identity protection services), OPM faced pressure in 2024 to dismantle post-breach safeguards under budget cuts by the **Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)**, risking further victimization. The attack’s scale and persistence of stolen data—particularly biometric and health records—highlighted systemic failures in federal cybersecurity, with repercussions extending beyond financial harm to national security threats. Senator Mark Warner warned that terminating protective measures would exacerbate the **permanent exposure** of affected individuals, emphasizing the breach’s irreversible damage.
Description: The Office of Personnel Management experinced a data breach incident in September 2015. Hackers breached its systems and stole almost six million US government fingerprints which exposed the social security numbers, addresses, employment history, and financial records of 21.5 million current and former US government employees. The government provided additional information to individuals whose fingerprints had been stolen in this breach.


No incidents recorded for U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) in 2025.
No incidents recorded for U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) in 2025.
No incidents recorded for U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) in 2025.
UOPM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) serves as the chief human resources agency for the federal government.


Work with the Alberta government to build a stronger province for current and future generations. We offer diverse and rewarding employment opportunities in an environment that encourages continuous learning and career growth. We are one of the largest employers in Alberta with over 27,000 empl

The City of Los Angeles employs more than 45,000 people in a wide range of careers. Visit our website for information on current openings, including regular civil service positions, exempt and emergency appointment opportunities, in addition to internships! The City of Los Angeles is a Mayor-Counci

Københavns Kommune er Danmarks største arbejdsplads med ca. 45.000 medarbejdere. Vi udvikler hovedstaden og servicerer over 500.000 københavnere. Vores mål er at fastholde og udvikle København som en af verdens bedste byer at bo i – og skabe øget vækst gennem viden, innovation og beskæftigelse. Fi

Welcome to the official WA Government page where you can stay up to date on the latest information about Western Australia and WA government initiatives. Questions relating to a specific activity within the WA Government should be referred to the relevant Department or Minister’s Office for a re

Every young Queenslander deserves a strong education and a fulfilling future. The Queensland Department of Education is committed to realising the potential of every student through the power of quality education, support and teamwork. With a workforce of over 95,000 people across regional, remote,

Workingfor.be is the job platform of the federal administration. Here, you will find a wide variety of jobs in different fields of profession. Every day thousands of our employees help build tomorrow's society. When you choose the federal administration, you choose an employer who embraces you
Official LinkedIn page for the state of Oregon. Oregon is a state in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. It is located on the Pacific coast, with Washington to the north, California to the south, Nevada on the southeast and Idaho to the east. The Columbia and Snake rivers delineate mu

With a workforce of 30,000 people, and opportunities in 1,000 different job categories, the City of Philadelphia is one of the largest employers in Southeastern Pennsylvania. As an employer, we operate through the guiding principles of service, integrity, respect, accountability, collaboration, dive

The OFFICIAL careers page for the South Australian Government. The South Australian Public Sector is the State's largest workforce. We are an employer of choice that reflects the diverse community we serve. Our people are from a range of backgrounds and vocations, from entry level, mid-career and
.png)
The Office of Personnel Management transferred the current identity protection contract to GSA in September and will let it run out at the...
In a consolidated multidistrict class action against the Office of Personnel Management following a severe data breach of OPM's...
DOGE is “bypassing cybersecurity protections” at three agencies, Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Democrats...
The U.S. Office of Personnel Management said a recent cybersecurity incident affecting its systems and data may have exposed the personal information of...
The bipartisan Cybersecurity Hiring Modernization Act would give the edge to skills-based hiring for cyber jobs at federal agencies.
Uncle Sam's HR department has become the latest agency to get a nastygram from federal auditors, who are hoping its recently-appointed...
The US federal government's HR department violated the law and bypassed its own cybersecurity safeguards by giving DOGE affiliates access to personnel records.
A federal judge temporarily blocked the Department of Government Efficiency's access to Office of Personnel Management data, saying OPM broke the law and...
In a victory for personal privacy, a New York federal district court judge today granted a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit challenging...

