Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » NATO » MFANAT1775903094

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MFANAT1775903094)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-20
Company Score Before Incident839 / 1000
Company Score After Incident819 / 1000
Company LinkView NATO Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERMFANAT1775903094
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORCredential Reuse, Weak Passwords, Third-Party Service Breaches
DATA EXPOSEDEmail addresses, passwords, phone numbers,...
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2020
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of NATO's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts NATO Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the NATO breach identified under incident ID MFANAT1775903094.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of NATO's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/nato, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: International Affairs and the number of employees: 9204 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 839 and after the incident was 819 with a difference of -20 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on NATO and their customers.

Hungarian Ministry of Defence recently reported "Hungarian Government Security Crisis Due to Weak Passwords and Credential Reuse", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A Bellingcat investigation exposed a major security lapse within Hungary’s government, revealing nearly 800 compromised email and password pairs tied to key ministries, including defense, foreign affairs, and finance.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Government email systems, third-party services used by officials, and exposing Email addresses, passwords, phone numbers, personally identifiable information, with nearly Nearly 800 records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as The incident underscores the risks of poor password hygiene, credential reuse, and unchecked third-party sign-ups in undermining government cybersecurity. Basic security failures can lead to significant compromises without advanced hacking, and recommending next steps like Enforce strong password policies and multi-factor authentication for all government accounts, Prohibit reuse of passwords across platforms and Restrict registration of government emails on third-party services.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating nearly 800 compromised email and password pairs tied to key ministries and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating officials registered government emails on third-party services. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating weak, reused passwords that surfaced in breach dumps, Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating password choices were particularly alarming...easily guessable patterns, and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating infostealer malware logs indicating active device compromises. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating credentials spread through underground markets. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating no advanced hacking required, basic security failures. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 120 compromised records linked to defense personnel from NATO eLearning platform and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating infostealer logs indicating active device compromises. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating credentials spread through underground markets and Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating infostealer malware logs indicating active device compromises. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (90%)
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (80%)
Credential Access
Valid Accounts (90%)
Brute Force: Password Guessing (70%)
Credentials from Password Stores (80%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (90%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (80%)
Collection
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Data from Local System (70%)
Exfiltration
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (70%)
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)