Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
NATO

NATO Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

nato.int

Working for peace, security and freedom for one billion people. Official LinkedIn account of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. #NATO #WeAreNATO Comments posted by followers do not necessarily represent official opinion or policy of member governments, or of NATO. NATO is a military alliance established by the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty on 4 April 1949. NATO’s essential purpose is to safeguard the freedom and security of its members through political and military means. POLITICAL - NATO promotes democratic values and encourages consultation and cooperation on defence and security issues to build trust and, in the long run, prevent conflict. MILITARY - NATO is committed to the peaceful resolution of disputes. If


NATO A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

NATO
Company Information
Website:http://www.nato.int
Employees number:9,204
Number of followers:0
NAICS:92812
Industry Type:International Affairs
Homepage:nato.int
NATO Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 800 and 849
logo
NATOInternational Affairs
Updated:
12/06/2026
827/1000
Good
A
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
NATO Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
NATOInternational Affairs
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

NATO
NATOGood
Current Score
827A (GOOD)
01000
4 incidents
-8 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
827Before Incident
MAY 2026
827Before Incident
APRIL 2026
826Before Incident
MARCH 2026
834Before Incident
Cyber Attack
11 Mar 2026NATO
NATO: FancyBear Server Exposure Reveals Stolen Credentials, 2FA Secrets and NATO-Linked Targets

FancyBear’s Major OpSec Blunder Exposes Espionage Campaign Targeting European Governments and NATO

826After Incident
CRITICAL-8
NAT1773851315
FancyBear’s Major OpSec Blunder Exposes Espionage Campaign Targeting European Governments and NATO In a rare operational security failure, Russian state-linked hacking group FancyBear (APT28/Forest Blizzard/GRU Unit 26165) inadvertently exposed a long-running cyberespionage campaign after leaving a server unsecured for over 500 days. The breach, first detected by threat intelligence firm Hunt.io on January 13, 2026, and later analyzed by Ctrl-Alt-Intel, provided researchers with unprecedented visibility into Operation Roundish, an active campaign targeting government and military entities across Europe. The exposed server a NameCheap Virtual Private Server (VPS) hosted in the U.S. at IP 203.161.50.145 had been previously attributed to FancyBear by Ukraine’s CERT-UA in September 2024, yet the group continued using it without interruption. The open directory contained 2,800 exfiltrated government and military emails, 240 stolen credentials (including passwords and TOTP 2FA secrets), 140 silent email-forwarding rules, and 11,500 harvested contact addresses from victims in Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, Serbia, and North Macedonia. Notably, the stolen data included email addresses tied to four NATO member states, including NATO’s own headquarters infrastructure. A second exposed directory, discovered by Ctrl-Alt-Intel, revealed even more sensitive material: FancyBear’s full command-and-control (C2) source code, additional JavaScript payloads, campaign telemetry logs, and further exfiltrated data. The targeting pattern aligned with geopolitical priorities, with Ukraine’s regional prosecutors (likely linked to war crimes investigations) as the largest victim group. Other high-profile targets included Romania’s Air Force, Greece’s National Defence General Staff, Serbia’s Ministry of Defence, and Bulgarian government entities all nations involved in recent military cooperation, such as Greece’s training of Ukrainian F-16 pilots and a 2024 military mobility agreement between Romania, Bulgaria, and Greece. The most alarming technical aspect of the campaign was FancyBear’s method for silently bypassing 2FA. Using a JavaScript module (keyTwoAuth.js), the group exploited a Roundcube webmail XSS vulnerability to extract TOTP secrets and recovery codes from authenticated sessions without victim interaction. The module parsed the twofactorgauthenticator plugin settings, encoded the stolen data, and exfiltrated it to the group’s C2 server (zhblz.com) under the log prefix ktfu. Researchers recovered 516 log entries from 108 unique victim addresses, with 256 accounts having their TOTP secrets compromised including targets at Romania’s Air Force, Greece’s GEETHA, Ukraine’s Asset Recovery Agency, and Serbia’s Ministry of Defence. The remaining 260 accounts had no 2FA enabled, making them trivial to access. The exposure underscores the group’s persistent reliance on known infrastructure despite prior attribution, as well as the sophistication of its 2FA bypass techniques. While the incident provides defenders with critical intelligence, it also highlights the ongoing threat posed by FancyBear to NATO-aligned governments and military organizations.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyberespionage
MOTIVATION
State-sponsored espionage, geopolitical intelligence gathering
IMPACT
Data Compromised: 2,800 exfiltrated government and military emails, 240 stolen credentials (including passwords and TOTP 2FA secrets), 140 silent email-forwarding rules, 11,500 harvested contact addressesSystems Affected: Government and military email systems (Roundcube webmail), NATO infrastructureOperational Impact: Compromised 2FA protections, unauthorized access to sensitive communications, potential long-term espionage capabilitiesBrand Reputation Impact: Significant reputational damage to targeted governments and NATO due to exposure of sensitive dataIdentity Theft Risk: High (TOTP secrets and recovery codes compromised)
DATA BREACH
Government/military emailsCredentials (passwords, TOTP secrets)Contact addressesEmail-forwarding rulesNumber Of Records Exposed: 2,800 emails, 240 credentials, 11,500 contact addressesSensitivity Of Data: High (military/defense communications, 2FA secrets, NATO-related data)EmailsJavaScript payloadsTelemetry logsCredentialsPersonally Identifiable Information: Email addresses, TOTP secrets, recovery codes
FEBRUARY 2026
833Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
834Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
833Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
833Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
833Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
832Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
832Before Incident
JULY 2025
832Before Incident
MARCH 2023
824Before Incident
Vulnerability
14 Mar 2023NATO
Microsoft and NATO: APT28 Weaponizes Outlook Zero-Click Flaw to Steal Net-NTLMv2 Hashes From NATO Targets