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
The official website of U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is http://www.opm.gov.
According to Rankiteo, U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM)’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 756, reflecting their Fair security posture.
According to Rankiteo, U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
According to Rankiteo, U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
According to Rankiteo, U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
According to Rankiteo, U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is not listed as GDPR compliant.
According to Rankiteo, U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
According to Rankiteo, U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
According to Rankiteo,U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) operates primarily in the Government Administration industry.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) employs approximately 5,342 people worldwide.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM)’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 165,112 followers.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is classified under the NAICS code 92, which corresponds to Public Administration.
No, U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Yes, U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/opm.
As of December 04, 2025, Rankiteo reports that U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has an estimated 11,337 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an incident response plan activated with yes (post-breach), and third party assistance with yes (identity protection services contracted), and remediation measures with identity theft monitoring and protection services (legislated via congressional spending bill), and communication strategy with congressional notifications (e.g., sen. mark warner's letter to opm)..
Title: OPM Data Breach
Description: The Office of Personnel Management experienced a data breach incident in September 2015. Hackers breached its systems and stole almost six million US government fingerprints which exposed the social security numbers, addresses, employment history, and financial records of 21.5 million current and former US government employees.
Type: Data Breach
Title: 2015 Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Data Breach
Description: A massive cyberattack in 2015 compromised sensitive personal data of 21.5 million federal employees and others, including Social Security numbers, birthdates, addresses, fingerprints, and financial/medical records for 1.1 million individuals. The breach was attributed to China, and the exposed data—particularly fingerprints and health records—remains highly valuable on the dark web, posing lifelong risks to affected individuals. Identity protection services were established via congressional legislation to mitigate ongoing threats, but recent budget cuts by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) threaten to dismantle these protections.
Date Detected: 2015
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2015
Type: Data Breach
Threat Actor: China (alleged)
Motivation: Espionage / Data Theft
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

Data Compromised: Social security numbers, Addresses, Employment history, Financial records, Fingerprints

Data Compromised: Social security numbers (21.5 million), Birthdates (21.5 million), Addresses (21.5 million), Fingerprints (1.1 million), Financial records (1.1 million), Medical records (1.1 million)
Brand Reputation Impact: Severe (long-term distrust in federal data security)
Identity Theft Risk: High (lifelong risk for 21.5 million individuals)
Payment Information Risk: Moderate (financial records of 1.1 million exposed)
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Social Security Numbers, Addresses, Employment History, Financial Records, Fingerprints, , Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Biometric Data (Fingerprints), Financial Records, Medical/Health Records and .

Entity Name: Office of Personnel Management
Entity Type: Government Agency
Industry: Government
Location: United States
Customers Affected: 21500000

Entity Name: Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
Entity Type: Federal Agency
Industry: Government / Human Resources
Location: United States
Customers Affected: 21.5 million (federal employees, contractors, and family members)

Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes (post-breach)
Third Party Assistance: Yes (identity protection services contracted)
Remediation Measures: Identity theft monitoring and protection services (legislated via congressional spending bill)
Communication Strategy: Congressional notifications (e.g., Sen. Mark Warner's letter to OPM)
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes (post-breach).
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Yes (identity protection services contracted).

Type of Data Compromised: Social security numbers, Addresses, Employment history, Financial records, Fingerprints
Number of Records Exposed: 21500000
Sensitivity of Data: High

Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Biometric data (fingerprints), Financial records, Medical/health records
Number of Records Exposed: 21.5 million (PII); 1.1 million (fingerprints/financial/medical)
Sensitivity of Data: Extremely High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (SSNs, birthdates, addresses)
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Identity theft monitoring and protection services (legislated via congressional spending bill).

Legal Actions: Congressional legislation enacted to mandate identity protection services
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Congressional legislation enacted to mandate identity protection services.

Lessons Learned: Lifelong risks from breached biometric/health data highlight the need for sustained identity protection; federal agencies must prioritize long-term remediation over short-term cost-cutting.

