MITRE
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
mitre
Website:
Employees number:
9,312
Number of followers:
234,635
NAICS:
5417
Industry Type:
Homepage:
mitre.org
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
MIT_5275633
Scan Status:
In-progress
MITRE Company CyberSecurity Posture
mitre.org
The MITRE Corporation is working to solve some of the nation’s biggest challenges in defense, cybersecurity, healthcare, homeland security, the judiciary and transportation. MITRE is a not-for-profit corporation committed to the public interest, operating federally funded R&D centers on behalf of U.S. government sponsors. To learn more, visit www.mitre.org.
MITRE A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
MITRE Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
MITRE
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
MITRE Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
MITRE
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
MITRE Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
1
Spotify, Mitre and Splunk: Misconfigured GitHub Actions could leave repos and secrets exposed, Sysdig finds • DEVCLASS
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: GitHub Repositories at Risk: Sysdig Uncovers Critical Workflow Vulnerabilities Sysdig researchers have identified a significant security risk in GitHub repositories, where improperly configured workflows could allow attackers to hijack projects by exploiting the `pull_request_target` event in GitHub Actions. Unlike the standard `pull_request` trigger which runs in the context of a merge commit `pull_request_target` executes in the base branch (typically the default branch) and has access to repository secrets and write permissions via the `GITHUB_TOKEN`. The vulnerability arises when maintainers use `pull_request_target` to test untrusted code from public contributors, inadvertently exposing sensitive credentials. If misconfigured, attackers could inject malicious code, exfiltrate secrets, and gain elevated privileges within the repository. Sysdig’s investigation revealed multiple affected projects, including: - Spotipy, an open-source Python library for the Spotify Web API, where researchers demonstrated the ability to execute malicious Python packages and steal the `GITHUB_TOKEN`. The flaw has since been patched. - Mitre’s cyber analytics repository, where attackers could exfiltrate the `GITHUB_TOKEN` and other secrets, potentially gaining full control. Mitre addressed the issue promptly. - Splunk’s security_content repository, where two secrets were exposed, though the extracted `GITHUB_TOKEN` had limited read-only access. Stefan Chierici, Sysdig’s threat research lead, warned that the impact depends on the privileges of the extracted token. In severe cases, attackers could modify workflows, exfiltrate additional secrets, or alter files in the main branch effectively taking over the repository. While `pull_request_target` can be used safely, its nuances require careful handling to avoid exploitation. Sysdig has reported additional vulnerable repositories and is awaiting remediation before disclosing further details. The findings underscore the need for maintainers to audit their GitHub Actions workflows for potential misconfigurations.
MITRE Corporation
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: The MITRE Corporation faced a critical funding crisis for its CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) Program, a cornerstone of global cybersecurity infrastructure used by vendors, governments, and critical infrastructure entities to track and prioritize vulnerabilities. The U.S. federal government initially appeared unwilling to renew MITRE’s contract, risking the shutdown of the CVE program halting new vulnerability entries and eventually taking the platform offline. While historical CVE records would remain accessible via GitHub, the disruption would sever a vital resource for real-time threat intelligence, leaving organizations worldwide exposed to unpatched vulnerabilities without centralized tracking.The temporary 11-month contract extension by CISA averted immediate collapse, but the uncertainty underscored systemic risks: reliance on a single entity for a foundational cybersecurity service, potential exploitation gaps during transitions, and the broader fragility of public-private partnerships in critical infrastructure. ENISA’s parallel launch of the European Vulnerability Database further highlighted the urgency of decentralizing such dependencies, as MITRE’s near-lapse revealed how a funding lapse could cascade into global cybersecurity blind spots, delaying patch management and increasing attack surfaces for threat actors.
MITRE Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for MITRE
Incidents vs Research Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MITRE in 2026.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MITRE in 2026.
Incident Types MITRE vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MITRE in 2026.
Incident History — MITRE (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MITRE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
MITRE Company Subsidiaries
The MITRE Corporation is working to solve some of the nation’s biggest challenges in defense, cybersecurity, healthcare, homeland security, the judiciary and transportation. MITRE is a not-for-profit corporation committed to the public interest, operating federally funded R&D centers on behalf of U.S. government sponsors. To learn more, visit www.mitre.org.
