Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » OpenAI » TANOPE1778755599

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (TANOPE1778755599)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-39
Company Score Before Incident759 / 1000
Company Score After Incident720 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERTANOPE1778755599
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized access to corporate code repositories, Compromised open-source library (TanStack npm)
DATA EXPOSEDSmall amount of credential material
INCIDENT DATE30/04/2024
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of OpenAI's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts OpenAI Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the OpenAI breach identified under incident ID TANOPE1778755599.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of OpenAI's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/openai, the number of followers: 9569287, the industry type: Research Services and the number of employees: 6888 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 759 and after the incident was 720 with a difference of -39 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on OpenAI and their customers.

OpenAI recently reported "OpenAI Third-Party Breach with Limited Impact", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

OpenAI disclosed a third-party security incident involving unauthorized access to its corporate code repositories.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Corporate code repositories, Two employee devices in corporate environment, and exposing Small amount of credential material.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Isolating impacted systems, Temporarily restricting code deployment workflows, and began remediation that includes Rotating code-signing certificates, Requiring macOS users to update applications, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure of incident details.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Assurance that user data and services were not impacted.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating supply chain attack on the open-source library TanStack npm and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating third-party security incident involving unauthorized access. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating small amount of credential material was exfiltrated. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating small amount of credential material was exfiltrated. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Subvert Trust Controls: Code Signing (T1553.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating rotating code-signing certificates as a precaution. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating temporarily restricting code deployment workflows. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (90%)
Trusted Relationship (80%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Defense Evasion
Subvert Trust Controls: Code Signing (80%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (60%)

Sources & References