Comparison Overview
OpenText Observability and Service Management
OpenText Observability and Service Management
Waterloo, CA
Last Update: 02/04/2026
For years, IT Operations has been reactive, focused on monitoring or on ticketing systems to maintain performance and manage service requests. This approach creates order for IT but drives up support costs and frustrates users. At OpenText, we believe the best ticket is...
PayPal
2211 North First Street, San Jose, 95131, US
Last Update: 05/10/2026
We're championing possibilities for all by making money fast, easy, and more enjoyable. Our hope is to unlock opportunities for people in their everyday lives and empower the millions of people and businesses around the world who trust, rely, and use PayPal every day. ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
OpenText Observability and Service Management
PayPal
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for OpenText Observability and Service Management in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
PayPal has 684.31% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - OpenText Observability and Service Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)
OpenText Observability and Service Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - PayPal (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PayPal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
OpenText Observability and Service Management
PayPal
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.