Loading...
MITRE Similar Companies
Technical University of Munich
Our university combines top-class facilities for cutting-edge research with unique learning opportunities for 52,000 students. Whether our researchers are investigating the origins of life, matter and the universe or looking for solutions to the major challenges for our society, people lie at the he
The University of Edinburgh
Imagine what you could do at a world-leading university that is globally recognised for its teaching, research and innovation. The University of Edinburgh has been providing students with world-class teaching for more than 425 years, unlocking the potential of some of the world's leading thinkers
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Los Alamos National Laboratory is one of the world’s most innovative multidisciplinary research institutions. We're engaged in strategic science on behalf of national security to ensure the safety and reliability of the U.S. nuclear stockpile. Our workforce specializes in a wide range of progressive
University of Amsterdam
The University of Amsterdam is one of the largest comprehensive universities in Europe. With some 44,000 students, 6,000 staff, 3,000 PhD candidates, and an annual budget of more than 850 million euros, it is also one of Amsterdam’s biggest employers. There is an inseparable link between the unive
The PPD™ clinical research business of Thermo Fisher Scientific, the world leader in serving science, enables customers to accelerate innovation and drug development through patient-centered strategies and data analytics. Our services, which span multiple therapeutic areas, include early development
UCL
UCL (University College London) is London's leading multidisciplinary university, ranked 9th in the QS World University Rankings. Established in 1826 UCL opened up education in England for the first time to students of any race, class or religion and was also the first university to welcome female
CNRS
The French National Centre for Scientific Research is among the world's leading research institutions. Its scientists explore the living world, matter, the Universe, and the functioning of human societies in order to meet the major challenges of today and tomorrow. Internationally recognised for the
Utrecht University
At Utrecht University (UU), we are working towards a better world. We do this by researching complex issues beyond the borders of disciplines. We put thinkers in contact with doers, so new insights can be applied. We give students the space to develop themselves. In so doing, we make substantial con
CEA
The CEA is the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission ("Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives"). It is a public body established in October 1945 by General de Gaulle. A leader in research, development and innovation, the CEA mission statement has two main
.png)
MITRE CyberSecurity News
January 22, 2026 08:52 AM
MITRE introduces ESTM 3.0 to protect embedded systems across critical infrastructure
Non-profit organization MITRE introduced ESTM 3.0, the latest version of its Embedded Systems Threat Matrix, a cybersecurity framework...
January 22, 2026 08:32 AM
Experts welcome EU-led alternative to MITRE's vulnerability tracking scheme
Cybersecurity experts have welcomed the launch of the new Global CVE Allocation System (GCVE) as a positive move toward more robust...
January 21, 2026 12:11 PM
MITRE Launches New Security Framework for Embedded Systems
MITRE launched Embedded Systems Threat Matrix (ESTM), a cybersecurity framework designed for protecting critical embedded systems.
January 21, 2026 09:36 AM
MITRE Unveils Embedded Systems Threat Matrix
The ESTM cybersecurity framework outlines tactics and techniques for attacking embedded systems and provides tools to address cyberthreats.
January 20, 2026 12:00 PM
MITRE Launches Embedded Systems Threat Matrix to Strengthen Cyber Defense for Critical Infrastructure and Defense Systems
McLean, Va., and Bedford, Mass., January 20, 2026 – MITRE has introduced the Embedded Systems Threat Matrix™ (ESTM), a cybersecurity...
January 01, 2026 08:00 AM
Infosecurity's Top 10 Cybersecurity Stories of 2025
Explore Infosecurity Magazine's most-read cybersecurity stories of 2025, from major vendor shake-ups and zero-day exploits to AI-driven...
December 23, 2025 08:00 AM
NIST and MITRE partner to test AI defense technology for critical infrastructure
Experts said the new partnership should focus on making AI-based systems more reliable.
December 23, 2025 08:00 AM
MITRE partners with NIST for AI cybersecurity research centers
According to NIST spokesperson Jennifer Huergo, the centers aim to support technology development needed to protect U.S. leadership in AI,...