APT28 Exploits Zero-Click Outlook Flaw to Steal Credentials from NATO and Critical Infrastructure

822After Incident
CRITICAL-2
NATMIC1781267313
APT28 Exploits Zero-Click Outlook Flaw to Steal Credentials from NATO and Critical Infrastructure Russian state-sponsored threat group APT28 (also known as Fancy Bear or Forest Blizzard), linked to the GRU’s Unit 26165, has intensified its cyber espionage operations by exploiting a zero-click vulnerability in Microsoft Outlook to target NATO members, defense organizations, and critical infrastructure entities. The campaign centers on CVE-2023-23397, a critical elevation-of-privilege flaw in Outlook that allows attackers to trigger forced authentication without user interaction. APT28 sends malicious Outlook reminders that, when processed, automatically connect to attacker-controlled Server Message Block (SMB) shares, leaking victims’ Net-NTLMv2 hashes. These stolen credentials enable NTLM relay attacks, granting unauthorized access to Microsoft Exchange mailboxes without deploying traditional malware. Unlike past operations that relied on heavy implants like the X-Agent toolkit, APT28 has shifted to stealthier, single-purpose techniques, minimizing forensic traces. To evade detection, the group has overhauled its infrastructure, leveraging compromised SOHO edge devices specifically, the MooBot botnet, consisting of hijacked Ubiquiti EdgeRouters. These routers serve as relay nodes for stolen hashes and host credential-scraping proxies, masking malicious traffic behind legitimate consumer IP addresses and bypassing reputation-based security filters. The attack chain highlights a sophisticated evolution in APT28’s tactics, combining zero-click exploitation with decentralized infrastructure to silently infiltrate high-value targets. The campaign underscores the growing threat to European defense and critical infrastructure sectors.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyber Espionage
MOTIVATION
Cyber espionage, unauthorized access to sensitive information
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Net-NTLMv2 hashes, Microsoft Exchange mailbox accessMicrosoft OutlookMicrosoft ExchangeOperational Impact: Unauthorized access to sensitive communications and dataIdentity Theft Risk: High (credential theft enabling further attacks)
DATA BREACH
Net-NTLMv2 hashesMicrosoft Exchange mailbox dataSensitivity Of Data: High (sensitive communications, potential classified information)
JUNE 2021
821Before Incident
Cyber Attack
16 Jun 2021NATO
NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization)

Maritime Cyber Attack Database (MCAD) Launch and Historical Incidents Including Russian Spoofing of NATO Ships (2021)