Recommendations: Maintain identity protection services for all 21.5 million affected individuals indefinitely., Enhance federal cybersecurity protocols to prevent future breaches of sensitive personnel data., Conduct regular audits of OPM's data security posture., Expand legislative protections for federal employees' data.Maintain identity protection services for all 21.5 million affected individuals indefinitely., Enhance federal cybersecurity protocols to prevent future breaches of sensitive personnel data., Conduct regular audits of OPM's data security posture., Expand legislative protections for federal employees' data.Maintain identity protection services for all 21.5 million affected individuals indefinitely., Enhance federal cybersecurity protocols to prevent future breaches of sensitive personnel data., Conduct regular audits of OPM's data security posture., Expand legislative protections for federal employees' data.Maintain identity protection services for all 21.5 million affected individuals indefinitely., Enhance federal cybersecurity protocols to prevent future breaches of sensitive personnel data., Conduct regular audits of OPM's data security posture., Expand legislative protections for federal employees' data.
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Lifelong risks from breached biometric/health data highlight the need for sustained identity protection; federal agencies must prioritize long-term remediation over short-term cost-cutting.

Source: Sen. Mark Warner's Letter to OPM (2024)

Source: Congressional Legislation (Post-2015 Breach)
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Sen. Mark Warner's Letter to OPM (2024), and Source: Congressional Legislation (Post-2015 Breach).

Investigation Status: Closed (attribution to China widely accepted but not formally confirmed)
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Congressional notifications (e.g. and Sen. Mark Warner's letter to OPM).

Stakeholder Advisories: Sen. Mark Warner's warning to OPM against discontinuing identity protection services (2024).
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: was Sen. Mark Warner's warning to OPM against discontinuing identity protection services (2024)..

High Value Targets: Federal employee PII, biometric data, and health records.
Data Sold on Dark Web: Federal employee PII, biometric data, and health records.

Root Causes: Inadequate Cybersecurity Defenses At Opm (2015), Failure To Encrypt Sensitive Personnel Data., Lack Of Multi-Factor Authentication Or Advanced Threat Detection.,
Corrective Actions: Legislated Identity Protection Services For Victims., Opm Cybersecurity Overhaul (Post-Breach)., Ongoing Monitoring For Affected Individuals (Though Now At Risk Due To Budget Cuts).,
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Legislated Identity Protection Services For Victims., Opm Cybersecurity Overhaul (Post-Breach)., Ongoing Monitoring For Affected Individuals (Though Now At Risk Due To Budget Cuts)., .
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an China (alleged).
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2015.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2015.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Social Security numbers, Addresses, Employment history, Financial records, Fingerprints, , Social Security numbers (21.5 million), Birthdates (21.5 million), Addresses (21.5 million), Fingerprints (1.1 million), Financial records (1.1 million), Medical records (1.1 million) and .
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Social Security numbers, Employment history, Medical records (1.1 million), Addresses, Financial records (1.1 million), Fingerprints, Social Security numbers (21.5 million), Financial records, Fingerprints (1.1 million), Addresses (21.5 million) and Birthdates (21.5 million).
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 22.6M.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Congressional legislation enacted to mandate identity protection services.
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Lifelong risks from breached biometric/health data highlight the need for sustained identity protection; federal agencies must prioritize long-term remediation over short-term cost-cutting.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Maintain identity protection services for all 21.5 million affected individuals indefinitely., Conduct regular audits of OPM's data security posture., Enhance federal cybersecurity protocols to prevent future breaches of sensitive personnel data. and Expand legislative protections for federal employees' data..
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Sen. Mark Warner's Letter to OPM (2024) and Congressional Legislation (Post-2015 Breach).
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Closed (attribution to China widely accepted but not formally confirmed).
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Sen. Mark Warner's warning to OPM against discontinuing identity protection services (2024)., .
.png)
MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.
XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.
An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.
Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.
Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Get company history
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.