December 23, 2025 08:00 AM
NIST Invests $20M in AI Centers
NIST has expanded its partnership with MITRE and invested $20 million to launch two AI centers.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
MITRE CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of MITRE
The official website of MITRE is http://www.mitre.org/.
MITRE’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, MITRE’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 772, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does MITRE’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, MITRE currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has MITRE been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, MITRE has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.
Does MITRE have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, MITRE is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does MITRE have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, MITRE does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does MITRE comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, MITRE is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does MITRE have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, MITRE does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does MITRE comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, MITRE is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does MITRE have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,MITRE is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of MITRE
MITRE operates primarily in the Research Services industry.
Number of Employees at MITRE
MITRE employs approximately 9,312 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by MITRE
MITRE presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
MITRE’s LinkedIn Followers
MITRE’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 234,635 followers.
NAICS Classification of MITRE
MITRE is classified under the NAICS code 5417, which corresponds to Scientific Research and Development Services.
MITRE’s Presence on Crunchbase
Yes, MITRE has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/mitre.
MITRE’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, MITRE maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/mitre.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving MITRE
As of January 23, 2026, Rankiteo reports that MITRE has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
MITRE has an estimated 5,282 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at MITRE ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Vulnerability.
How does MITRE detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with enisa in contact with mitre to assess impact and next steps., and remediation measures with temporary 11-month contract extension for mitre to continue operating the cve program; historical cve records to remain available on github if funding lapses., and communication strategy with public statements by enisa and mitre; media coverage by recorded future news., and third party assistance with sysdig researchers assisted in identifying and reporting vulnerabilities, and containment measures with flaws were fixed by the respective maintainers (spotify, mitre, splunk), and remediation measures with correcting misconfigured github actions workflows to prevent secret exfiltration..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Launch of European Union's Vulnerability Database and Concerns Over CVE Program Funding
Description: The European Union launched its new European Vulnerability Database (EVD), a notification platform for cybersecurity vulnerabilities, while concerns arose over the funding and future of MITRE's CVE Program. The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) temporarily extended MITRE's contract for 11 months to prevent disruption, as the cybersecurity community expressed alarm over potential lapses in CVE updates. ENISA is coordinating with MITRE to assess the impact and next steps.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-02-20
Type: Vulnerability Management
Title: GitHub Repositories Vulnerable to Hijacking via Insecure pull_request_target Workflows
Description: Sysdig researchers warned that developers and maintainers could leave their GitHub repositories open to hijacking due to inadequately secured workflows, specifically the misuse of the pull_request_target trigger event in GitHub Actions. This flaw allows attackers to exfiltrate secrets, including the GITHUB_TOKEN, and gain elevated privileges within repositories.
Type: Supply Chain Attack
Attack Vector: Misconfigured GitHub Actions workflows (pull_request_target)
Vulnerability Exploited: Insecure use of pull_request_target in GitHub Actions workflows
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Vulnerability.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Misconfigured GitHub Actions workflows (pull_request_target).
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Management MIT3490134112625
Operational Impact: Potential disruption to global vulnerability tracking and response prioritization if CVE program funding lapses; historical records would remain available on GitHub but no new CVEs would be added.
Brand Reputation Impact: Concerns raised within the cybersecurity community about the reliability and continuity of critical vulnerability databases (CVE program).
Incident : Supply Chain Attack SPOMITSPL1767777752
Data Compromised: Repository secrets (e.g., GITHUB_TOKEN), potentially other sensitive data
Systems Affected: GitHub repositories with misconfigured workflows
Operational Impact: Potential repository takeover, unauthorized code modifications, and secret exfiltration
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage for affected projects and maintainers
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Repository secrets (e.g., GITHUB_TOKEN) and potentially other sensitive data.