814After Incident
CRITICAL-7
NAT1492114091725
In 2021, Russia executed a location spoofing cyber attack targeting NATO ships, specifically British and Dutch warships, in the Black Sea near Ukraine. The attack falsely projected the vessels as entering Russian-occupied Crimean waters and approaching Russia’s primary naval base in Sevastopol—a provocation designed to trigger a military or diplomatic reaction. The incident, though virtual, demonstrated the disruptive potential of GPS/jamming spoofing attacks in maritime cyber warfare, risking escalation between nuclear-armed states.The attack exposed critical vulnerabilities in maritime navigation systems, which rely on unencrypted GPS signals susceptible to manipulation. While no physical damage or data breach occurred, the psychological and geopolitical impact was severe: it undermined trust in naval positioning systems, forced NATO to verify ship locations manually, and highlighted how cyber deception could provoke real-world conflicts. Experts warned that such tactics could be expanded to disrupt commercial shipping, port operations, or even trigger accidental military engagements by misleading adversaries into perceiving hostile actions.The incident was part of a broader pattern of Russian cyber operations targeting maritime infrastructure, emphasizing the need for resilient navigation technologies and international cyber norms to prevent miscalculation in contested regions like the Black Sea. The attack’s strategic intent—deploying disruptive power to influence adversary behavior—aligned with hybrid warfare doctrines, where cyber tools are used to create uncertainty without kinetic confrontation.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
cyber deceptionGPS spoofingdisinformationmaritime cyber incident
MOTIVATION
geopolitical provocationdisruptive power demonstrationpsychological warfare
IMPACT
GPS navigation systems of NATO warshipsmaritime situational awarenessfalse deployment alertspotential for misinformed military or diplomatic responsesundermined trust in maritime GPS integrityhighlighted vulnerabilities in naval cyber defenses
JANUARY 2021
839Before Incident
Breach
01 Jan 2021NATO
Hungarian Government and NATO eLearning Platform: Hungary officials used weak passwords exposed in breach dump

Hungarian Government Security Crisis Due to Weak Passwords and Credential Reuse

819After Incident
CRITICAL-20
MFANAT1775903094
Hungarian Government Faces Security Crisis Due to Weak Passwords and Credential Reuse A Bellingcat investigation has exposed a major security lapse within Hungary’s government, revealing nearly 800 compromised email and password pairs tied to key ministries, including defense, foreign affairs, and finance. The findings suggest systemic negligence rather than targeted hacking, with officials relying on weak, reused passwords that eventually surfaced in breach dumps. Among the most concerning discoveries were 120 compromised records linked to defense personnel, some stemming from a 2023 NATO eLearning platform breach that exposed emails, passwords, and phone numbers. While much of the data dates back to 2021, new instances continue to emerge, with some recent infostealer logs indicating active device compromises as recently as last month. Password choices were particularly alarming. A colonel in "information security" used "FrankLampard" a reference to the former England footballer while a district director opted for "123456aA." Another senior official in Hungary’s NATO delegation used a password translating to "cute." Other examples included simple name-based passwords, easily guessable patterns, and credentials like "linkedinlinkedin" likely from the 2012 LinkedIn breach still in use. The root issue appears to be poor security hygiene: officials registered government emails on third-party services, then reused passwords across multiple platforms. Once those services were breached, the credentials spread through underground markets. The investigation also uncovered infostealer malware logs, suggesting some devices were actively compromised rather than just caught in old leaks. The incident underscores how basic security failures weak passwords, credential reuse, and unchecked third-party sign-ups can undermine even critical government functions. With no advanced hacking required, the breach highlights the persistent risks of human error in cybersecurity.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Credential Compromise
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Email addresses, passwords, phone numbers, personally identifiable informationSystems Affected: Government email systems, third-party services used by officialsOperational Impact: Potential compromise of government communications and sensitive informationBrand Reputation Impact: Significant damage to government cybersecurity reputationIdentity Theft Risk: High risk due to exposure of PII and credentials
DATA BREACH
Email addressesPasswordsPhone numbersPersonally Identifiable InformationNumber Of Records Exposed: Nearly 800Sensitivity Of Data: HighPersonally Identifiable Information: Yes

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for NATO ?
?
What was NATO's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was NATO's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was NATO's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was NATO's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was NATO's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was NATO's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was NATO's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was NATO's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was NATO's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was NATO's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was NATO's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on NATO's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with NATO ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view NATO's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?