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Management MIT3490134112625
Entity Name: European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA)
Entity Type: Government Agency
Industry: Cybersecurity
Location: European Union
Incident : Vulnerability Management MIT3490134112625
Entity Name: MITRE Corporation
Entity Type: Non-profit Organization
Industry: Cybersecurity
Location: United States
Customers Affected: Global (vendors, governments, critical infrastructure entities relying on CVE program)
Incident : Vulnerability Management MIT3490134112625
Entity Name: U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)
Entity Type: Government Agency
Industry: Cybersecurity
Location: United States
Incident : Supply Chain Attack SPOMITSPL1767777752
Entity Name: Spotipy (Spotify Web API Python Library)
Entity Type: Open Source Project
Industry: Technology/Software Development
Incident : Supply Chain Attack SPOMITSPL1767777752
Entity Name: Mitre Cyber Analytics Repository
Entity Type: Open Source Project
Industry: Cybersecurity/Defense
Incident : Supply Chain Attack SPOMITSPL1767777752
Entity Name: splunk/security_content
Entity Type: Open Source Project
Industry: Technology/Cybersecurity
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Management MIT3490134112625
Third Party Assistance: ENISA in contact with MITRE to assess impact and next steps.
Remediation Measures: Temporary 11-month contract extension for MITRE to continue operating the CVE program; historical CVE records to remain available on GitHub if funding lapses.
Communication Strategy: Public statements by ENISA and MITRE; media coverage by Recorded Future News.
Incident : Supply Chain Attack SPOMITSPL1767777752
Third Party Assistance: Sysdig researchers assisted in identifying and reporting vulnerabilities
Containment Measures: Flaws were fixed by the respective maintainers (Spotify, Mitre, Splunk)
Remediation Measures: Correcting misconfigured GitHub Actions workflows to prevent secret exfiltration
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through ENISA in contact with MITRE to assess impact and next steps., Sysdig researchers assisted in identifying and reporting vulnerabilities.
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Supply Chain Attack SPOMITSPL1767777752
Type of Data Compromised: Repository secrets (e.g., GITHUB_TOKEN), potentially other sensitive data
Sensitivity of Data: High (secrets could lead to repository takeover)
Data Exfiltration: Yes (secrets were exfiltrated in proof-of-concept attacks)
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Temporary 11-month contract extension for MITRE to continue operating the CVE program; historical CVE records to remain available on GitHub if funding lapses., Correcting misconfigured GitHub Actions workflows to prevent secret exfiltration.
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by flaws were fixed by the respective maintainers (spotify, mitre and splunk).
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Management MIT3490134112625
Lessons Learned: The incident highlights the critical dependency of the global cybersecurity ecosystem on centralized vulnerability databases like the CVE program. It underscores the need for sustainable funding models and contingency planning to ensure continuity of essential cybersecurity infrastructure. Collaboration between regional entities (e.g., ENISA) and global programs (e.g., MITRE) is vital for resilience.
Incident : Supply Chain Attack SPOMITSPL1767777752
Lessons Learned: Maintainers must fully understand the security implications of GitHub Actions workflows, particularly pull_request_target, and use them with caution. Misconfigurations can lead to severe security risks, including repository takeover.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Vulnerability Management MIT3490134112625
Recommendations: Establish long-term funding mechanisms for critical cybersecurity utilities like the CVE program to prevent operational disruptions., Develop redundant or distributed vulnerability databases to mitigate single points of failure., Enhance transparency in contract renewals and funding allocations for foundational cybersecurity programs., Foster international cooperation to share vulnerability data and reduce reliance on any single entity., Encourage private-sector contributions to support public-good cybersecurity initiatives.Establish long-term funding mechanisms for critical cybersecurity utilities like the CVE program to prevent operational disruptions., Develop redundant or distributed vulnerability databases to mitigate single points of failure., Enhance transparency in contract renewals and funding allocations for foundational cybersecurity programs., Foster international cooperation to share vulnerability data and reduce reliance on any single entity., Encourage private-sector contributions to support public-good cybersecurity initiatives.Establish long-term funding mechanisms for critical cybersecurity utilities like the CVE program to prevent operational disruptions., Develop redundant or distributed vulnerability databases to mitigate single points of failure., Enhance transparency in contract renewals and funding allocations for foundational cybersecurity programs., Foster international cooperation to share vulnerability data and reduce reliance on any single entity., Encourage private-sector contributions to support public-good cybersecurity initiatives.Establish long-term funding mechanisms for critical cybersecurity utilities like the CVE program to prevent operational disruptions., Develop redundant or distributed vulnerability databases to mitigate single points of failure., Enhance transparency in contract renewals and funding allocations for foundational cybersecurity programs., Foster international cooperation to share vulnerability data and reduce reliance on any single entity., Encourage private-sector contributions to support public-good cybersecurity initiatives.Establish long-term funding mechanisms for critical cybersecurity utilities like the CVE program to prevent operational disruptions., Develop redundant or distributed vulnerability databases to mitigate single points of failure., Enhance transparency in contract renewals and funding allocations for foundational cybersecurity programs., Foster international cooperation to share vulnerability data and reduce reliance on any single entity., Encourage private-sector contributions to support public-good cybersecurity initiatives.
Incident : Supply Chain Attack SPOMITSPL1767777752
Recommendations: Audit GitHub Actions workflows for insecure use of pull_request_target, Limit GITHUB_TOKEN permissions to the minimum required, Use pull_request_target only when absolutely necessary and with proper safeguards, Monitor for unauthorized access or modifications to workflowsAudit GitHub Actions workflows for insecure use of pull_request_target, Limit GITHUB_TOKEN permissions to the minimum required, Use pull_request_target only when absolutely necessary and with proper safeguards, Monitor for unauthorized access or modifications to workflowsAudit GitHub Actions workflows for insecure use of pull_request_target, Limit GITHUB_TOKEN permissions to the minimum required, Use pull_request_target only when absolutely necessary and with proper safeguards, Monitor for unauthorized access or modifications to workflowsAudit GitHub Actions workflows for insecure use of pull_request_target, Limit GITHUB_TOKEN permissions to the minimum required, Use pull_request_target only when absolutely necessary and with proper safeguards, Monitor for unauthorized access or modifications to workflows
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are The incident highlights the critical dependency of the global cybersecurity ecosystem on centralized vulnerability databases like the CVE program. It underscores the need for sustainable funding models and contingency planning to ensure continuity of essential cybersecurity infrastructure. Collaboration between regional entities (e.g., ENISA) and global programs (e.g., MITRE) is vital for resilience.Maintainers must fully understand the security implications of GitHub Actions workflows, particularly pull_request_target, and use them with caution. Misconfigurations can lead to severe security risks, including repository takeover.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Management MIT3490134112625
Source: Recorded Future News
Date Accessed: 2024-02-20
Incident : Vulnerability Management MIT3490134112625
Source: ENISA Public Statement
Date Accessed: 2024-02-20
Incident : Vulnerability Management MIT3490134112625
Source: MITRE Spokesperson Statement
Date Accessed: 2024-01-XX
Incident : Vulnerability Management MIT3490134112625
Source: U.S. CISA Announcement on MITRE Contract Extension
Date Accessed: 2024-01-XX
Incident : Supply Chain Attack SPOMITSPL1767777752
Source: Sysdig Research
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Recorded Future NewsDate Accessed: 2024-02-20, and Source: ENISA Public StatementDate Accessed: 2024-02-20, and Source: MITRE Spokesperson StatementDate Accessed: 2024-01-XX, and Source: U.S. CISA Announcement on MITRE Contract ExtensionDate Accessed: 2024-01-XX, and Source: Sysdig Research.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Management MIT3490134112625
Investigation Status: Ongoing coordination between ENISA and MITRE; CVE program operations secured for 11 months via temporary contract extension.
Incident : Supply Chain Attack SPOMITSPL1767777752
Investigation Status: Ongoing (additional findings to be disclosed after remediation)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public statements by ENISA and MITRE; media coverage by Recorded Future News..
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Management MIT3490134112625
Stakeholder Advisories: Cybersecurity vendors, governments, and critical infrastructure entities advised to monitor updates from ENISA and MITRE regarding the CVE program's future.
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Cybersecurity vendors, governments and and critical infrastructure entities advised to monitor updates from ENISA and MITRE regarding the CVE program's future..
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Supply Chain Attack SPOMITSPL1767777752
Entry Point: Misconfigured GitHub Actions workflows (pull_request_target)
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Management MIT3490134112625
Root Causes: Uncertainty In Federal Funding For The Cve Program, Leading To Potential Operational Gaps., Lack Of A Backup Or Distributed System To Ensure Continuity Of Vulnerability Tracking., Dependency On A Single Non-Profit Organization (Mitre) For A Critical Global Cybersecurity Utility.,
Corrective Actions: Temporary Contract Extension By Cisa To Maintain Cve Program Operations., Enisa'S Launch Of The European Vulnerability Database As A Complementary Notification Platform., Ongoing Discussions Between Enisa And Mitre To Address Long-Term Sustainability.,
Incident : Supply Chain Attack SPOMITSPL1767777752
Root Causes: Misunderstanding of pull_request_target security implications, overprivileged GITHUB_TOKEN permissions, and lack of workflow audits
Corrective Actions: Fixing misconfigured workflows, reducing GITHUB_TOKEN permissions, and educating maintainers on secure workflow practices
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as ENISA in contact with MITRE to assess impact and next steps., Sysdig researchers assisted in identifying and reporting vulnerabilities.
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Temporary Contract Extension By Cisa To Maintain Cve Program Operations., Enisa'S Launch Of The European Vulnerability Database As A Complementary Notification Platform., Ongoing Discussions Between Enisa And Mitre To Address Long-Term Sustainability., , Fixing misconfigured workflows, reducing GITHUB_TOKEN permissions, and educating maintainers on secure workflow practices.
Additional Questions
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2024-02-20.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Repository secrets (e.g., GITHUB_TOKEN) and potentially other sensitive data.
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was ENISA in contact with MITRE to assess impact and next steps., Sysdig researchers assisted in identifying and reporting vulnerabilities.
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Flaws were fixed by the respective maintainers (Spotify, Mitre and Splunk).
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Repository secrets (e.g., GITHUB_TOKEN) and potentially other sensitive data.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was The incident highlights the critical dependency of the global cybersecurity ecosystem on centralized vulnerability databases like the CVE program. It underscores the need for sustainable funding models and contingency planning to ensure continuity of essential cybersecurity infrastructure. Collaboration between regional entities (e.g., ENISA) and global programs (e.g., MITRE) is vital for resilience., Maintainers must fully understand the security implications of GitHub Actions workflows, particularly pull_request_target, and use them with caution. Misconfigurations can lead to severe security risks, including repository takeover.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Foster international cooperation to share vulnerability data and reduce reliance on any single entity., Use pull_request_target only when absolutely necessary and with proper safeguards, Monitor for unauthorized access or modifications to workflows, Enhance transparency in contract renewals and funding allocations for foundational cybersecurity programs., Audit GitHub Actions workflows for insecure use of pull_request_target, Limit GITHUB_TOKEN permissions to the minimum required, Develop redundant or distributed vulnerability databases to mitigate single points of failure., Establish long-term funding mechanisms for critical cybersecurity utilities like the CVE program to prevent operational disruptions. and Encourage private-sector contributions to support public-good cybersecurity initiatives..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Sysdig Research, MITRE Spokesperson Statement, Recorded Future News, U.S. CISA Announcement on MITRE Contract Extension and ENISA Public Statement.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing coordination between ENISA and MITRE; CVE program operations secured for 11 months via temporary contract extension..
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Cybersecurity vendors, governments, and critical infrastructure entities advised to monitor updates from ENISA and MITRE regarding the CVE program's future., .
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Misconfigured GitHub Actions workflows (pull_request_target).
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Uncertainty in federal funding for the CVE program, leading to potential operational gaps.Lack of a backup or distributed system to ensure continuity of vulnerability tracking.Dependency on a single non-profit organization (MITRE) for a critical global cybersecurity utility., Misunderstanding of pull_request_target security implications, overprivileged GITHUB_TOKEN permissions, and lack of workflow audits.
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Temporary contract extension by CISA to maintain CVE program operations.ENISA's launch of the European Vulnerability Database as a complementary notification platform.Ongoing discussions between ENISA and MITRE to address long-term sustainability., Fixing misconfigured workflows, reducing GITHUB_TOKEN permissions, and educating maintainers on secure workflow practices.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description
Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description
Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=mitre' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
